Danny Smith wrote:
The problem I had was with the second case below. We don't know if a
method is implicitly virtual
until search.c:look_for_overrides_r). Would t be better to unset
DECL_DLLIMPORT_P (and remove the attribute as well) there?
Ah, right, good point. I always forget that case,.
> From: Mark Mitchell
> Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
> >
> > In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
>
Leonardo Mata wrote on 09/08/06 15:56:
> I wish to know if there exists any plugin that translate
> these intermediate format into C sources.
>
Not that I know of. There is an existing effort to implement link-time
optimizations (search for LTO in the archives and web pages) that may at
some poi
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
I definately don't know enough about attributes and
Eric, Do you mean that they're noisy because of the WARNINGs? I always
find warnings annoying, perhaps test_summary should filter them out.
Yeah, that's what I meant.
Notice that for -m32, the message from the linker includes "In function
`main':"; this causes prune_gcc_output to remove tha
g77 does not allow you to define an equivalence after
DATA statements. here is a reduced example:
INTEGER*4DEBUGidx
PARAMETER (DEBUGidx = 1)
INTEGER*4MAPelements
PARAMETER (MAPelements = 262)
INTEGER*4MAPlevel(0:MAPelements-1)
DATA MAPle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes:
> Has anyone else had problems accessing the svn server today
> for gcc? I tried from home and work today. In both cases, the
> 'svn update' never produces any updates of new files or completes.
This should now be fixed.
We were being hit hard by a si
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:44:56AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> > Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> > > > x86_64-darwin
Hi,
I'm interested in the new -fwhole-program -combine functionality offered
in GCC 4.1 but am having trouble applying it to this particular
scenario.
Is -fwhole-program supposed to cover situations like this? Should I be
doing this another way? Is this a bug?
I am building a .so library from s
Yes, I noticed that and sent a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can workaround by relocating the working copy to use http:// instead, as in:
svn switch --relocate svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On 13/09/06, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone
Jack Howarth wrote:
Has anyone else had problems accessing the svn server today
for gcc? I tried from home and work today. In both cases, the
'svn update' never produces any updates of new files or completes.
Jack
I was beginning to think I was the only one.
I did a s
Has anyone else had problems accessing the svn server today
for gcc? I tried from home and work today. In both cases, the
'svn update' never produces any updates of new files or completes.
Jack
Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
I definately don't know enough about attributes and dllimport to
comment. Th
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:44:56AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> > Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> > > > x86_64-darwin
>On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 08:34 +0200, mathieu lacage wrote:
>> hi,
>> Maybe it is the idea of writing an IPA pass operating on SSA which is
>> just plain braindead in which case it would be nice for someone to tell
>> me so :)
>It is not braindead except GCC currently does not support that on the
>m
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 08:34 +0200, mathieu lacage wrote:
hi,
Maybe it is the idea of writing an IPA pass operating on SSA which is
just plain braindead in which case it would be nice for someone to tell
me so :)
It is not braindead except GCC currently does not support tha
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 08:34 +0200, mathieu lacage wrote:
> hi,
> Maybe it is the idea of writing an IPA pass operating on SSA which is
> just plain braindead in which case it would be nice for someone to tell
> me so :)
It is not braindead except GCC currently does not support that on the
mainline
hi,
I am trying to write an inter-procedural SSA-based pass: all the
existing (in trunk) IPA passes seem to be running on a non-ssa
representation and I have been unable to figure out how to hack passes.c
to make it schedule an inter-procedural pass right after ssa
construction or after the end of
18 matches
Mail list logo
