Ok, now I have some results from the auto-compile-script-generation.
I got it to work, but it required some manual corrections.
First of all, I got link errors, because sched-ebb etc were trying
to call various functions, but those functions were not being
compiled in because INSN_SCHEDULING
Paul Edwards wrote:
First of all, I got link errors, because sched-ebb etc were trying
to call various functions, but those functions were not being
compiled in because INSN_SCHEDULING was not defined
(that's my quick analysis, anyway). So I just grepped those
files out of the source list.
Paul Edwards:
1. I think my unixio.h, which has a stack of POSIX functions
that need to be there (mkdir, pwait, open, fileno etc), needs to
be considered honorary ansi (after all, so much code assumes
that they exist) and get included in ansidecl, with unixio.h
living in include, and
Next, a stack of libiberty files were not compiled - strcasecmp,
vasprintf, asprintf, getpagesize, strdup. I don't know why this
would be the case, because e.g. HAVE_STRCASECMP is
not defined. Anyway, I added them to the source list manually,
and with a script, awk and m4, I was able to produce
Paul Edwards wrote:
The thing is, I already know it has detected that I don't have
strcasecmp. That's why it doesn't have HAVE_STRCASECMP
defined in the config.h. You are right that I don't have a linker,
but the compile with error-on-no-prototype is working fine - I
can see the result in
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:23:30PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
Yes, more Graphite merges are planned. The VTA merge broke Graphite
and we are waiting for Alexandre's recent VTA fixes for Graphite to be
updated based on the initial feedback from Sebastian and merged into
the trunk. Then
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Mark Mitchell m...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Jason Merrill wrote:
It isn't such a corner case, unfortunately; any code that tries to
overload on multiple vector sizes (i.e. MMX and SSE vectors) will break.
See bug 12909 and its duplicates. This is becoming
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
This still seems a lot of complexity to me, and I still think inserting
a new version between 2 and 3 is odd. If we need the complexity, I
think we have to introduce a new orthogonal option for vector mangling,
independent of the ABI version, but implied by ABI
Hello,
I recently came across a false negative in GCC's detection of array bounds
violation. At first, I thought the other tool (PC-Lint) was having false
positive, but it turns out to be correct. The false negative occurs in GCC
4.3, 4.4.1, and latest trunk (4.5). I'm curious to understand
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt m...@use.net wrote:
Hello,
I recently came across a false negative in GCC's detection of array bounds
violation. At first, I thought the other tool (PC-Lint) was having false
positive, but it turns out to be correct. The false negative occurs in GCC
4.3,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt m...@use.net wrote:
Hello,
I recently came across a false negative in GCC's detection of array bounds
violation. At first, I thought the other tool (PC-Lint) was having false
positive, but it turns out to be
In the following example:
namespace NS {
class T { };
void g(T, int) { }
}
NS::T parm;
void g(NS::T, float) { }
int main() {
extern void g(NS::T, float);
g(parm, 1);
}
program should call void ::g(NS::T, float), but g++ calls NS::g(T, int).
--
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 09:05 ---
Subject: Bug 42001
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 13 09:05:18 2009
New Revision: 154145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154145
Log:
PR testsuite/42001
* g++.dg/lto/lto.exp: Pass
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 09:11 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
nickpelling at nanodome dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
GCC target triplet||ARM
GCC trunk rev. 154141 seems to handle less efficiently a convolution code than
previous stable releases, it was also spotted in revision 153048.
Here are some average timings on an Intel E5320 clocked at 1.86 GHz with 4 MB
of L2 cache, Debian GNU/Linux with a 2.6.26 kernel.
* with -O2
Bootstrapping of gcc-4.4.2 fails on my machine because the stage 1 compiler has
a runtime dependency on mpfr and gmp, which are not in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH
because I only built them in order to compile gcc.
Using --with-gmp, --with-mpfr and --with-build-libsubdir at configure time lets
it compile
--- Comment #1 from nbenoit at tuxfamily dot org 2009-11-13 09:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=19010)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19010action=view)
Source file with a convolution loop pattern.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42027
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 10:03 ---
Can you be more specific?
Ordinary unqualified lookup finds ::g and lookup in the associated namespace
finds NS::g, the latter is a better match for the arguments.
--
The following valid code snippet triggers in ICE on trunk:
==
void foo()
{
int i;
_Complex int c = 0;
#pragma omp parallel for private(i) reduction(+:c)
for (i = 0; i 8; ++i)
c += 0;
}
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42029
--- Comment #2 from pi3orama at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 10:10 ---
This is an example in C++ language standard. The version is N2960. It said (at
page 47, [basic.lookup.argdep]/3):
Let X be the lookup set produced by unqualified lookup (3.4.1) and let Y be the
lookup set produced by
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 10:24 ---
Ah yes, this is DR 239
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#239
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from scovich at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 10:35 ---
Hmm.. it seems the final executable depends on mpfr and gmp as well... I could
have sworn the docs said it was a build-time dependency only.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42028
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 10:45
---
Confirmed. Reduced testcase (compile with -O2):
typedef void* Ptr;
struct A
{
int i;
union
{
Ptr p;
char *q;
} u;
};
static void foo(struct A *p,
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 10:59 ---
A::B should have external linkage according to [basic.link] but the definition
of A::B::foo() is a local symbol:
$ nm A.o
t _ZN1A1B3fooEv
U __gxx_personality_v0
--
redi at gcc dot
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 12:32
---
Even shorter testcase (crashes with -O -fprefetch-loop-arrays):
===
void foo(int);
void bar(int n)
{
int a[2], i, j = 0;
for (i = 0; i 2; i += j+1)
for (j = 0; j (n
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-11-13 13:22 ---
Between revisions 154095 and 154111, fifteen new failures appeared on the test
performed by regress (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg01028.html):
...
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/complex-sign-add.c -O3
--- Comment #21 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-11-13 13:26
---
Subject: Re: String not extracted for translation
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, pearly dot zhao at oracle dot com wrote:
(In reply to comment #19)
Subject: Re: String not extracted for translation
It didn't do
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 13:42 ---
I will have a look.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42024
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-11-13 13:40 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.5 regression] Revision 154128 caused many failures
These are frontend bugs caught by sanity check I accidentally comitted.
I posted objc fix and C++ part is in testing.
Honza
--
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 13:49 ---
It looks like it is induction variable related.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 13:52 ---
some DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P is missing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42029
--- Comment #3 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:33 ---
Subject: Bug 41697
Author: abel
Date: Fri Nov 13 14:32:52 2009
New Revision: 154148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154148
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/41697
* sel-sched-ir.c
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:41 ---
Subject: Bug 21008
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 14:40:22 2009
New Revision: 154150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154150
Log:
PR c++/21008, DR 515
* semantics.c
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 11987
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 14:40:13 2009
New Revision: 154149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154149
Log:
PR c++/11987
* parser.c
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:41 ---
Subject: Bug 35075
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 14:40:32 2009
New Revision: 154151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154151
Log:
PR c++/35075
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument):
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:41 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:42 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 14:42 ---
.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-11-13
14:20 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gnat.dg/null_pointer_deref1.adb execution test
I see that it fails on HP-UX as well. That's probably because there is
something missing in the fallback routines in config/pa, namely:
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-11-13
14:26 ---
I tried the patch from comment 3 on x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0 and the gcj
crashes still occur. I wonder if this change only makes the bug potentially go
latent on certain hardware for intel darwin. It is
When I attempt to compile the 11/12/09 snapshot of gcc 4.5 on an HP-PA
workstation under Debian Linux 5.0 I get the message:
/home/mrichmon/gcc-4.5-20091112/g95/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home/mrichmon/gcc-4.5-20091112/g95/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/mrichmon/irun/hppa1.1-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
--- Comment #15 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2009-11-13 15:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] typedef doesn't fully
expose base class type
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I'm assuming Mark isn't actually working on this bug.
Sad, but true.
--
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 15:10 ---
Adding CC.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 15:37 ---
Subject: Bug 21008
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 15:37:29 2009
New Revision: 154153
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154153
Log:
PR c++/21008, DR 515
* semantics.c
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 16:16 ---
Bumping down the priority since it doesn't ICE on 4.4+ and it's unclear whether
or not the code should be valid.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 16:45 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This was more likely caused by HJL's stack alignment patches based on the
context of the ICE.
I had also saw this the last time I ran the testsuite on x86-darwin.
Is this a
--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 16:36 ---
This seems to be IPA SRA and thus mine.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 16:56 ---
No longer ICEs in 4.3+.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 16:56 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Is this a regression or a new test? They are OK on Linux.
BTW, stack alignment was checked in a long time ago.
The tests are old, they are from 2003 :).
The patch which I was talking
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 16:57 ---
One should note on darwin we have:
/* On Darwin, the stack is 128-bit aligned at the point of every call.
Failure to ensure this will lead to a crash in the system libraries
or dynamic loader. */
#undef
The patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00515.html breaks
CSibe builds at Os for thumb2. I've attached a reduced testcase with this bug
report. This was reduced from linux-2.4.23/fs/nfs/read.c .
Building with -fno-schedule-insns works.
Command Line options used
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 17:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=19011)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19011action=view)
Reduced testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42031
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 17:32 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
In gcc4.2.1 targeting ARM processors, pure leaf functions were able to make
use
of r14 / lr (the link register). However, in gcc4.3.2 and gcc4.4.1 (and
presumably since then, since I
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 17:37
---
This is an interesting suggestion. However, the results in doing
this are mixed. It fixes the current testcase on hpux but not linux.
Yes, you additionally need this for Linux:
2009-11-12 Eric Botcazou
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-13 17:45
---
Jason, see Comment #3, it still ICEs for me...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27425
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 17:52 ---
Oops.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 17:55
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 17:59 ---
Subject: Bug 26965
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 17:59:26 2009
New Revision: 154157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154157
Log:
PR debug/26965
* dwarf2out.c (gen_variable_die):
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:02 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:03 ---
Subject: Bug 21008
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:03:31 2009
New Revision: 154158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154158
Log:
PR c++/21008, DR 515
* semantics.c
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:03 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:08 ---
Richard, any preferences on how to fix this? The approach outlined in the
report
doesn't work since intl/loadmsgcat.c uses this definition of PRId64
# define PRId64 (sizeof (long) == 8 ? ld : lld)
which doesn't mix
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:33 ---
Subject: Bug 41900
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:33:37 2009
New Revision: 154160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154160
Log:
2009-11-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/41900
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42029
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:38:36 2009
New Revision: 154161
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154161
Log:
PR middle-end/42029
* gimplify.c
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:42 ---
Subject: Bug 42029
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:42:32 2009
New Revision: 154162
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154162
Log:
PR middle-end/42029
* gimplify.c
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:46 ---
Subject: Bug 29363
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:46:39 2009
New Revision: 154163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154163
Log:
PR c++/29363
* decl.c (create_implicit_typedef):
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27425
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:46:47 2009
New Revision: 154164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154164
Log:
PR c++/27425
PR c++/34274
* pt.c
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:47 ---
Subject: Bug 34274
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 13 18:46:47 2009
New Revision: 154164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154164
Log:
PR c++/27425
PR c++/34274
* pt.c
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:47 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:48 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 18:48 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 19:13 ---
Subject: Bug 41900
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 13 19:13:16 2009
New Revision: 154169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154169
Log:
2009-11-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/41900
I'm seeing the following error:
In function int main():
cc1plus: warning: dereferencing pointer anonymous does break
strict-aliasing
rules
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.4.0/../../../../include/c++/4.4.0/bits/stl_tree.h:184:
note: initialized from here
I'm unsure of these are legitimate
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 19:24 ---
Which binutils version do you have installed? You might want to try a newer
version of binutils since that includes ld.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
Hi,
compiling tramp3d with -fwhole-program leads to:
/home/jh/gcc-install/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../lib64/libstdc++.a(sstream-inst.o):
In function `std::basic_stringbufchar, std::char_traitschar,
std::allocatorchar ::str() const':
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 19:25 ---
Might be related to PR 39390.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032
--- Comment #2 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2009-11-13
19:34 ---
The version of binutils provided by Debian is not the latest:
mrich...@msc545ux:~$ ld --version
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.18.0.20080103
Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This
--- Comment #2 from craig dot schlenter at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 19:34
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Might be related to PR 39390.
Would it be possible for someone to test the code from the description section
with trunk please .. if error messages were removed, the problem should
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 19:34 ---
Yep, this is definitely mine. Even though I have a fix for the above
testcase, it unfortunately does not work for my all-time favorite
one-filed structures, e.g.:
typedef struct
{
void *p;
} Ptr;
struct A
{
--- Comment #3 from evan at chromium dot org 2009-11-13 19:49 ---
I brought this up on the Google-internal C list. They reduced it further:
$ cat main.cc
#include map
int main(void)
{
typedef std::mapint, char* MyMap2;
MyMap2 map2_;
MyMap2::iterator map_iter2 =
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 19:52 ---
Subject: Bug 41900
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 13 19:51:52 2009
New Revision: 154171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154171
Log:
2009-11-13 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/41900
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 19:54 ---
It may be related to PR41316, I suspected that the library might contain
similar patterns in other containers besides forward_list.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032
--- Comment #3 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2009-11-13
19:56 ---
The error was caused by a full disk. I apologize for wasting your time.
--
michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 20:02 ---
There are definitely a lot of casts like
static_cast_Link_type(_M_node)
in stl_list.h. If _M_node is ever not a rb_tree_node but only a
rb_tree_node_base
(which probably is the case again for the head of the
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 20:08 ---
libstdc++ does define that function, in string-inst.cc. And it shouldn't be
defined anywhere else. I don't know what would be causing that error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42033
The program below demonstrates an incorrect error on an expression involving
operator(). The error incorrectly reported is error: 'type name' declared as
function returning a function.
#include stdio.h
struct T {
int operator()(int) const { printf(hello\n); return 1; }
};
int main()
{
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 20:21 ---
I don't think this is a bug. There is an ambiguous in the syntax in figuring
out if T() (int()) is a function declaration or a calling the operator() on a
newly created T. The C++ standard resolves it as being a
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 20:22 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Is this a regression or a new test? They are OK on Linux.
BTW, stack alignment was checked in a long time ago.
The tests are old, they are from 2003 :).
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 20:31 ---
Well I know it appeared between revision 152380 and 153960. I don't have a
narrower revision right now though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41988
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 20:35 ---
The only other change that might have caused it as far as I can tell is the IFC
changes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41988
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-13 20:37
---
It's normally exported from the *.so, just grep it:
000a90d0 W std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar,
std::allocatorchar ::basic_stringchar*(char*, char*, std::allocatorchar
const)
--
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 20:38 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Well I know it appeared between revision 152380 and 153960. I don't have a
narrower revision right now though.
Please read
Since at least revision 152615, I see the following failures
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
