Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> This still seems a lot of complexity to me, and I still think inserting >> a new version between 2 and 3 is odd. If we need the complexity, I >> think we have to introduce a new orthogonal option for vector mangling, >> independent of the ABI version, but implied by ABI version > 4. > > How is mangling orthogonal to the ABI?
It's certainly possible to have ABIv2-with-vector-change and ABIv2-without. I never claimed that they were the same ABI. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
