On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 21:48 -0700, C.W. Holeman II wrote:
You might try:
http://groups.google.com/group/ppp-public?pli=1
--
C.W.Holeman II | cw...@julianlocals.com | http://JulianLocals.com/cwhii
To only a fraction of the human race does God give the privilege of
earning one's
On 1 November 2010 08:46, eric wrote:
should I also post this to X.org and gcc 's mailing list?
No. This mailing list is not for help using GCC, and your problem is
not caused by GCC. Please post somewhere else more appropriate, such
as the gcc-help list.
On 10/31/2010 07:09 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
This patch should not of course change whether or not distros choose to
package the Java compiler; undoubtedly they would continue to do so,
just as they package the Ada compiler today.
Comments? Approvals?
I see your point, but this will
On 11/01/2010 04:06 AM, Geert Bosch wrote:
On Oct 31, 2010, at 15:33, Steven Bosscher wrote:
The argument against disabling java as a default language always was
that there should be at least one default language that requires
non-call exceptions. I recall testing many patches without
Does the Go language define a specific ABI convention for returning
two values from a function thru registers? If yes, how does GCC
implement it? Or is it some future work?
The Go language does not define an ABI for returning multiple values.
The gccgo frontend implements it by saying
On 01/11/2010 03:48, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Is it possible to build and test java without all of libjava?
configure --disable-libgcj. I have been using this for my daily
On 31/10/2010 19:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Java in the same category as Ada and Objective C++. The main argument
in favor of this proposal is twofold: 1) building libjava is a large
component of gcc bootstrap time, and thus a large component in the
amount of time it takes to test changes;
On Nov 1, 2010, at 00:30, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Feel free to enable Ada. Builds and tests faster than Java,
and is known to expose many more middle end bugs, including
ones that require non-call exceptions.
But to get that coverage, testers will need to have gnat installed.
Will that
Quoting Geert Bosch bo...@adacore.com:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 00:30, Joern Rennecke wrote:
But to get that coverage, testers will need to have gnat installed.
Will that become a requirement for middle-end patch regression testing?
No, the language will only be built if a suitable bootstrap
Hi,
We are working on a new project which requires a retargetting a
compiler to a small cpu on FPGA.
The cpu is hand-coded and it supports only a limited number of instruction sets.
My questions are:
1. Since I have very limited experience with compilers (this is my
first compiler project), is
On Oct 31, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Paul Koning paul_kon...@dell.com writes:
What triggered the question is that I'm trying to debug a testsuite
ICE in fortran, pdp11 target, where it aborts in
convert_memory_address_addr_space apparently trying to make a 32 bit
pointer.
Hi All,
Is it possible to define UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD as a global variable and
to set this varibale using a pragma (even once for a compilation) and
that way to be able to compile one file with UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD = 8
and another file with UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD = 16?
Thanks, Roy.
Hi All,
Is it possible to define UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD as a global variable and
to set this varibale using a pragma (even once for a compilation) and
that way to be able to compile one file with UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD = 8
and another file with UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD = 16?
No. This is an internal
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to define UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD as a global variable and
to set this varibale using a pragma (even once for a compilation) and
that way to be able to compile one file with UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD = 8
and
Hi Guys,
So this becomes a question for the binutils maintainers: do
the binutils want to be self-contained, or do they want to follow the
path of gcc and require additional libraries to be installed before a
build can succeed?
As I see it the pros of having a copy of the zlib sources in the
Ian == Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
Ian This patch puts the code in libiberty, but it could equally well go in
Ian gcc. Anybody want to make an argument one way or another?
Ian +extern const char *
Ian +objfile_attributes_compare (objfile_attributes *attrs1,
GDB already uses the
Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com writes:
On 31/10/2010 19:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Java in the same category as Ada and Objective C++. The main argument
in favor of this proposal is twofold: 1) building libjava is a large
component of gcc bootstrap time, and thus a large component in
Steven == Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
Steven The argument against disabling java as a default language always was
Steven that there should be at least one default language that requires
Steven non-call exceptions. I recall testing many patches without trouble if
Steven I did
On 11/01/2010 05:50 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Steven == Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
Steven The argument against disabling java as a default language always was
Steven that there should be at least one default language that requires
Steven non-call exceptions. I recall testing
Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com writes:
Ian == Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
Ian This patch puts the code in libiberty, but it could equally well go in
Ian gcc. Anybody want to make an argument one way or another?
Ian +extern const char *
Ian +objfile_attributes_compare
On 11/01/2010 06:16 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 15:09, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Comments? Approvals?
FWIW, I agree with this patch for the same reasons stated by Ian.
Other than massively increasing build times, I have not seen
substantial benefits for
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there anything we could do to change your mind?
Yes, if we have an autotester that runs the libgcj test suite and
mails maintainers (or the list) when they break things.
I don't mind enabling Java in my autotesters for
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2010 04:06 AM, Geert Bosch wrote:
On Oct 31, 2010, at 15:33, Steven Bosscher wrote:
The argument against disabling java as a default language always was
that there should be at least one default language that
Hi All,
While using gcc-4.6 with option -flto, I found that interprocedural
analysis were performed on each source file separately. For example for
the pass pass_ipa_pta, if we compile two files like :
gcc -O -flto f1.c f2.c
we have the pass run twice, one for each source file. So is
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 19:57, Hongtao yu...@purdue.edu wrote:
Hi All,
While using gcc-4.6 with option -flto, I found that interprocedural
analysis were performed on each source file separately. For example for
the pass pass_ipa_pta, if we compile two files like :
gcc -O -flto f1.c
On 11/01/10 20:35, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 19:57, Hongtao yu...@purdue.edu wrote:
Hi All,
While using gcc-4.6 with option -flto, I found that interprocedural
analysis were performed on each source file separately. For example for
the pass pass_ipa_pta, if we compile two
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:25:50AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:13:44PM +, Nick Clifton wrote:
* We have to make sure that zlib will build on all of the
hosts that we care about. Should the situation arise
where the zlib does not build on a particular host,
/usr/include/c++/4.4/backward/backward_warning.h:28:2: warning:
#warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated
header which may be removed without further notice at a future date.
Please use a non-deprecated interface with equivalent functionality
instead. For a listing of
On 11/01/10 12:16, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 15:09, Ian Lance Taylori...@google.com wrote:
Comments? Approvals?
FWIW, I agree with this patch for the same reasons stated by Ian.
Other than massively increasing build times, I have not seen
substantial benefits for having
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/10 12:16, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 15:09, Ian Lance Taylori...@google.com wrote:
Comments? Approvals?
FWIW, I agree with this patch for the same reasons stated by Ian.
Other than massively
eric lin fs...@luxmail.com writes:
I am using 4.4.3, could anyone have experience to use different(newer)
version of gcc/g++ so it can distinquish different useage of same
variable, i.e. Window, in my case without response by compile time
error?
This question is not appropriate for the
On 31.10.2010 20:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Currently we build the Java frontend and libjava by default. At the GCC
Summit we raised the question of whether should turn this off, thus only
building it when java is explicitly selected at configure time with
--enable-languages. Among the people
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
07:58:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 1 07:58:46 2010
New Revision: 166126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166126
Log:
PR target/45250
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
11:22:26 UTC ---
This would also be solved by the override control features coming in C++0x
c.f. PR 17920, PR 31397, PR 36848
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
11:24:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 22217
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22217
gcc46-pr46034.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
11:25:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 22218
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22218
gcc46-pr46034.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
--- Comment #3 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:29:27 UTC ---
As far as I know attributes were removed from the C0x Final Draft.
Besides, if GCC were to provide a compiler flag to warn for this, you would
also be able to catch potential
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
12:36:45 UTC ---
Attributes were still in the FCD, and are still in the current draft, but might
be removed. Override control may not be done by attributes, but will be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
12:39:48 UTC ---
also, GNU-style attributes are not being removed from GCC, even if C++0x
attributes get dropped
my point was just that there are several similar bugs and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
--- Comment #6 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:54:25 UTC ---
OK, fair enough.
However, I reported this bug, because I would like GCC to produce a warning
when hiding a non-virtual method in *existing* code; an option similar to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
13:01:43 UTC ---
Yup, that's why I haven't closed this as a duplicate.
The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names, so is
relevant to this PR *and*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46255
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359
--- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich mahatma at eu dot by 2010-11-01
13:21:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 0
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=0
native VIA/CentaurHauls
(In reply to comment #1)
Why do you think it's a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046
Dzianis Kahanovich mahatma at eu dot by changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mahatma at eu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in
SPEC CPU 2006
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #1 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2010-11-01 14:40:58 UTC ---
A backtrace and/or a reduced testcase would be helpful. I don't have a
copy of SPEC 2006.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 14:48:00
UTC ---
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a2830 tree check: %s, have %s in %s, at %s:%d)
at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:825
#1 0x00ccb556 in tree_check_failed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 14:49:15
UTC ---
(gdb) f 3
#3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880)
at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253
10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 14:50:25
UTC ---
(gdb) f 3
#3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880)
at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253
10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #5 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2010-11-01 14:57:32 UTC ---
If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible:
--- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in expand_expr_real_2 |[4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
16:01:19 UTC ---
I have submitted a patch for this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00044.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-11-01 16:08:18
UTC ---
I can confirm that attachment 22191 fixes the original problem, namely that
one source file from util-linux, for me. No testsuite run, though ☹
Built on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-01 16:21:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible:
--- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45803
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #24 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-11-01 16:38:53
UTC ---
You'd need also the patch for bug 41064.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nospamname at web
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40414
Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202
Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45803
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-11-01 16:53:18
UTC ---
Probably, but not on m68k ;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053
--- Comment #27 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-11-01 16:58:20
UTC ---
Better: not for this testcase. We found it on CRIS, but the bug could really
happen on any target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260
Summary: Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261
Summary: avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8
option
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
18:58:35 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Mon Nov 1 18:58:30 2010
New Revision: 166139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166139
Log:
gcc/
2010-11-01 Nathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:30:01 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Nov 1 19:29:57 2010
New Revision: 166140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166140
Log:
2010-10-30 Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected
function_type or method_type, have pointer_type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:45:12 UTC ---
The following variant:
module integrable_model_module
implicit none
type :: integrable_model
contains
procedure :: multiply
generic :: operator(*) =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:49:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 2
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
full test case
When fixing, one should make sure that the full code from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45062
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46243
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #10 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-11-01
20:40:17 UTC ---
Thanks for working on this, Dodji!
Meanwhile, I've been trying to find some source workaround for my example until
this is patched and the next release is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45095
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46263
Summary: without zip in system, gcc with
--enable-languages=,java bootstraps, but no libgcj
in result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Summary: Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator
returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
21:28:48 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Nov 1 21:28:44 2010
New Revision: 166150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166150
Log:
2010-11-01 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
21:32:05 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Nov 1 21:32:01 2010
New Revision: 166151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166151
Log:
2010-11-01 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
21:33:44 UTC ---
trunk and 4.5.2 should work with python 2.4 now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01
21:49:56 UTC ---
foo::operator* returns a reference to a local variable which goes out of scope,
causing c.data to contain garbage.
operator* should return by value instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
Mirza mirza.husadzic at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45022
Changpeng Fang changpeng.fang at amd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
