P.S.: Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks

2010-11-17 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Joern Rennecke amyl...@spamcop.net: Does that mean you acknowledge that we shouldn't have CUMULATIVE_ARGS taking hooks in the global target vector? FWIW, I think the attached patch would be approximately what it takes to remove the CUMULATIVE_ARGS taking hooks from the global target

incompatible GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.1 libstdc++ ?

2010-11-17 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi, I have just faced a problem where a C++ program (which I get in binary form - I can't recompile) crashes when it uses libstdc++.so.6 from GCC-4.5.1, while it works when using libstdc++.so.6 from GCC-4.4.5. I am using an x86 machine. Are there any known incompatibilities between these two

Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization)

2010-11-17 Thread Nathan Froyd
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:00PM -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote: Quoting Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com: I am admittedly a C++ newbie; the first thing I thought of was: class gcc::cumulative_args { virtual void advance (...) = 0; virtual rtx arg (...) = 0; virtual rtx

Re: CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization)

2010-11-17 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com: On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:00PM -0500, Joern Rennecke wrote: ... Does that mean you acknowledge that we shouldn't have CUMULATIVE_ARGS taking hooks in the global target vector? Maybe? I think the methods discussed in this thread would be

Re: incompatible GCC 4.4.5 and 4.5.1 libstdc++ ?

2010-11-17 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@st.com writes: I have just faced a problem where a C++ program (which I get in binary form - I can't recompile) crashes when it uses libstdc++.so.6 from GCC-4.5.1, while it works when using libstdc++.so.6 from GCC-4.4.5. I am using an x86 machine. Are there

Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Art Haas
Hi. My build this morning failed when libquadmath was being built. Things failed when configuring in the 'amd64' subdirectory - the bits below are taken from the 'config.log' in that directory: configure:3040: /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc-1117/./gcc/xgcc -B/export/home/arth/gnu/gcc-1117/./gcc/

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Art Haas wrote: My build this morning failed when libquadmath was being built. Things failed when configuring in the 'amd64' subdirectory - the bits below are taken from the 'config.log' in that directory: There are two known problems: a) libquadmath should - at least for now - only be build

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Tobias Burnus wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:20:39PM CET: b) Building with a cross compiler is not supported by the libquadmath configure script http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520 You should probably try out GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES in configure.ac and check with a couple of

ICE on Cygwin [trunk]

2010-11-17 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Trying to bootstrap rev. 166873, on Cygwin, configuring with: /tmp/gcc-4.6-r166873/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gfortran --program-suffix=-4.6 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-checking=release --enable-threads=posix --enable-libgomp --disable-bootstrap --disable-libmudflap

Re: ICE on Cygwin [trunk]

2010-11-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Why does everyone think that I and Fortran have something to do with it if something breaks?* ;-) The issue is known and a fix, which seemingly works on Darwin, exists. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 Angelo Graziosi wrote: /tmp/gcc-4.6-r166873/libgomp/barrier.c:41:1:

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Rainer Orth
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes: * Tobias Burnus wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:20:39PM CET: b) Building with a cross compiler is not supported by the libquadmath configure script http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520 You should probably try out

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Rainer Orth
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes: I won't post a proper patch until it has completed, just a heads-up to those running into the same failures. While the build completed with the patch I've posted, fortran testing for the non-default multilib is completely broken, e.g. Setting

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Rainer Orth wrote: While the build completed with the patch I've posted, fortran testing for the non-default multilib is completely broken, e.g. That's in a way the a duplicate of PR 46516. Or at least the solution is similar: Getting rid of libgfortran.spec and fall back (again) to having

Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend

2010-11-17 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes: I casually looked at libgo/{Makefile.am,configure.ac}. Thanks for the review. You don't need to list .c files in the BUILT_SOURCES variable if they are also listed in some prog_SOURCES variable (and are not undocumented prerequisites for other

Re: Maybe bug in call function to static declaration variable?

2010-11-17 Thread Gilberto Cuba Ricardo
Hi Axel, Axel Freyn escribió: [CUT] I simply added debug output before/after each event My gcc-generated executable says the following at runtime: main 1 type_schema called the 1 time type_schema 1 Contructor called the 1 time Constructor sponge_object_schema: 1 type_schema called the

Re: Maybe bug in call function to static declaration variable?

2010-11-17 Thread Jonathan Wakely
[This question should have been sent to gcc-help, this list is for discussing development of GCC] On 18 November 2010 03:03, Gilberto Cuba Ricardo wrote: Maybe it's possible, though, I searched in the working draft of standard programming c++ of this year that: Static initialization shall be

Re: Boostrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10 - libquadmath error

2010-11-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Rainer Orth wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15:55PM CET: * One cannot -lm to libquadmath_la_LIBADD since that gets passed to nm, which doesn't know (and doesn't need to be run) -lm. That's a bug in the rule using nm then, though. Again, as in libjava/Makefile.am, I've moved it to

Re: GCC-4.5.0 comparison with previous releases and LLVM-2.7 on SPEC2000 for x86/x86_64

2010-11-17 Thread Xinliang David Li
Some text size measurement. Summary: 1) LTO with -O3 bloats up code considerably; 2) LTO with -O2 reduces text size compared with -O2 3) Google 4.4.3 based compiler is really effective in reducing C++ program size -- this is where the focus of the tuning was done. Witnessed by eon in SPEC2k and

[Bug driver/46516] gfortran-trunk: error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2010-11-17 08:02:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) I suppose it's the --disable-multilib, but I don't know why. Yes, it is certainly this. The driver seems to search

[Bug driver/46516] gfortran-trunk: error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 08:20:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) I suppose it's the --disable-multilib, but I don't know why. Yes, it is certainly this. The driver

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2010-11-17 08:46:11 UTC --- mine look like: static const char *const multilib_raw[] = { . !m64 !m32;, .:../lib64 m64 !m32;, .:../lib !m64 m32;, NULL }; however, I just

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch 2010-11-17 08:50:06 UTC --- FYI, with strace I see following things being searched for the specs:

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 09:27:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) however, I just observe that the libgomp.spec are causing no problems in my build. Are they actually read? Even here, where I use

[Bug c/46517] New: Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization

2010-11-17 Thread lepinat at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46517 Summary: Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/46455] resource leaks due to missing destructors for mutexes and condvars

2010-11-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 09:37:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) because __gthread_mutex_destroy returns void. Argh, why is gthr-win32.h different here?! Nevermind ... after changing the

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 09:40:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Are they actually read? Sorry, I tested wrongly. One needs to have both -fopenmp *and* one needs to link. Then I also sees Read

[Bug c/46460] warn for shifting more than the bits in the (promoted) type is undefined

2010-11-17 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46460 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lepinat at free dot

[Bug c/46517] Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization

2010-11-17 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46517 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

2010-11-17 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 --- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:00:34 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Wed Nov 17 10:00:27 2010 New Revision: 166860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166860 Log: PR tree-optimization/46312

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:25:40 UTC --- And the reason why it only shows up on ia64 is because it uses vectorization factor 2 instead of 4 that is used on x86_64/i386+sse2. With: int id[16][16][17]

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/46498] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1112 with -O -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46498 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:43:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 17 10:43:21 2010 New Revision: 166861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166861 Log: 2010-11-16 Richard

[Bug c++/46513] Request: Warning for use of unsafe string handling functions

2010-11-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46513 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:43:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I know finding the replacement is not a GCC issue, but perhaps folks who need to the *nix safe string gear can use TR24731-2 (not

[Bug tree-optimization/46498] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1112 with -O -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46498 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:46:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 17 10:46:36 2010 New Revision: 166862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166862 Log: 2010-11-17 Richard

[Bug middle-end/45838] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/pr34513.c execution test

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45838 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 11:15:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 17 11:15:55 2010 New Revision: 166863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166863 Log: PR middle-end/45838

[Bug middle-end/45838] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/pr34513.c execution test

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45838 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46498] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1112 with -O -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46498 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/46502] collect2 LTO marker detection is fragile wrt. to nm output format

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46502 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 11:41:11 UTC --- The marker should be removed.

[Bug lto/46504] LTO failed on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46504 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/46513] Request: Warning for use of unsafe string handling functions

2010-11-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46513 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-17 11:50:16 UTC --- On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, noloader at gmail dot com wrote: I stand corrected: C1X draft dated 2010-10-04 now includes the bounds checking

[Bug lto/46505] LTO miscompiled 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46505 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 11:50:51 UTC --- Hm, worked for me last time. Re-checking with r166798.

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 11:51:23 UTC --- Hm, worked for me last time. Re-checking with r166798.

[Bug c/46509] -Wparentheses shouldn't warn about: A || Y foo

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46509 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-17 11:55:29 UTC --- In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg00826.html I discussed issues relating to finding specs in the presence of multilib

[Bug lto/46505] LTO miscompiled 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46505 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 12:05:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 17 12:05:24 2010 New Revision: 166865 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166865 Log: PR testsuite/45429 *

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 12:05:24 UTC --- Tonto works for me.

[Bug c/46509] -Wparentheses shouldn't warn about: A || Y foo

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46509 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-17 12:53:39 UTC --- Failures look like spawn [open ...]^M FAIL: InterfaceDispatch -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test UNTESTED: InterfaceDispatch -findirect-dispatch

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-17 12:54:35 UTC --- It is on Linux/x86-64.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46440] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 13:02:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 17 13:02:31 2010 New Revision: 166867 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166867 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/46440] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

2010-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0

[Bug target/39064] libiberty md5.h needs uintptr_t

2010-11-17 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39064 --- Comment #4 from nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com 2010-11-17 13:13:44 UTC --- *** Bug 46464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/46464] libiberty pointer size assumptions for Win64 incorrect

2010-11-17 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46464 nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-17 13:19:07 UTC --- Created attachment 22429 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22429 The src.alt for 465.tonto Can you try this alternate source for tonto with -O3

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 13:36:03 UTC --- I have different alternate source, calling destroy_ptr_part_ instead. But I can't parse the perl patch, so I'm not 100% sure.

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

2010-11-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 14:08:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) P1 sounds a little overrated, it's a specialized option and an artificial test. Only IA-64 really uses this thing, right?

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 14:08:35 UTC --- Btw, the scheduler guys have a fix in the works already.

[Bug fortran/46518] New: internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 Summary: internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 14:52:42 UTC --- Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin suppresses the ICE.

[Bug target/46519] New: Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 Summary: Missing vzeroupper Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/46086] fail to build gcc 4.5.2 on sparc64-portbld-freebsd9.0 - configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

2010-11-17 Thread mexas at bristol dot ac.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46086 --- Comment #12 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2010-11-17 15:09:20 UTC --- yes, GMP fails 14 tests: http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/gmp-5.0.1-regression-test.log I submitted a bug report to gmp-bugs. MPFR passes all tests.

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 15:11:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Do you know whether this is present on x86_64-linux? I am unable to do a --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap using...

[Bug c++/46497] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] Defaulted vs declared move constructor vs is_convertible

2010-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46497 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++0x] Defaulted vs|[C++0x]

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 15:29:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin suppresses the ICE. Is that in relation to

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

2010-11-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 15:31:36 UTC --- Btw, the scheduler guys have a fix in the works already. Then they should assign the PR to someone to avoid duplicating efforts.

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 15:32:34 UTC --- Some debugging: While for libgfortran.spec and libgomp.spec the call to gcc.c's find_a_file and thus to for_each_path is the same, the global variable

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 15:33:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin suppresses the ICE.

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

2010-11-17 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 15:44:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin suppresses the ICE.

[Bug lto/46504] LTO failed on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46504 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 15:47:20 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 17 15:47:17 2010 New Revision: 166870 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166870 Log: 2010-11-17 Richard

[Bug fortran/46520] New: libquadmath: Build also with --enable-languages=c; fails with some cross targets

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520 Summary: libquadmath: Build also with --enable-languages=c; fails with some cross targets Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug rtl-optimization/46521] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -Os -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fprofile-generate -fno-early-inlining

2010-11-17 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -Os -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fprofile-generate -fno-early-inlining

[Bug lto/46504] LTO failed on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46504 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/46522] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -O3 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -funroll-loops

2010-11-17 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -O3 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -funroll-loops Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug c/20385] Lame parse error message for undefined type

2010-11-17 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20385 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-11-17 16:14:32 UTC --- Another case in which we still do not detect the unsigned type is after declspecs: typedef uintt16_t pid_t; extern uintt16_t x; I think that until this is

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

2010-11-17 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22334|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/46497] [C++0x] Defaulted vs declared move constructor vs is_convertible

2010-11-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46497 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-11-17 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
pr42294.f -m32 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip pr42294.s -O -O2 -version -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -funroll-all-loops -o pr42294.s -fintrinsic-modules-path finclude GNU Fortran (GCC) version 4.6.0 20101117 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

2010-11-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 16:25:56 UTC --- Suggested solution from Joseph on #gcc: - get rid of the spec file (hooray!) - Add a configure test. One needs to make sure that both the compiler supports

[Bug tree-optimization/46523] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/46523] [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers

2010-11-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 ---

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
/x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0/lib/ -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0/include -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp -I../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp/config/bsd -I../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp/config

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 16:37:14 UTC --- Backtraces as... gdb /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/cc1 ... (gdb) r -quiet -v -I . -I ../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp -I

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 16:38:11 UTC --- sorry...comment 8 ended up in the wrong PR

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-11-17 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-17 16:38:47 UTC --- Backtraces as... gdb /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/cc1 ... (gdb) r -quiet -v -I . -I ../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp -I

[Bug c++/46269] [trans-mem] internal compiler error in expand_block_tm of trans-mem.c

2010-11-17 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/46497] [C++0x] Defaulted vs declared move constructor vs is_convertible

2010-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46497 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-11-17 16:44:21 UTC --- Ok, I'm still digesting all of this (and in the meanwhile we also realized that likely we have problems in the specs of std::is_convertible itself, in

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

2010-11-17 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #21 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 16:47:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) Comment on attachment 22334 [details] testcase failing in r166433 Opened PR46521 and PR46522 for the new two testcases.

[Bug bootstrap/41337] [LTO] Parallel build failure

2010-11-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwild at gcc

  1   2   >