All,
Imagination Technologies would like to introduce the design of an O32 ABI
extension for MIPS to allow it to be used in conjunction with MIPS FPUs having
64-bit floating-point registers. This is a wide-reaching design that involves
changes to all components of the MIPS toolchain it is
An update to this year's Cauldron. We have almost reached
capacity. There are only a few slots left for registration.
If you still have not registered, please do it quickly. As soon
as we fill up, I will start a waiting list. Priority will be
given to those proposing a presentation or BoF.
If
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
But I'm pretty sure that any compiler guy must *hate* that current odd
dependency-generation part, and if I was a gcc person, seeing that
bugzilla entry Torvald pointed at, I would personally want to
dismember somebody with a rusty spoon..
Yes.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 07:35:37PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
But I'm pretty sure that any compiler guy must *hate* that current odd
dependency-generation part, and if I was a gcc person, seeing that
bugzilla entry Torvald pointed at, I
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Peter Sewell
peter.sew...@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
If one thinks this is too fragile, then simply using memory_order_acquire
and paying the resulting barrier cost (and perhaps hoping that compilers
will eventually be able to optimise some cases of those barriers to
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:28:05PM +, Peter Sewell wrote:
On 20 February 2014 17:01, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
[ . . . ]
So, if you make one of two changes to your example, then I will agree
with you.
No. We're not playing games here. I'm fed up with
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Why would this be any different, especially since it's easy to
understand both for a human and a compiler?
Btw, the actual data path may actually be semantically meaningful even
at a processor level.
For
On 21 February 2014 19:41, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Why would this be any different, especially since it's easy to
understand both for a human and a compiler?
Btw, the actual
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Peter Sewell
peter.sew...@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
You have to track dependencies through other assignments, e.g. simple x=y
That is all visible in the SSA form. Variable assignment has been
converted to some use of the SSA node that generated the value. The
use
Hi!
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:24:56 +0100, I wrote:
First, pardon the long CC list. You are, in my understanding, the people
who are interested in collaborating on the topics that are being prepared
on gomp-4_0-branch: LTO streaming, acceleration device offloading,
OpenMP target, OpenACC, nvptx
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
This needs to be as follows:
[[carries_dependency]] int getzero(int i [[carries_dependency]])
{
return i - i;
}
Otherwise dependencies won't get carried through it.
C11 doesn't have attributes at all (and no specification regarding
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:10:54PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
This needs to be as follows:
[[carries_dependency]] int getzero(int i [[carries_dependency]])
{
return i - i;
}
Otherwise dependencies won't get carried through
if the page isn't accessible?
Or is this program somehow invalid?
tested gcc and g++ 4.7.2
and from svn, gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20140221 (experimental)
While both lines read an array entry, only the second crashes.
dup = c[i];
fun(c[i]);
The attached program sets up and reads through the array with extra
David Fries da...@fries.net writes:
The attached program sets up and reads through the array with extra
padding at the of the array from 8 bytes to 0 bytes. Padding from 4
to 0 crashes.
This program has undefined behaviour because you are using unaligned
pointers.
Andreas.
--
Andreas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57896
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60298
Bug ID: 60298
Summary: [ARM/Thumb1] ICE caused by LRA for case pr54713-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60296
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
For the % conversion there are no modifiers defined, so gcc stops before the
second %, parsing the rest as %*d, which requires two arguments.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
Bug ID: 60299
Summary: [C++11] Copy constructor calls itself if base class
has a constructor which is a variadic function
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
--- Comment #2 from Martin Lederhilger m.lederhil...@ds-automotion.com ---
Created attachment 32187
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32187action=edit
Command line used to build the example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
--- Comment #1 from Martin Lederhilger m.lederhil...@ds-automotion.com ---
Created attachment 32186
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32186action=edit
Example which exhibits the probelm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
--- Comment #3 from Martin Lederhilger m.lederhil...@ds-automotion.com ---
Created attachment 32188
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32188action=edit
GDB session which shows the disassembly of C's copy constructor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60298
--- Comment #1 from Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com ---
I did a little investigation and think the issue may be related to following
code from function remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges:
782 max_regno = max_reg_num ();
783
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60286
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Vogt a.vogt at fulguritus dot com ---
Thanks for fixing it *that* fast (I'm impressed)!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60288
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60234
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Feb 21 09:06:57 2014
New Revision: 207986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207986root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/60234
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60234
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, so the rest is hash collisions in the mem-attrs hash. We also do useless
work here:
case MEM_REF:
{
addr_space_t as
= TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, redlizard at redlizard dot nl wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
--- Comment #6 from Ruud Koolen redlizard at redlizard dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
Won't that break with function-local statics? Those can certainly refer to
other function-local static, with this patch gcc might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here the assert added while fixing PR 57422 means that we should always be able
to schedule the current fence instruction. The PR 57422 analysis was good but
for the added assert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 21 09:53:56 2014
New Revision: 207988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207988root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/56490
* params.def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With the redundant set_mem_addr_space removed -Og now takes
expand : 19.21 (31%) usr 0.60 ( 8%) sys 20.06 (29%) wall
165633 kB ( 8%) ggc
TOTAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
--- Comment #4 from Martin Lederhilger m.lederhil...@ds-automotion.com ---
Interestingly clang-3.4 produces the same result - is my program somehow wrong?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-O0 time with both patches
phase parsing : 6.34 (17%) usr 5.18 (71%) sys 11.53 (25%) wall
294905 kB (15%) ggc
tree gimplify : 2.17 ( 6%) usr 0.19 (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60253
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60295
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60254
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
The second issue is a Dup of PR60215.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60300
Bug ID: 60300
Summary: [avr] Suboptimal stack pointer manipulation for frame
setup
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Feb 21 13:05:40 2014
New Revision: 207990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207990root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 21 13:14:23 2014
New Revision: 207991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207991root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60276
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 21 13:18:54 2014
New Revision: 207992
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207992root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60276
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60167
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.3 |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01314.html we get at -O0
expand : 1.59 ( 5%) usr 0.05 ( 1%) sys 1.72 ( 5%) wall
261220 kB (13%) ggc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60222
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:00:44 2014
New Revision: 207994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207994root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60167
PR c++/60222
PR c++/58606
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60167
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:00:44 2014
New Revision: 207994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207994root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60167
PR c++/60222
PR c++/58606
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58606
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:00:44 2014
New Revision: 207994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207994root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60167
PR c++/60222
PR c++/58606
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60251
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:01:20 2014
New Revision: 207995
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207995root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60251
* lambda.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60250
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:01:29 2014
New Revision: 207996
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207996root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60250
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Hi all,
I think it went as follows: We found out that some code doesn't - in
particular code which uses array-valued deferred-length characters.
After trying to fix it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60301
Bug ID: 60301
Summary: cross compiler for android: multiple definition of
TARGET_POSIX_IO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60222
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60167
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60250
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60251
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Dominique, I don't have a darwin machine, can you help me with testing
this patch on darwin? I will do the x86-64 and ia64.
I am currently bootstrapping with the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60266
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
It's caused by mixing -O0 and -O2 with LTO:
Indeed. Patch fixing this ICE is pending approval at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60051
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:56:20 2014
New Revision: 207998
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207998root=gccview=rev
Log:
DR 1591
PR c++/60051
* pt.c (unify): Only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60252
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:56:31 2014
New Revision: 207999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207999root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60252
* lambda.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:56:46 2014
New Revision: 208001
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208001root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60277
* call.c (build_array_conv):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60248
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:56:38 2014
New Revision: 208000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208000root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60248
* mangle.c (mangle_decl): Don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60224
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:56:53 2014
New Revision: 208002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208002root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60224
* decl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60219
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:57:00 2014
New Revision: 208003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208003root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60219
* pt.c (coerce_template_parms):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:57:07 2014
New Revision: 208004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208004root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60216
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60302
Bug ID: 60302
Summary: ICE with c_f_pointer and android cross compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
--- Comment #20 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #19)
I brought this exact case up on linux-sparse, and Christopher Li's (quite
reasonable) perspective was that it doesn't really make sense
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60303
Bug ID: 60303
Summary: Spelling Error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60248
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 15:01:54 2014
New Revision: 208005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208005root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60248
* mangle.c (mangle_decl): Don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60302
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60248
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 15:29:14 2014
New Revision: 208006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208006root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60248
* mangle.c (mangle_decl): Don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60219
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 15:29:25 2014
New Revision: 208007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208007root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60219
* pt.c (coerce_template_parms):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 15:29:32 2014
New Revision: 208008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208008root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60216
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60051
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60303
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60252
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60248
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60227
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 21 15:53:43 2014
New Revision: 208009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208009root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60227
Fix ChangeLog
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60299
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60227
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60224
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60219
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304
Bug ID: 60304
Summary: Including atomic disables -Wconversion-null
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304
--- Comment #1 from bug-reports at psdtechnologies dot com ---
Created attachment 32191
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32191action=edit
Similar code behaving as expected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60300
--- Comment #1 from Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl ---
I noticed I didn't use -O in the output I pasted, but I just confirmed that the
results are the same with -Os and -O3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60241
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid,|ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60241
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60200
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60187
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60186
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
Meador Inge meadori at codesourcery dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meadori at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #3 from Meador Inge meadori at codesourcery dot com ---
As shown in the backtrace, the ICE occurs when GCSE tries generate a move.
The the following asserts fire in 'gen_movsi':
gcc_assert (GET_CODE (tmp) == SYMBOL_REF);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60302
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo