[Bug c++/84824] DCE fails to remove dead code of std::function constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824 --- Comment #1 from linzj --- According to the tree generated, the problem is sourced from fail to remove the lambda function call. But the constant value is deduced and propagated. In case of the side effect?

Re: MIPS ASAN status? (and "volunteering")

H.J.: please see last. > From: Jean Lee > Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 20:22:45 +0800 > > See above regarding looking at patches, but I guess you mean > > that the patch is trivial, so then I presume it was more or less > > the same as this, which is basically a copy-paste from

[Bug target/33944] streaming 64-bit integer stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/50696] [x32] Unnecessary lea

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50696 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug c++/84824] New: DCE fails to remove dead code of std::function constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84824 Bug ID: 84824 Summary: DCE fails to remove dead code of std::function constructor Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/43748] build machinery insufficient for installing target specific .def files as plugin headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43748 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84802] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_decl_expr since r251433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84802 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/49854] Clean up SPE/e500 option handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/48957] GCC's handling of include-fixed does not work well with --sysroot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48957 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/47315] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable insn) with -mvzeroupper and __attribute__((target("avx")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47315 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/33979] support for char16_t, char32_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/23551] dwarf records for inlines appear incomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23551 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/83939 -- Enforce F2018 C15100

On 03/11/2018 01:48 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: The attach patch enforces F2018:C15100. Similar constraints are present in older versions of the standard. The patch and testcase are sufficiently explanatory. Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit? Looks OK Steve. Jerry

Re: Patch ping (Re: [PATCH PR82965/PR83991]Fix invalid profile count in vectorization peeling)

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Paul Hua wrote: >> It's looks fixed >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965#c12 on mips64el. > Hmm, is it fixed? or is it exposed now on mips64el? I

[Bug middle-end/84823] New: [6 Regression?] x86 LRA hang on valid code (no ICE) with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823 Bug ID: 84823 Summary: [6 Regression?] x86 LRA hang on valid code (no ICE) with -fno-omit-frame-pointer Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 --- Comment #6 from Neil Carlson --- Thank you, thank you Paul! This also fixes my test case for PR83118 which I think must have been due to the same underlying problem

gcc-8-20180311 is now available

Snapshot gcc-8-20180311 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20180311/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 11 22:25:11 2018 New Revision: 258438 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258438=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84546 *

[Bug fortran/81849] Size of automatic array argument specified by host-associated variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81849 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/84780] [8 Regression] wrong code aarch64 with -O3 --param=tree-reassoc-width=32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- I have a patch.

[Bug fortran/83939] Constraint C1290 (elemental function cannot be allocatable) not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83939 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Mar 11 21:39:15 2018 New Revision: 258437 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258437=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-11 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- KILL has been at least reviewed for correctness. See r258436 | kargl | 2018-03-11 14:34:40 -0700 (Sun, 11 Mar 2018) | 14 lines 2018-03-11 Steven G. Kargl *

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/84822] New: Partial specializing template internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84822 Bug ID: 84822 Summary: Partial specializing template internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

GSoC 2018 - Adding functions in math.h

> * roundeven is similar to existing functions round / ceil / floor / trunc. > So you'd define built-in functions (roundeven / roundevenf / roundevenl > and _FloatN and _FloatNx variants) similar to those for the older rounding > functions, in builtins.def. Hello, Thanks to all for your inputs

GSoC 2018 - Adding functions in math.h

> * roundeven is similar to existing functions round / ceil / floor / trunc. > So you'd define built-in functions (roundeven / roundevenf / roundevenl > and _FloatN and _FloatNx variants) similar to those for the older rounding > functions, in builtins.def. Hello, Thanks to all for your inputs

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[PATCH] PR fortran/83939 -- Enforce F2018 C15100

The attach patch enforces F2018:C15100. Similar constraints are present in older versions of the standard. The patch and testcase are sufficiently explanatory. Regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. OK to commit? 2018-03-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/83939

[Bug other/84821] [8 Regression] ICE (unable to find a register to spill)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

Re: [PATCH] Fortran -- clean up KILL

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:16:01PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > The attach patch cleans up KILL to match its > > documentation. In doing so, I have changed > > the argument keywords to consistently

[Bug fortran/66128] ICE for some intrinsics with zero sized array parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Mar 11 20:28:00 2018 New Revision: 258435 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258435=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-11 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/66128

Re: [patch, fortran] Some more corrections to zero-size simplification

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hello world, > > the attached patch fixes a few corner cases of a corner case in > simplification, i.e. empty arrays where array intrinsics can actually > have a non-empty array result. > > Regression-tested. OK for

Re: [PATCH] Fortran -- clean up KILL

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > The attach patch cleans up KILL to match its > documentation. In doing so, I have changed > the argument keywords to consistently use > pid and sig. If no one objects, I intend to > commit this tomorrow. >

[Bug fortran/83939] Constraint C1290 (elemental function cannot be allocatable) not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83939 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[patch, fortran] Some more corrections to zero-size simplification

Hello world, the attached patch fixes a few corner cases of a corner case in simplification, i.e. empty arrays where array intrinsics can actually have a non-empty array result. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? Regards Thomas 2017-06-11 Thomas Koenig

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR84546 - [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

On 03/11/2018 12:23 PM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: This regression came about because the vtable deep copy for derived types with unlimited polymorphic components was not making use of the _len parameter to compute the memory to be allocated and the offsets to array elements. The ChangeLogs are

[Patch, fortran] PR84546 - [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

This regression came about because the vtable deep copy for derived types with unlimited polymorphic components was not making use of the _len parameter to compute the memory to be allocated and the offsets to array elements. The ChangeLogs are reasonably self explanatory. Bootstraps and

Re: GSOC 2018 - Textual LTO dump tool project

Hi, Greetings! Please find my draft proposal for GSOC attached herewith. I am very grateful to all of you for your inputs, suggestions and directions. I have tried to assimilate these inputs received from you to convert it into a proposal. Your suggestions in regard with this draft would

[Bug c/84819] several typos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84819 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[wwwdocs] www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu has moved to https (projects/prefetch.html)

It appears I already fixed this weeks, if not months ago, except that actually committing the changes helps? Done now. Gerald Index: projects/prefetch.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/prefetch.html,v retrieving

[wwwdocs] math.nist.gov has moved to https (readings.html)

Applied. Gerald Index: readings.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/readings.html,v retrieving revision 1.290 diff -u -r1.290 readings.html --- readings.html 10 Mar 2018 16:15:35 - 1.290 +++ readings.html

[Bug other/84821] New: [8 Regression] ICE (unable to find a register to spill)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84821 Bug ID: 84821 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE (unable to find a register to spill) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Re: Where and how do I download and install a C/C++ compiler GCC for Windows 10?

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Mauro Roberto Peña Gutiérrez wrote: > The IDE of Eclipse for C/C++ projects development asks me for a route to a > GCC compiler. > > Apparently ALL of the IDEs of Eclipse do NOT include an C/C++ compiler! > > Where do I download a

[Bug c++/84820] New: [6/7/8 Regression] Bogus pointer-to-member accepted within template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84820 Bug ID: 84820 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Bogus pointer-to-member accepted within template Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

Where and how do I download and install a C/C++ compiler GCC for Windows 10?

The IDE of Eclipse for C/C++ projects development asks me for a route to a GCC compiler. Apparently ALL of the IDEs of Eclipse do NOT include an C/C++ compiler! Where do I download a C/C++ compiler from GCC? How do I install it in Windows 10? How do I make the IDE of Eclipse recognize it in

New German PO file for 'gcc' (version 8.1-b20180128)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the German team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po (This file, 'gcc-8.1-b20180128.de.po',

[Bug c++/84816] [7.2.0/8.0.1 x86_64] Incorrect code generation if signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84816 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/84819] New: several typos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84819 Bug ID: 84819 Summary: several typos Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at

[Bug debug/58150] debug info about definition of enum class not emitted if the declaration was already used in a class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 8.1+.

[Bug fortran/84070] Incorrect assignment to allocatable character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84070 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|WAITING

[PATCH] Fortran -- clean up KILL

The attach patch cleans up KILL to match its documentation. In doing so, I have changed the argument keywords to consistently use pid and sig. If no one objects, I intend to commit this tomorrow. 2018-03-11 Steven G. Kargl * check.c (gfc_check_kill): Check pid

[Bug c/84818] New: integer_onep must not be used for i18n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84818 Bug ID: 84818 Summary: integer_onep must not be used for i18n Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug debug/58150] debug info about definition of enum class not emitted if the declaration was already used in a class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Mar 11 16:50:08 2018 New Revision: 258434 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258434=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/58150 * dwarf2out.c (gen_enumeration_type_die): Don't

Re: [PATCH] Fix scoped enum debug info (PR debug/58150)

OK. On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > As the following testcase shows, we emit bad debug info if a scoped > enum is used before the enumerators are defined. > gen_enumeration_type_die has support for enum forward declarations that > have NULL

[Bug target/47105] Some mxl-options have only placeholders as descriptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47105 Roland Illig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roland.illig at gmx dot de --- Comment

[Bug target/79644] Undocumented options in microblaze.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79644 Roland Illig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for some tests compiled with -m32 after r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Another test that does not require -fdefault-integer-8 module chtest contains function chararray2string(chararray) result(text) character(len=1), dimension(:) :: chararray! input

[PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR83789: __builtin_altivec_lvx fails for powerpc for altivec-4.c

PR83789 shows a problem in the builtin expansion code not calling the correct define_insn, given the correct mode (32-bit versus 64-bit). One could add tests in this code to call the correct pattern, but it's easier to create a common define_expand which everyone can call that does the right

[PATCH] Fix bogus strncpy source length warning on source bound by constant

Avoid issuing a bogus warning when the source of strncpy is bound by a constant and is known to be less than the size of the destination. Testsuite run is underway (not complete yet, but no new errors so far) and a bootstrap is also underway, I'll report status once they're both done. gcc/

New Swedish PO file for 'gcc' (version 8.1-b20180128)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po (This file, 'gcc-8.1-b20180128.sv.po',

[Bug target/83984] ld: The value 0x8000000000005 does not fit when applying the relocation DIR21L

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 11 14:44:48 2018 New Revision: 258433 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258433=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-02-14 John David Anglin

[Bug target/83984] ld: The value 0x8000000000005 does not fit when applying the relocation DIR21L

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83984 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 11 14:43:39 2018 New Revision: 258432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258432=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-02-14 John David Anglin

PING^2: [PATCH] x86: Force __x86_indirect_thunk_reg for function call via GOT

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:20 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:39 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> For x86 targets, when -fno-plt is used, external functions are called >> via GOT slot, in 64-bit mode: >> >> [bnd] call/jmp *foo@GOTPCREL(%rip)

PING^2: [PATCH] i386: Don't generate alias for function return thunk

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:17 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> Function return thunks shouldn't be aliased to indirect branch thunks >> since indirect branch thunks are placed in COMDAT section and a COMDAT >>

[Bug other/37210] Discourage Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree more strongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/84817] PR tree-optimization/84526: gcc-8-8-20180310-1 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd by removing "dead" code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84817 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84475] pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on riscv-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84475 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net ---

[Bug c++/61982] Optimizer does not eliminate stores to destroyed objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61982 --- Comment #8 from Avi Kivity --- Still unfixed in trunk.

[Bug fortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 --- Comment #40 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 43624 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43624=edit Changes in gfortran.dg to fix some failures with -fdefault-integer-8 With the three attached patches the

[Bug fortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 --- Comment #39 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 43623 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43623=edit Changes in gfortran.dg/ieee to fix some failures with -fdefault-integer-8

[Bug fortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 --- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 43622 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43622=edit Changes in gfortran.dg/coarray to fix some failures with -fdefault-integer-8

[Bug tree-optimization/84817] New: PR tree-optimization/84526: gcc-8-8-20180310-1 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd by removing "dead" code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84817 Bug ID: 84817 Summary: PR tree-optimization/84526: gcc-8-8-20180310-1 FTBFS on GNU/Hurd by removing "dead" code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

New Spanish PO file for 'gcc' (version 8.1-b20180128)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po (This file, 'gcc-8.1-b20180128.es.po',

Re: [wwwdocs] AVR entry in readings.htmls

This is a new one. http://www.microchip.com/design-centers/8-bit/microchip-avr-mcus 2018-03-10 20:15 GMT+04:00 Gerald Pfeifer : > It appears this link at atmel.com has been taken down without > what appears a replacement, so I applied the patch below. > > Denis, if you have a