On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Chandler Carruth chandl...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Richard Smith rich...@metafoo.co.uk
wrote:
[Crossposted to both GCC and Clang dev lists]
Hi,
One issue facing library authors wanting to use C++11's constexpr feature
is that
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
On 07/03/2012 09:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
2) Object layout changes to std::list and std::basic_string. For these
types, there is no way to both retain backward compatibility with older
C++98 code and
I've posted this to http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility. I
would greatly appreciate any corrections or improvements.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@googlers.com wrote:
I've put together the following description of C++98/11 ABI
(in)compatibility, so people
I've put together the following description of C++98/11 ABI
(in)compatibility, so people can tell which libraries need to be
recompiled. This is useful when you've bought a library that didn't
come with source code, and you're trying to figure out if you need to
buy a new version. I think this
Looks good to me. Yay for kicking the can down the road. ;)
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
To be applied to google/gcc-4_7.
Allow static const floats unless -pedantic is passed.
This patch allows us to migrate to C++11 more incrementally, since we can
Could you try to get this into mainline instead of just the google
branches? In http://gcc.gnu.org/PR52538, Jonathan sounded like he'd
consider accepting it.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Add new option, -Wreserved-user-defined-literal.
This option, which
be
accepted into trunk.
Ollie
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
wrote:
Could you try to get this into mainline instead of just the google
branches? In http://gcc.gnu.org/PR52538, Jonathan sounded like he'd
consider accepting it.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:54 PM
Thanks!
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Okay, I'll send out a trunk patch for review now, too.
Ollie
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com wrote:
Let's let the discussion _start_ before assuming it'll be protracted.
;) I
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
The attached patches fix http://gcc.gnu.org/PR52822, and have been
tested with `make check-c++` on linux-x86_64. The trunk patch applies
and tests cleanly on gcc-4_7-branch. The gcc-4_6-branch patch is
that there's no way to force
get_temporary_buffer to return a short buffer, I'm not sure how to
improve it. It might be possible to use set_memory_limits(), but that
would require a very complex test program to make sure exactly the
right operator new call fails.
Jeffrey Yasskin
be happy to fix up the google branch to match
whatever gets accepted for gcc-4_6-branch once that's decided.
Tested with `make check` on x86-64-linux, and I'll check this against
the build I originally noticed the problem in before committing it.
2012-04-02 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
in valgrind for
each changed location. Some of the insert_aux locations appear
inaccessible because of missing emplace() functions.
I plan to only apply this to the google/gcc-4_6 branch, since gcc-4.7
already makes these cases work properly.
2012-03-30 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Joe Buck joe.b...@synopsys.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:35:17PM -0700, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
C++11 is essentially binary incompatible with C++98.
Only partially.
it in a few hours unless I hear
complaints.
c-family/ChangeLog.google-4_6:
2011-11-02 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
Backport from rev 176665
2011-07-22 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
* c.opt (Wnarrowing): New.
cp/ChangeLog.google-4_6:
2011-11-02 Jeffrey Yasskin
them to use constexpr.
We should NOT forward-port this to any gcc-4.7 branches.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog.google-4_6
2011-10-28 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
google ref 5514746; backport of r179121
Modified locally to only block static const literals in -pedantic
mode
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/05/2011 12:14 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
I see two ways out:
1) Say that accessing a non-volatile atomic through a volatile
reference or pointer causes undefined behavior. The standard doesn't
say
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
I've been working on GCC's C++11 atomic implementation. In discussions with
Lawrence, I've recently discovered a fundamental change in what libstdc++-v3
is likely to provide as far as an implementation.
Previously,
Thanks. Committed to gcc-4_6-branch in r176851 and the google/gcc-4_6
branch in r177072.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes.
Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com wrote:
Thanks. I'll commit to trunk in the morning when I can be around to
watch
And reverted in r177083 because I fixed the underlying problem.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Ok for inclusion in google/gcc-4_6.
Ollie
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com wrote:
For the google/gcc-4_6 branch _only_
Thanks. I'll commit to trunk in the morning when I can be around to
watch for breakage.
Is this also ok for gcc-4_6-branch?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok.
Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com wrote:
Hi Jason. Paolo suggested I ping you directly
to check it in to trunk, and
will propagate it to the gcc-4_6-branch if you think that's the right
thing to do.
No more tests fail than in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-07/msg02995.html.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2011-07-26 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
* pt.c
checker. Until I can
find why the locations are inconsistent, we can work around the
problem by putting the name and closing ')' on the same line.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
2011-07-22 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
* include/bits/stl_heap.h(make_heap): Remove a newline.
Index: libstdc
-c++` on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
2011-06-14 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
Merge r173574 to google/gcc-4_6.
* include/c_global/cmath (acosh, asinh, atanh, cbrt, copysign,
erf, erfc, exp2, expm1, fdim, fma, fmax, hypot, ilogb, lgamma,
llrint, llround, log1p
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:45, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com wrote:
In C++0x mode, without this patch, calls to a user-defined trunc() function
with an argument in namespace std and
a parameter type that has
:
`make -k check-c++` on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. (still running)
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2011-04-06 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
* include/ext/algorithm (is_sorted): In C++0x mode import from
namespace std.
* include/ext/numeric (iota): In C++0x mode import from
this change.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2011-03-31 Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@google.com
* libsupc++/exception_ptr.h: Forward-declare std::type_info.
* libsupc++/nested_exception.h (__throw_with_nested): Remove a
redundant default argument from std::__throw_with_nested.
diff
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Paolo Carlini
paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
On 03/31/2011 09:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think this is a candidate to backport to libstdc++-4.6.1.
exception_ptr.h needs the forward declaration because it's
included fromtypeinfo beforetypeinfo defines
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:49, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, as it is non-invasive trying it is ok. I just wanted to see if it
fixes any existing problem - it does not seem to (apart from
28 matches
Mail list logo
