On 29/05/2013 9:41 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
Maybe I misunderstood... there's currently a (very small) cache
(unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c) that lives behind the loader mutex. It contains 8
entries and each entry holds
On 29/05/2013 4:13 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
I have a large C++ app that throws exceptions to unwind anywhere from 5-20
stack frames when
On 29/05/2013 3:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:02:27AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Note, swapping the order of dl_iterate_phdr and _Unwind_Find_registered_FDE
IMHO is fine.
I think what you're saying is that the p_eh_frame_hdr field could
end up with a dangling
On 29/05/2013 9:41 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
Maybe I misunderstood... there's currently a (very small) cache
(unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c) that lives behind the loader mutex. It contains 8
entries and each entry holds
On 28/05/2013 8:47 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
I have a large C++ app that throws exceptions to unwind anywhere from 5-20
stack frames when an error prevents the request from being served (which
happens rather
On 28/05/2013 11:05 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:19:48PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 28/05/2013 8:47 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
I'm bringing the issue up here, rather than filing a bug
On 28/05/2013 11:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
That last point makes me really wonder why we bother grabbing the mutex
during unwind at all... at the very least, it would seem profitable to
verify the object
On 29/05/2013 12:01 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
For example, it should be reasonably safe to let __cxa_allocate_exception
call dl_iterate_phdr in order to build a list of object headers valid at the
time unwind
Hi all,
(please CC me in replies, not a list member)
I have a large C++ app that throws exceptions to unwind anywhere from
5-20 stack frames when an error prevents the request from being served
(which happens rather frequently). Works fine single-threaded, but
performance is terrible for 24
Hi all,
(Please CC me in replies, not a list member)
I'd like to use libbacktrace in a C++ app built by gcc-4.8.0 [1], but it
seems that the target library doesn't actually get installed, even
though it's built.
Is there a reason user C/C++ apps shouldn't be able to incorporate
On 17/05/2013 6:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ryan Johnson
ryan.john...@cs.utoronto.ca wrote:
Is there a reason user C/C++ apps shouldn't be able to incorporate
libbacktrace, or is it just an oversight/TODO? It works beautifully if I
copy the relevant files
Eric wrote:
Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
You're up against three factors here. First, the sparc64 platform ABI
specifies 32-bit executables unless the user specifically asks for
64-bit. I'm really unclear on why
On 10/11/2012 3:51 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Eric wrote:
Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
You're up against three factors here. First, the sparc64 platform ABI
specifies 32-bit executables unless the user specifically
On 10/11/2012 4:54 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10 November 2012 20:51, Dennis Clarke wrote:
So 32-bit gcc works just fine. However I need a pile of libs all over the
place ( gmp, mpfr, mpc, etc etc ) for this to work
No you don't. If you put gmp, mpfr and mpc in the GCC source tree, or
14 matches
Mail list logo
