I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed
I sent the patch. Send it once more.
2013/1/11 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386
Kirill,
Could you commit patch?
2013-01-11 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL): New
Hello Uros,
It seems I didn't sent a patch with last changes. Sorry if so.
Vladimir
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386
I fixed typos and added CalangeLog.
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL
I did changes. Please take a look.
2012/12/29, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com
wrote:
processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
corei7, corei7-avx, core-avx-i and core-avx2. At least, it has
Hello,
processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
corei7, corei7-avx, core-avx-i and core-avx2. At least, it has
consequence on checking x86_avx256_split_unaligned_load
ix86_tune_mask: for all these processors it results the same. Moreover
we cannot turn new features on for
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com
Date: 2012/11/9
Subject: Re: [off-list] Re: [PATCH] Vzeroupper placement/47440
To: Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Копия: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com
I did changes that moves
Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com
wrote:
I did changes that moves vzeroupper insertion after reload
2012-11-09 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* i386/i386-protos.h
Hello,
Thanyou for investigation and fixing the problem. I'll answer on remarks later.
Regards,
Vladimir
2012/11/7 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:11:50PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
you,
Vladimir
2012/11/7 Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Thanyou for investigation and fixing the problem. I'll answer on remarks
later.
Regards,
Vladimir
2012/11/7 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:11:50PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6
, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of GCC.
2012/11/5 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@rr.iij4u.or.jp:
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2012-11-04 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* mode-switching.c
2012/9/30 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com
wrote:
The compiler with the patch and without post_reload.patch is built and works
successfully. It has
Will we wait for LRA commit or is it possiple to commit to trank
vzeroupper patch now?
2012/10/2 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com
wrote:
The compiler with the patch and without post_reload.patch is built and
works
be in vacation till end of nonth.
Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com writes:
I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument of
EMIT_MODE_SET. Is it good fo trunk?
I'm not sure I understand why you need
I tried to perform vzeroupper emitting after reload as additional pass
of mode switching.
I sow one problem that I don't know haw to overcome. After
'pro_and_epilogue', there can be no
flow edge to exit block and pre_exit block is not created in this case
(see rotine create_pre_exit).
Without that
Looks OK to me, though I have no authority to approve it
except SH specific part.
Is there any more comments? Can it be committed in trank?
Regards,
Vladimir
2012/9/14 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@rr.iij4u.or.jp:
Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com wrote:
I reproduced the failure and found reason
Hello,
I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument of
EMIT_MODE_SET. Is it good fo trunk?
Thank you,
Vladimir
2012-09-14 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* (optimize_mode_switching
/configure
--prefix=/export/users/vbyakovl/workspaces/vzu/install-middle
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
2012/9/14 Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument
Thank you for testing.
With commenting out if (i != mode) of the hunk
I changed type of transp and added this checking because if we reset
transp[mode], then later in the loop
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
sbitmap_not (kill[bb-index], transp[i][bb-index]);
we set kill of the bb for that mode
=/export/users/vbyakovl/workspaces/vzu/install-ref
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7
--with-fpmath=sse
Ok for trank.
2012-08-25 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* mode-switching.c (transp): Changed type
(make_preds_opaque): Added
This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it
really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact
actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple
misprint.
Please look.
Vladimir
2011/9/30 Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakov...@gmail.com:
This patch fixes
Could anyone checkin that?
Thanks,
Vladimir
2011/10/14 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
Hello!
This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it
really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact
actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple
This patch fixes performance regression with -mtune=atom. Changing
atom cost removes regression in several tests of EEMBC and spec2000.
Bootstrap amd make check Ok for both with and witout -mtune-atom.
OK for trunk?
2011-09-30 Yakovlev Vladimir vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
*
Hi,
Following test fails in linking if compiled with ffast-math and O0,
but it compiled successfully with ffast-math and O2. Also no problem
if -lm is added.
$ cat t.c
#include stdio.h
float foo(float x)
{
float y = 0;
while (x 0.0001) {
y += x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x;
x =
Hi Steven,
I need a separate pass because the transformation on vzeroupper
redandancy elemination must be performed when reload is completed.
I think it is possible to make it as a separate pass in ix86-reorg if
the phase works after reload.
Thaks,
Vladimir
2011/7/19 Steven Bosscher
Hi Uros,
Thank you for such a detailed explanation. I'll study it.
Regards,
Vladimir
2011/7/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
Hello!
? ? ? ?* a/gcc/gcse.c (alloc_gcse_mem): Added code to run in PRE2.
And this is necessary because...???
Why not just make it a separate pass in ix86-reorg
27 matches
Mail list logo
