http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52715
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13
09:36:46 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012
New Revision: 186410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186410
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52715
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13
09:36:47 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 13 09:36:42 2012
New Revision: 186410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186410
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-27
13:06:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
It's failing not only on sh, but on x86-64 too, started with (no surprise
here)
r185564
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-27
13:28:03 UTC ---
So, something like the below patch, or even better -- as we want to fold all
RTL-build related pseudo passes into expand, make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-27
14:08:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Looks reasonable. Though I think that whoever removed the fallthru
edge should have adjusted the flags on the others.
That's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52715
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-07
12:00:42 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Mar 7 12:00:37 2012
New Revision: 185036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185036
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
07:31:49 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Mar 6 07:31:43 2012
New Revision: 184975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184975
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-27
13:03:58 UTC ---
When removing an empty block, we need to find its neighbour to stick the bb
note list to, and the code doing this now just picks some pred block from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22
18:49:15 UTC ---
I'll take a look on Friday, tomorrow I am off work. Indeed I do not remember
seeing these notes at the assert time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13
08:48:35 UTC ---
Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and
*avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks correct as the
manual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
06:56:10 UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't explain clearly from the start. Regarding the backend, I just
wanted to double check that for the given insn not having a reservation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
10:10:41 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:10:36 2012
New Revision: 184038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184038
Log:
2012-02-09 Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09
10:17:59 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Feb 9 10:17:55 2012
New Revision: 184040
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184040
Log:
2012-02-09 Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-06
08:32:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Seems you forgot to actually add the test case.
Thanks, I forgot to svn add, fixed in 183928.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-06
12:10:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Can this be applied to 4.5/4.6 please?
Well, the patch was approved for trunk only, but it is committed for two weeks
now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27
13:47:45 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Jan 27 13:47:41 2012
New Revision: 183624
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183624
Log:
PR middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25
13:20:47 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Jan 25 13:20:43 2012
New Revision: 183519
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183519
Log:
gcc:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24
09:08:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26441
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26441
Proposed patch
The patch described above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19
09:28:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
By the way I think we could get cases where the user wrote volatile in one
case
and non-volatile in another so fixing up
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20
06:22:31 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Jan 20 06:22:24 2012
New Revision: 183325
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183325
Log:
gcc:/
2012-01-20 Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18
09:46:41 UTC ---
This seems like an overkill as we only need to remove a single vector. The
below helper looks enough:
+/* Remove the EQ_USES vector for INSN assuming
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18
12:02:36 UTC ---
No problem -- I will go back to df_notes_rescan and repost to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-19
07:29:25 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Jan 19 07:29:18 2012
New Revision: 183296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183296
Log:
gcc/:
2012-01-19 Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-17
16:05:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 26353
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26353
untested patch
I've tried to implement what Paolo suggests, the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26353|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-12
12:12:40 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jul 12 12:12:36 2011
New Revision: 176197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176197
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-28
12:46:37 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Jun 28 12:46:34 2011
New Revision: 175582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175582
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-20
11:56:11 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:56:08 2011
New Revision: 175207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175207
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #24 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
15:08:55 UTC ---
Thanks for reminder, I've started bootstap and test on ia64 and x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25
07:59:09 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed May 25 07:59:06 2011
New Revision: 174172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174172
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-17
14:20:52 UTC ---
That patch is most likely just exposed a sel-sched bug or a target bug. I will
be looking at it tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-06
06:24:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Sounds like either ia64 must clear the disable-schedule flag on all basic
blocks, or sms must be fixed to set TImode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-06
12:33:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Or schedule_block could have a mode of preserving the existing insn order,
which can also be useful
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27
08:10:12 UTC ---
The patch from 4.5 can likely be ported to 4.4 somewhat easy, however, it is
big enough and I am not sure that there will be any more releases off
4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-27
10:04:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 24112
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24112
backported patch
Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
06:42:22 UTC ---
Just to remind the middle-end folks that stage 1 is a fine time for deciding on
middle-end volatile semantics, before we forget about this for another 6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
13:25:35 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 8 13:25:29 2011
New Revision: 172183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172183
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:50:12 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:50:08 2011
New Revision: 172077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172077
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:51:52 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:51:49 2011
New Revision: 172078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172078
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518
--- Comment #15 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:52:33 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:52:29 2011
New Revision: 172079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172079
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:53:48 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:53:44 2011
New Revision: 172080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172080
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46602
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:54:25 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:54:23 2011
New Revision: 172081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172081
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:56:50 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:56:47 2011
New Revision: 172082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172082
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:58:31 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:58:29 2011
New Revision: 172083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172083
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
06:59:21 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:59:19 2011
New Revision: 172084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172084
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46875
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:00:15 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:00:10 2011
New Revision: 172085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172085
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:01:30 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:01:25 2011
New Revision: 172086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172086
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:02:40 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:02:34 2011
New Revision: 172087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172087
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:04:10 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172088
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:04:10 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172088
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #29 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:04:09 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:04:02 2011
New Revision: 172088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172088
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
07:05:19 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:05:16 2011
New Revision: 172089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172089
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48215
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48442
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
08:00:28 UTC ---
And some of our sel-sched-ir.h helpers can be moved to cfgloop.c as well (e.g.
get_loop_exit_edges_unique_dests).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-07
12:07:29 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Apr 7 12:07:24 2011
New Revision: 172097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172097
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-01
11:07:47 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 1 11:07:44 2011
New Revision: 171825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171825
Log:
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-31
11:44:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Do you plan to backport this to 4.6 branch?
Sure, I was just waiting for 4.6.0 to take off.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-26
11:40:54 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Sat Mar 26 11:40:51 2011
New Revision: 171555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171555
Log:
PR rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-22
12:34:02 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Mar 22 12:33:53 2011
New Revision: 171286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171286
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-22
15:58:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 23751
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23751
Current patch
The ICE turned out to be the new one. We are updating
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-21
12:07:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Andrey,
I was just looking at PR 48191, a bug submitted against GCC 4.5.2. It looks
like it is caused by the same problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47489
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #27 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13
09:29:13 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Jan 13 09:29:09 2011
New Revision: 168742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168742
Log:
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46642
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #14 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13
10:04:18 UTC ---
Do we want at least the patch properly merging the volatile bits in the
scheduler for 4.6? Or is this better be s plain ICE instead of a silent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-24
08:23:07 UTC ---
Zdenek, please don't worry about the set of flags, it does not make fixing the
problem any harder, and your work on finding these is invaluable for us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #22 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-21
12:10:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22834
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22834
Another patch
This patch should fix the last attachment from this bug
201 - 300 of 323 matches
Mail list logo