H.J.: please see last.
> From: Jean Lee
> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 20:22:45 +0800
> > See above regarding looking at patches, but I guess you mean
> > that the patch is trivial, so then I presume it was more or less
> > the same as this, which is basically a copy-paste from
> See above regarding looking at patches, but I guess you mean
> that the patch is trivial, so then I presume it was more or less
> the same as this, which is basically a copy-paste from looking
> at rs6000 and xtensa. I checked a typical /proc/self/maps and
> guess that 1<<29 probably fits for
TL;DR: see last sentence.
> From: Jean Lee
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 19:56:59 +0800
> 2018-03-03 21:14 GMT+08:00 Hans-Peter Nilsson :
>
> > > From: Jean Lee
> > > Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:29:39 +0800
> > > It is great to
2018-03-03 21:14 GMT+08:00 Hans-Peter Nilsson :
> > From: Jean Lee
> > Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:29:39 +0800
>
> > 2018-03-02 7:53 GMT+08:00 Hans-Peter Nilsson <
> hans-peter.nils...@axis.com>:
> >
> > > There's no address-sanitizer support for
> From: Jean Lee
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:29:39 +0800
> 2018-03-02 7:53 GMT+08:00 Hans-Peter Nilsson :
>
> > There's no address-sanitizer support for MIPS (in particular for
> > O32) on trunk, at least not when building for
> >
2018-03-02 7:53 GMT+08:00 Hans-Peter Nilsson :
> There's no address-sanitizer support for MIPS (in particular for
> O32) on trunk, at least not when building for
> mipsisa32r2el-linux-gnu and libsanitizer/configure.tgt seems
> to support that observation. There's a
There's no address-sanitizer support for MIPS (in particular for
O32) on trunk, at least not when building for
mipsisa32r2el-linux-gnu and libsanitizer/configure.tgt seems
to support that observation. There's a set of patches "floating
around", but the last sign of work-in-progress was more than