Re: Memory dependence

2013-06-11 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:07 AM, shmeel gutl shmeelg...@shmuelhome.mine.nu wrote: In the architecture that I am using, there is a big pipeline penalty for read after write to the same memory location. Is it possible to tell the difference between a possible memory conflict and a definite memory

Memory dependence

2013-06-10 Thread shmeel gutl
In the architecture that I am using, there is a big pipeline penalty for read after write to the same memory location. Is it possible to tell the difference between a possible memory conflict and a definite memory conflict?

Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix violation of memory dependence

2011-06-15 Thread Revital Eres
Hello, better do   else if (!mem_read_insn_p (to-insn)) +       create_ddg_dep_no_link (g, from, to, ANTI_DEP, MEM_DEP, 0); +    } Done. Committed to -r175090. Thanks, Revital

Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix violation of memory dependence

2011-06-14 Thread Ayal Zaks
Revital Eres revital.e...@linaro.org wrote on 13/06/2011 10:29:06 AM: From: Revital Eres revital.e...@linaro.org To: Ayal Zaks/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Patch Tracking patc...@linaro.org Date: 13/06/2011 10:29 AM Subject: [PATCH, SMS] Fix violation of memory dependence

[PATCH, SMS] Fix violation of memory dependence

2011-06-13 Thread Revital Eres
Hello, The attached patch fixes violation of memory dependencies. The problematic scenario happens when -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves flag is set and certain anti-dep edges are not created. For example, consider the following three instructions and the edges between them. When