Hi Winfried,
> [..]
> > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person
> [..]
>
> others like me might see it different:
> Spam discarding is evil and often hits an innocent person.
>
> Silently discarding a legal mail because of false spam-detection is
> the worst case
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > You mean as with a failure response given to the SMTP DATA command?
> > This is actually equally evil as the resulting bounce (i.e. a delivery
> > failure notification, or a flood of them, once other MTAs have joined in a
> > response to a mass
* Maciej W. Rozycki:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person whose address has
>> > been faked by the sender of spam, making the source of bounces not better
>> > than the originator.
>>
>> I expect this to be an SMTP-level
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person whose address has
> > been faked by the sender of spam, making the source of bounces not better
> > than the originator.
>
> I expect this to be an SMTP-level rejection, not a bounce.
Am 21.03.20 um 21:29 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc:
Hi -
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list
* Maciej W. Rozycki:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
>
>> > > So, a request: Could the overseers either install more effective
>> > > spam protection for the list as a whole (preferred)
>>
>> Heh, if only it were that easy! Spam filtering was and is distinct
>> from
Hello Maciej,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 09:22:31PM +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
[..]
> Spam bouncing is evil and often hits an innocent person
[..]
others like me might see it different:
Spam discarding is evil and often hits an innocent person.
Silently discarding a legal
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 13:08 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:40 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc <
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> >
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
> > > So, a request: Could the overseers either install more effective
> > > spam protection for the list as a whole (preferred)
>
> Heh, if only it were that easy! Spam filtering was and is distinct
> from mailing list processing, and as you
Hi -
> > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> > and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
> > bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
> > confirmed it (which I then
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:40 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> > and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
> > bounces and that I would
Hi,
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
confirmed it (which I then did).
This has now
12 matches
Mail list logo
