Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:23:30PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >>By the way, the public-inbox software >>(), as recently mentioned in a >>different thread discussing deficiencies of

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi! On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > By the way, the public-inbox software > (), as recently mentioned in a > different thread discussing deficiencies of Mailman's Pipermail, also > does support this: >

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:56:04PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>>I was thinking we might be able to trick pipermail (the web archiver >>>component) to simply name the message web urls after some function of >>>the message-id instead of the sequence number. Will give this a try >>>very

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi - > >I was thinking we might be able to trick pipermail (the web archiver > >component) to simply name the message web urls after some function of > >the message-id instead of the sequence number. Will give this a try > >very shortly. > > I just want to go on record as saying that I think

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 06:14:55AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>Such a service is not currently available on sourceware, but it'd be >>possible to implement: as messages come in, you'd build a database >>mapping from the Message-ID header to "current Mailman's Pipermail >>URL". > >I was

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >On 2020-05-06T10:44:46-0400, "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc" > wrote: >>>Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really need those, we >>>reference those in commit messages, other mails, bugzilla etc. > >>It would be good to have

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi - > Such a service is not currently available on sourceware, but it'd be > possible to implement: as messages come in, you'd build a database > mapping from the Message-ID header to "current Mailman's Pipermail URL". I was thinking we might be able to trick pipermail (the web archiver

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi! On 2020-05-06T10:44:46-0400, "Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc" wrote: >> Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >> need those, we reference those in commit messages, other mails, bugzilla >> etc. > It would be good to have another way of making permanent URLs for > individual

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:54:06PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote: >may I also chime in with a related (to some extent), even though a separate >issue? It seems URL rewriting rules designed to replace old-style > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml//current > >URLs pointing to monthly digests to current ones >

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:11:39PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >Hi! > >Last week after sending status report mails to gcc mailing list, >I've opened the web archive and copied the URLs of those status reports >https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232267.html

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi, >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html >> Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small >> numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like >> 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >> need those, we

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi, >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html >> Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small >> numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like >> 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really >> need those, we

Re: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs

Hi - > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html > Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small > numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like > 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really > need those, we