On 9/26/07, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a possibility, but I don't want to commit at this point. We can
have a look at it when you submit it and decide. However, in general,
introducing churn for the sake of a
On Oct 1, 2007, Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you develop this more in the open to allow contribution,
facititate further review and make merging it to 4.4 less pain?
Sure! I'm very glad you asked ;-)
I've just created the var-tracking-assignments branch, and I'll check
my
On 10/1/07, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you develop this more in the open to allow contribution,
facititate further review and make merging it to 4.4 less pain?
Sure! I'm very glad you asked ;-)
I've just
On Sep 11, 2007, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a possibility, but I don't want to commit at this point. We can
have a look at it when you submit it and decide. However, in general,
introducing churn for the sake of a feature that will be off by default
isn't something that I
On Aug 9, 2007, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We entered Stage 2 on July 6th. I plan to put us into Stage 3 on
September 10th. At that point, we will accept only bug-fixes -- no
more new features until Stage 1 for GCC 4.4.
I was hoping I'd have the new debug info infrastructure,
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
I think it would be nice to offer this new debug info generation
machinery, at least as an option, in GCC 4.3, so I'd like to request
some more time to make it fully functional before I post the very
large patches.
Thank you for letting me know.
Making it optional
