On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
Thanks for the patch!
On 2012-09-13 08:46 , Richard Guenther wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/builtin-location.C
===
*** /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0
If you link with -rdynamic you can show a backtrace with something
like the attached code.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
I've spent the last couple of days working on a stack backtrace library.
It uses the GCC unwind interface to collect a stack
On 2012-09-13 16:46:04 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
But if you want an example, I don't think that the formatOf
arithmetic operations (IEEE 754-2008 §5.4.1 -- that's a shall)
are implemented by GCC, either for binary or for decimal, say
add two
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.2-RC-20120914
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 191287.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-linux. Please test it and report
The GCC 4.7 branch is now frozen for creating a first release candidate
of the GCC 4.7.2 release.
All changes need explicit release manager approval until the final
release of GCC 4.7.2 which should happen roughly one week after
the release candidate if no issues show up with it.
Previous
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
round-to-odd would be a good solution if it were provided directly
in hardware. Otherwise a direct implementation would probably be
more efficient (in particular when the implementation of the usual
operation is done in software, like for decimal
I added some reference returning member functions in cgraph.h,
and now Ada appears to break while including cgraph.h. Huh?
gnatbind -nostdinc -I- -I. -Iada -I../../src2/gcc/ada
-I../../src2/gcc/ada/gcc-interface -o b_gnat1.adb -n ada/gnat1drv.ali
mv b_gnat1.adb b_gnat1.ads ada/
build/gengtype -S
I added some reference returning member functions in cgraph.h,
and now Ada appears to break while including cgraph.h. Huh?
I suspect you are doing a parallel build (make -jxx), and the error is actually
unrelated to the lines you quoted, but occurs above.
Do a 'make' and you'll see the error
Hi,
I know most compilers go from AST to CFG.
I am writing a decompiler, so I was wondering if anyone knew of any
documents describing how best to get from CFG to AST.
The decompiler project is open source.
https://github.com/jcdutton/libbeauty
The decompiler already contains a disassembler and
On 9/14/12, Arnaud Charlet char...@adacore.com wrote:
I added some reference returning member functions in cgraph.h,
and now Ada appears to break while including cgraph.h. Huh?
I suspect you are doing a parallel build (make -jxx), and the error
is actually unrelated to the lines you quoted,
thanks for sharing, will check this out.
mike
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:05 PM, James Courtier-Dutton
james.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know most compilers go from AST to CFG.
I am writing a decompiler, so I was wondering if anyone knew of any
documents describing how best to get from CFG
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120914 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120914/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
06:05:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Manuel, what do you think about this? I see the warning happening because the
underlying type of Code is unsigned int.
Isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #22 from Jörg Richter joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de 2012-09-14 07:58:16
UTC ---
I have reduced a real live case. But still using vector.
$ cat t.cc
#include vector
struct ClassicUpdate
{
ClassicUpdate();
};
typedef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54578
Bug #: 54578
Summary: [OOP] -Wunused-function warnings for __copy functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
08:34:52 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54571
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
11:42:00 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Sep 14 11:41:53 2012
New Revision: 191294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191294
Log:
Check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth at gmail dot com 2012-09-14
11:48:56 UTC ---
Would this do? ;-)
..
templatetypename _From, typename _To
struct is_convertible { static const bool value = true; };
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-14
12:00:21 UTC ---
Fantastic, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:16:59 UTC ---
H.J., could you please review the fmaintrin.h changes of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00921.html
(Uros wanted your feedback on that). Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:22:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:22:27 2012
New Revision: 191295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191295
Log:
2012-09-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:36:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:36:33 2012
New Revision: 191297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191297
Log:
PR target/54564
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:36:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:36:33 2012
New Revision: 191297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191297
Log:
PR target/54564
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:37:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:37:16 2012
New Revision: 191298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191298
Log:
PR target/54564
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
12:40:37 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, backport also tested on the 4.7 branch, but as 4.7.2-rc1 is in
the works, I'll defer it for after 4.7.2 is released.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 12:44:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Fixed
Thank you.
(in case you have a testcase feel free to add it).
Mostly I could tweak the last forwprop-xx.c tests to dump an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54546
--- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 13:22:34 UTC ---
Author: chrbr
Date: Fri Sep 14 13:22:29 2012
New Revision: 191301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191301
Log:
PR target/54546
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #46 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
13:28:52 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Sep 14 13:28:44 2012
New Revision: 191302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191302
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579
Bug #: 54579
Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:42:44 UTC ---
--- Comment #26 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 14:19:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:44:22 UTC ---
--- Comment #27 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 14:56:46 UTC ---
FWIW, I just filed the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:49:28 UTC ---
--- Comment #28 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 17:32:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:51:58 UTC ---
--- Comment #30 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-09-01 08:18:06 UTC ---
I commented out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:54:42 UTC ---
--- Comment #32 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-09-01 11:22:55 UTC ---
Went back to 4.5.0 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
13:55:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Martin,
Have you done any more digging on this? I just discovered that cpu2006
benchmark 471.omnetpp suffers the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
14:07:21 UTC ---
Wconversion does not warn either, but it also does not warn for:
enum Code {
SUCCESS=-1
};
Code a;
void foo(void)
{
unsigned int r;
r = a;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #38 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-09-14 14:43:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
I've no idea why gmp 4.3.x or 5.x works for you: both fail make check
for me if built with gcc 4.4.2. I've not yet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
Bug #: 54580
Summary: 64-bit pointer to int cast fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
16:59:21 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 14 16:59:10 2012
New Revision: 191304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191304
Log:
c:
PR c/54103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
17:07:50 UTC ---
C++ is not C.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54516
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
17:10:53 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
New Revision: 191307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191307
Log:
PR target/54516
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
17:10:53 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
New Revision: 191307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191307
Log:
PR target/54516
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 17:17:08
UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:17:01 2012
New Revision: 191308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191308
Log:
2012-09-14 Marc Glisse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 17:22:24
UTC ---
Progress :-)
Documentation update is needed.
Next useful one would be ?: so we can generate vec_cond_expr. See the OpenCL
specification for a list of what's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #48 from Chip Salzenberg chip at pobox dot com 2012-09-14
17:23:08 UTC ---
May Shub-Internet not see you as you pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-09-14 17:38:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Would this do? ;-)
..
templatetypename _From, typename _To
struct is_convertible { static const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54581
Bug #: 54581
Summary: decltype and opaque vector types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-14
18:22:17 UTC ---
Ah, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
18:25:52 UTC ---
I tend to agree; this isn't the only place in the middle-end this could cause
trouble. The handling of pow/powf in reassociation comes to mind as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
18:30:18 UTC ---
Seems the C++ FE ignores the nothrow attribute from builtins and instead just
uses its own cfns.gperf. pow is in there, but powf/powl is not (as C++03 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
Bug #: 54582
Summary: gap in FORTIFY checking of buffer lengths
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54583
Bug #: 54583
Summary: Spurious warning: value computed is not used with
variable-size array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
Bug #: 54584
Summary: m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #28 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-09-14 20:52:14
UTC ---
Created attachment 28194
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28194
Patch for trunk version 2012-09-09 of gcc/config/m68k/uclinux.h
To fix the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487
--- Comment #32 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 21:06:54 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Fri Sep 14 21:06:49 2012
New Revision: 191312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191312
Log:
Backport from trunk r190952 to add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54585
Bug #: 54585
Summary: stack space allocated but never used when calling
functions that return structs in registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
21:17:00 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 14 21:16:56 2012
New Revision: 191313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191313
Log:
c:
PR c/54552
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
21:20:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28195
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28195
reduced testcase
Further reduced testcase that triggers on either C/C++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
--- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
23:23:45 UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Sep 14 23:23:41 2012
New Revision: 191316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191316
Log:
PR target/38607
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
Bug #: 54586
Summary: Help diagnosing error: Link tests are not allowed
after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15
00:28:08 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Sep 15 00:28:05 2012
New Revision: 191336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191336
Log:
PR c/54103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-15
00:29:31 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Sep 15 00:29:28 2012
New Revision: 191337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191337
Log:
PR c/54552
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE at |[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
--- Comment #1 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-09-15 00:39:14 UTC
---
I found that the -msep-data link would succeed if program section
.tm_clone_table has a non-zero length.
I changed __JCR_LIST__[] and __TMC_LIST__[] to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #29 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-09-15 05:41:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 28196
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28196
Patches for Sourcery (Mentor Graphics) CodeBench Lite GCC 4.6-2011.09-23
Patches
Hello,
I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument of
EMIT_MODE_SET. Is it good fo trunk?
Thank you,
Vladimir
2012-09-14 Vladimir Yakovlev vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
*
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 13, 2012, at 6:52 AM, Robert Dewar de...@adacore.com wrote:
Sure, it is obvious that you don't want -g to affect -O1 or -O2 code,
but I think if you have -Og (if and when we have that), it would not
be a bad thing
Richard,
I've tried to handle more LSHIFT_EXPR cases with a shift range in tree-vrp.
Currently we handle cases like this:
- non-negative shifting out zeros
[5, 6] [1, 2]
== [10, 24]
This patch adds these cases:
- unsigned shifting out ones
[0xff00, 0x] [1, 2]
==
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:27:27AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81-2.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp82.c: Same.
Why not vrp82.c, vrp83.c and vrp84.c (and rename the recently added
vrp80-2.c test to vrp81.c)?
On 14/09/12 09:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:27:27AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81-2.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp82.c: Same.
Why not vrp82.c, vrp83.c and vrp84.c (and rename the recently added
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:51:48AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 14/09/12 09:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:27:27AM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp81-2.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp82.c: Same.
Why
Additionaly.
You can find the patch history in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01590.html.
I need this changes for my implementation of vzeroupper placement:
for some statements I have no needs doing real insertion.
I tested the changes on bootstrap using config
I think it's going to make GCC harder to maintain if we drop the -g0
vs. -g no-code-difference requirement for just some optimization
levels.
Seconded, this is surely going to open yet another can of worms.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:50:31AM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
A few quick comments,
1) Although mmap is not guaranteed to be async-signal-safe, in
practice it should be as you mentioned previously. However I see that
when using mmap, the implementation uses pthread mutexes. These are
not
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
for a followup (and I bet sth else than PRE blows up at -O2 as well).
Actually, the only thing that really blows up is that enemy
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:46:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
There is no reason why --eh-frame-hdr can't be used with static
executable on Linux. This patch enables --eh-frame-hdr for static
Well, there is. For more than 2 years after the addition of --eh-frame-hdr
support dl_iterate_phdr in
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
for a followup (and I bet sth else than PRE blows up at -O2 as well).
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
