Foone Turing wrote:
This page: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/
under release history says GCC 4.8 was released on March 22, 2012.
This should be 2013, not 2012.
Thanks for the report! I have corrected it now.
Tobias
Index: index.html
sorry, The numbers were too good, something was wrong in my setup.
thanks, Dinar,
before:
Base Base Base Peak
Peak Peak
BenchmarksRef Time Run Time RatioRef Time Run Time Ratio
Hello,
I have been investigating gcc and gprof interaction.
I have noticed something strange, even though I cannot reproduce an example.
In certain situations, GCC will produce functions called foo.isra.0 or
foo.constprop.0.
These function names are created by clone_function_name where suffix
Dear gcc-developers,
The attachment is a sample source code that shows an error of
gcc-optimization(O2, O3 and Os).
gcc version 4.4.7 20120313
Best regards,
chenzhi
//
// Name: hello.cpp
// Author : chenzhi
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:48 AM, chenzhi chenzh...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear gcc-developers,
The attachment is a sample source code that shows an error of
gcc-optimization(O2, O3 and Os).
gcc version 4.4.7 20120313
Please use bugzilla to file bugreports. Note that I get the exact same
output
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:43:53AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Mar 27, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com wrote:
global-used-types.c in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2 only specifies
-g in dg-options. For a target that is not configured to generate
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:13:13PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at why gcc.dg/c1x-align-3.c (test for errors, line 15) is
failing for the AVR target, and I found that the test expects _Alignas
with -__INT_MAX__ - 1
Hi Diego,
Does gengetype works with inheritance now? I could not
find anything to that effect in the documentation.
Thanks,
-- Gaby
On 2013-03-28 07:57 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Does gengetype works with inheritance now? I could not
find anything to that effect in the documentation.
No. The plan is to get rid of gengtype by implementing manual markers
(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-conversion/gc-alternatives). But those
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 2013-03-28 07:57 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Does gengetype works with inheritance now? I could not
find anything to that effect in the documentation.
No. The plan is to get rid of gengtype by implementing manual
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson [mailto:h...@bitrange.com]
Sent: 26 March 2013 17:43
To: Paulo Matos
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: Modeling predicate registers with more than one bit
What do you mean by source modes?
The SI and HI in subsi3 and subhi3. IIRC you
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 2013-03-28 07:57 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Does gengetype works with inheritance now? I could not
find anything to that effect in the
Hi,
Do we still support GCC on recent versions of mac os x?
The reason I am asking is that I have been unable to build
GCC, both 4.8 branch and trunk, for about 2 weeks now.
The failure as of this morning is:
g++ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 2013-03-28 07:57 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Does gengetype works with inheritance now? I could not
find anything to that effect in the documentation.
No. The plan is to get rid of gengtype by implementing manual
On Thu Mar 28 08:53:03 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
Eh - in fact you _promised_ to do that in trade for accepting the C++
conversion!
Never trust promises from google ... *sigh*
You need to calm down. This childish attitude is insulting and
counterproductive.
The gengtype conversion was
On Thu Mar 28 09:53:24 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
what about -- as interim plan -- add support for inheritance while we are
still working on the longer term?
Support for inheritance is tricky and convoluted. Using manual markers
in your class is much more direct. There may be rough
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
tree_log2 appears to be a general function, so I suppose the check for
negative integers must be made in check_user_alignment. Will the
following patch work? (Bootstrapped x86_64, all alignment tests pass).
This patch is OK, subject to full
On 03/28/13 09:40, Paulo Matos wrote:
In certain situations, GCC will produce functions called foo.isra.0 or
foo.constprop.0. These function names are created by
clone_function_name where suffix is isra or constprop.
On the other hand in gprof/corefile.c (function core_sym_class) of
-Original Message-
From: Joe Seymour [mailto:jseym...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: 28 March 2013 15:17
To: Paulo Matos
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Clarification of cloned function names during profiling
I had a patch committed to trunk gprof that taught it to handle
.constprop
On 03/28/13 15:28, Paulo Matos wrote:
On the other hand this seems to imply that nobody actually uses gprof
anymore...
FWIW I fixed this for constprop because a customer reported it as an
issue, so at least 1 person is still using it.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Seymour [mailto:jseym...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: 28 March 2013 15:37
To: Paulo Matos
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Clarification of cloned function names during profiling
FWIW I fixed this for constprop because a customer reported it as an
issue,
Hi, Richard:
Thank you very much for replying.
There is an error when build with -m64 -O[2, 3, s].
I have just tried with -m32 and no error.
GCC (Red Hat 4.4.6-4)
GCC (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)
chenzhi
On 3/27/13 5:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
You could install autoconf 2.64, which is the version used to build
the configure files in the GCC tree.
I am using 2.64 (installed from the source). I also installed automake
1.11.1 from the source, but 'aclocal' (part of automake) is a perl
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson [mailto:h...@bitrange.com]
Sent: 26 March 2013 17:43
To: Paulo Matos
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: Modeling predicate registers with more than one bit
Unfortunately undocumented, but UTSL, for example
gcc/config/mips/mips-modes.def.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu Mar 28 08:53:03 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
Eh - in fact you _promised_ to do that in trade for accepting the C++
conversion!
Never trust promises from google ... *sigh*
You need to calm down. This childish
Are you using Mac ports for gmp/mpfr/mpc libraries? I see that
you have -L/opt/local/lib on you path.
I had the same issue and as I recall it was related to installing
iconv mac port package and incompatibility of iconv.h header
files.
I switched to building gmp/mpfr/mpc from sources and not
Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu Mar 28 08:53:03 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
Eh - in fact you _promised_ to do that in trade for accepting the C++
conversion!
Never trust promises from google ... *sigh*
You need to calm down. This childish attitude is insulting and
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Nenad Vukicevic ne...@intrepid.com wrote:
Are you using Mac ports for gmp/mpfr/mpc libraries? I see that
you have -L/opt/local/lib on you path.
yes, I was using macports -- it was one of the first things I installed
on this machine since I wanted to write
On 2013-03-28 17:32 , Richard Biener wrote:
Ah well, sorry about that.
Thanks. No harm done.
Fine. As long as reviewers resist enhancements to gengtype and push
people to rely on manual marking.
Agreed. In this sense, I would like to consider gengtype*.[ch] frozen
to new features and
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20130328 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20130328/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Interesting, I was able to get faste LTO+PGO compile times than non-LTO,PGO.
I however did testng only on combine.c compliation, so not very scientific.
There are some cases FDO information is not streamed well in all cases. I
will
post patch for that later today. Perhaps it will make
I tried compiling the 4.8.0 gcc release with the 4.7.2 compiler with
a specs file that defaulted to std=c++11. I found problems with
incompatibilities between the old c++ standard and the new.
I recommend that the sources be made C++11 compilable. I also
recommend that the style rules
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56759
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56759
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
06:57:56 UTC ---
*** Bug 56759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
Bug #: 56760
Summary: namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #1 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 07:01:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 29740
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29740
v2 source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #2 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 07:05:22 UTC ---
You see attached two files. v1.cpp and v2.cpp
g++ --version
g++ (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
07:38:04 UTC ---
Something goes wrong in LIM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761
Bug #: 56761
Summary: Error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #4 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 07:58:00 UTC ---
The example is reduced very much. Actually I have a module for holder and one
for contain (separate compilation units). They do not know about each other.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
07:58:29 UTC ---
Where did you grab the prebuilt binraries from? gcc.gnu.org does not support
prebuilt binraries really.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #5 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 08:22:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 29741
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29741
v3 source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #6 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 08:27:34 UTC ---
let me paste v3 source code that is also added as attachment:
namespace nam { class binbuffer {}; }
templateclass T void func (const T a, nam::binbuffer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
08:53:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 29742
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29742
gcc49-pr19449.patch
Untested patch. There is another case where
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
09:12:15 UTC ---
There is no iostream.h header in standard C++, so any code written in the
last 15 years should not try to use it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
09:16:52 UTC ---
Read the section on name lookup changes at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
09:54:58 UTC ---
It seems that move_computations_stmt firstly inserts into bb 11
# VUSE .MEM_21
D__lsm.5 = *_17;
and then
# VUSE .MEM_21
_17 = *q_8(D);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #8 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 09:55:49 UTC ---
I read the section on name lookup changes at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html
but it talks about a different kind of problem. Consider that there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-03-28 10:07:29 UTC ---
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #4 from Marek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
10:11:55 UTC ---
FWIW, started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=196769
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-03-28 10:26:48 UTC ---
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #6 from Marek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762
Bug #: 56762
Summary: too aggressive optimization or missing warnings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746
--- Comment #7 from Mathias Gaunard mathias at gaunard dot com 2013-03-28
10:39:53 UTC ---
Using either -save-temps or -ftrack-macro-expansion=0-ftrack-macro-expansion=0
removes the memory hog.
Compiling the preprocessed source does not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
11:05:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I read the section on name lookup changes at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html
but it talks about a different
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
11:15:20 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 28 11:14:44 2013
New Revision: 197192
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197192root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
12:34:24 UTC ---
Ok, so one reason is that we simply ignore dependencies when computing
what stmts to move (which happens in the same processing order):
static bool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
--- Comment #31 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
12:36:36 UTC ---
The 4.8 workaround has been reverted yesterday with the commit below
so the bug should be alive and kicking again.
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
12:42:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 29744
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29744
patch
This patch makes us not rely on a dominator walk to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56763
Bug #: 56763
Summary: attribute ignored in declaration of warning points
to wrong place
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764
Bug #: 56764
Summary: vect_prune_runtime_alias_test_list not smart enough
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Michel Morin mimomorin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
13:36:07 UTC ---
The implementation is complete. Unfortunately, my fixes for DRs 337 and 657
are interfering with the desired result; creating a function type returning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762
--- Comment #2 from npl at chello dot at 2013-03-28 13:38:01 UTC ---
Oh how I hate this rule. Thanks for the info and sorry for the invalid report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765
Bug #: 56765
Summary: compilation errors/ICE with unlimited polymorphic
array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-28
13:46:02 UTC ---
Thanks Jason. Looks like to be safe we should also add Nathan's testcase as-is
to the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
14:07:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 29745
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29745
gcc49-pr34949-1.patch
Incremental patch, passed bootstrap together
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
14:09:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 29746
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29746
gcc49-pr34949-2.patch
Another needed patch, without which DSE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56766
Bug #: 56766
Summary: Fails to combine (vec_select (vec_concat ...)) to
(vec_merge ...)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15672
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
15:13:08 UTC ---
Clang diagnoses the most vexing parse, comment 5 gets:
sf.cc:7:7: warning: parentheses were disambiguated as a function declaration
[-Wvexing-parse]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15672
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||npl at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Balakrishnan B balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-28
16:11:31 UTC ---
Cool, thanks guys for working on this. I hope the library issues aren't too
serious.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #10 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 16:50:06 UTC ---
But the function actually IS defined, because the call func(foo,b) works. Yes
it is not defined early enough maybe. But the linker is run after the compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
17:19:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
But the function actually IS defined,
No it isn't! Please read my answer again carefully.
The function that gets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56767
Bug #: 56767
Summary: gcc does not generate correct code with -O2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56767
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56767
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-28
17:39:38 UTC ---
GCC clearly warns you about this:
x.c: In function ‘round2’:
x.c:10:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
This is why
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56768
Bug #: 56768
Summary: [4.7] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56769
Bug #: 56769
Summary: [4.7] ICE in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:2511
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
Bug #: 56770
Summary: Partial sums loop optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56679
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
