Snapshot gcc-11-20240425 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20240425/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 07:47, Gejoe Daniel via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi team,
> The following is my query posted but would need more inputs :
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114751
>
> The gcov tool which was working so far seems to fail with our latest branch
> where gcc is 11.4.0 and
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 09:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 07:47, Gejoe Daniel via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > Hi team,
> > The following is my query posted but would need more inputs :
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114751
> >
> > The gcov tool which was working so
Hi team,
The following is my query posted but would need more inputs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114751
The gcov tool which was working so far seems to fail with our latest branch
where gcc is 11.4.0 and hence we wanted to sort this out by getting the right
help as early as
Am 25.04.2024 um 08:45 schrieb Gejoe Daniel via Gcc:
Hi team,
The following is my query posted but would need more inputs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114751
The gcov tool which was working so far seems to fail with our latest branch
where gcc is 11.4.0 and hence we wanted to
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:16:31PM +0800, LIU Hao via Gcc wrote:
> --- a/gcc/rust/parse/rust-parse.cc
> +++ b/gcc/rust/parse/rust-parse.cc
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ extract_module_path (const AST::AttrVec _attrs,
>// Source: rustc compiler
>//
>
Hello,
Attached is a patch for fixing build issues on *-w64-mingw32. Please check and
update at your leisure.
'gcc/system.h' contains a macro called `mkdir()` and there is no need to invoke `_mkdir()` within a
conditional block.
--
Best regards,
LIU Hao
diff --git
Зоро спит, а мы нет, потому что запускаем новый аниме-спешл...
Hi all,
while bisecting I recently ran into build errors like
In file included from /devel/gcc/libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:101,
from /devel/gcc/libgcc/libgcov.h:42,
from /devel/gcc/libgcc/libgcov-interface.c:26:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:931:6: error: wrong number of
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:21 AM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> while bisecting I recently ran into build errors like
>
> In file included from /devel/gcc/libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:101,
> from /devel/gcc/libgcc/libgcov.h:42,
> from
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:55 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:21 AM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > while bisecting I recently ran into build errors like
> >
> > In file included from /devel/gcc/libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:101,
> >
Am 15.03.2024 um 21:40 schrieb Björn Schäpers:
Am 25.01.2024 um 23:04 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:53 AM Björn Schäpers wrote:
Am 23.01.2024 um 23:37 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:33 PM Björn Schäpers wrote:
Am 03.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240425
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8649-gf3cff718df] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8649 vs commit r13-8648 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-6.c execution test
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-fp-int-inexact-c2x.c -O2 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 24 15:27:33 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10108-gbc17a92380f)
Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdcfeb5aa467d17024891bdbc218531151b0f1d6
commit cdcfeb5aa467d17024891bdbc218531151b0f1d6
Author: Michael Meissner
Date: Thu Apr 25 20:24:59 2024 -0400
Add -mmfspr option.
2024-04-25 Michael Meissner
gcc/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58043
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58043=edit
Patch but no testcases yet
Will add testcases in a little bit. Also I have not tested this fully yet. Will
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114856
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am able to run your reproducer and I can see the increasing times as the
number of modules goes up. I am curious if you could randomize the subroutine
names? These appear fairly repetitive and I wonder
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2805b66b9547d41e9fb3ee4c1ae2ecbbcd9077c
commit d2805b66b9547d41e9fb3ee4c1ae2ecbbcd9077c
Author: Michael Meissner
Date: Thu Apr 25 18:12:15 2024 -0400
Update ChangeLog.*
Diff:
---
gcc/ChangeLog.test | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114857
Bug ID: 114857
Summary: Pointer attributes and qualifiers are parsed in wrong
order
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
outputs-23 exe savetmp named2-2: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-24 exe savetmp named2-3: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-25 exe savetmp named2-4: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-294 lto sing unnamed-3: a.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-294 lto sing unnamed-3: a.ld_args
=== gcc Summary ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/gnustep/
git commit g:9353f6f475b92930a582cb42c380da6aebeb9406
gcc-descr r14-10136-g9353f6f475b929
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 00:23:03 UTC 2024
git commit g:9353f6f475b92930a582cb42c380da6aebeb9406
gcc-descr r14-10136-g9353f6f475b929
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 01:25:42 UTC 2024
git commit g:159671da6d9f4228e5ff46668693cfbdd66b1e1d
gcc-descr r12-10395-g159671da6d9f42
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 04:22:08 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #10)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9)
> > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> > > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline. There seems to be
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114858
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[11/12/13/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114858
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.8.4, 4.8.5
Known to work|
failures 5241
# of unsupported tests 23201
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 14.0.1 20240425
(experimental) [master r14-10135-g1604f7cebc] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution
s147360
# of unexpected failures38
# of unexpected successes 4
# of expected failures 916
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 2772
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-11/gcc/xgcc version 11.4.1 20240425
[releases/gcc-11
git commit g:45816f7eefa669f98b1ab574633d520f3a7b
gcc-descr r13-8650-g45816f7eefa669
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc3.30.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26
git commit g:159671da6d9f4228e5ff46668693cfbdd66b1e1d
gcc-descr r12-10395-g159671da6d9f42
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 03:06:22 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7c32f032d273335cf1f4e16c31754f23f7ba3ca
commit b7c32f032d273335cf1f4e16c31754f23f7ba3ca
Author: Michael Meissner
Date: Thu Apr 25 19:34:31 2024 -0400
Revert all changes
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 10 --
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19d46f68bba26bc9b3e0b15f6aa6326d653d0940
commit 19d46f68bba26bc9b3e0b15f6aa6326d653d0940
Author: Michael Meissner
Date: Thu Apr 25 20:26:28 2024 -0400
Update ChangeLog.*
Diff:
---
gcc/ChangeLog.test | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git
Regressions on master at commit r14-10135 vs commit r14-10123 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr68260.c -O2 execution test
FAIL:
git commit g:9353f6f475b92930a582cb42c380da6aebeb9406
gcc-descr r14-10136-g9353f6f475b929
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc3.30.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Apr 25 17:05:20 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10123-gc96c2a304b4)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cb1010a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14
t/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179467
# of unexpected failures97
# of unexpected successes 20
# of expected failures 1612
# of unsupported tests 4251
/home/g
== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes178448
# of unexpected failures128
# of unexpected successes 13
# of expected failures 1595
# of unsupported tests 5035
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240425
(experimental) [remotes
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eebc665799dc3cacf8c57f62863b489e07d6066d
commit eebc665799dc3cacf8c57f62863b489e07d6066d
Author: Michael Meissner
Date: Thu Apr 25 19:38:52 2024 -0400
Make moves from SPRs higher in cost.
2024-04-25 Michael Meissner
gcc/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
git commit g:159671da6d9f4228e5ff46668693cfbdd66b1e1d
gcc-descr r12-10395-g159671da6d9f42
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc3.30.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1902/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-04-26T00:47:43+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14-10136-g9353f6f475b) aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target
git commit g:881c6ec845c4cb7cb0fdd31a86dd0e539b6c84b3
gcc-descr r11-11374-g881c6ec845c4cb
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 00:28:04 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859
Bug ID: 114859
Summary: Seeing new segmentation fault in same_type_as
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
arget/s390/vector/vec-scalar-cmp-1.c scan-assembler
ne:\\n[^:]*\\twfcdb\\t%v[0-9]*,%v[0-9]*\\n\\t[^:]+\\tlocghine\\t%r2,1
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes180905
# of unexpected failures173
# of unexpected successes 17
# of expected failu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #10)
> Since the whole eh_return is an internal ABI in libgcc, a fix would be to
> change EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO(N) to avoid x0 and x1. Since eh_return already
> reserves 7
/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
version 14.0.1 20240425 (experimental) [master revision
gcc-14-10135-g1604f7cebc4] (GCC)
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target qemu
FAIL: gfortr
git commit g:45816f7eefa669f98b1ab574633d520f3a7b
gcc-descr r13-8650-g45816f7eefa669
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 02:56:57 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1a7529aaec43878cc0d0a5e754d894a1857d18a
commit d1a7529aaec43878cc0d0a5e754d894a1857d18a
Author: Michael Meissner
Date: Thu Apr 25 18:10:35 2024 -0400
Make moves from SPRs higher in cost.
2024-04-25 Michael Meissner
gcc/
*
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8649 vs commit r13-8648 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak1.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak2.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/thread_leak2.c -O2 output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #13 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> I have a fix for aarch64, able to produce now:
> ```
> f:
> .LFB0:
> .cfi_startproc
> stp x0, x1, [sp, -32]!
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
>
f expected failures 1550
# of unsupported tests 3992
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240425
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8649-gf3cff718df] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2
git commit g:9353f6f475b92930a582cb42c380da6aebeb9406
gcc-descr r14-10136-g9353f6f475b929
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 00:58:15 UTC 2024
git commit g:45816f7eefa669f98b1ab574633d520f3a7b
gcc-descr r13-8650-g45816f7eefa669
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 01:56:19 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114858
Bug ID: 114858
Summary: Compilation Hang and Excessive RAM Consumption in GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
git commit g:159671da6d9f4228e5ff46668693cfbdd66b1e1d
gcc-descr r12-10395-g159671da6d9f42
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 26 03:15:38 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58024|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104717
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
LGTM, thanks :)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:26 AM juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
wrote:
>
> lgtm
>
>
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> From: pan2.li
> Date: 2024-04-25 09:25
> To: gcc-patches
> CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; Pan Li
> Subject: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Add early
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114842
--- Comment #1 from Kewen Lin ---
We can extend powerpc_vsx to consider current_compiler_flags, it means that if
a test case has an explicit -mvsx, even if users specify -mno-vsx it's still
able to be tested if powerpc_vsx checking concludes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #1 from Hugo Melder ---
Output:
hmelder@ubuntu:/Users/hmelder/Downloads/gcc_bug_report$
temps/ReproduceUnwindTest
RaiseException returned 0xeb9e72a0
Compiler Output (With Ubuntu GCC 13.2.0) as example:
Using built-in specs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89462
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10ad46bc191f8aa90b0d7b00963bfd52c6d7b09c
commit r14-10117-g10ad46bc191f8aa90b0d7b00963bfd52c6d7b09c
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Apr 25 08:55:08 2024 +0800
RISC-V: Add early clobber to the dest of vwsll
We missed the existing early clobber for the dest operand
l.s[0-9]+tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 3
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshr.c scan-assembler-times
vshl.u[0-9]+tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 3
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes180742
# of unexpected failures317
# of expected failures 1255
# of unresolved t
Bitcount operations popcount, clz, and ctz are emulated for narrow modes
in case an operation is only supported for wider modes. Beside that ctz
may be emulated via clz in expand_ctz. Reflect this in
expression_expensive_p.
I considered the emulation of ctz via clz as not expensive since this
of unsupported tests 4249
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240425
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-10117-g10ad46bc191] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114849
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104391
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114842
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58035
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58035=edit
Preprocessed source of unwind-dw2.i which shows the issue
cc1 -fpreprocessed unwind-dw2.i -quiet -dumpbase
failures 3852
# of unsupported tests 20896
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-12/gcc/xg++ version 12.3.1 20240425
[remotes/origin/releases/gcc-12 r12-10393-g43c8cb0e00] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AArch64: Wrong Register |aarch64: epoligue in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114849
Bug ID: 114849
Summary: Static function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114848
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also it looks like I messed up comment #0 and forgot to change powerpc to
longarch64 :). That is what I get for trying to split this all out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114751
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I don't know of any difference compared to older compilers but gcov isn't my
main expertise. I fear you have to dig into the gcov code to see where and how
we exactly invent the stamp to see where it goes
tests 3116
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-12/gcc/xgcc version 12.3.1 20240425
[remotes/origin/releases/gcc-12 r12-10393-g43c8cb0e00] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114845
Bug ID: 114845
Summary: Confusing message when using undeclared identifier of
Const
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Committed, thanks Kito and Juzhe.
Pan
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 11:19 AM
To: 钟居哲
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches ; Robin
Dapp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Add xfail test case for highpart register
overlap of vwcvt
LGTM
Committed, thanks Kito and Juzhe.
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Kito Cheng
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 2:24 PM
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches ; Robin
Dapp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Add early clobber to the dest of vwsll
LGTM, thanks :)
On Thu, Apr 25,
150371
# of unexpected failures176
# of unexpected successes 33
# of expected failures 985
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 3769
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-11/gcc/xgcc version 11.4.1 20240425
[releases/gcc-1
scan-assembler-times padd 5
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/vect-reduc-1.c scan-assembler-times psrl 2
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/xorsign.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 2 loops" 1
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 196219
# of unexpected failures229
# of unex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I just happened to finish a build of aarch64 so I was able to create the
preprocessed source of unwind-dw2.i really quick. And then I just read the
aarch64.cc to see the saving of x0 happened due to
nexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 901
# of unresolved testcases 28
# of unsupported tests 5261
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/arm-eabi-gcc
version 14.0.1 20240425 (experimental) [master revision
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734
--- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp ---
Created attachment 58037
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58037=edit
Expand dump
Dump attached. Insn 209 is the problematic one.
The changing from _911 to 1078 happens in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114849
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114842
Bug ID: 114842
Summary: rs6000: Adjust some test cases with powerpc_vsx_ok
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Bug ID: 114843
Summary: AArch64: Wrong Register Reload in
_Unwind_RaiseException causes corrupt return value on
_URC_END_OF_STACK
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #6)
> This one is really a bit tricky.
>
> We have the following situation:
>
> loop:
>
> # vectp_g.178_1078 = PHI
> _911 = vectp_g.178_1078
> MASK_LEN_LOAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114844
Bug ID: 114844
Summary: A trivial but noexcept(false) destructor is
incorrectly considered non-throwing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
((insn 262 261 263 14 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 0 x0)
(unspec:DI [
(mem/c:V2x8QI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 31 sp)
(const_int 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|13.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
ss
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes165811
# of unexpected failures31
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 1481
# of unsupported tests 2973
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240425
[relea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114848
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
