On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:39:40 +1000
Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com wrote:
The top level modules already exist and are named.
Not really. I see nowhere on the GCC site a picture as clear as
the plateform
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:39:40 +1000
Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com wrote:
The top level modules already exist and are named.
Not
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. There is also different module hierarchies that overlap. For
example ILs used in the different parts of the compiler.
I think Basile is mostly confused about what files belong to what module,
a
Thank you for the quick reply.
OKay, follow up from a few days ago. I ran the testsuite again however
with a stack size of 32Mb and now there are no ICE issues.
See :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02401.html
What I find interesting is why we see an internal
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Dennis Clarke wrote:
What I find interesting is why we see an internal compiler error
as opposed to something more reasonable when the user stack size is
too small. Really, this is not a compiler fault at all but a user
environment issue and thus the ICE is a false
Hello,
In my transformation of an input program, I need to clone functions
and the callee functions in each clone. To clone a function, or
create a duplicate, I use cgraph_function_versioning() This works
perfectly well for the parent function. I then go through the
statements in the
I have hit a rather annoying issue during make install thus :
.
.
.
gmake ada/doctools/xgnatugn
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/opt/bw/src/gcc-4.6.3-SunOS5.8-i386/gcc'
mkdir -p ada/doctools
cp -p ../../gcc-4.6.3/gcc/ada/xgnatugn.adb ada/doctools
cd ada/doctools gnatmake -q xgnatugn
gnatmake:
Hi Martin, thanks very much for the information!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:07:17PM +1100, Matt Davis wrote:
Hello,
In my transformation of an input program, I need to clone functions
and the callee functions
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Dennis Clarke wrote:
What I find interesting is why we see an internal compiler error
as opposed to something more reasonable when the user stack size is
too small. Really, this is not a compiler fault at all but a user
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:57:08AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
Indeed. There is also different module hierarchies that overlap. For
example ILs used in the different parts of the compiler.
I think Basile is mostly confused about what files belong to what module,
a question with not a
Em 21/03/2012 08:58, Peter Dolding escreveu:
If there is a grey area you have broken into modules wrong. Module
based code has no grey. No grey equals less errors of person editing
a file they think is exclusive to some part that turns out to be
shared with another part so causing nasty
Hello,
I am a PhD student studying compilers. I am wondering, is there any
representation of array regions in the gcc/g++ IR? (Like in this
paper: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1152165).
I am having quite a hard time understanding how to build this IR from
the paper. Does anyone on this list
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Pedro Lamarão
pedro.lama...@prodist.com.br wrote:
Em 21/03/2012 08:58, Peter Dolding escreveu:
If there is a grey area you have broken into modules wrong. Module
based code has no grey. No grey equals less errors of person editing
a file they think is
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Sorry people, we don't have any established list of named modules. I see
nowhere a list of one or two dozens of modules with for each of them:
* a name
* short description in one or two sentences
*
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:24:54AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Sorry people, we don't have any established list of named modules. I see
nowhere a list of one or two dozens of modules with for each of
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
That's a Linux-only option, unfortunately. I asked the Solaris
engineers about implementing split-stack support, but they rejected it
for the complexity.
Wimps. The split-stack support is simpler than than TLS support.
Not that I really
On 20/03/12 10:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Like any other builtin expander? There are many dozens of examples in
builtins.c. It is called with the tree argument, so you verify it, complain
if the argument is not the one you are expecting, and just expand it as the
symbol instead of expanding the
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 14:55 +, James Murray wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:40 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
Stephane Carrez is listed as maintainer of the port, so he should
know how to contribute fixes to the port upstream.
Yes, but as I said... he is no longer active on this
James Murray j...@jsm-net.demon.co.uk writes:
However, the generated code isn't as good as the output from 3.3.6. I
swapped back to unpatched 3.4.4 and compared with unpatched 3.3.6.
I can understand why you are doing this. However, you should be aware
that the compiler internals changed
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:57:08AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
Indeed. There is also different module hierarchies that overlap. For
example ILs used in the different parts of the compiler.
I think
On 21 March 2012 15:35, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
I am not sure what you expect from me. As I said many times, I have not a
global understanding of GCC (the global reviewers have a much better
global understanding than I do). So I cannot propose or initiate a list of
modules.
Or do you
Very well said. Discussing about modules also makes no sense. Figure out
the present state.
these kind of meta discussions are very rarely of value, this
one is no exception IMO
Richard.
--
P.
On 3/21/2012 11:35 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
I would be happy to help, but please understand that my understanding of GCC
is restricted to gengtype, ggc, and some parts of the middle-end. I know
nothing about the vast rest of the GCC compiler.
Perhaps suggestions about improvements in
anyone can help on this question please? thanks
From: blue_3...@hotmail.com
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; maxim.kuvyr...@gmail.com
Subject: dep question in sched-deps.c
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:17:07 +
Hello,
I am confused by following piece of code in sched-deps.c. My understanding is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52644
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
Bug #: 52649
Summary: internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at
predict.c:1812
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Bug #: 52650
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c *
(internal compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21
07:48:02 UTC ---
Regstrapped with the patch in comment #2 without regression (but for
pr52650;-).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
08:05:56 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 21 08:05:51 2012
New Revision: 185599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185599
Log:
2012-03-21 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52651
Bug #: 52651
Summary: Fortran testsuite ICEs with -flto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 08:48:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already
support
1) long symbol names (I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
--- Comment #1 from deepu.sarmatian at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 09:37:00 UTC ---
Hi,
Please delete the attachment. Though the bug is in the compiler, it seems it
violates the security protocol of my concern.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #3 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-21 09:38:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
We should disable libquadmath on AIX. It is not needed or useful there.
Have you tried adding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
--- Comment #2 from deepu.sarmatian at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 09:43:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hi,
Please delete the attachment. Though the bug is in the compiler, it seems it
violates the security protocol of my concern.
Also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
Bug #: 52652
Summary: call to gfc_match_asynchronous for allocatable at
parse.c line 164
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40058
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
10:05:24 UTC ---
If this ever gets fixed, we can remove a test in SRA as in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01356.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Bug #: 52653
Summary: GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
Bug #: 52654
Summary: [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
10:48:13 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:48:08 2012
New Revision: 185602
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185602
Log:
PR testsuite/52641
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
Bug #: 52655
Summary: right shit in switch: gcc compiles with error: label
at end of compound statement
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-03-21
11:29:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The following code compiles with error: label at end of compound statement
with
the gcc 4.6.1 compiler.
Content of t.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
11:33:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 26940
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26940
patch
Patch. Not sure what to do about PA_IN - can we even end up with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
11:40:49 UTC ---
Ah, indeed we can. But we should be able to prune from PA_OUT.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||borut.razem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
--- Comment #3 from Jan Lachnitt pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2012-03-21
12:18:59 UTC ---
Thanks for testing and for the link to GFortranBinaries. I have just installed
the very recent unofficial build of gfortran:
Using built-in specs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
--- Comment #4 from Borut Ražem borut.razem at gmail dot com 2012-03-21
12:44:34 UTC ---
What a shame :-(
Sorry for the false alarm.
Borut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-03-21
12:55:55 UTC ---
It's caused by r158372, but silent with 4.7.0 on i686. Duplicate of PR50708.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21
12:57:54 UTC ---
I have posted the results for powerpc-apple-darwin9 with the patch in comment
#0 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02399.html . It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
13:01:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 26941
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26941
Needs an ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL platform for testing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
13:03:57 UTC ---
Ah, and obviously there should be a pointer_set_insert before VEC_safe_push...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:09:44 UTC ---
This is from my Tru64 UNIX removal patch. Could you please check if
IPPROTO_IPV6 and/or IPV6_MULTICAST_IF are defined in any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21
13:12:51 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the code compiles with the options in comment #0
(with a lot of warnings) for 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.3, 4.7.0RC2, and trunk (with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25362
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
13:20:25 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:20:20 2012
New Revision: 185605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185605
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52543
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21
13:20:25 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:20:20 2012
New Revision: 185605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185605
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52543
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suckfish at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:32:31 UTC ---
I don't yet know if they are related.
Now I do: I've just built a 32-bit C-only compiler on
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 at r185563
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #3 from ro at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:51:46 UTC ---
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
[...]
If they are related
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:57:34 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #5 from ro at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47923
Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21
14:22:49 UTC ---
Reduced test
SUBROUTINE GHDSYM(IZ,IS,LMMAX,S,LMS,Y,L2M,DRL,NLAY2,K0,DCUT)!,
!
COMPLEX Y(L2M,L2M),H(33),S(LMS)
COMPLEX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #4 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-21 14:27:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
But the problem isn't with libquadmath itself, but with config-ml.in setting
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 14:43:57 UTC ---
On 3/21/2012 9:09 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:04:51 UTC ---
IPPROTO_IPV6 and IPV6_MULTICAST_IF are not defined in any system header
on HP-UX 11.00. As far as I can tell, there is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656
Bug #: 52656
Summary: [4.8 regression] gcc.target/sparc/fpmul-2.c FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:51:23 UTC ---
and with #if 1 they fail? As they are wrong-code regressions on
an architecture I have no access to, can you see what is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #6 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-03-21
15:51:22 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 26941
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26941
Needs an ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL platform for testing
Where does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21
15:56:46 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, compiling the test with 4.6.3, 4.7.0RC2, or trunk
gives the follwoing errors
pr52622.f90:130.2:
function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26941|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52629
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 16:22:38 UTC ---
On 3/21/2012 11:04 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
Ok, but at least struct sockaddr_in6 is present in/fromnetinet/in.h,
otherwise the HAVE_INET6 configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 16:31:41 UTC ---
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 16:22:38 UTC ---
On 3/21/2012 11:04 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52626
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 16:46:21 UTC
---
Created attachment 26943
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26943
proposed patch
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
