I have been trying repeatedly and in incrementally more rewarding stages
towards building a purely 64-bit GCC compiler on Solaris 10 sparc. I have no
need for the 32-bit libs at all and my entire toolchain is 64-bit only. There
are no 32-bit libs in /usr/local/lib nor do there need to be. Thus
Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
nope. Been there .. done that and that fails badly .. in fact worse than before
:
Configure .. look good but lies :
$ ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --build=sparc64-sun-solaris2.10
nope. Been there .. done that and that fails badly .. in fact worse
than
before :
Yet this is the standard way and works flawlessly if done correctly...
I can not see my error here and am wondering what the issue is.
However I am way way open to suggestion here.
You need to
Eric wrote:
Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
You're up against three factors here. First, the sparc64 platform ABI
specifies 32-bit executables unless the user specifically asks for
64-bit. I'm really unclear
The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the
freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default.
BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html.
That isn't true at all.
CC='cc -m64' CXX='CC -m64'
The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the
freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default.
BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html.
That isn't true at all.
okay .. I'll just nod my head and agree.
CC='cc
What isn't clear is where that is run. I decided that I will take your
approach and try to follow the magic incantations to the very
letter. OKay,
sort of. I may expand on the CFLAGS just a little bit and I have to
assume,
in the absence of any data, that I shall run these config ;
On 11 November 2012 21:57, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Here is what I did with gmp :
$ ls $SRC/gmp*
/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
$ /opt/schily/bin/star -x -bz -xdir -xdot -U -fs=16m
file=/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
star: 1262 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 12922880 bytes
System is Solaris 8 Sparc. Totally up to date. Vendor provided compiler is
Sun ONE Studio 8 also patched up to date.
My boot strap of GCC 4.2.1 fails at stage 2. Here is what I know.
My approach with GCC has always been to bootstrap at least twice and then
run the testsuites to verify that
On 26 July 2007 03:09, Dennis Clarke wrote:
The configure line for GCC 4.2.1 looks like so :
bash-3.2$ /export/home/dclarke/build/gcc-4.2.1/configure
--with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld
--enable-threads=posix --disable-nls --prefix=/export/home/dclarke
SUMMARY : the stage 2 compiler produces the wrong binary type for this machine
I did further digging and built my own libiconv and installed that into my
own isolated local directory at $HOME/local
then I destroyed my previous stage 1 work and started over again thus :
bash-3.2$ date
Thu Jul
Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SUMMARY : the stage 2 compiler produces the wrong binary type for this
machine
This question is appropriate for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
rather than the gcc@gcc.gnu.org list. Please take any followups to
gcc-help. Thanks.
I
what options do I need to set on the configure line in order for this to
work?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html , SPARC section.
You Sir are magnificent and wonderful !
Thank you so very much.
Dennis
Dennis Clarke wrote:
At the moment GCC 4.2.1 seems to be tied to the UltraSparc processor and
thus the older sun4m and 32-bit Sparc machines are being ignored.
The default cpu is v8plus. You can change that by using the configure
option --with-cpu=v8 or --with-cpu=v7 depending on how old
The default cpu is v8plus.
v9 actually, which automatically enables the V8+ stuff in 32-bit mode.
That isn't what I see here. The output binary was definately for a v8plus
processor. That would be a UltraSparc 1 at the least.
ELF Header
ei_magic: { 0x7f, E, L, F }
ei_class:
: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
-
Dennis Clarke
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Is there a way to allow the testsuite to just run regardless of howlong it
takes?
I am getting program timed out warnings for multiple tests :
Running
/export/home/dclarke/build/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp
...
WARNING: program timed out
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Is there a way to allow the testsuite to just run regardless of
how long it takes?
I think you need to pass set timeout -1 into dejagnu. I'd suggest a larger
positive timeout instead.
I forget the correct way to do this - I used to end up editing the .exp
. Here we use* * the
high resolution timers in Solaris to get more fine grained * *
measurements. Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
**/
#include stdio.h
#include sys/time.h
#include mpfr.h
hrtime_t start_hrt, end_hrt
. Here we use* * the high resolution timers in
Solaris to get more fine grained * * measurements. Dennis Clarke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]*
**/
#include stdio.h
#include sys/time.h
#include mpfr.h
hrtime_t start_hrt, end_hrt
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/buildstat.html
It seems stuck at 4.2.0 only.
If I search around I cna find reports from Joe Buck that seem to help my
work but there is nothing linked on the build status page.
Dennis Clarke
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 17:55 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/buildstat.html
It seems stuck at 4.2.0 only.
If I search around I cna find reports from Joe Buck that seem to help my
work but there is nothing linked on the build status page.
That would be my fault, I'll
, this is harder to test today. Still, not too hard:
you would just start with some other free compiler.
I generally bootstrap with a Sun Studio compiler on Solaris and then
bootstrap again with whatever *that* resulted in.
-
Dennis Clarke
How do I go about downloading GCC. Which files do I need to download and
how
can I run a .tar file. Thanks for the help.
I'll try to help you here.
One of the big problems with the open source world is that it can be tough
to get started when you don't know .. much of anything about it.
. I would like
to at least see GCC 4.2.2 bootstrap out of the box before flailing forwards
to GCC 4.3.x.
-
Dennis Clarke
the previous one still needs some work? To appease sales people and
developers making noises for features?
I don't want to start a flame-fest, but perhaps we could reconsider the
release-branching criteria.
I will read intently.
Dennis Clarke
On 10/26/07, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, Andrew MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 10/26/07, Andrew MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... when we think it's ready. It doesn't help anyone to declare victory
and release 4.3.0 when
When I look at the Build status page I see no one has posted a result
there for GCC 4.2.2 :
Please see : http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/buildstat.html
Here are a couple of posts by Kaveh:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-10/msg00388.html
Why isn't the main page for build reports updated ?
Will do.
It *looks* like no one ( me too ) is getting clean builds.
The GCC 4.2.x compiler is in pretty good shape on SPARC/Solaris, modulo the
libgomp problems on Solaris 10 with the Sun tools. You need to use the GNU
tools if you
, error
conditions, underflows and rounding errors etc etc ?
Dennis Clarke
On 29 December 2007 20:07, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Do you have a testsuite ? Some battary of tests that can be thrown at the
code to determine correct responses to various calculations, error
conditions, underflows and rounding errors etc etc ?
There's a make check target in the tarball. I
as if -liconv got dropped somewhere and that was what was needed.
Did I miss something here ?
Dennis clarke
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux
about an internal compiler error ?
Dennis
( concerned in Solaris world )
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
;-)
Rainer
* nod *
Will redo ... and see what I get. Thanks for the input.
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86
I would suggest pentium_pro if one can still find one running out there.
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris
but it is probably
impossible. I'll give it a go anyways. This can't get worse.
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
sys 0.381
titan$
I can not figure out why I would be seeing a error like that.
baffled on Solaris , Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
I'm not too sure how many things changed from 4.6.1 to 4.6.2 but I am
seeing a really large increase in the number of unexpected failures on
various tests.
With 4.6.1 and Solaris I was able to get reasonable results :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
This should probably be on the gcc-help list.
I never really know which direction to go as the issues seem to be related
to how limits-exprparen.c gets tested. However, no problem, I'll jump ship
and get out of this ml.
On 7 November 2011 01:08, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Well, dear GCC users I
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
Only the new go language seems to be a major issue now.
The implementation of Go in the 4.6 releases does not support Solaris.
Go on Solaris works on mainline.
Well, I would not have seen that coming. I should look more closely at the
various
Message from Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org at 2011-11-07
06:38:47 --
Have you checked your ulimit?
I was thinking that too! I just recently increased the stack size limit
to
16 MB :
The 'fix' in mainline set it higher:
2011-07-22 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
today? Are there specific bugids I can look at ?
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any expected date on a 4.7 RC ?
- --
- --
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
Any expected date on a 4.7 RC ?
When it's ready. Which we'd usually expect it to be around the
beginning of April.
cool. thank you.
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis
(when done) */
reg[REG_O7] = (greg_t)resumecontext - 8;/* return pc */
}
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
for (argno = 0; argno argc; argno++) {
if (argno 6)
*tsp++ = reg[REG_O0 + argno] = va_arg(ap, long);
else
*tsp++ = va_arg(ap, long);
This is broken. The arguments
/cc -V
cc: Sun C 5.8 Patch 121016-08 2009/04/20
usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details
$
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux
-sparc-SunOS5.8 $
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 184777
On 03/02/2012 08:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
If all goes well, I'd like to release 4.7.0 in about three weeks.
I'll drop it on Solaris. Give it a push. Do we realy really need that
ppl/cloog stuff? I have never seen it build and pass any tests, ever,
even once, on Solaris with or without
timed out.
.
.
.
Somewhat annoying as I am in no particular hurry. :-)
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
as that was the compiler used
in stage 1 of the bootstrap.
Any thoughts anyone ?
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla
Also : http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-02/msg00153.html
I was surprised to see this pop up during make install :
. In detail.
What would the procedure for that be ?
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect
On 19 March 2012 14:56, Dennis Clarke wrote:
thus : http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02155.html
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c -O0 (internal compiler
error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits
Hr, tried that and didn't get very far probably because the
srcdir is at ../gcc-4.6.3
I don't think that's the problem.
Maybe you need
make check RUNTESTFLAGS=compile.exp=limits-exprparen.c
or
make check RUNTESTFLAGS=compile.exp=*/limits-exprparen.c
or some other variation on that
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
. Any enlightened thoughts would be welcome.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open
:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
I had sent this to the wrong maillist I think. Yet another error. :-\
In any case .. here it is :
---
Subject:gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
From: Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, March 11, 2008 16
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the set of posted solaris test results for trunk during the
last four months barely requires two hands:
2008-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01474.html
A small request.
Can the md5 sum hash for the various release files be published at the
main GCC release pages ?
If we look at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/ there is no md5 sum there
and while I can find that data at a mirror thus :
with high resolution timers and perhaps we
can compare notes.
Dennis Clarke
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision 138152
Would be nice to have md5 sums there also
$ /opt/csw/bin/openssl md5 gcc-4.4-20080725.tar.bz2
MD5(gcc-4.4-20080725.tar.bz2)= 865deaea79c12635f9a9b92937df8d41
etc etc
Dennis Clarke
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:56:57PM +0200, Agner Fog wrote:
2008/7/26 Agner Fog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have libc version 2.7. Can't find version 2.8
It's in Fedora 9, I have no idea why the source isn't directly
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote on 28 July 2008 18:54:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
also, IMO, the NEWS sections says nothing useful to any human.
but, *some* humans
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Eus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ho!
--- On Tue, 7/29/08, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hold on .. on the NEWS page I see ... okay .. how very user friendly.
Sort of the thing one would put on the project homepage I would think.
Do you mind to tell
/ppc-dev/usr/src/lib/libc/ppc/gen/memcpy.s
is that nice and small ?
Dennis Clarke
believe that the spirit of the GNU project is that you
should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
you should charge as little as possible — just enough to cover the
cost.
Actually we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge
as much as they wish or can.
Dennis
and
fixincludes gets to it. Not sure what the fix is other than .. don't run
mkheaders? Have I screwed up something in the compiler specs ?
Any thoughts ?
Dennis Clarke
.
Sorry for being a nag.
--
Dennis Clarke
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 10:04:05PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I really do value the build status reports submitted by
others and I go searching for a few results in particular.
People like Joe Buck can be relied upon to post good looking
results for Solaris and thus I need to be able
to for testing. Last time I checked it was a dual proc 4000
series machine with Windows NT on it. Yes .. really. :-P
--
Dennis Clarke
with looking at the task .. if I could employ some
slightly more modern techniques. I could even host the page with a list of
OS platforms and have the thing sorted ( or sortable ) by arch etc.
Just me thinking out loud.
Dennis Clarke
http://wiki.blastwave.org
Hi.
My last successful build was from yesterday morning. After the large
libstdc++ patch by Chris Fairles landed the builds have failed with the
following error:
In file included from
/export/home/arth/gnu/gcc.git/libstdc++-v3/src/mutex.cc:30:
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:44, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Hi.
My last successful build was from yesterday morning. After the large
libstdc++ patch by Chris Fairles landed the builds have failed with
the
following error:
In file included from
/export/home/arth/gnu/gcc.git/libstdc++-v3
works right ?
Dennis Clarke
http://www.blastwave.org/
.. pretty wildly different results.
Dennis
--
Dennis Clarke
Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de writes:
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
One of the things I have had no joy with is figuring out how to
include the ada component but that is a battle for another day.
To build ada you need a good ada compiler to start with. If you don't
have
for a long long long time yet.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source for Solaris
you can buy a support contract for it then you have a valid platform in
commercial use.
You can get support for the OpenSolaris distribution if you like
I just went and looked ... you are correct, they have three levels in
fact. It looks like $1080 for premium, $720 is standard business
awesome
engineers and good people that work to benefit the state of mankind.
--
Dennis Clarke http://www.blastwave.org/
dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source for Solaris
May I make a subject line change please ?
This issue is trivial trailing whitespace changes I think and procedures,
process and notice of such changes.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source
knows where.
Just a suggestion.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source for Solaris
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 01:41:10PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
The GNU Compiler Collection version 4.4.4 has been released.
Please provide MD5/SHA1/SHA256 hash sums for the release files in your
release announcement. Those would be the reference standard for people
to
check as opposed
/show_bug.cgi?id=44455
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source for Solaris
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
FYI , bug 44455 is a show stopper in the Solaris world.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44455
This is
bootstrap/44455 GCC fails to build if MPFR 3.0.0 (Release Candidate) is
used
Why would this be a showstopper? Who forces
If I go back and rebuild gmp mpfr and mpc thus :
GMP: include 5.0.1, lib 5.0.1
MPFR: include 3.0.0-p3, lib 3.0.0-p3
MPC: include 0.8.2, lib 0.8.2
Use GMP from the 4.2.x series and MPFR from the 2.3.x series. Or do
not build these libraries in-tree.
I built and tested them separate.
--
GMP: include 5.0.1, lib 5.0.1
MPFR: include 3.0.0-p3, lib 3.0.0-p3
MPC: include 0.8.2, lib 0.8.2
Use GMP from the 4.2.x series and MPFR from the 2.3.x series. Or do
not build these libraries in-tree.
I built and tested them separate.
You forgot to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
That is
On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org
wrote:
GMP: include 5.0.1, lib 5.0.1
MPFR: include 3.0.0-p3, lib 3.0.0-p3
MPC: include 0.8.2, lib 0.8.2
Use GMP from the 4.2.x series and MPFR from the 2.3.x series. Or
do
not build these libraries in-tree.
I built
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
