Hello,
We are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. GCC has
applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected organizations
have not been announced yet.
On Fri, Jan 12 2024, Gaurang Aswal via Gcc wrote:
> Hey I am Gaurang Aswal a 4th year B.E. Computer Science student from BI
On Mon, Jan 22 2024, Vedant Tewari wrote:
Hello Vedant,
> Hello,
> I am expressing my interest as a potential gsoc participant, based on this
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode, are there any available projects
> that you might recommend or might be best suited for a potential proposal
> for
Hello Arpit,
We are very happy that you found contributing to GCC-rust interesting.
GCC has applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected
organizations have not been announced yet this year.
On Sat, Dec 30 2023, CS21B062 ARPIT GUPTA wrote:
> Dear GCC Community,
>
> I hope this email fin
Hello,
We are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. GCC has
applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected organizations
have not been announced yet this year. More comments inline.
On Mon, Jan 22 2024, Rupali P via Gcc wrote:
> Respected GSoC Review Team,
>
>
> I am writi
would like to be a mentor, please speak up.
Thanks,
Martin
On Mon, Jan 15 2024, Martin Jambor wrote:
[...]
> The most important bit:
>
> I would like to ask all (moderately) seasoned GCC contributors to
> consider mentoring a contribut
much longer.
Thanks to everyone who helped me with this so far. I am very happy that
we'll get this chance to attract new contributors this year too.
Martin
On Mon, Jan 15 2024, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> another year has passed, Google has announced there will be again Goog
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 16 2024, Nada Elsayed via Gcc wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am Nada Elsayed, A fresh graduate from computer engineering at Cairo
> University.
welcome, we are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting.
> I have good knowledge in C/C++, and a basic knowledge in compilers. a
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 22 2024, Suraj Kadapa via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an undergraduate student with an extensive experience in computers
> from an early age, but most of my work has been limited to arduinos, and
> raspberry pi's. I have been intrigued with compilers, architecture and low
> lev
o GCC interesting. Please have
a look at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode and specifically at
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode#Before_you_apply which explains
some of the steps you can take to familiarize yourself with our code
base and other initial steps to take.
Good luck,
Martin Jambor
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode#Before_you_apply which explains
some of the steps you can take to familiarize yourself with our code
base.
Good luck!
Martin Jambor
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 28 2024, Aditya Ballaki via Gcc wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I'm an incoming graduate student in Computer Engineering at Cornell
> University, and I'm keen on participating in GSOC by contributing to
> open-source projects before starting my graduate program.
Wonderful, welcome!
> Sp
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 04 2024, mokshagnareddyc--- via Gcc wrote:
> Hello sir/mam
> I am mokshagna reddy from Mahindra university and i am currently in my
> second year of under graduation in Btech artificial intelligence i had
> intrest in your organization and i know programming languages like c,
>
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 06 2024, Abhinav Gupta via Gcc wrote:
> Dear GCC Community,
> I hope this email finds you well. My name is Abhinav Gupta. I am a
> 3rd-year student at IIT Tirupati pursuing a bachelor's degree in
> computer science and engineering. I am writing to express my interest
> in co
ood luck,
Martin
> Thanking you
> Abhinav
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 20:37, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 06 2024, Abhinav Gupta via Gcc wrote:
>> > Dear GCC Community,
>> > I hope this email finds you well. My
d: if something in function apsses can_throw_external then
function can throw. So in the next step the propgation will need to be
added here.
--
Hope this help, if you have any specific issues you'd like to help with,
certainly feel free to ask here again.
Good luck!
Martin Jambor
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 21 2024, Soumya Ranjan via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this message finds you well. My name is Soumya Ranjan, and I hold a
> Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and a Master's in Computer
> Engineering. I am currently working as a Firmware Engineer at Qualcomm
> Wirel
s (again, at look at those described at
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode#Before_you_apply ) yourself. Then
we can help you to polish things up.
Good luck!
Martin Jambor
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 24 2024, M Hamza Nadeem via Gcc wrote:
> Hi Sir / mam,
>
>
> I hope this email finds you well. As an enthusiastic contributor with a
> strong grasp of C/C++ and familiarity with Rust, I am eager to explore
> potential projects for Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2024 within the GNU
Hello Anuj,
On Thu, Mar 28 2024, Anuj Mohite wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Anuj M, an undergraduate student interested in participating in GSoC
> 2024 with GCC. I would like to work on the project improving the DO
> CONCURRENT construct in the GFortran compiler.The current implementation in
> GFortran has li
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 27 2024, Soumya Ranjan wrote:
> Hello!
> Thanks for your response Martin!
> Sorry for the late response, I've been researching the project, going over
> the source code and preparing the proposal. After a lot of thought, I've
> decided to go with the "Offloading to a separate pr
15 Mar 2024 at 03:54, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>>
>> Hi Abhinav!
>>
>> Thanks for your interest in contributing to GCC, and thanks to Martin for
>> all the information you already provided. Just a bit more, to get you
>> started on developing a proper project pro
Hello,
I actually forgot to CC the mailing list as I promised to, so
re-sending.
Sorry,
Martin
On Sat, Mar 30 2024, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> and sorry for replying late, I have faced a few urgent interruptions
> last week and unfortunately it is also a short week becau
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 30 2024, Nada Elsayed via Gcc wrote:
> I think that I didn't fully understand the project, so I read more and
> updated the Timeline Suggestion.
Sorry that we were for not being able to respond sooner, Easter got into
way in an unfortunate way. I do not know much about Cython
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 31 2024, tmpod via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a Computer Science student, currently taking a Master's degree in
>
>
> Portugal's top university. I have a
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 05 2024, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 1:16 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:14 AM Thor Preimesberger via Gcc
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Forgot to CC the mailing list - mea culpa.
>> >
>> > -- Forwarded message -
>> >
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 05 2024, PRANIL DEY wrote:
> Hello GCC Community,
> I am Pranil Dey and I had submitted a proposal for the project "Improve
> nothrow detection in GCC", but as the deadline period was a holiday time I
> wanted to ask you to review my proposal now.
> I am already getting familiar
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 05 2024, Vedant5432 via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a potential contributor for GSoC 2024, I made a submission for the
> project Extend the Static Analysis Pass, I was wondering about the process
> of ranking the proposals and the general timelines when the applicants will
> be n
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26 2024, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> In implementing prange (pointer ranges), I have found a 1.74% slowdown
> in VRP, even without any code path actually using the code. I have
> tracked this down to irange::get_bitmask() being compiled differently
> with and wit
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that we will have as many as seven
contributors working on GCC as part of their Google Summer of Code
(GSoC) projects in 2024! In no particular order:
- Anuj Mohite will be enhancing the f951 compiler's DO CONCURRENT
construct while mentored by Tobias Burnus and
Hi everyone, but especially Diego :-)
it seems to me that our new C++ vectors have some problems holding
derived classes. For example, when try to compile the following
struct zzzA
{
int kind;
};
struct zzzB : public zzzA
{
int some, data, here;
};
struct container
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:55:14AM +0200, Veres Lajos wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Ondrej Bilka wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 12:41:42AM +0200, Veres Lajos wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wrote a small misspell finder/fixer script and when I have a little
> > > spare time I clean OS pro
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:43:00AM +0200, Veres Lajos wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Veres Lajos wrote:
>
> > Around 99% of the typos are in comments and documentations a few of them
> > are only in function/variable names (living code).
> > I think it is not really history obtrusive.
> >
> > I
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 04:52:30PM -0300, Rodolfo Guilherme Wottrich wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> Please disregard this message in case it doesn't fit here.
>
> During compilation of a C file, I need to be able to create a global
> function definition, with whatever a body I may have forged. I
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:17:08PM -0300, Rodolfo Guilherme Wottrich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks! I had solved the problem some days ago, and it was actually
> related to your answer.
> First, I hadn't used push_struct_function() to allocate storage for my
> new function.
> Second, I wasn't ca
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 08:42:16AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to suggest that new implementation files have
> the '.cc' extension, unless they are meant to be processed
> with a C compiler. (I am not proposing wholesale renaming.)
>
I do not care very much but I disag
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:13:22AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> I do not care very much but I disagree. Having some files with .c
> >&g
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:07:52AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> > As far as newbies are concerned, I think that grasping that .c files
> > are C++ files is one of the easy things to learn about GCC compared to
&
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:00:13AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> At a minimum, I do think that if a .h file *requires* another .h
> file to compile, that it should include it.
Absolutely.
> ie, if gimple-ssa.h is
> included, it wont compile unless tree-ssa-operands.h has already
> been inc
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:19:26PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> > As my bugreport is being ignored it would help if one ouf our
>
> Sorry. Which one?
I believe richi meant
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849180
Martin
>
> > partners (hint! hint!) would raise this issue via
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:36:47PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:19:26PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> >> > As my bugreport is being ignored it would help if one ou
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:26:06PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 07:16 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>
> >>>Yes. Debian moved everything for some reason. It's a problem that must
> >>>be addressed somehow before gcc 4.7 is released.
> >>>
> >>>It's extremely unfortunate that this wil
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:07:17PM +1100, Matt Davis wrote:
> Hello,
> In my transformation of an input program, I need to clone functions
> and the callee functions in each clone. To clone a function, or
> create a duplicate, I use "cgraph_function_versioning()" This works
> perfectly well
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:34:55AM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I am currently trying to take certain functions (marked by certain
> attributes) and create vector version along with the scalar versions
> of the function. For example, let's say I have a function my_add
> tha
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:57:44PM +, Jay K wrote:
>
> Our front end is wierd.
> The input is unusually low level, and so are the trees it produces.
> I do have a hankering to fix that (or maybe just to output more portable C...)
> But for now:
> It doesn't use component_refs, and doesn't
e is not the type cast in the third assignment but
the fact that there is no dereference there, which means that gimple
folder has to deal with it at a different place.
I played with it a bit this afternoon and came up with the following
untested patch to fix the pr45605.C testcase
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > I've had this flagged to look at "later" for quite long now...
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:34:24AM +, Mailaripillai, K
Hi,
(I'm CCing the gcc mailing list too since I suppose it is an accident
that it wasn't in the message I'm replying to)
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:22:27AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >> > Consequentely you need to track to
> > >> > which
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:21:29AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a solicitation for help in converting passes to use the new
> dump infrastructure. More context below.
thanks for the email. I hoped you'd summarize what the long thread
about this (that I lost track of) led t
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:01:53AM +, Yangyueming wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I do the research of min max instructions recently. I find it is related with
> phiopt.
>
> case1:
> int foo(short a ,short b)
> {
> if (a < b)
> a = b;
> return a;
> }
>
> It is successed in pass phiopt1(
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 09:32:48PM -0800, Handong Ye wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:01:53AM +, Yangyueming wrote:
> >> Hi, all
> >>
...
> >>
> >> But when I do the test for
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:12:15PM -0800, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Diego and I seek your comments on the following (loose) proposal.
>
>
> It is sometimes hard to remember which printing function is used
> for debugging a type, or even which type you have.
Yeah, from time to time a still nee
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:08:52AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> > So you do not plan to replace/rename at least some of them? This
> > seems like unnecessary and confusing layering just to avoid the work
> &g
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:19:41AM -0800, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 11/19/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 2012 Michael Matz wrote:
> > > So, yes, the larger layouting should be determined by name of the
> > > dump function. A flag argument might look nice from an interface
> > > design
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:12:17PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > In this day and age of rich-text capable mailers, restricting postings
> > to be text-only seems quaint and antiquated. Are there any hard
> > requirements that force u
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 07:25:34PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While trying to bootstrap with GCAC checking enabled and some
> instrumentation to measure how often objects are being marked, I
> noticed that a lot of cache misses happen because already-marked
> objects are being
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:16:43AM +, Alec Teal wrote:
> configure went well but I keep hitting:
>
> ../.././gcc/gengtype.c:963: error: undefined reference to 'lexer_line'
> ../.././gcc/gengtype.c:1098: error: undefined reference to 'lexer_line'
> ../.././gcc/gengtype.c:1154: error: undef
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:44:07AM -0500, Chassin wrote:
> Hi again , this time i am trying to clone a function then insert it
> with new name
>
If you want to create a clone of a function including its body, you
probably want to use cgraph_function_versioning. See how it is used
in ipa-spl
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> I'm trying to make IL verifying more streamlined - it's often
> that passes have some random (or no) verification in their TODO
> which makes pinning down issues to specific passes hard.
>
> Thus I propose to unify the vario
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:00:52PM +0400, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
> Hi,
> The current implementation of IPACP doesn't allowed to clone function
> if caller(s) to that function is located in another object.
That is not exactly true. With -fipa-cp-clone (default at -O3),
IPA-CP is happy to c
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:28:49PM +0400, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:00:52PM +0400, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
...
> >> Here is what I mean:
> >>
> >> int func
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:02:26PM +0530, Jaishri wrote:
> Hi,
> I am beginner in GCC. I want to make few changes in source code. What are
> the steps that I need to do to get the changes in effect and to test the
> changes?
> Any help is appreciated.
It's all on the web and wiki.
Configuring an
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:50:17PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > AFAIK the only reason we don't break this rule is that doing so would
> > be grossly inefficient; there's nothing to stop any gcc back-end with
> > (say) seriously slow DImode writes from using two SImode writes instead.
>
> I'm fairl
Hi,
I've been rebootstrapping my switch conversion patch (which is still
waiting for review) to make sure it still works. Unfortunately, it
did not. The error given was the following and I believe this is the
warning introduced by Ian as a response to the infamous CERT advisory.
(Furthermo
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:59:54PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> The warnings I added for the CERT advisory say "assuming pointer
> wraparound does not occur" You are running into one of the older
> signed overflow warnings.
>
Oh, sorry for that oversight. It has started happening (wh
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:35:51PM -0300, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> While doing the final trunk->tuples merge, I was surprised to find several
> changes to the inliner and IPA cprop that I was convinced were not going to
> happen until after the branch was merged.
I'm sorry this turned out t
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:24:13PM +0200, Martin Schindewolf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> my current efforts to get some basic support for transactional memory in
> GCC advance slowly but there is one thing I would like to ask because it
> stopped me for days now. What is the best way to do the fu
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:16:03PM -0700, michael.a wrote:
>
> Any advice on compiling gcc? That is the chicken and egg problem. If I
> install a binary version of GCC, then use it to build and install a custom
> GCC (which I want to become the system wide GCC) ...then how is this
> commonly done?
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:40:19PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Summary
> ===
>
> We are closing in on Stage 3, previously announced for September 10th.
> At this point, I'm not aware of any reason to delay that date. Are
> there any Stage 2 patches that people don't think will be submi
Hi,
when trying to analyse dynamically allocated objects in C++, I came
across the need to identify results of the new operator (at least the
non-overridden standard one) as malloc-allocated. The cleanest
approach would probably be to mark the new operator function with the
malloc att
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:16:41PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> I understand, but allowing users to override new means that the actual
>> implementation may not honor the aliasing guarantees of attribute malloc.
>> -Chris
>
> Maybe it could make sense to give t
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 06:30:33PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> when trying to analyse dynamically allocated objects in C++, I came
>> across the need to identify results of the new operator (at least the
>> non
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 07:45:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 12:57:13AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > I seem to remember we had had this discussion before -- in connection
> > with optimizations related to 'malloc' attribute -- and decided not to
> > apply the attrib
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:56:25PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> For a particular implementation of "operator new" (such as the one in
> libstdc++), you can of course make it safe in the same way as "malloc";
> hide the implementation somewhere the rest of the program can't see it
> (modulo LT
Hi,
thanks for looking at the patch.
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:42:55AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> > Well, there's mine :-) Specifically, its the "Switch initializations
> > conversion:" http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg0
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:42:55AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Other than that, the patch looks pretty good to me. However, I'd like a
> middle-end maintainer to review the patch. Ian, Diego, Roger, would one
> of you please take a look?
Well... ping?
> to use the --param mechanism. Our pol
Hi,
On Nov 16, 2007 12:16 PM, Alexander Lamaison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Several projects will survive the initial prototyping stages and become
> > techniques we can apply in industrial settings. We want to attract
> > that. Plus we want to attract the grad student
Hi,
On Nov 16, 2007 6:45 PM, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Kenner wrote:
> > As was said before, the difficultly in people working with GCC is
> > primarily lack of adequate documentation. Creating a "plugin" interface
> > is certainly much more fun than writing documentation
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:13:37PM -0500, Rob Johnson wrote:
> I'm experimenting with the gimple plugin infrastructure and I'm having
> trouble instrumenting code in a way that is compatible with the optimizer.
> Here's a simple example that is intended to insert the function call
> "__mem
301 - 378 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
