on Power Architecture
CRUX PPC - http://cruxppc.org/
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/GCC-4.5.2-Release-Candidate-available-from-gcc.gnu.org-tp30405453p30432287.html
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dennis Clarke-2 wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to
see
their value and I generally exclude them. This
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 14:42 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
A release candidate for GCC 4.5.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.2-RC-20101208
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 167585.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
The branch remains frozen and all checkins until after the final release
of GCC 4.5.2 require explicit RM approval.
I'd like to get the following three testsuite-only patches into the
branch if possible:
[v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Rainer Orth wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
The branch remains frozen and all checkins until after the final release
of GCC 4.5.2 require explicit RM approval.
I'd like to get the following three testsuite-only patches into the
branch if possible:
A release candidate for GCC 4.5.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.2-RC-20101208
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 167585.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-linux, bootstraps and tests on
Hi,
Is there time to include the 4.5 backport patch for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
(is fixed on trunk, a 4.5.0 regression, 4.4.3 branch regression)
The comments indicate that the patch is good to go for 4.5, but I didn't
see an entry log that it was actually
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
A release candidate for GCC 4.5.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.2-RC-20101208
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 167585.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to see
their value and I generally exclude them. This results ( thus far ) in
nice
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to see
their
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with neither ppl nor cloog ? I have yet to
see
their
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, David Fang wrote:
Hi,
Is there time to include the 4.5 backport patch for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
(is fixed on trunk, a 4.5.0 regression, 4.4.3 branch regression)
The comments indicate that the patch is good to go for 4.5, but I didn't
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against ppl 0.10.2 and cloog 0.15.10.
Have you tried a bootstrap with neither
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:16:23PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:44:38PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
snip wonderful work
This was built against
16 matches
Mail list logo
