Hi Peter,
The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time.
Last change 2009-09-25?
Sorry yes. cvs log does things in a unhelpful order. I've been
using SVN too long.
Yes, I found it annoying when I went to look.
$ cvs log |
sed '/^date: /!d; s#/.. .*##; s/.* //;
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:26:31 -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
What I'll likely do then is close down the Sourceforge page. I'll
import the ArcEm CVS into riscos.info SVN for historic value (if
anyone really wants write access, just let me know a user
name/password). It's possible
Ian Jeffray wrote:
Peter,
Please don't top-post.
I do not think it is acceptable for you to close down an opensource
project and take it on to your private subversion server.
riscos.info is not private, any more than any other well-known
RISC OS site is.
As a
contributor, supporter
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:30:26AM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
I don't see the point? arcem.sf.net is the well-known place for it that
has been referenced on the web, mailing lists, and Usenet over many
years. Sourceforge is unlikely to disappear without notice anytime
soon; it's not like
Ian Jeffray wrote:
Peter,
Please don't top-post.
Understand common business practice and avoid the pettyness.
This is a serious development discussion. Proper inline posting
means the points can actually be replied to. Unfortunately
your response seems to be full of insults towards me,
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Peter,
The ArcEm CVS has been static for quite some time.
Last change 2009-09-25?
Sorry yes. cvs log does things in a unhelpful order. I've been
using SVN too long. Do you have any specific plans for ArcEm here?
My biggest frustration with RPCEmu is still the
