Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-09 Thread Ben Avison
On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 14:06:32 -, John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: I thought about that too (i.e. check on Alias$@RunType_XYZ), but then we have text files with execute permission bit set too. I'm not sure whether it going to be worthwhile. As you say, most data filetypes has RunType

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-09 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Ben, I thought about that too (i.e. check on Alias$@RunType_XYZ), but then we have text files with execute permission bit set too. I'm not sure whether it going to be worthwhile. As you say, most data filetypes has RunType variables assigned, so that's no use to distinguish

[gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-08 Thread Duncan Moore
GCCSDK GCC 4.7.4 Release 1 Development 4.7.4 2014-01-08 http://www.riscos.info/downloads/gccsdk/testing/4.7.4/gccsdk-gcc-bin-4.7.4-Rel1dev.zip SharedUnixLibrary 1.12 VirtualRPC-Adjust RISCOS 4.39 The execute permission bit for Text files has changed to be the same as for other filetypes. So the

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-08 Thread John Tytgat
In message 531b1ae9.9010...@gmx.com Duncan Moore duncan.mo...@gmx.com wrote: GCCSDK GCC 4.7.4 Release 1 Development 4.7.4 2014-01-08 http://www.riscos.info/downloads/gccsdk/testing/4.7.4/gccsdk-gcc-bin-4.7.4-Rel1dev.zip SharedUnixLibrary 1.12 VirtualRPC-Adjust RISCOS 4.39 The

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-08 Thread Jeremy Nicoll - ml roinfo
John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e. test on Obey, Absolute, ELF, Module, Utility (any others ?). If you allowed Obey, why not BASIC? And then, why not Lua, REXX, Python etc - how would the code know whether to treat an

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-08 Thread John Tytgat
In message mpro.n24muc00igub60...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid Jeremy Nicoll - ml roinfo jn.ml.roi...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote: John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e. test on Obey, Absolute, ELF, Module,

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-08 Thread Duncan Moore
On 08/03/2014 17:33, John Tytgat wrote: In message mpro.n24muc00igub60...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid Jeremy Nicoll - ml roinfo jn.ml.roi...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote: John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e.

Re: [gccsdk] GCC 4.7.4 Rel 1 Dev 2014-01-08: Text file execute permission bit

2014-03-08 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi John, I think it would be better to derive this from RISC OS filetype, i.e. test on Obey, Absolute, ELF, Module, Utility (any others?). If you allowed Obey, why not BASIC? And then, why not Lua, REXX, Python etc - how would the code know whether to treat an arbitrary