--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 20092
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 20744
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 17992
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 20661
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 20005
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 19595
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:40 ---
Subject: Bug 19568
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-03 19:36 ---
Here it is. I tried to debug it, but it does a lot of things I have a little
knowlegde about.
(gdb) bt
#0 _Jv_Throw (value=0x20001b1b220) at ../../../libjava/exception.cc:113
#1 0x02b6c7dc in _Jv_InterpMethod
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-03 19:35
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Reload may generate
stores to read-only memory
Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:10 +, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
> wrote:
>
>>--- Additional
Consider
int
foo (int a, int b)
{
if (a == b)
if (a == b)
return 123;
return 0;
}
With -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fdump-tree-vrp-details, VRP does not fold
the second "if" statement. Here is what I get from VRP.
Value ranges after VRP:
D.1234_1: VARYING
a_2: VARYING
b_3: VARYING
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Reload may
generate stores to read-only memory
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:10 +, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
19:09 ---
This area in the file has not changed in a while.
I would assume it would be included with the standard headers.
Anyways this is either a bug in cygwin's installer or your install of cygwin.
--
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:09
---
AIX 5.2 supports weak symbols, when using AIX assembler and linker. wEXP
means weak export and EXP means export.
I do not see this problem when using GCC 4.0. I am not sure if the patch for
this was or will
--- Additional Comments From rittle at latour dot waar dot labs dot mot dot
com 2005-05-03 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in
std::basic_string
>|> Secondly, it is clear that your bug report is hypothetical. The
>|> library maintainers do not typic
--- Additional Comments From christophe at saout dot de 2005-05-03 18:46
---
Ok, forget that last part, I'm an idiot. (I added lots of debug to trace down
the problem, in the actual warning, the quotes appear correctly)
Only the %J -> %H problem then.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
When compiling a module with -bundle the -bundle does not get passed right.
It results in an unknown option "undle".
--
Summary: The -bundle linking option does not get processed right
on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: U
This is BASH 2.05b - DISPLAY on
Tue May 3 11:29:07 PST 2005
bash-2.05b$ cd f:/temp/obj1/
bash-2.05b$ ls
Makefile config.cache config.status* gcc/ libcpp/
multilib.out sh3-elf/
build-i686-pc-cygwin/ config.logfixincludes/intl/ libiberty/
serdep.tmp
bash-2.05b$ ma
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
18:29 ---
I didn't download the source to try this out.
But based on the stack trace, I think the problem is probably that
a class compiled with the C++ ABI is referring to an org.xml class.
This doesn't work, as these
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
18:24 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> John, does this work now?
Ping,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20930
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 18:24
---
The specific translation issue you mention will need to be dealt with by the
translators. I don't know why you say %q isn't honoured, the translation
includes translations for the opening and closing quotes a
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
18:23 ---
Could you run gij under gdb and attach a stack trace to this PR?
That might help.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21285
> [de.po]
> #: tree-ssa.c:1379
> msgid "%H%qD is used uninitialized in this function"
> msgstr "%J%qD wird in dieser Funktion uninitialisiert verwendet"
The %J causes gcc to segfault. Changing it to %H fixes everything, obviously.
Besides, the `q' modifier in %qD doesn't seem to be honoured in th
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
17:06 ---
I think this is how C++ works. Or this because of the lazy createness of
constructors.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21363
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
17:01 ---
Subject: Bug 16888
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 17:01:01
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/i386: i
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
17:00 ---
Subject: Bug 16888
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 17:00:26
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
16:47 ---
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.341.2.2
diff -u -r1.341.2.2 configure.in
--- configure.in
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
16:36 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> We no longer fail with this code on the mainline but most likely because
> actually thread the jump
> which I was taking in comment #5.
Let me rewrite that.
This now works on th
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 16:33
---
Conversion of out-of-range floating point values to integers yields undefined
behavior in both C and C++. There is no need for it to be consistent between
compile-time and runtime conversions.
However, the I
The following code generate a compilation error:
class Foo {
private:
Foo() { }
};
class Bar : public Foo
{
public:
Bar() {}
};
int main()
{
return 0;
}
however,commenting out "Bar(){}" (i.e. let the compiler generate one for me),do
not cause any compilation error.
the same case for
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|gcc version 3.4.4 20050429 |
|(prerelease) [FreeBSD] |
GCC target triplet||i686-pc-linu
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-03
16:21 ---
Subject: Re: Problem with define of HUGE_VAL in math_c99.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> 1. Can we work around bug 20558 by using the sizeof trick for isinf?
No, because
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
16:15 ---
We no longer fail with this code on the mainline but most likely because
actually thread the jump which
I was taking in comment #5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20606
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 16:10
---
See also PR 21362
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20606
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
"jkanze at cheuvreux dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regretfully no. For reasons beyond my fathoming, we have to use
> Lotus Notes on a Windows machine for all external email, and
> they've set up the Notes server to add this trailer (which as
> you correctly point out, doesn't make much s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
16:00 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 4.0.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From jkanze at cheuvreux dot com 2005-05-03 15:57
---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
|> > "This message, including any attachments may contain confidential and
|> > privileged material; it is intended only for the person
--- Additional Comments From gbenson at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 15:53
---
Created an attachment (id=8809)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8809&action=view)
Testcase source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21362
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-03 15:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] build now requires bision
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|What|Removed |Added
| ---
--- Additional Comments From gbenson at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 15:27
---
This is possibly the same as bug 20606.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:26 ---
Ok, we don't require bison at least before, sounds like the release package is
messed up.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gbenson at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 15:26
---
Created an attachment (id=8808)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8808&action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21362
Compiling the attached jarfile with optimisation fails with gcj (GCC) 4.0.0
20050423 (Red Hat 4.0.0-2).
$ gcj -findirect-dispatch -shared bork.jar # works
$ gcj -findirect-dispatch -shared -O bork.jar
org/apache/catalina/session/FileStore.java: In class
'org.apache.catalina.session.FileStore':
org
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-03 15:24 ---
Subject: Re: configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Are you building from the source tarball or from CVS?
| If fro
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Are you building from the source tarball or from CVS?
| If from the source tarball, you don't need bison which is why it is just a
warning.
| Otherwise this is a bug in the release process if bison is now required (and
a regression).
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:21 ---
Closing as works for me, a GMP bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:21 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From bh at techhouse dot brown dot edu 2005-05-03
15:18 ---
My (apparently broken) gmp is:
> rpm -qf /usr/lib/libgmp.so.3.3.2
gmp-4.1.2-2
Downloading a new GMP (4.1.4, which creates libgmp.so.3.3.3) appears to work. I
wonder if it's easy to check for this situa
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:17 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcaseL
program bug
real :: t_intersect(2)
t_intersect(minloc(t_intersect)) = 1.e10
end program
Related to PR 21063.
--
What|Removed |Adde
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.4.0 4.0.0 4.1.0
Known to work||3.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Additional Comments From dtemirbulatov at ru dot mvista dot com
2005-05-03 15:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=8807)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8807&action=view)
proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21360
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
The following code produces different output in gcc4.0.0 and MSVC++7 .NET.
Additionally, I've tried 3.4.3 20050227 (Red Hat 3.4.3-22.fc3) and gcc 3.3.4
20040817 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.4-2), who all produce the same output as gcc4.0.0.
I'm unsure who is right here (don't know the exact C++ standards).
--- Additional Comments From dtemirbulatov at ru dot mvista dot com
2005-05-03 15:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=8806)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8806&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21360
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21360
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:06 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> "This message, including any attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged material; it is intended only for the person to whom it is
...
Can you stop attaching this mess
Following code produces wrong results:
#include
float f = -1.0f ;
int main( void )
{
if ( (unsigned int)f != (unsigned int)-1.0f ) {
printf( "%-12s %04d:NG...[%u]--->[%u]\n",
__FILE__, __LINE__, (unsigned int)-1.0f, (unsigned
int)f ) ;
}
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:04 ---
The problem is that we are checking too late.
Confirmed, a regression from 3.3.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From matt at mail dot bettencourt dot info
2005-05-03 15:04 ---
mail.bettencourt.info> gfortran -c part.f90
part.f90: In function 'updateposition':
part.f90:168: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_ss_descriptor, at
fortran/trans-array.c:1264
Please submit a full
--- Additional Comments From matt at mail dot bettencourt dot info
2005-05-03 15:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=8805)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8805&action=view)
code which causes compiler error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21359
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21359
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
15:00 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
struct coperator_stack
{
template
void push3();
};
template
void bla(F f);
template
void f()
{
bla(coperator_stack::push3);
}
Related to PR 20549.
--
What
--
Summary: gfortran internal error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: matt at mail
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
14:51 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
14:45 ---
Are you building from the source tarball or from CVS?
If from the source tarball, you don't need bison which is why it is just a
warning.
Otherwise this is a bug in the release process if bison is now requi
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 14:42
---
Yeah, a bug in combine_simplify_rtx. I have a patch that fixes this, but
while working on a testcase I encountered other bug as well, so am looking
into that too.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
14:39 ---
> __builtin_isnan is type-generic and functionally so, unlike
> __builtin_signbit which isn't although it should be and __builtin_isinf
> which tries to be type-generic and is broken in doing so (bug 205
--- Additional Comments From kho at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 14:25 ---
Fixed in cvs.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
13:43 ---
This is known and a long standing bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21357
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan at yosifov dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21314
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 13:34
---
I'm tempted to change this to WONTFIX.
The patch for PR java/19285 party fixes this for indirect dispatch: in A.foo2(),
the field B.bar is initialized by a call to _Jv_ResolvePoolEntry, and this is
only called
--- Additional Comments From william at gallaf dot net 2005-05-03 13:32
---
*** Bug 21358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21357
--- Additional Comments From william at gallaf dot net 2005-05-03 13:32
---
Browser hung for 5 minutes after first submit without showing a "bug submitted"
page, so I tried again ... apologies for noise.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21357 ***
--
What
--
Bug 17574 depends on bug 18399, which changed state.
Bug 18399 Summary: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Class initialization optimization does
not work with the inliner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18399
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 13:12
---
This bug is obsoleted by the fix for PR java/19285.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
Output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.0/configure --prefix=/home/williamg/local/x86_64-40
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0
Command line:
~/local/x86_64-40/bin/gcc -O1 -Wall
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
13:10 ---
Subject: Bug 21330
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 13:09:54
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog loop-unswitch.c
gc
Output of gcc -v:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.0/configure --prefix=/home/williamg/local/x86_64-40
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0
Command line:
~/local/x86_64-40/bin/gcc -O1 -Wall
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
13:01 ---
Subject: Bug 21297
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 12:58:13
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/i386: i
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-03
12:59 ---
Subject: Re: Problem with define of HUGE_VAL in math_c99.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> > We have a functional __builtin_isnan, there is no need to fix that
> > particular
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2005-05-03 12:30 ---
on powerpc-linux, the build fails earlier:
stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/usr/powerpc-linux/bin/ -c -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-error
-DH
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
12:12 ---
Subject: Bug 21209
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 12:02:14
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-03 12:03
---
Fixed for 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
I have internal compiler error for the following c code:
int a;
void* p;
void foo (void)
{
switch (a)
{
a0: case 0: p = &&a1;
a1: case 1: p = &&a2;
a2: default: p = &&a1;
}
goto *p;
}
Command line:
gcc -c -O2 1.c
Output:
1.c: In function 'foo':
1.c:5: error: dominator of
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
11:35 ---
> Use __FLT_MIN__ etc. since may not be included.
Of course.
> For a good fix we'll want to add built-in functions compatible with the
> Solaris header and remove the relevant fixes, and those would te
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-03 11:14
---
Hi James, and thanks for your explanations. Indeed, maybe better concentrating
on the v7-branch + documentation updates: as I told you already the framework
is already there and I will add very soon a different pol
--- Additional Comments From jkanze at cheuvreux dot com 2005-05-03 10:59
---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
|> > I'm not sure what sort of help you are looking for. I thought
|> > that I very clearly pointed out the problem, and the point in
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-03
10:54 ---
Subject: Re: Problem with define of HUGE_VAL in math_c99.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> This works fine for "big" numbers, but are there similar tricks to distinguish
> den
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-03 10:39
---
In exceptions, I'm tempted to use something very simple, a fixed-size buffer,
as in STLPort, but that is the typical change affecting the ABI :(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-03 10:15
---
... remember to regenerate ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21131
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 10:01
---
Applied 3.3.x patch too.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
09:50 ---
Subject: Bug 21131
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_3-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 09:49:47
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
09:48 ---
> I'm not sure what is best done with the signbit definition (maybe nothing if
> it will never call a library function at present, even though it isn't
> properly type-generic);
We can discriminate using
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-03 09:29
---
> I'm not sure what sort of help you are looking for. I thought
> that I very clearly pointed out the problem, and the point in
> the code where it occured.
Ok, my message was not clear. I'm looking for help abou
--- Additional Comments From jkanze at cheuvreux dot com 2005-05-03 09:09
---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
|> Whereas I'm all for providing alternate memory management
|> policies (we are very close to that in the v7-branch and I
|> promise f
seen with CVS 20050502, last version that built sucessfully was CVS 20050413.
reproducible on i486-linux and x86_64-linux.
Bootstrap comparison failure!
ada/b_gnatb.o differs
make[3]: *** [gnucompare-lean] Error 1
--
Summary: [3.4 regression] ada bootstrap comparision failure
There are numerous places in the library where rank 7
arrays are not handled correctly. This affects, for example,
in_pack:
$ cat re.f90
program main
real, dimension (2,2,2,2,2,2,2):: a
a = 1.0
call foo(a(2:1:-1,:,:,:,:,:,:))
end program main
subroutine foo(a)
real, dimension (2,2,2,2,2,
--- Additional Comments From jkanze at cheuvreux dot com 2005-05-03 08:56
---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
|> >I am sending this to the g++ bug list on the recommendation of
|> >Gabriel Dos Reis. From what little I've read in the g++
|> >doc
works as expected on : gcc 2.95, freebsd/linux
does not work as expected on: gcc 3.4.2, freebsd/linux
//non-const references to temp values should be disallowed
--
//the code
enum X{ a, b, c };
class C
{
public:
void func( X & ref = a ) //illegal - should not compile.
{ }
101 - 200 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
