[Bug bootstrap/53583] gcc 4.6.2 build issue..

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53583 --- Comment #3 from ravish ravish_nayak2003 at yahoo dot co.in 2012-06-06 06:31:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Dup of bug 42750. Related to PR 39747 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42750 *** Hi, In Bug-ID 42750 user

[Bug fortran/52594] no traceback expected for explicit fortran stop command combined with -fbacktrace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52594 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53585] template value parameter of pointer-to-member type incorrectly rejects non-direct values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53585 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/53583] gcc 4.6.2 build issue..

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53583 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 08:03:28 UTC --- Did you try the instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC ?

[Bug c/53467] xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 martin dokumentarfilme at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/53583] gcc 4.6.2 build issue..

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53583 --- Comment #5 from ravish ravish_nayak2003 at yahoo dot co.in 2012-06-06 08:36:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Did you try the instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC ? Yes, Jonathan.. I am suspecting on gmp compilation

[Bug bootstrap/53583] gcc 4.6.2 build issue..

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53583 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 08:51:08 UTC --- The linked PRs say you need both 32-bit and 64-bit gmp, not only one or the other.

[Bug c++/53582] [4.6 regression] ICE on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53582 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 09:45:33 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 6 09:45:27 2012 New Revision: 188261 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188261 Log: 2012-06-06 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/29174] does not recognize memcpy and optimize it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29174 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/31677] gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c tree dump scan fails on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31677 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/32629] missing CSE for constant in registers / inefficient memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32629 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/33103] Redundant multiplications for memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33103 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-08-18 09:02:38 |2012-06-06

[Bug middle-end/36598] Failed optimisation of return of struct argment in memcpy-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36598 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/53578] include/ext/concurrence.h relies on ill-formed narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/41455] memcpy not tail called if it's a struct assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41455 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-elf |arm-elf,

[Bug libstdc++/53578] include/ext/concurrence.h relies on ill-formed narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 10:43:22 UTC --- That's because ext/concurrence.h is included throughout the library. I plan to add __gthread_recursive_mutex_destroy on trunk but any fix on the release

[Bug libstdc++/53578] include/ext/concurrence.h relies on ill-formed narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug lto/51205] -flto discards memset/memcpy when only referenced by g++ generated code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51205 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/53583] gcc 4.6.2 build issue..

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53583 --- Comment #7 from ravish ravish_nayak2003 at yahoo dot co.in 2012-06-06 11:00:20 UTC --- Hi, Yes that is true we need to build gmp which supports 32bit and 64bit.. My problem is that one how to build gmp with supporting both 32bit and 64bit.

[Bug target/52415] memcpy to local variable generates unnecessary stack frame for armv7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52415 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jay.foad at

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/53578] include/ext/concurrence.h relies on ill-formed narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 --- Comment #7 from Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com 2012-06-06 11:10:34 UTC --- Changing this line: static typename __enable_ifsizeof(_Rm::sema), void::__type to read: static typename

[Bug libstdc++/53578] include/ext/concurrence.h relies on ill-formed narrowing conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 11:21:30 UTC --- Yes I know, but I want to get rid of that code entirely on trunk, and even a small tweak to fix the narrowing conversion might not be suitable for the release

[Bug bootstrap/53583] gcc 4.6.2 build issue..

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53583 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 11:22:21 UTC --- I've already suggested you use the gcc-help mailing list not bugzilla.

[Bug other/53587] New: [manual] Option -mms-bitfields not documented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53587 Bug #: 53587 Summary: [manual] Option -mms-bitfields not documented Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 --- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-06-06 11:32:08 UTC --- It doesn't quite seem to work for this simple Fortran testcase yet SUBROUTINE S(a,N) INTEGER :: N,a(N) a=1 END SUBROUTINE S (works for

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-06 11:39:25 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 --- Comment #12 from Joost

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 --- Comment #14 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-06-06 11:54:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Well, you can't transform this to a memset ;) blush things work as advertised for correct testcases... thanks!

[Bug debug/53470] [4.8 Regression] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-06 11:55:32 UTC --- On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, jason at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 12:22:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 6 12:22:16 2012 New Revision: 188264 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188264 Log: 2012-06-06 Fabien

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/53588] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53588 Bug #: 53588 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug tree-optimization/53588] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53588 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53589] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53589 Bug #: 53589 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/53588] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53588 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 12:53:35 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 6 12:53:30 2012 New Revision: 188266 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188266 Log: 2012-06-06 Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/53589] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53589 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug ada/53590] New: new compiler generates both SISD and SIMD instructions for parallel operations of a pure function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590 Bug #: 53590 Summary: new compiler generates both SISD and SIMD instructions for parallel operations of a pure function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/53589] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53589 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 13:16:53 UTC --- Created attachment 27562 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27562 gcc48-pr53589.patch Untested fix.

[Bug ada/53590] new compiler generates both SISD and SIMD instructions for parallel operations of a pure function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590 --- Comment #1 from Georg Bauhaus bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2012-06-06 13:29:36 UTC --- For comparison, consider this, giving expected results (1 DIVPD). -- 8 -- typedef double fpt; typedef fpt Vec[2]; struct ArrayWrap { Vec _; };

[Bug fortran/53591] New: Front-end optimize empty string assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53591 Bug #: 53591 Summary: Front-end optimize empty string assignments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 14:11:07 UTC --- Created attachment 27563 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27563 proposed patch Not as easy when the initialized struct contains padding

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc

[Bug ada/53592] New: ICE when hitting assigment to component of SSE vector_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592 Bug #: 53592 Summary: ICE when hitting assigment to component of SSE vector_type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52654] [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug debug/53470] [4.8 Regression] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 15:27:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) All of the clearing is done to push down memory usage and/or cause types to be referenced that are otherwise unused. A way to

[Bug fortran/45602] Reject coarrays for move_alloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45602 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53526] [Coarray] (lib) Properly handle MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53526 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 15:34:23 UTC --- *** Bug 45602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/53580] Internal Segmentation fault in nested omp parallel, omp parallel for and omp parallel for reduction Directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug debug/53470] [4.8 Regression] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at redhat dot com | --- Comment #10

[Bug c/53593] New: #pragma prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53593 Bug #: 53593 Summary: #pragma prefetch Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 16:36:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Joseph, Jason - any opinion on the question of equivalence between memcpy/memset and an aggregate assignment/init (also consider

[Bug c++/53585] template value parameter of pointer-to-member type incorrectly rejects non-direct values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53585 --- Comment #2 from Simon Hill yacwroy at gmail dot com 2012-06-06 16:43:41 UTC --- Thats... really odd but OK. I guess I read it as you do, the key words being expressed as. I wonder whether that was the intent, and if so, what their rationale

[Bug c++/53594] New: [C++11Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for member with NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53594 Bug #: 53594 Summary: [C++11Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for member with NSDMI Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53594] [C++11] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for member with NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53594 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/53594] [C++11] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for member with NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53594 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 16:56:12 UTC --- Reduced: class Range { const int min = 1; };

[Bug c/53580] Internal Segmentation fault in nested omp parallel, omp parallel for and omp parallel for reduction Directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27565|0 |1 is

[Bug c/53580] Internal Segmentation fault in nested omp parallel, omp parallel for and omp parallel for reduction Directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 17:50:42 UTC --- Created attachment 27567 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27567 gcc47-pr53580.patch Untested 4.7 patch.

[Bug fortran/53509] exp and log function give unexpected results when called with numbers as arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53509 --- Comment #3 from Fedor Baart f.baart at gmail dot com 2012-06-06 17:55:54 UTC --- Thanks, I managed to solve this by recompiling gmp using gcc 4.5 instead of clang, which is the default in macports.

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/53593] #pragma prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53593 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 18:17:28 UTC --- This pragma is a control for the equivalent of the option -fprefetch-loop-arrays . You might want to try out -fprefetch-loop-arrays out.

[Bug libgomp/52993] gomp_init_nest_lock_25: possible bad call to memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52993 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 18:31:13 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 6 18:31:06 2012 New Revision: 188276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188276 Log: PR libgomp/52993 *

[Bug libgomp/52993] gomp_init_nest_lock_25: possible bad call to memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52993 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53586] Internal compiler errors on cp/pt.c:12077 and expr.c:9147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53586 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Torrens paulotorrens at gnu dot org 2012-06-06 18:43:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) What happens if you use decltype instead of typeof ? templatetypename T auto ptr2bitmap(T *bitmap, int width, int depth = 3) -

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] New: Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

=c,c++ --disable-nls --disable-shared --with-dwarf2 Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.1 20120606 (prerelease) (GCC) GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.1 20120606 (prerelease) (avr) compiled by GNU C version 3.4.5 (mingw-vista special r2), GMP version 4.3.2, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC version 0.8.2 It's

[Bug c++/53596] New: g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 Bug #: 53596 Summary: g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 19:54:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27570 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27570 ira dump of older version (good)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 19:55:49 UTC --- Created attachment 27571 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27571 ira dump of newer version (+10%)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 19:56:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27572 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27572 reload dump of older version (good)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 19:58:10 UTC --- Created attachment 27573 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27573 reload dump of newer version (+10%)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 20:05:02 UTC --- And here is the first part of the diff of the reload dumps that shows that something weird is going on: --- bresenham-i-1.198r.reloadWed Jun 6 19:59:24

[Bug c++/53585] template value parameter of pointer-to-member type incorrectly rejects non-direct values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53585 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-06-06 20:06:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I wonder whether that was the intent, and if so, what their rationale was. IMO it's very arbitrary and unintuitive,

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 20:12:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) That's not very narrow interval. Please bisect what affected it (or what affected it most). The only changes to 4_7-branch in the

[Bug fortran/40850] double free in nested types with allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850 Brent W. Barker b.w.barker at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.w.barker

[Bug fortran/53597] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] F95/F2003 constraint no longer triggers: un-SAVED default-initialized module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53597 Bug #: 53597 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] F95/F2003 constraint no longer triggers: un-SAVED default-initialized module variable Classification: Unclassified

[Bug fortran/40850] double free in nested types with allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 20:58:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) I found that the following nested deallocation program still fails in 4.6.3. I can confirm that it fails with 4.6.3. However, it works for me

[Bug other/53598] New: missed diagnostics / equality comparison result unused.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53598 Bug #: 53598 Summary: missed diagnostics / equality comparison result unused. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51938] missed optimization: 2 comparisons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51938 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug c++/53599] New: gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 Bug #: 53599 Summary: gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53599] gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 --- Comment #1 from Philipp s...@s-e-f-i.de 2012-06-06 21:45:30 UTC --- Created attachment 27574 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27574 Preprocessed source

[Bug libgomp/53600] New: Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'omp_lib.mod' for reading at (1).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53600 Bug #: 53600 Summary: Fatal Error: Can't open module file 'omp_lib.mod' for reading at (1). Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 22:43:23 UTC --- The warning is valid, the fact Base is protected is irrelevant, you're not using delete with a Base* operand. Consider: class MoreDerived : public Derived {

[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 22:45:00 UTC --- The reason previous versions of GCC do not warn is because GCC has been improved and now issues a warning for unsafe code that it didn't diagnose before. This

[Bug c++/53567] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered on missing enum entry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53567 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-06 23:01:52 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jun 6 23:01:45 2012 New Revision: 188283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188283 Log: /cp 2012-06-06

[Bug c++/53567] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered on missing enum entry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53567 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-07 05:36:23 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Thu Jun 7 05:36:18 2012 New Revision: 188294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188294 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012-06-07