[Bug c/55084] please submit full bug report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55084 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/55103] New: [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/mips/int-moves-2.c ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55103 Bug #: 55103 Summary: [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/mips/int-moves-2.c ICEs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/55103] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/mips/int-moves-2.c ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55103 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/52956] Missing overflow warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52956 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/55103] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/mips/int-moves-2.c ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55103 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 09:32:06 UTC --- This is because save_target_globals does not allocate a target_lra_int (though it might be zero out the array before doing anything else too).

[Bug middle-end/55103] [4.8 Regression] All MIPS16 attribute tests ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55103 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #30 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 10:08:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28543 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28543 Updated patch Hi, this is updated patch I am testing. It fixes

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 10:11:13 UTC --- Concerning vincenzo's request about 4.7 version, it won't work - it depends on improvements of inline metric and ipa-prop we made for 4.8

[Bug c++/54526] [C++11] :: is incorrectly treated as digraph : followed by colon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-28 10:59:50 UTC --- You are right, sorry. I have a lexer patch in testing which I will be sending shortly.

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #27 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 11:15:24 UTC --- There were concerns about error handling in out-of-memory conditions which I addressed in a separate patch

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #32 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-10-28 11:27:22 UTC --- In a small test (that I will eventually publish here) the new patch at -O2 looks superior to 4.7.2 at O3. I would like to build a test with

[Bug rtl-optimization/39607] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145309 caused ICE in emit_swap_insn, at reg-stack.c:827

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39607 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54961] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr48757.f -O (internal compiler error) after revision 192440

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 11:44:50 UTC --- The problems of comment #4 and comment #5 are PR39607, a problem that should be solved in reg-stack. The problem of comment #0 is a problem in IRA.

[Bug rtl-optimization/38711] ira should not be using df-lr except at -O1.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38711 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 11:52:16 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Sun Oct 28 11:52:11 2012 New Revision: 192890 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192890 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/38711] ira should not be using df-lr except at -O1.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38711 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/39607] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145309 caused ICE in emit_swap_insn, at reg-stack.c:827

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39607 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/54961] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr48757.f -O (internal compiler error) after revision 192440

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 12:33:50 UTC --- I cannot reproduce this problem, neither before nor after r192890. Can you please attach the .ira dump (with -fdump-rtl-ira-all) after r192890, with

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 12:54:01 UTC --- I think the reason this doesn't show up everywhere is due to a problem with older versions of GDB. Using GDB 7.3.50.20110722-16.fc16 I get this in the

[Bug target/27619] wrong code for mixed-mode division with -mpowerpc64 -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27619 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 13:20:38 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sun Oct 28 13:20:31 2012 New Revision: 192894 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192894 Log: PR

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 13:27:20 UTC --- The shared_ptr tests fail because GDB is getting the variable's type wrong, seeing it as the base class not the correct type: (gdb) p sp1 $1 =

[Bug c++/55104] New: ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:269

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55104 Bug #: 55104 Summary: ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:269 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/55105] New: use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH incorrect for AIX -- cause trunk build to fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55105 Bug #: 55105 Summary: use of LD_LIBRARY_PATH incorrect for AIX -- cause trunk build to fail Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 13:37:31 UTC --- Sorry, I misread that output, it does know the right type, it just doesn't match the printer for some reason (gdb) ptype sp1 type = class

[Bug debug/54773] no debug info generated for rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54773 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 13:57:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (I'll file a separate bug about the unknown type error for the shared_ptr type) That's http://sourceware.org/PR14441

[Bug c++/55106] New: ice: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106 Bug #: 55106 Summary: ice: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/55107] New: GCC in an infinite loop at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55107 Bug #: 55107 Summary: GCC in an infinite loop at -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/55106] ice: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/54996] gcc with --target=avr fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54996 --- Comment #2 from lvd.mhm at gmail dot com 2012-10-28 15:25:28 UTC --- I was wrong not setting $PATH to just compiled binutils. However, even after setting correct $PATH or just compiling binutils to default /usr/local/bin, problem still

[Bug target/54996] gcc with --target=avr fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54996 lvd.mhm at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-28 15:30:37 UTC --- What exactly did you test? The bug is clearly present before r192890. Here is the diff between r192889 and r192890: @@ -1663,16 +1663,17 @@

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-28 15:36:55 UTC --- Created attachment 28546 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28546 wait.ii.203r.ira.r192889

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-28 15:38:09 UTC --- Created attachment 28547 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28547 wait.ii.203r.ira.r192890

[Bug c/55108] New: bad compile-time evaluation of members of initialized union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55108 Bug #: 55108 Summary: bad compile-time evaluation of members of initialized union Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/54957] Two crashes introduced by rev192488

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957 --- Comment #17 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 16:37:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 28466 [details] Proposed patch Handle the possibility that stmt_bb may be NULL in

[Bug fortran/54958] Wrongly rejects ac-implied-DO variables which also occur with INTENT(IN)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54958 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 16:57:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Oct 28 16:57:12 2012 New Revision: 192896 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192896 Log: 2012-10-28

[Bug c++/55109] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while reporting error in template function instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109 Bug #: 55109 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while reporting error in template function instantiation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 17:24:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) What exactly did you test? The bug is clearly present before r192890. I was testing a cross from

[Bug tree-optimization/55110] New: Internal compiler error in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4633

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55110 Bug #: 55110 Summary: Internal compiler error in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4633 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/55109] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while reporting error in template function instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-10-28 17:58:55 UTC --- The constant folder (fold-const.c:int_const_binop_1) would seem to be the place where overflow information would most readily be

[Bug c++/55077] implement and enable by default -Wliteral-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55077 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-10-28 18:02:07 UTC --- On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: // Expressions, such as those that indicate rounding-down, should NOT

[Bug target/51106] [4.6 Regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:2314

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106 --- Comment #21 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 18:17:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) This issue still exists in mainline, there seems to be no objection to Andrey's suggested fix, could someone please

[Bug fortran/54958] Wrongly rejects ac-implied-DO variables which also occur with INTENT(IN)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54958 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 18:34:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) The constant folder (fold-const.c:int_const_binop_1) would seem to be the place where overflow information would most readily

[Bug rtl-optimization/54993] [4.8 regression] PIC register not marked as live

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54993 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-10-28 18:34:52 UTC --- I didn't write anything about -fPIC. The PIC register is used for TLS accesses.

[Bug tree-optimization/55111] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in live_on_edge, at tree-vrp.c:89

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55111 Bug #: 55111 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in live_on_edge, at tree-vrp.c:89 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug fortran/52724] Internal read with character(kind=4) data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized TST #imm, R0 instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 22:01:47 UTC --- Another thing I've noticed... Cases such as: mov.l r0,@r2! LS mov r13,r0! MT and #7,r0 !

[Bug lto/55112] New: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112 Bug #: 55112 Summary: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5424 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug lto/55112] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Oppenlander patrick at motec dot com.au 2012-10-28 22:18:32 UTC --- Created attachment 28549 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28549 Problem object file

[Bug lto/55113] New: internal compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:3739

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113 Bug #: 55113 Summary: internal compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:3739 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug target/54963] [4.8 Regression] Wrong code generated for libgfortran/generated/eoshift3_8.c on SH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 23:01:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28551 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28551 Proposed patch This patch fixes the problem, by using

[Bug lto/55113] internal compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:3739

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 23:27:17 UTC --- Can you attach the preprocessed source for those object files and how those object files were compiled?

[Bug lto/55112] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5424

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-28 23:28:39 UTC --- Can you attach the preprocessed source for this object file?

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28541|0 |1 is

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-10-29 00:41:19 UTC --- This patch: diff --git a/gcc/lra-eliminations.c b/gcc/lra-eliminations.c index d80..681c609 100644 --- a/gcc/lra-eliminations.c +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/55106] ice: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29 00:42:30 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Mon Oct 29 00:42:25 2012 New Revision: 192904 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192904 Log:

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 ---

[Bug target/54963] [4.8 Regression] Wrong code generated for libgfortran/generated/eoshift3_8.c on SH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29 00:59:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Created attachment 28551 [details] Proposed patch This patch fixes the problem, by using 'emit_move_insn' instead of

[Bug middle-end/55114] New: [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/builtins-53.c ICEs on mips64 soft-float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55114 Bug #: 55114 Summary: [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/builtins-53.c ICEs on mips64 soft-float Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-10-29 02:31:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I am testing this patch: diff --git a/gcc/lra-eliminations.c b/gcc/lra-eliminations.c index d80..cbfbe7a 100644 ---