http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57948
Bug ID: 57948
Summary: internal compiler error: in initialize_reference, at
cp/call.c:9285
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57947
Bug ID: 57947
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault using
extended initializer lists without -std=c++11 or
-std=gnu++11
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57946
Bug ID: 57946
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in
int_fits_type_p
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945
Bug ID: 57945
Summary: internal compiler error: in varpool_get_node, at
cgraph.h:840
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57944
Bug ID: 57944
Summary: undefined reference to 'sqrt'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57943
Bug ID: 57943
Summary: [c++11] invalid decltype expression accepted in
template default type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57942
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57942
Bug ID: 57942
Summary: g++-4.8.1 tries to instantiate wrong constructor
(C++11)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5)
> + gfc_error ("In a READ statement, the input item at %L shall not "
> +"be the do-variable of any io-implied-do");
Requires for %L: &n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57922
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45318
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
Bug ID: 57941
Summary: [c++11] confusing error message with invalid constexpr
constructor in template struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57940
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #60 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Laurent Aflonsi from comment #59)
> I have a functional regression due to this improvement when we are compiling
> the enclosed example in -O2.
> $ sh-superh-elf-gcc -O2 pr51244-20-main.c pr51244-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If multi-line descriptions are to be disallowed (and it does appear they
are outside the .opt format as presently documented in options.texi), then
opt-read.awk should generate an error on e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352
--- Comment #4 from Göran Uddeborg ---
Created attachment 30531
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30531&action=edit
Merge all multi-line descriptions in .opt files
That I'll do, I thought.
And promptly forgot about, apparently!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Cleaned-up & reduced testcase:
/* PR sanitizer/56417 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-w" } */
int
foo (void)
{
return __builtin_strlen (&foo);
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45318
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57940
Bug ID: 57940
Summary: [PATCH] Rerun df_analyze after delete_unmarked_insns
during DCE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57938
--- Comment #1 from Francesco Nidito ---
Tried the code on gcc 4.8.1 for win32 (mingw) and it dos not repro.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57934
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57922
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
26 matches
Mail list logo