http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58289
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58289
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #2)
1. This is not mentioned anywhere in
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Bug ID: 58294
Summary: ice in update_ssa_across_abnormal_edges, at
tree-inline.c:1892
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Krzysztof Strasburger strasbur at chkw386 dot ch.pwr.wroc.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #12 from Krzysztof Strasburger strasbur at chkw386 dot
ch.pwr.wroc.pl ---
Created attachment 30740
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30740action=edit
Example of failing FORTRAN code, with assembler output from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
It looks like
Index: gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
Bug ID: 58295
Summary: The combination pass doesn't eliminates some extra
zero extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58242
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58296
Bug ID: 58296
Summary: ivopts is unable to handle some loops altered by the
loop header copying pass
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21682
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 2 09:42:39 2013
New Revision: 202163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202163root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-09-02 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26605
Bug 26605 depends on bug 21682, which changed state.
Bug 21682 Summary: Disallowed using declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21682
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21682
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative fix:
...
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index ee3503c..c8b328c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -5189,7 +5189,7 @@ finish_transaction_stmt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58290
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For a cross to mips-elf this works for me:
./cc1plus -quiet t.i -flto
t.i:36:5: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration [enabled by
default]
};
^
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55484
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51394
Bug 51394 depends on bug 45170, which changed state.
Bug 45170 Summary: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 45170, which changed state.
Bug 45170 Summary: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51075
Bug 51075 depends on bug 45170, which changed state.
Bug 45170 Summary: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58297
Bug ID: 58297
Summary: wrong DTOR call is generated when virtual base is
present
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58297
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcc at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Nice. Any hope?
Chromium is another project which we can't build with gcc trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
--- Comment #2 from Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de ---
Oh, -DPRECOMP `wx-config --cflags` is a remnant and may be removed from the
Makefile. The issue continues to be reproducible. It appears on openSUSE
Factory's gcc 4.8.
Using built-in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57910
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
In practice, this would block the release of 4.9.0. Thus hope for sure, it's
only matter of when.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58233
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58224
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
--- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de ---
you cannot include a precompiled header from inside another header.
Ok. So, this limitation was properly implemented in gcc 4.7, which simply
skipped over the indirectly-included .gch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenther at suse dot de |rguenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #4 from Winston Smith smith_winston_6079 at hotmail dot com ---
I see. Is that the cause for the issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Krzysztof Strasburger strasbur at chkw386 dot ch.pwr.wroc.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed by r199422 - doesn't seem to be easily backportable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 2 13:24:30 2013
New Revision: 202168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202168root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-02 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Bug ID: 58298
Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in mentions_vars_p_field_decl, at
lto/lto.c:1392
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222
blake.fumberger at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58292
--- Comment #3 from Timo Sintonen t.sintonen at luukku dot com ---
It seems gdc has a fix that does not produce this any more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58299
Bug ID: 58299
Summary: Ada defines UNICODE and _UNICODE too late for
__MINGW32__
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #6 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Mon Sep 2 14:59:09 2013
New Revision: 202176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202176root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-08-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56382
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Sep 2 16:19:20 2013
New Revision: 202179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202179root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/56382
* expr.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #16 from Krzysztof Strasburger strasbur at chkw386 dot
ch.pwr.wroc.pl ---
Dear Dominique,
I cannot agree with you. You are interpreting the code that may access the
array beyond declared bounds as invalid, which is simply not true.
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I cannot agree with you. You are interpreting the code that may access the
array beyond declared bounds as invalid, which is simply not true.
6.5 Use of data objects
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10541
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58106
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Sep 2 19:28:01 2013
New Revision: 202184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202184root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-02 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #7 from Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com ---
I wrote the patch for 4.8.1 (which is the easy part), now I will see if I can
get approval to submit it through the bureaucracies (the hard part).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
--- Comment #6 from Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de ---
It seems to be ineffective.
//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-202158-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130902 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56519
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58301
Bug ID: 58301
Summary: [4.9 Regression] error: inlining failed in call to
always_inline 'set_mem_alias_set'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Created attachment 30743
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30743action=edit
Yet another untested fix
Ok, this is somewhat similar to Martin's very first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
-gnu
--target=i686-w64-mingw32 --disable-multilib --disable-nls
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-arch=i686
--with-tune=generic
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.9.0 20130902 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
Bug ID: 58302
Summary: compilation error :
std::negative_binomial_distribution::operator(e, p)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58303
Bug ID: 58303
Summary: C99 union initializers new union members clobber
earlier data
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58292
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
73 matches
Mail list logo