https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #16)
Created attachment 33433 [details]
bb-slp-11.c.126t.slp2 dump
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-11.c:19:8:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #17)
Created attachment 33434 [details]
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
For this we see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63011
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63092
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63052
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62940
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63084
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63117
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61986
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62291
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, the testcase is absymally slow in compiling even with -O1 if you enable
glibc memory checking with both(!) MALLOC_CHECK_=3 and MALLOC_PERTURB_=69
I have no idea why...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Bug ID: 63135
Summary: [4.9 regression] Infinite loop in var-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3, 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63137
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63136
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63138
Bug ID: 63138
Summary: Gentleman!!*Watch NEW ZEALAND vs USA Live Streaming
Online
Product: gcc
Version: new-ra
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63138
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
Bug ID: 63139
Summary: Class-scope typedef overwrites typedef of previously
defined class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't remember, but IRC log does something:
IRC #gcc on oftc Dec 1 2009
jakub jason: so, I have a patch to handle the implicit cdtors in extern
template class by exporting the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63139
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
--- Comment #2 from yml yml6087582 at 163 dot com ---
But with the option of -mlittle-endian ,it would not have this error. Do it
prove that the backend support zero-length arrays passed by value ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That is perhaps where we started to have %r11 clobbered in the routine
(therefore pro_and_epilogue wanted to save %r11-%r15), and all the %r11 uses
later disappear because of later
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #4 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
So it looks like the reason was
jason My thinking was that the ABI change should also support implementations
that implement D0 as another entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
--- Comment #38 from Vidya Praveen vp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Until we fix this issue, could we have workaround posted by Martin Jambor
(comment #29) applied again on 4.9 and trunk? This issue is not seen on 4.8
releases because of the workaround.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You could e.g. implement the dtors as:
_Z...D0...:
set some hard reg to 0
tail call some function
_Z...D1...:
set some hard reg to 1
tail call some function
_Z...D2...:
set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #27)
Possible fix:
Applied to trunk, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
Bug ID: 63140
Summary: wrong code generation probably due to optimization
problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Hoffmann gcc at boomerangsworld dot de ---
Created attachment 33436
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33436action=edit
(gzipped) preprocessed input file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 2 15:57:56 2014
New Revision: 214825
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214825root=gccview=rev
Log:
[ARM][1/2] Implement lceil, lfloor, lround optabs with new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 2 16:00:01 2014
New Revision: 214826
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214826root=gccview=rev
Log:
[2/2] Vectorise lroundf, lfloorf, lceilf using the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Sep 2 16:08:05 2014
New Revision: 214827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214827root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/62270
* interface.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63142
Bug ID: 63142
Summary: gcc-cilk can not spawn a function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63142
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Try:
g++ -o fib -fcilkplus -lcilkrts fib.cpp
instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #6 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
OK, so should we declare r206182 an unintentional bug fix and mark this bug
wontfix?
To be clear, the ABI then is
For any class an implementation has the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62015
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63145
Bug ID: 63145
Summary: [AArch64] ICE with vcombine_u64 at -O2 -g
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63145
--- Comment #1 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Created attachment 33438
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33438action=edit
vcombine.c testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
--- Comment #5 from Joshua Conner josh.m.conner at gmail dot com ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63145
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Hoffmann gcc at boomerangsworld dot de ---
Small update: The working 32 bit target was gcc 4.7, so it's not related to
this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't see cppmodelmanager in that link command, so I'm guessing ensureUpdated
is hidden in a different .so? Certainly compiling the preprocessed file you
attached provides a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62174
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese fritzoreese at gmail dot com ---
Patches should go to the gcc-patches at gcc.gnu.org mailing list (and in
case of Fortran FE patches also CC fortran at gcc.gnu.org ml). That is
where patch review happens.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #7 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
(In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #6)
OK, so should we declare r206182 an unintentional bug fix and mark this
bug wontfix?
One thing to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #7 from Chris Clayton chris2553 at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 33439
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33439action=edit
Pre-processed cppcodemodelinspectordialog
cppcodemodelinspectordialog.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409
Freddie Chopin freddie_chopin at op dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
On x86_64-apple-darwin13.3, for the test in comment 1 I get
0 0 ''
sh: /bin/false: No such file or directory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't think this is a compiler bug.
cppmodelmanager.o is simply missing in the object file list of the
libCppEditor.so link command.
And the undefined symbol from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63147
Bug ID: 63147
Summary: Cilk Plus in GCC 4.9 is missing metadata support
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #9 from Chris Clayton chris2553 at googlemail dot com ---
That seems odd to me, although I'm happy to be told I'm wrong. I base this on
the fact that reverting the code change from r214208 permits a successful
build. MoreOver, in both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Chris Clayton from comment #9)
That seems odd to me, although I'm happy to be told I'm wrong. I base this
on the fact that reverting the code change from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111
--- Comment #18 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Sep 2 22:28:29 2014
New Revision: 214832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214832root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62111
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62261
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Sep 2 22:32:29 2014
New Revision: 214833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214833root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62261
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62261
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
--- Comment #3 from angelo angelo70 at gmail dot com ---
This is probably a non-bug.
I was confused last night, you are right,
move.l square_test@GOT(%a5),%a0
jsr (%a0)
Is generated and is correct (move.l, instruction set is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63148
Bug ID: 63148
Summary: r187042 causes auto-vectorization failure for X86 for
-m32.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61981
Bountysource community at bountysource dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31176
Richard Smith richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63149
Bug ID: 63149
Summary: can't initialize std::vectorT from auto-deduced type
'const std::initializer_listT '
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63149
Richard Smith richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|can't initialize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63149
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63150
Bug ID: 63150
Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr53199.c
scan-assembler-times *
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63151
Bug ID: 63151
Summary: Accessibility error when brace-constructing base class
with protected defaulted constructor and member
variable
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm working on it
501 - 569 of 569 matches
Mail list logo