https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55190
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've adjusted the title, since the issues here are not SH specific. There is
also a similar PR 62233.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65680
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, PR56812 and thus g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc looks suspiciously similar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65680
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35241
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35241action=edit
gcc5-pr65680.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647
--- Comment #11 from Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
In any case, a remaining testsuite issue doesn't deserve P1 at this point.
If nobody work on this, I will come up with a patch soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647
--- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If nobody work on this, I will come up with a patch soon.
Ok Terry, beside the testsuite issue the problem is fixed for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65679
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65678
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65676
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Looking at the definition of __mmask8 and __mmask16 in vx512fintrin.h:
typedef unsigned char __mmask8;
typedef unsigned short __mmask16;
the masks should use:
DEF_PRIMITIVE_TYPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65679
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65675
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |bootstrap
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65052
--- Comment #8 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
This seems to work for me, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65675
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It doesn't allow bootstrapping without a hosted runtime, but we probably want
this patch in libstdc++ anyway:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algo.h
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65678
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647
--- Comment #14 from Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com ---
The test case is already updated with -mfloat-abi=soft.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65675
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since GCC itself now depends on a hosted C++ library, you can't disable the
hosted library when bootstrapping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65682
Bug ID: 65682
Summary: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on mips64el target in
libgcc _mulvdi3.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 7 09:57:46 2015
New Revision: 221891
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221891root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65351
config/
* picflag.m4:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Gone latent with inliner heuristic changes, -fno-inline -flto-partition=max is
now required to reproduce the ICE (with -O -g, of course).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A posted patch was approved but not yet checked in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
3
fprintf.o 2
195 905fe68a PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY main_test
233 905fe68a RESOLVED_EXEC __iob_func
fprintf-lib.o 1
263 905f8622 RESOLVED_IR inside_main
main.o 3
172 905f8490
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64987
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64236
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65676
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Following patch:
--cut here--
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===
--- config/i386/i386.c (revision 221888)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ping? If TARGET_LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT_P is at fault isn't this a latent issue
also present on branches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also crashes with 4.8.
markus@x4 tmp % tcp_client.ii
template typename struct __and_;
template typename class function;
template typename _Functor class _Base_manager {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Apr 7 10:24:19 2015
New Revision: 221892
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221892root=gccview=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 65489: Accept VSTRUCT constants in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47748
--- Comment #1 from yuta tomino demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp ---
It seems fixed with gcc-4.7.2, 4.8.1, 4.9.2 and 5-20150405.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65684
Bug ID: 65684
Summary: Wrong error message when writing to a string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
Bug ID: 65685
Summary: Reducing alignment with alignas should be rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65684
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Vogt a.vogt at fulguritus dot com ---
This is motivated by this post on Stack Overflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29489388/fortran-end-of-record-error-when-saving-a-variable/29490374#29490374
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65683
Bug ID: 65683
Summary: [5 regression] access types across limited with
breaks restriction of No_Elaboration_Code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62205
--- Comment #3 from yuta tomino demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp ---
It seems fixed with gcc-5-20150405.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256
--- Comment #48 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On ppc64 we generate
.L2:
lfd 6,8(10)
lfd 7,16(10)
lfd 8,24(10)
lfd 9,32(10)
lfd 10,40(10)
lfd 11,48(10)
lfd 12,56(10)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
Created attachment 35244
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35244action=edit
reproducer with temporaries and verbose gcc output including -Wl,-debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Bug ID: 65686
Summary: incorrect warning maybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
Unfortunately -Wl,-debug is missing ;)
Ok, I uploaded a version including -Wl,-debug
It would be interesting to see the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, the ld invocation still looks correct. For some reason we don't see the
debug output from lto-wrapper or the linker plugin. Ah - it looks for '-v',
so can you try with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65687
Bug ID: 65687
Summary: Inconsistent behavior for
__attribute__((__deprecated__)) between C and C++.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62205
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47748
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65678
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Apr 7 15:01:07 2015
New Revision: 221901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221901root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-07 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
--- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Tue Apr 7 13:24:05 2015
New Revision: 221894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221894root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-04-07 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
Ok, the ld invocation still looks correct. For some reason we don't see the
debug output from lto-wrapper or the linker plugin. Ah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65678
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 7 14:35:18 2015
New Revision: 221900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221900root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/65678
* valtrack.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
Created attachment 35245
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35245action=edit
yet another more verbose reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 7 13:40:24 2015
New Revision: 221895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221895root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-07 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 7 13:40:24 2015
New Revision: 221895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221895root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-07 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65680
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE |[4.8/4.9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Apr 7 14:10:43 2015
New Revision: 221897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221897root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/65548
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org ---
Reopening due to lack of resolution.
If system patches should resolve the issue,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65680
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 7 14:34:06 2015
New Revision: 221899
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221899root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/65680
* expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65678
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65676
Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
doko, this fails for me with 4.8.1, and 4.7.4 and 4.8.0
There are no changes between 4.8.1 and 4.8.2 that could have affected this.
Are you sure it's a regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Per discussion on gcc-patches, powerpc64le-linux-gnu shares the
baseline_symbols.txt file with powerpc64-linux-gnu, and there's no current
reason for them to diverge. So nothing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65540
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52982
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65684
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65684
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Vogt a.vogt at fulguritus dot com ---
OK, I agree that the behavior is Standard conforming...
Thanks for the clarification!
Still, the error message issued is not really helpful if one is unfamiliar with
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65688
Bug ID: 65688
Summary: xbomb 2.2a segfault, infinite loop at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635
Tom Honermann tom at honermann dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65688
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256
--- Comment #49 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Richi, see c#45. Basically the regression is gone for the testcase as-is...
But it's pretty easy to twiddle it slightly and show the regression. It's also
important to note this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65684
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65689
Bug ID: 65689
Summary: [AArch64] S constraint fails for inline asm at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65338
iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635
Tom Honermann tom at honermann dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65689
--- Comment #1 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Problem stems from parse_input_constraint (in stmt.c):
if (reg_class_for_constraint (cn) != NO_REGS
|| insn_extra_address_constraint (cn))
*allows_reg = true;
else if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65690
Bug ID: 65690
Summary: [5 Regression] typedef alignment lost since r219705
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #35 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Apr 7 18:09:28 2015
New Revision: 221906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221906root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/63731
libgo: Build and install
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65634
--- Comment #3 from Tom Honermann tom at honermann dot net ---
Confirmed fixed with r221861. I'll leave the bug open though since comment 2
is requesting additional followup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65636
--- Comment #3 from Tom Honermann tom at honermann dot net ---
Confirmed fixed with r221861. I'll leave the bug open though since comment 2
is requesting additional followup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65688
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65690
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #36 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Lynn added a new facility. Some notes on docs:
As far as documentation, I tried to find some documentation on build tags in
general and netgo specifically because it seems like this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65657
--- Comment #4 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj senthil_kumar.selvaraj at atmel dot
com ---
Doesn't appear to be a missed clobber in the md file, as *.expand shows in insn
7 - r22 is in the clobbered registers list. Later passes assume r22 is unused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191
--- Comment #5 from woodfin at intersystems dot com ---
You could try adding a non-static function that returns an address inside Zs.
const Z* getzs() {
return Zs[0];
}
I'd think that would force it to actually perform the initialization if
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo