[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com --- Kostya, Alexey, Eugeniy, please land this fix to llvm tree while I am OOO.

[Bug c++/66234] New: Too much output from pragma message with g++ 4.8 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66234 Bug ID: 66234 Summary: Too much output from pragma message with g++ 4.8 and above Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug target/66235] New: [SH] Optimize tst reg,const movrt sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66235 Bug ID: 66235 Summary: [SH] Optimize tst reg,const movrt sequence Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/66215] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong after label NOP emission for -mhotpatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- No, IMHO you can have many debug insns after that and before first real insn. I'd go for something like: rtx_insn *insn = get_insns (); if (!active_insn_p (insn)) insn =

[Bug rtl-optimization/66207] Switch alpha to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Native bootstrap with alphaev68-linux-gnu (a BWX architecture) with the patch from Comment #1 succeeded, the testresults are at [1]. Comparing to non-LRA testsuite run, here is only one

[Bug tree-optimization/66233] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sounds like gimple folding issue. We have: vect__4.9_31 = (vector(4) float) { 0, 1, 2, 3 }; vect__5.10_32 = (vector(4) unsigned int) vect__4.9_31; where the first stmt's rhs_code is

[Bug rtl-optimization/66207] Switch alpha to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) Native bootstrap with alphaev68-linux-gnu (a BWX architecture) with the patch from Comment #1 succeeded, the testresults are at [1].

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Douglas Mencken from comment #20) I'm lost. “Vanilla” 5.1.0 configured without --disable-checking went thru stage2 w/o any issue... That's interesting - we might

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- linux/aio_abi.h was added in 2.5.32. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=ea5097be4e814a2a9457e60653052306295941e8

[Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 20 May 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Format it as a hexadecimal number.

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #9 from Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5) linux/aio_abi.h was added in 2.5.32. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/

[Bug tree-optimization/66233] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/66221] [CHKP, 6 regression] lto1: error: type variant has different TYPE_ARG_TYPES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66221 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu May 21 08:32:52 2015 New Revision: 223471 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223471root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/66221 *

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Are you sure their user-space kernel headers are at 2.6.9 level? https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=31a3791056e43c6dd7386b8bc0f5fb94848c5a61

[Bug target/66215] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong after label NOP emission for -mhotpatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215 --- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Wouldn't the correct and easy to identify place be right after the first NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK?

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #38 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Thu May 21 06:49:38 2015 New Revision: 223470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223470root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-05-21 Manuel

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #39 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- A summary of what is still pending: 1. Handle macros #define c%d __builtin_printf(c, 0.5); 2. Handle non-contiguous strings: __builtin_printf( % d ,

[Bug c/66233] New: internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233 Bug ID: 66233 Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ossman at cendio

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #11 from Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se --- Not really. :) I stumbled upon this trying to use 2.4 headers, so I honestly haven't tried 2.6.9, RHEL variant or otherwise.

[Bug middle-end/66221] [CHKP, 6 regression] lto1: error: type variant has different TYPE_ARG_TYPES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66221 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/66215] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong after label NOP emission for -mhotpatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5

[Bug c++/66223] Diagnostic of pure virtual function call broken, including __cxa_pure_virtual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING ---

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #2 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com --- I understand you're short of time but this problem is very difficult to reproduce !! I did try to compile and link with -fsanitize=undefined this morning, now here's the interesting part : *

[Bug lto/66228] Compiling simple program with -flto -O1 causes mad behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66228 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c/66219] The gcc generated section start/stop pointers become undefined when option -flto is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/66233] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Seems this is the /* Handle cases of two conversions in a row. */ patterns in match.pd that are causing this. I'd say the bug is that those simplifications are just handling

[Bug tree-optimization/66233] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed, in 4.9 this is in tree-ssa-forwprop.c (combine_conversions) and in fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc). Perhaps we need {inter,inside,final}_vec_{int,float,unsignedp} variables too

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 Bug ID: 66236 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/64208] [4.9 Regression][iwmmxt] ICE: internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64208 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libgcc/58660] ARM/Thumb non-interworking code broken in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58660 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702 --- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ramana Date: Thu May 21 09:23:14 2015 New Revision: 223473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223473root=gccview=rev Log: Fix PR target/26702 For Kwok Cheung

[Bug rtl-optimization/66237] New: [6.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237 Bug ID: 66237 Summary: [6.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE (internal compiler error) Product: gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot

[Bug target/66235] [SH] Optimize tst reg,const movrt sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66235 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is actually a special case of PR 65250.

[Bug target/65979] Multiple issues in conftest.c prevent build on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #18) Yes, that is true. However, because op0, op1, op2 are all arith_reg_dest the peephole will only match if those are GP regs. Each captured

[Bug target/65937] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/pr26702.c scan-assembler \\.size[\\t ]+static_foo, 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65937 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/66207] Switch alpha to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66207 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) Native bootstrap with alphaev68-linux-gnu (a BWX architecture) with the patch from Comment #1

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another thing you might try is to use: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations (as per http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/) and see if the issue goes away, too.

[Bug tree-optimization/66163] [6 Regression] Not working Firefox built with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Firefox developers just fixed first half of problem seen by null sanitizer and I would still wait for fixing the rest: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167119. Looks

[Bug libstdc++/63345] Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast) in libstdc++-v3/include/bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why does your patch need to touch operator* or operator- for any of the iterators? For any dereferenceable iterator the cast should be valid, so if you're seeing invalid casts it

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/66176] Handle conjg() in inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66176 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu May 21 19:00:45 2015 New Revision: 223499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223499root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-05-21 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/66241] [6 regression] [ARM] ICE: verify_type failed while building libstdc++ (dwarfout.c: gen_type_die_with_usage())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241 --- Comment #3 from Vidya Praveen vp at gcc dot gnu.org --- And this change seems to be the cause: Author: hubicka Date: Sat May 16 20:51:50 2015 New Revision: 223252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223252root=gccview=rev Log: *

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED

[Bug target/65979] [4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Multiple issues in |[4.9/5/6

[Bug target/66232] -fPIC -fno-plt -mx32 fails to generate indirect branch via GOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66232 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35585 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35585action=edit A patch I am testing this.

[Bug ada/66242] Front-end error if exception propagation disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66242 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org --- Created attachment 35588 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35588action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug c++/66239] Unoptimized sqrt(float or double) returns wrong values for ARM Cortex-A8 -mfloat-abi=[soft,softfp]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66239 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Andrzejewski maciej.andrzejewski at data dot pl --- It is getting even more interesting. I have disassabled 4 binaries compiled with options: 1) -mfloat-abi=softfp 2) -mfloat-abi=softfp -O 3) -mfloat-abi=hard 4)

[Bug c/66240] New: RFE: extend -falign-xyz syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240 Bug ID: 66240 Summary: RFE: extend -falign-xyz syntax Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ada/66242] New: Front-end error if exception propagation disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66242 Bug ID: 66242 Summary: Front-end error if exception propagation disabled Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/29358] Warning issued two times with snprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29358 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug target/54236] [SH] Improve addc and subc insn utilization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu May 21 12:36:35 2015 New Revision: 223479 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223479root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/54236 *

[Bug middle-end/66241] New: ICE: verify_type failed while building libstdc++ (dwarfout.c: gen_type_die_with_usage())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241 Bug ID: 66241 Summary: ICE: verify_type failed while building libstdc++ (dwarfout.c: gen_type_die_with_usage()) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #3) Alternatively, you can try the patch proposed at [1] and see if it fixes the issue you're facing since it seems to be the same one.

[Bug middle-end/66241] ICE: verify_type failed while building libstdc++ (dwarfout.c: gen_type_die_with_usage())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241 --- Comment #1 from Vidya Praveen vp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35586 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35586action=edit preprocessed file to reproduce ICE

[Bug c/66247] make check-gmp fails for gcc-5.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66247 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Matthew L. Martin from comment #3) The source code in question is downloaded as a prerequisite for building gcc-5.1.0 (gmp). Where should I file a bug against the

[Bug other/66250] New: Can't adjust complex nor decimal floating point modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66250 Bug ID: 66250 Summary: Can't adjust complex nor decimal floating point modes Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/66223] Diagnostic of pure virtual function call broken, including __cxa_pure_virtual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Frey d.frey at gmx dot de --- I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 in a VM, packages are installed from http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-toolchain-r/test/ubuntu trusty main. Package version is 5.1.0-0ubuntu11~14.04.1 Output from

[Bug c++/60943] [C++14] Return type deduction interferes with ref-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943 Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/65979] [4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #25 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #24) I am partially to be blamed for that. I initially reported the gcc-5 issue here, then saw gcc-4.9 failed to build as well

[Bug rtl-optimization/66237] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- This fixes the ICE both on aarch64 and m68k.

[Bug c++/60943] [C++14] Return type deduction interferes with ref-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nathan Date: Thu May 21 20:50:45 2015 New Revision: 223502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223502root=gccview=rev Log: cp/ PR c++/60943 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/66237] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237 --- Comment #4 from Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35593 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35593action=edit Proposed patch Please try this patch. I tested it on the attached profile and it

[Bug middle-end/66221] [CHKP, 6 regression] lto1: error: type variant has different TYPE_ARG_TYPES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66221 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu May 21 09:47:32 2015 New Revision: 223474 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223474root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline

[Bug libstdc++/66017] Undefined behaviour in std::setlong long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66017 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think this would solve it (I'm still trying to build a clang that will allow me to reproduce the error): --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_tree.h +++

[Bug sanitizer/66190] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘call_expr’ is not supported in LTO streams with -fsanitize=null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66190 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok, then maybe the following could work (only lightly tested so far). Arguably static_init_p could be renamed to e.g. no_sanitize_p. diff --git gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to gpnuma from comment #8) Thanks Markus I didn't think these alignment issues were actually the problem, it goes a long way. By doing memmoves instead of

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Alternatively, you can try the patch proposed at [1] and see if it fixes the issue you're facing since it seems to be the same one. [1]

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #5 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com --- Ok I did just try -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations and the issue is still there. If I add the printf(something); at the top of the function, everything works

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug target/65979] Multiple issues in conftest.c prevent build on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #19) Could you guys please test this patch? Actually, now it looks quite obvious I think. gen_rtx_SET functions required SImode as their

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #9 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com --- What I mean is the structs I was using the pointer casts allocations with are instanciated by the program itself, so there could be a way to instanciate them with the required alignment I

[Bug rtl-optimization/66237] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/65979] Multiple issues in conftest.c prevent build on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #20) (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #19) Could you guys please test this patch? Actually, now it looks quite obvious I think.

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #4 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com --- Sorry I meant gcc 4.9.2 / -O3 of course, 4.8 works fine.

[Bug ipa/66181] [6 Regression]: /usr/include/bits/types.h:134:16: ICE: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181 --- Comment #9 from Christophe Lyon clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Jan, when do you plan to commit your patch? So far it made it impossible for me to run validations on a subset of 29 commits related to ARM/AArch64 targets since the ICE was

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Uroš, I tried with a n alpha-linux-gnu GCC cross-compiler built from revision 223280 but couldn't reproduce this. I configured it with just --prefix and

[Bug fortran/66238] New: C/Fortran interoperability broken with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66238 Bug ID: 66238 Summary: C/Fortran interoperability broken with -flto Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/66220] -Wmisleading-indentation false/inconsistent warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220 --- Comment #4 from Franz Sirl sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch from #c3 works fine for our codebase, I couldn't spot any false positives anymore.

[Bug c++/66239] New: Unoptimized sqrt(float or double) returns wrong values for ARM Cortex-A8 -mfloat-abi=[soft,softfp]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66239 Bug ID: 66239 Summary: Unoptimized sqrt(float or double) returns wrong values for ARM Cortex-A8 -mfloat-abi=[soft,softfp] Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65709 for a similar bug in LZ4.

[Bug c/66230] Using optimizations causes program to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66230 --- Comment #8 from gpnuma at centaurean dot com --- Thanks Markus I didn't think these alignment issues were actually the problem, it goes a long way. By doing memmoves instead of pointer cast allocations I got rid of the segfault, but of

[Bug fortran/66089] [6 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, ok, which opens the question why that isn't done?

[Bug fortran/66245] New: ICE on select type with empty type spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66245 Bug ID: 66245 Summary: ICE on select type with empty type spec Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libgcc/66212] Exception handling broken on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66212 Andri Yngvason andri.yngvason at marel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/66246] New: PCH breaks preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66246 Bug ID: 66246 Summary: PCH breaks preprocessor Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug c++/66239] Unoptimized sqrt(float or double) returns wrong values for ARM Cortex-A8 -mfloat-abi=[soft,softfp]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66239 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana

[Bug target/51726] LTO and attribute 'selectany'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51726 Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jacek at

[Bug target/65979] [4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #24 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #23) Ouch. The peephole in problem was added at gcc-5 not at 4.9. The above patch should fix the original

[Bug fortran/66089] [6 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vehre from comment #5) For the interpretation of (intrinsic) assignment, you have to look at 7.2.1.3: The execution of the assignment shall have the same effect as if

[Bug preprocessor/66246] PCH breaks preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66246 --- Comment #1 from kai-bugs at cats dot ms --- Created attachment 35591 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35591action=edit Source

[Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0

[Bug c/66219] The gcc generated section start/stop pointers become undefined when option -flto is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219 --- Comment #2 from Cao Da Shi dscao999 at hotmail dot com --- This issue poped up when cross compiling systemd-219. It is confirmed that the missed section has the __attribute__((used)) declared. But still the link will only pass without -flto,

[Bug target/65283] [SH] lds fpscr not put in delay slot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65283 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/65979] [4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #23 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ouch. The peephole in problem was added at gcc-5 not at 4.9. The above patch should fix the original conftest.c issue, but debien 4.9-16 problem would be an another issue.

[Bug target/65283] [SH] lds fpscr not put in delay slot

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65283 --- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- yes it's only for the SH4A fpchg case

  1   2   >