https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64345
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A recent change in the middle end has triggered this:
FAIL: gcc.target/sh/pr54236-1.c scan-assembler-times negc 2
The test
int
test_07 (int *vec)
{
/* Must not see a 'sett' or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66903
--- Comment #4 from Salva Peiró speirofr at gmail dot com ---
Confirmed, the cause of the crash is the parser
_cpp_lex_direct() consuming the default 8 MB Linux stack.
Indeed, ulimit -s shows the stack size limit is set to 8192 KB,
After
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36012
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36012action=edit
addsicc pattern
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9)
The following function compiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
--- Comment #14 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
---
I hit another two cases of this.
1. g2root tool, which converts GEANT geometry to ROOT geometry. It create a
single function, which contains lots of descriptions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64345
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
The following pattern seems to fix the test case.
===
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think we could combine most of your reports into one or two PRs since they're
all related and fixing them one by one would probably not be very efficient.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66932
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
--- Comment #4 from Eugene Zelenko eugene.zelenko at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
Does Clang have an option for this? GCC could use the same name.
(The same warning exists in the C++ FE, thus it should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64394
--- Comment #4 from Jana Saout jana at saout dot de ---
Indeed - I've applied the patch on top of 5.2.0 and I can't reproduce the issue
anymore with any of the packages that have failed before. Looking fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #5 from Keith Marshall keith.marshall at mailinator dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #4)
Update title. The code in question is
#ifdef HAVE_UMASK
/* Temporarily set the umask such that the file has 0600 permissions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Problem report i.e. bugzilla bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66938
Bug ID: 66938
Summary: using bool as destination in overflow checkers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #6 from Keith Marshall keith.marshall at mailinator dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #4)
Update title. The code in question is
#ifdef HAVE_UMASK
/* Temporarily set the umask such that the file has 0600 permissions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66934
--- Comment #2 from Anders Granlund anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
I think we could combine most of your reports into one or two PRs since
they're all related and fixing them one by one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66939
Bug ID: 66939
Summary: build error gcc-5.2.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1955:6 internal
compiler error: in real_from_string, at real.c:2078
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #8 from Keith Marshall keith.marshall at mailinator dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #7)
So add
#define S_IRWXG 0
#define S_IRWXO 0
to the header file wherever mingw defines the available mask bits
for umask(3).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66732
--- Comment #2 from jamespharvey20 at gmail dot com ---
Patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01162.html
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01506.html
Appear to resolve the issue. Compiling with ISL 0.15 just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #2 from Keith Marshall keith.marshall at mailinator dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
The name of the language is Fortran. The language has been called
Fortran since 1988 or so.
It was always FORTRAN, in the days
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 05:29:35PM +, keith.marshall at mailinator dot com
wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #2 from Keith
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #15 from Jeremy gcc.hall at gmail dot com ---
Perhaps the optimizer can reduce seta; test; jnz to ja since the
compiler now knows the intention. In which case this is a great solution.
On 17 July 2015 at 22:24, gccbugzilla at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
Bug ID: 66936
Summary: io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the
basis that mkstemp() is available
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937
Bug ID: 66937
Summary: Do not compare constraints for unconstrained template
template parameters
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66932
--- Comment #3 from Michael McWilliam pilot.mm at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
Works for me too, with any version.
gcc_bug$ which gcc
~/gcc/4.9.3/bin/gcc
gcc_bug$ cd gas
gas$ ./compile.sh
^[[3~In file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|io/unix.c gratuitously uses |io/unix.c gratuitously uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com ---
In 5.2.0 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66941
Bug ID: 66941
Summary: Missing diagnostic extraneous template parameter list
in template specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66940
Bug ID: 66940
Summary: ifcvt.c:1907 signed integer overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #25 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #24)
Fixed.
Can confirm, graphicsmagick just built successfully for the first time since
2013 :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
This test case changed behaviour twice in the 4.7-4.8 development cycle.
First r185807 broke it by replacing code for unaligned memory accesses with
code requiring more
32 matches
Mail list logo
