https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68656
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Which version worked ok? I think these warnings should simply not output
4.7.4 worked ok.
4.8.5 onward behave like current trunk a.k.a 6.0
> any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56383
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 2 15:08:18 2015
New Revision: 231181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231181=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix ambiguity with multiple enable_shared_from_this bases
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68658
Bug ID: 68658
Summary: [6 Regression] LTO - bogus redefinition of warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
The problem happens when trying to extract subregs from V4HF.
On big-endian, CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS returns 1, which at some point makes
xpart = operand_subword (x, i, 1, mode); (in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Patch posted, waiting on review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I think some kind of delayed warning could help (so parse expressions and print
possible warnings to some "printer" and then print warnings from this "printer"
only for the association that matched).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657
Bug ID: 68657
Summary: [6 Regression] "gcc -Werror=sign-conversion test.i"
shows invalid: -Wsign-conversion is not an option that
controls warnings
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Bug ID: 68659
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68652
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Interesting the only effect could be different GC allocation pattern because
the non-splice variant may end up re-allocating the target vector multiple
times. But this alone should never change code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Fomin ---
It should, but for some reason we see a stable reproducible degradation between
r228667 and r228668...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to cesar from comment #10)
> Thanks for reducing this Dominique. I'm not sure what caused the ICE yet, I
> don't think this test case is valid anymore.
But still shouldn't result in an ICE.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56383
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |4.9.4
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68658
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68658
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68636
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
The vreg pass is different
OLD
ode_label 16 9 17 6 2 "" [1 uses])
(note 17 16 18 6 [bb 6] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 18 17 0 6 (set (mem/v:SI (reg/f:SI 194 [ iftmp$0 ]) [2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
Bug ID: 68660
Summary: "5.2" instead of "5.3" on the main page at
https://gcc.gnu.org/
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68637
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Run-time test:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr68637]$ cat x.i
extern void (*bar[]) (int, int) __attribute__ ((regparm (2)));
void
foo (void)
{
bar[0] (1, 2);
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr68637]$ cat main.i
static void
__attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
typedef int v4si __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
v4si bar (v4si a, v4si b)
{
return __builtin_shuffle (a, b, (v4si) { 0, 1, 4, 5 });
}
works just fine using shufps.
It might be that the generic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression]|[5 Regression] Incompatible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Dec 2 16:41:02 2015
New Revision: 231189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231189=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68290
* constraint.cc (make_constrained_auto): Move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> It was made P1 to make you fix it during stage1 of GCC 6 ;)
Yep, I even made patch in last P3 for turning to sreals, but then did not have
time to pull it out.
I will look it up - it needed some changes to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162
--- Comment #15 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Dec 2 18:24:23 2015
New Revision: 231194
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231194=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT construction for arrays of qualified typedefs (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Yes, so this would be somehow tied to c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings as in we
warn for
0 ? foo () : 2;
if foo() wasn't declared but not for the div-by-zero here:
0 ? 1 / 0 : 2;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68638
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I agree delaying warnings would help, but you'd need to distinguish
warnings relating to execution of the code that should be disabled in
unevaluated code from warnings that should always
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
---
The following simpler looking testcase fails at -O1:
> cat bug.f90
SUBROUTINE PD2VAL(RES,NDERIV,TG1,TG2,C0)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
REAL(KIND=dp), INTENT(OUT) :: res(*)
REAL(KIND=dp),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32415
Hugues de Lassus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huguesdelassus at hotmail dot
fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
--- Comment #12 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #11)
> (In reply to cesar from comment #10)
> > Thanks for reducing this Dominique. I'm not sure what caused the ICE yet, I
> > don't think this test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68661
Bug ID: 68661
Summary: __attribute__ ((no_caller_saved_registers)) trashes
stack
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
--- Comment #2 from Leo Yuriev ---
Hm, it is a devel-status of 5.3, not 5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
Bug ID: 68662
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210
c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #19 from The Written Word
---
The latest linker patch for HP-UX 11.23/IA is PHSS_44401 and the latest for
HP-UX 11.31/IA is PHSS_44402. Both are dated 2015/10/24.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > > #ifndef OPTIMIZE_MANUALLY
> > > void setutent(void) {
> > > ((void)0);
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67548
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
--- Comment #13 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:59:27 2015
New Revision: 231204
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231204=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/63861
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 2 20:40:17 2015
New Revision: 231206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231206=gcc=rev
Log:
fix PR68550: do not handle ISL loop peeled statements
In case ISL did some loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66147
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66054
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66147
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:27:58 2015
New Revision: 231199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231199=gcc=rev
Log:
./:
PR go/66147
* Makefile.tpl (HOST_EXPORTS): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
That looks like (latent?) bug in the target asm output - we should not produce
invalid asm based on visibility changes. I will see if I can reproduce it on
gcc compile farm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:39:11 2015
New Revision: 231201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231201=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/68647
* optabs.c (expand_doubleword_popcount,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 2 20:01:37 2015
New Revision: 231205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231205=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/68513
* gcc.dg/pr68513.c: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:29:17 2015
New Revision: 231200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231200=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68653
* tree.c (nonnull_arg_p): Allow OFFSET_TYPE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67337
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:57:55 2015
New Revision: 231203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231203=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix c++/67337 (segfault in mangle.c)
PR c++/67337
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67337
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800
>
> --- Comment #5 from Alexander Fomin ---
> Richard, are there any updates on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331
>
> --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Created attachment 36885
> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is related to maybe_retrofit_in_chrg somehow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I also wonder when we have expand_doubleword_clz if we couldn't handle
expand_doubleword_ctz similarly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
--- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Dec 2 09:08:49 2015
New Revision: 231161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231161=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 68432: Add a target hook to control size/speed optab choices
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68432
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68651
Bug ID: 68651
Summary: [5/6 Regression][AArch64] Missing combination of
shift-by-one with other arithmetic patterns with
-mcpu=cortex-a53
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68640
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Is it used because it ends up in the static chain of the omp_fn and uses the
same (original) qualifiers? And the static chain itself is passed "by
reference"
and thus gets its fields looked at and restrict
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sorry Uros, forgot to assign this to myself before I've started to work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Sorry Uros, forgot to assign this to myself before I've started to work on
> it.
Ah, nice. I have a target-dependent patch for this, but I agree that generic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68648
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68064
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Any update on this issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663
Bug ID: 68663
Summary: Build failure on AIX 7.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
> I took the example code found in
> http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/ where the register based
> vector computations are explicitly called via the SSE registers and
> converted it to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68656
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68640
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Dec 3 04:13:33 2015
New Revision: 231217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231217=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/68184
* g++.dg/torture/pr68184.C: New testcase.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #20 from Alexander ---
I have no issue to build it now.
Only important thing that is sed must be GNU.
(can check it in config.log)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67106
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
The function is:
>
QI
size
unit size
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 structural equality
attributes
value >>
arg-types
chain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68667
--- Comment #1 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vekumar from comment #0)
> Build breaks while compiling graphite related file.
> Occurred with trunk r231212.
>
> (Snip)
> ../../gcc-fsf-trunk/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68645
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo