: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237082] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk -O3 small.c -w
small.c: In function ‘fn2’:
small.c:6:6: error: integral result type precision does not match field size of
BIT_FIELD_REF
void fn2() {
^~~
BIT_FIELD_REF <mask__22.25_75, 8, 120&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00316.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66947
Austin Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asbeer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237059] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp
$ clang++ -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In member function ‘void A::foo()’:
small.cpp:4:35: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Further reduced test
SUBROUTINE SQRINT (LFILE,IREGION,LENGTH)
DIMENSION IREGION(LENGTH)
LOGICAL DSKWRK,MASWRK
IF (DSKWRK.OR.MASWRK) READ(LFILE, END=200) IREGION
200 CONTINUE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71316
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71316
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 3 23:12:39 2016
New Revision: 237083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237083=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71316
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
--- Comment #10 from Kris ---
Thank you for the effort.
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, pault at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
>
> Paul Thomas changed:
>
>What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71316
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38640=edit
proposed patch
testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the breakage. Looking into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I can only guess until I get a test case. Perhaps the undo_symbols was too
agressive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #3 from Anton Mitrokhin ---
Could anyone please take a look on this?
The big reproducer still triggers ICE as for gcc version 7.0.0 20160601
(experimental) (Revision=237011/svn-rev:237016/).
The small reproducer seems to work
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237059] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -O1 small.cpp
$ g++-6.1 -Os small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -Os small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
small.cpp:17:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 27100, which changed state.
Bug 27100 Summary: ICE with multiple friend declarations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Jun 3 20:42:08 2016
New Revision: 237078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237078=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/27100
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/27100
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853
--- Comment #15 from Howard Brodale ---
The arr pointer is being set to the incremented value which is the 2nd element
in the array to start from as the arr[0] value, then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853
--- Comment #14 from Howard Brodale ---
My email address now is brod...@sbcglobal.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853
Howard Brodale changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brodhow at sbcglobal dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71404
Bug ID: 71404
Summary: [7 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160603 (experimental) [trunk revision 237059] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-6.1 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$
-
char a, c;
short b;
int
main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71402
Bug ID: 71402
Summary: -Wunused-variable warnings ignore initialization side
effects
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751
--- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang ---
Thanks, I will prepare a patch after various testing OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71401
Bug ID: 71401
Summary: [7 regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails
starting with r237003
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71325
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
libintl is part of GNU gettext and local changes in GCC should be avoided
if not needed, report problems there if still applicable to the current
version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71276
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71277
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71277
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:49:04 2016
New Revision: 237074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237074=gcc=rev
Log:
Add option for whether ceil etc. can raise "inexact", adjust x86 conditions.
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71276
--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:49:04 2016
New Revision: 237074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237074=gcc=rev
Log:
Add option for whether ceil etc. can raise "inexact", adjust x86 conditions.
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
--- Comment #4 from Vidya Praveen ---
I can confirm that this started from r236221.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42014
Marcin Baczyński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marbacz at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
Vidya Praveen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65095
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69575
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67841
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69734
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67630
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68661
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67634
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69596
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jun 3 15:08:00 2016
New Revision: 237073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237073=gcc=rev
Log:
Implement x86 interrupt attribute
The interrupt and exception handlers are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751
--- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang ---
Vlad,
Do you have any comments on this regression?
*arm_movsi_insn has the following operand constraints:
operand 0: "=rk,r,r,r,rk,m"
operand 1: "rk, I,K,j,mi,rk"
As r235184 won't explicitly refuse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71400
Bug ID: 71400
Summary: [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Jun 3 14:20:53 2016
New Revision: 237069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237069=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52171
* builtins.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71362
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started to ICE with r230098, before that it worked properly. ICE got fixed with
r232153, but it is miscompiled already then, so it is unclear when this
wrong-code has been introduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Created attachment 38638 [details]
> gcc7-pr70847.patch
>
> So, shall I test this version?
> As added bonus, if cp_fold returns for different stmts the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38638=edit
gcc7-pr70847.patch
So, shall I test this version?
As added bonus, if cp_fold returns for different stmts the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Jun 3 13:18:25 2016
New Revision: 237067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237067=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-06-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/70957
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I had in mind:
--- cp-gimplify.c.jj1 2016-06-02 18:35:18.0 +0200
+++ cp-gimplify.c 2016-06-03 15:06:04.465913964 +0200
@@ -941,13 +941,25 @@ cp_fold_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Jun 3 13:14:26 2016
New Revision: 237066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237066=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-06-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/70957
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I just tried this with 7.0.0 20160603, and seems it may have been fixed?
This PR seems to have been fixed between revisions r236300 (2016-05-16, ICE)
and r236559 (2016-05-21, compiles). The t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
--- Comment #2 from Ludovic Courtès ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> I tried a bootstrap of the GCC 5.3.0 release as taken from one of the
> mirrors in:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
>
> This was done on an ARMv8-A machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748
--- Comment #2 from Antony Lewis ---
I just tried this with 7.0.0 20160603, and seems it may have been fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Note, the patch has been successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
> and i686-linux.
>
> I don't think such shared trees should be occurring
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, the patch has been successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
and i686-linux.
I don't think such shared trees should be occurring significantly that it would
matter.
But, if you want to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Following patch fixes the failure:
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 7e9f511..cf5e460 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -19311,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #9 from Franz Sirl ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Created attachment 38636 [details]
> gcc7-pr70847.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Applied to gcc-6-branch r237059, no testsuite regressions. Testcase from
comment 6 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried a bootstrap of the GCC 5.3.0 release as taken from one of the mirrors
in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
This was done on an ARMv8-A machine inside an aarch32 chroot with binutils
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So is this PR now fixed on the branch and still broken on the trunk?
If yes, we should turn it into [7 Regression] then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asankau at millenniumit dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, as Jakub mentioned in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00268.html
C++ FE should reject initialization of a variable length object.
clang++ 3.7.0 rejects the reduced test case:
clang++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, matthew.fortune at imgtec dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
>
> --- Comment #35 from Matthew Fortune ---
> (In reply to Aurelien Jarno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71398
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 3 11:01:39 2016
New Revision: 237060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237060=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71387
* cgraph.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273
--- Comment #35 from Matthew Fortune ---
(In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #33)
> (In reply to Hector Oron from comment #32)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
> > > eipa_sra introduces the remaining SSA name with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
--- Comment #7 from asankau at millenniumit dot com ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> (In reply to asankau from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to asankau from comment #3)
> > > > Hi,
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
Bug ID: 71399
Summary: GCC 5.3.0 bootstrap comparison failure on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71398
Bug ID: 71398
Summary: ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit mode on
x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, find_edge)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn)
> (insn 198 206 199 11 (set (mem/c:V16QI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
> (const_int -664 [0xfd68])) [7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #21 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #18 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70735
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #16 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #10 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #27 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62211
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70355
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo