[Bug target/77770] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error on source which compiles with earlier versions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 --- Comment #4 from Zoltan Kocsi --- Tested several gcc versions. Up to and including 4.8.5 everything seems to be OK, but 4.9.0 or above all throw the error.

[Bug c++/77791] New: ICE on invalid C++11 code with redefined function parameter: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in cp_parser_lambda_declarator_opt

-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) [trunk revision 240585] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -std=c++11 -c small.cpp small.cpp:1:29: error: redefinition of ‘int i’ auto a = [] (int i, int i = 0

[Bug c++/77790] New: ICE on valid C++14 code when compiling with "-std=c++11": in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:227

cc version 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) [trunk revision 240585] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -c -std=c++14 small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c -std=c++11 small.cpp small.cpp:3:42: error: ‘f’ function uses ‘auto’ type specifier without trailing return type template < typename T > static auto

[Bug c/77789] New: MinGW option ./configure does not make

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77789 Bug ID: 77789 Summary: MinGW option ./configure does not make Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug bootstrap/77788] New: profiledbootstrap failures on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77788 Bug ID: 77788 Summary: profiledbootstrap failures on powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/71730] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Sep 29 00:18:44 2016 New Revision: 240608 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240608=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Steven G. Kargl backport from

[Bug fortran/77612] [5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid character len in contained procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77612 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Sep 29 00:18:44 2016 New Revision: 240608 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240608=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Steven G. Kargl backport from

[Bug c++/77787] segfault in mangle.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77787 --- Comment #1 from petschy at gmail dot com --- That last function in json.hpp was gutted: //template int foo(int div_) { ASSERT(div_ == 0); return 0; } Removed the assertions from all the template functions, as this moved the

[Bug fortran/77694] ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Sep 28 23:38:13 2016 New Revision: 240604 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240604=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Steven G. Kargl backport from

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 --- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #4) > This also occurs on powerpc64/powerpc64le. > I should note that the failure on powerpc64* doesn't start until GCC 7 rev 236043, where a

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Xidorn Quan from comment #5) > It seems G++ always throw that warning for enum class as bitfield, even when > the enum class is actually empty: > > enum class K {}; > > struct S { > > K v :

[Bug c++/51242] [C++11] Unable to use strongly typed enums as bit fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242 --- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Sasha B from comment #28) > You can disregard whether the underlying type is fixed or not. So, GCC > should not give a warning unless a bitfield containing Foo really is too > small to hold a

[Bug target/77756] __get_cpuid() returns wrong values for level 7 (extended features)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/71709] [6 Regression] powerpc64le: argument to strcpy() optimised out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Sep 28 21:36:59 2016 New Revision: 240599 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240599=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Bill Schmidt Alan Modra

[Bug rtl-optimization/71709] [6 Regression] powerpc64le: argument to strcpy() optimised out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709 --- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Sep 28 21:35:37 2016 New Revision: 240598 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240598=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Bill Schmidt Alan Modra

[Bug target/77756] __get_cpuid() returns wrong values for level 7 (extended features)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Sep 28 21:29:47 2016 New Revision: 240597 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240597=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77756 * config/i386/cpuid.h (__get_cpuid): Handle

[Bug middle-end/77683] [7 regression] ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1163

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from Gerald

[Bug target/77756] __get_cpuid() returns wrong values for level 7 (extended features)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Yale Zhang from comment #2) > But does level 13 really exist? I don't see any documentation for it. Yes, apparently. It was added to driver-i386.c by Intel people, where: if (max_level >= 13)

[Bug middle-end/77784] duplicate warning for snprintf when n > object size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/77787] New: segfault in mangle.c

)) static const char x[] = "bar"; prn(x); } int main() { foo(); bar(); } Let's pretend that the x[] arrays were put there by ASSERT() macros. Unfortunately, this won;t compile: $ g++ -c 20160928-section_type_conflict.cpp 20160928-section_type_conflict.

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yet another variation on missing argument list for a member function call: call.cc: In function ‘int main()’: call.cc:20:14: error: cannot convert ‘A::foo’ from type ‘int (A::)()’ to type ‘int (A::*)()’

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- For comparison, clang gives a much clearer error: 77711.cc:11:9: error: reference to non-static member function must be called; did you mean to call it with no arguments? x.f ~~^ ()

[Bug middle-end/77721] -Wformat-length not uses arg range for converted vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Sep 28 19:51:08 2016 New Revision: 240595 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240595=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/77721 - -Wformat-length not uses arg range for converted vars

[Bug c++/77786] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:13040

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77786 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Thul --- Created attachment 39721 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39721=edit preprocessed file

[Bug c++/77786] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:13040

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77786 Bug ID: 77786 Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:13040 Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk. Will backport in a few days.

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 28 19:43:03 2016 New Revision: 240593 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240593=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 28 19:38:03 2016 New Revision: 240592 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240592=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug c++/77467] Segmentation fault with switch statement in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77467 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Sep 28 19:21:47 2016 New Revision: 240591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240591=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77467 * constexpr.c (enum constexpr_switch_state): New.

[Bug target/77756] __get_cpuid() returns wrong values for level 7 (extended features)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756 --- Comment #2 from Yale Zhang --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1) > Created attachment 39711 [details] > Patch that fixes __get_cpuid > > Can you please check if the attached patch fixes your problem? Great, your patch works. Thanks

[Bug c++/68703] __attribute__((vector_size(N))) template member confusion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68703 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71709] [6 Regression] powerpc64le: argument to strcpy() optimised out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- Working on the backports. Stay tuned.

[Bug middle-end/77784] duplicate warning for snprintf when n > object size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug bootstrap/77753] [7 Regression] broken profiledbootstrap due to -Werror=format-length in varasm.c:1573

up please open a new bug for it. +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) (powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: | | in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5897| | Error detected around /src/gcc

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 --- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Sep 28 17:37:45 2016 New Revision: 240586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240586=gcc=rev Log: Correct libgcc complex multiply excess precision handling (PR libgcc/77519).

[Bug c/77762] Incorrect destination buffer length in -Wformat-length warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77762 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77782] New: ICE in gfc_get_union_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2387

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77782 Bug ID: 77782 Summary: ICE in gfc_get_union_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2387 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77785] New: ICE in gfc_get_caf_token_offset, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785 Bug ID: 77785 Summary: ICE in gfc_get_caf_token_offset, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1990 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 --- Comment #14 from Mueller --- I'd really like to know why this report has been closed although there may be a problem with deallocation. I think the rephrasing of Mikael pinpointed what I meant.

[Bug middle-end/77784] New: duplicate warning for snprintf for n > object size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784 Bug ID: 77784 Summary: duplicate warning for snprintf for n > object size Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/77783] ICE in gfc_compare_union_types, at fortran/interface.c:545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77783 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Some variations : $ cat z2.f90 subroutine f(x) structure /s1/ union integer i end union end structure record /s1/ x x.i = 0 end subroutine

[Bug fortran/77783] New: ICE in gfc_compare_union_types, at fortran/interface.c:545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77783 Bug ID: 77783 Summary: ICE in gfc_compare_union_types, at fortran/interface.c:545 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/77777] Use rich location to mark correct expression for "invalid use of non-static member function"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- FWIW the location information is available in the frame above: Breakpoint 6, invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p (loc=205792, expr=, complain=3) at ../../src/gcc/cp/typeck.c:1834 1834

[Bug c++/77777] Use rich location to mark correct expression for "invalid use of non-static member function"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Or maybe even better, make the caret point to the member function, but cover the entire expression: x.foo ~~^~~ (Please ignore the "did you mean...?" part shown in the initial comment, that

[Bug c++/77777] Use rich location to mark correct expression for "invalid use of non-static member function"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > > There are lots of cases where we should use rich locations, but here's one > Do you mean a fix-it hint? I

[Bug middle-end/69976] Zero the local stack on function exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Gutson --- Any update on this?

[Bug c/77762] Incorrect destination buffer length in -Wformat-length warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77762 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Sep 28 16:24:35 2016 New Revision: 240584 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240584=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77762 - Incorrect destination buffer length in -Wformat-length warning

[Bug middle-end/77683] [7 regression] ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1163

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] complex|[5 Regression] complex

[Bug middle-end/77683] [7 regression] ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1163

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Sep 28 16:13:12 2016 New Revision: 240583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240583=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/77683 - ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in

[Bug c++/77781] [DR 1315] Some valid cases of partial specialization not accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77781 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug libgcc/77519] [5/6 Regression] complex multiply excess precision handling inverted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519 --- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Sep 28 16:11:44 2016 New Revision: 240582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240582=gcc=rev Log: Correct libgcc complex multiply excess precision handling (PR libgcc/77519).

[Bug c++/77781] New: [DR 1315]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77781 Bug ID: 77781 Summary: [DR 1315] Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/77753] [7 Regression] broken profiledbootstrap due to -Werror=format-length in varasm.c:1573

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77753 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Sep 28 16:02:06 2016 New Revision: 240581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240581=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/77753 - [7 Regression] broken profiledbootstrap due to gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug target/71767] Endless stream of warnings when using GCC with -Wa,-q and Clang Integrated Assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767 --- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jonathan Ross from comment #26) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > > (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #22) > > > When a fix is designed, could you please backport it

[Bug go/77780] New: Go front-end ignores NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780 Bug ID: 77780 Summary: Go front-end ignores NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug go/77780] Go front-end ignores NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 --- Comment #6 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can confirm that Bernd's patch fixes the issue, bootstraps on powerpc64le, and does not cause any new regression test failures in "make check".

[Bug target/71767] Endless stream of warnings when using GCC with -Wa,-q and Clang Integrated Assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767 Jonathan Ross changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.ross at imc dot com ---

[Bug fortran/77385] "Unclassifiable statement" from gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77779] New: unnecessary trap checks for pointer subtraction with -ftrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Bug ID: 9 Summary: unnecessary trap checks for pointer subtraction with -ftrapv Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug bootstrap/77768] [7 Regression] LTO/PGO -O3 bootstrap broken: tree-vrp.c:11053:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/77778] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (Segmentation fault, visit_reference_op_store, extract_and_process_scc_for_name)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/77778] New: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (Segmentation fault, visit_reference_op_store, extract_and_process_scc_for_name)

-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) [trunk revision 240565] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c small.c: In function ‘main’: small.c:5:5: warning: assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] c = ^ small.c:4:5

[Bug c++/77777] Use rich location to mark correct expression for "invalid use of non-static member function"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/55152] MAX_EXPR(a,-a) is really ABS_EXPR(a)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #6 from coypu --- It is a local change bug! thanks. I'll let you know if the build completes.

[Bug c++/77775] [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/72712] [7 Regression] Tenfold compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Now that we have another (early) pass things should be even worse. Current trunk at -O2 with -fno-checking improved though (I guess by means of a cost model or so): phase opt and generate : 69.39 (99%)

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to coypu from comment #4) > indeed in EXTRAOBJS I only have netbsd.o > I'll try to use arm*) instead, and will report back. netbsd.o (and netbsd.c) don't appear to exist or be referenced

[Bug fortran/77764] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77764 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/77710] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c

--disable-libquadmath --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-nls --disable-rda --disable-sid --disable-tui --disable-utils --disable-werror --disable-fixed-point Thread model: single gcc version 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) (GCC) % grep -A 2 FAIL build/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.logFAIL: gc

[Bug middle-end/77407] Optimize integer i / abs (i) into the sign of i

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77407 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ideally we'd look to see if a.foo() would return a type that would make the call bar( a.foo() ) valid, and not suggest it otherwise (there's no point suggesting it if a.foo() returns void, for example).

[Bug c++/77733] Add fixit hint suggesting to use std::move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > As well as a fixit hint suggesting to use std::move it might be useful to > display the "" text in colour so it stands out. Good idea.

[Bug c++/77733] Add fixit hint suggesting to use std::move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- With: --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c @@ -1823,6 +1823,7 @@ invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p (location_t loc, tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain) /* Don't enforce this in MS mode. */ if

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #4 from coypu --- indeed in EXTRAOBJS I only have netbsd.o I'll try to use arm*) instead, and will report back.

[Bug c++/77777] New: Use rich location to mark correct expression for "invalid use of non-static member function"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Bug ID: 7 Summary: Use rich location to mark correct expression for "invalid use of non-static member function" Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/77399] Poor code generation for vector casts and loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/77411] object-size-9.c -fpic -m32 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77411 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Sep 28 12:48:16 2016 New Revision: 240575 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240575=gcc=rev Log: backport from mainline 2016-09-23 Bernd Edlinger

[Bug libstdc++/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Sep 28 12:47:24 2016 New Revision: 240574 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240574=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++/77686 use may_alias for std::function storage PR

[Bug libstdc++/77776] New: C++17 std::hypot implementation is poor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Bug ID: 6 Summary: C++17 std::hypot implementation is poor Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/77775] [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- g++ -O0 -fPIC -c moc_area.ii -S -o bad_

[Bug c++/77775] [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 39719 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39719=edit bad assembly

[Bug c++/77775] [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 39718 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39718=edit good assembly

[Bug c++/77775] New: [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Bug ID: 5 Summary: [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #2) > The configure target used here is armv6--netbsdelf-eabihf (note two dashes > after armv6) > > aarch64-common.o is added to extra_objs in config.gcc Of

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/77774] Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0, 7-20160925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77733] Add fixit hint suggesting to use std::move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77748] pr77550.C fails on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748 --- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Sep 28 12:11:57 2016 New Revision: 240573 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240573=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-28 Bernd Edlinger PR c++/77748

[Bug libstdc++/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 > > Jonathan Wakely changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Sep 28 12:03:43 2016 New Revision: 240571 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240571=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++/77686 use may_alias for std::function storage PR

  1   2   >