[Bug c++/81047] New: thread local storage static class members of class type cannot be initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81047 Bug ID: 81047 Summary: thread local storage static class members of class type cannot be initialized Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/79242] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81044] fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81044 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81046] New: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81046 Bug ID: 81046 Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81045] [7 Regression] return type deduction causes template function call failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81045 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Somehow GCC is deciding that easyObjects->begin() and end() are dependent types so you need to use the template keyword for the call to cast. That is: auto casted = obj.template cast(); I don't know if GCC

[Bug c++/81045] New: [7 Regression] return type deduction causes template function call failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81045 Bug ID: 81045 Summary: [7 Regression] return type deduction causes template function call failure Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/81044] fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81044 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I had recorded my observations in PR 80894.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81044] fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81044 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This was broken for me on aarch64-linux-gnu too by the same revision but had been fixed by revision 248919 aka PR80974. Can you try again to see if it is still broken also.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81044] fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81044 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 41529 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41529=edit Assembly code from svn 248446 that fails

[Bug rtl-optimization/81044] fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81044 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 41528 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41528=edit Assembly code from svn 248446 that works

[Bug rtl-optimization/81044] New: fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81044 Bug ID: 81044 Summary: fold-const change in svn 248447 breaks PowerPC spec 2006 hmmr Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67969] [concepts] bug with overloaded function when using constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67969 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hstong at ca dot ibm.com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/81043] New: [concepts] partially specializing on differing constraints gives cryptic error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81043 Bug ID: 81043 Summary: [concepts] partially specializing on differing constraints gives cryptic error Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/81042] Too many constexpr interations on unreachable loop.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81042 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Cox --- Also it appears the loop condition isn't properly evaluated. For example the following three examples (and any other number I tested also cause the error. while (++i == 0) {} // Unreachable while (++i == 1) {}

[Bug debug/81042] New: Too many constexpr interations on unreachable loop.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81042 Bug ID: 81042 Summary: Too many constexpr interations on unreachable loop. Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/80675] Incorrect implementation of LWG 2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80675 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80940] Private inheritance from std::ostream - compilation error for custom operator <

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80940 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80384] ICE when deducing noexcept in class template partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80384 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 9 20:13:38 2017 New Revision: 249078 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249078=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80384 - ICE with dependent noexcept-specifier * pt.c

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/80968] stack frame reference allowed in delay slot of return instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968 --- Comment #8 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: davem Date: Fri Jun 9 19:24:51 2017 New Revision: 249074 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249074=gcc=rev Log: sparc: Further adjustments for alloca epilogue blockage. gcc/

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Jun 9 19:23:48 2017 New Revision: 249073 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249073=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-09 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug target/80968] stack frame reference allowed in delay slot of return instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968 --- Comment #7 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: davem Date: Fri Jun 9 19:21:15 2017 New Revision: 249072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249072=gcc=rev Log: sparc: Further adjustments for alloca epilogue blockage. gcc/

[Bug other/81041] New: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr78582.c fails with ICE starting with r249058

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81041 Bug ID: 81041 Summary: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr78582.c fails with ICE starting with r249058 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.2 |5.5

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Jun 9 18:10:48 2017 New Revision: 249067 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249067=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-09 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/80009] Printing/writing a structure with a real edit descriptor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009 --- Comment #11 from Walt Brainerd --- I am not sure what you changed your mind from or to :-). Yes, the assignment is invalid because r is real the the rhs is type B_type. And, yes, the type of the io list item is B_type. However, the

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Jun 9 17:45:53 2017 New Revision: 249066 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249066=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-09 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/81039] INTERNAL-PROC procedure rejected as EXTERNAL-PROC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81039 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81040] New: asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040 Bug ID: 81040 Summary: asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/81039] INTERNAL-PROC procedure rejected as EXTERNAL-PROC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81039 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > WORKSFORME: r248853 and x86_64-apple-darwin16. Updating my trunk and doing a clean build.

[Bug fortran/81039] INTERNAL-PROC procedure rejected as EXTERNAL-PROC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81039 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81039] New: INTERNAL-PROC procedure rejected as EXTERNAL-PROC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81039 Bug ID: 81039 Summary: INTERNAL-PROC procedure rejected as EXTERNAL-PROC Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/80998] Implement -fsanitize=pointer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] New: [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 Bug ID: 81038 Summary: [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/81037] Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #1) > Created attachment 41522 [details] > reproducer for gcc 6.3.0 bootstrap failure with Xcode 9 beta > > bzip2 compressed archive with auto-profile.ii preprocessed

[Bug bootstrap/81037] Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth --- Created attachment 41523 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41523=edit reproducer for gcc 5.4.0 bootstrap failure with Xcode 9 beta bzip2 compressed archive with auto-profile.ii

[Bug bootstrap/81037] Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth --- Created attachment 41522 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41522=edit reproducer for gcc 6.3.0 bootstrap failure with Xcode 9 beta bzip2 compressed archive with auto-profile.ii

[Bug bootstrap/81037] New: Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037 Bug ID: 81037 Summary: Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/81029] Compiling sketch with arduinodroid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81029 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-06-09 10:35 AM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 > > --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Some other bugs were fixed and I am

[Bug libfortran/79540] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_fw_d.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Some other bugs were fixed and I am wondering if this is still failing?

[Bug lto/81004] [7/8 Regression] linking failed with -flto and static libboost_program_options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004 --- Comment #14 from Matt Godbolt --- I've just hit this same issue too (in only one of several projects I build with 7.1 and LTO). If anyone has any thoughts at a workaround I'd be very appreciative. Thanks!

[Bug other/80803] libgo appears to be miscompiled on powerpc64le since r247497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803 --- Comment #29 from Ian Lance Taylor --- My apologies for not explaining how to find the compilation commands, and I'm sorry you had to waste time on it. Using "make GOTESTFLAGS=--trace net/check" will put the commands in net/check-testlog.

[Bug target/81036] New: -fcall-saved-X does not work for floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81036 Bug ID: 81036 Summary: -fcall-saved-X does not work for floating-point registers Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/81035] noreturn leads to worse code due to lack of sibcall optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81035 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation --- Comment #1 from

[Bug middle-end/81035] New: noreturn leads to worse code due to lack of sibcall optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81035 Bug ID: 81035 Summary: noreturn leads to worse code due to lack of sibcall optimization Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #40 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #39 from simon at pushface dot org --- [...] > Updated patch posted here; working on gcc-patches@ submission. Thanks for the analysis and the patch. I'll give it a whirl

[Bug target/80855] [nvptx] missing sorry("target cannot support label values"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80855 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80855] [nvptx] missing sorry("target cannot support label values"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80855 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Fri Jun 9 13:11:52 2017 New Revision: 249060 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249060=gcc=rev Log: Add "sorry, target cannot support label values" for nvptx 2017-06-09 Tom de Vries

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41474|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/81022] invalid address with pointer type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81022 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Sedach --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > So I'd say INVALID but x86 people may want to double-check the official > intrinsic documentation. I was using _mm_store_sd(_mm_load_sd()) to copy an

[Bug target/81022] invalid address with pointer type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81022 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin --- Intrinsics guide states [1] that this intrinsic: Store the lower double-precision (64-bit) floating-point element from a into memory. mem_addr does not need to be aligned on any particular boundary. [1] -

[Bug tree-optimization/81028] GCC miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 > > Markus Trippelsdorf changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/81028] GCC miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81028] GCC miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Simpler testcase. The sinking is valid if the aliasing does not occur in the last iteration of the loop. In case *p would be done conditionally only that would not necessarily be the case. inline void*

[Bug fortran/80965] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class argument and -O2 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 41519 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41519=edit Patch for the bug This appears to be a consequence of r241450, which fixed PR69834 (select type clashes). The fix

[Bug other/80803] libgo appears to be miscompiled on powerpc64le since r247497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803 --- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 41518 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41518=edit Possible fix I'm testing the attached two patches which should fix the issue. If everything goes well, I will see

[Bug target/81034] [x86] Broken IRA pass when printing results of intrinsic execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81034 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Peryt --- I agree, that vec_merge takes 3 operands. And 3 are in my md (naming according to GCC internals): vec1: (vec_merge:V2DF (match_operand:V2DF 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "m") (match_operand:V2DF 2

[Bug other/80803] libgo appears to be miscompiled on powerpc64le since r247497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803 --- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor --- Created attachment 41517 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41517=edit Hack for revealing compiler command lines Thanks Ian, the above was definitely helpful but did not allow me to get

[Bug target/81034] [x86] Broken IRA pass when printing results of intrinsic execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81034 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 41516 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41516 Reproducible Hmm, bugzilla might not be the right place for this kind of issue. I suspect your avx512f_loadv2df_mask

[Bug tree-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, tetra2005 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 > > --- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 --- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, tetra2005 at gmail dot com wrote: > > > This should probly go to reassoc? Or better keep it in folder? > > As loads are involved it

[Bug target/81034] New: [x86] Broken IRA pass when printing results of intrinsic execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81034 Bug ID: 81034 Summary: [x86] Broken IRA pass when printing results of intrinsic execution Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Bootstrap broken on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin16 |x86_64-apple-darwin*

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Bootstrap broken on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, wrong-code

[Bug c++/81032] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with lambda and broken constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81032 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Version|unknown

[Bug middle-end/81030] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/81028] GCC miscompiles placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80965] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class argument and -O2 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/81022] invalid address with pointer type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81022 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug rtl-optimization/81020] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81019] [6/7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81019 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8

[Bug c++/81007] [7 Regression] ICE with virtual function in broken class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8

[Bug tree-optimization/66623] Unsafe FP math reduction used in strict math mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66623 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/66623] Unsafe FP math reduction used in strict math mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66623 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 9 09:40:45 2017 New Revision: 249053 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249053=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-09 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/79483] [7/8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use in block 28)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 9 09:36:06 2017 New Revision: 249052 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249052=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-09 Richard Biener PR

[Bug c++/81007] [7/8 Regression] ICE with virtual function in broken class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81007 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 9 09:35:05 2017 New Revision: 249051 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249051=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-09 Richard Biener PR middle-end/81007

[Bug tree-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, tetra2005 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 > > Yuri Gribov changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Bootstrap broken on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #29 from Daniel Santos --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28) >> As I've said before, the parallelization of ms-sysv.exp runs may be a >>

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 79988, which changed state. Bug 79988 Summary: [7/8 Regression][CHKP] ICE in tree check: accessed operand 5 of call_expr with 4 operands in ix86_expand_builtin, at config/i386/i386.c:36851

[Bug middle-end/79988] [7/8 Regression][CHKP] ICE in tree check: accessed operand 5 of call_expr with 4 operands in ix86_expand_builtin, at config/i386/i386.c:36851

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79988 Alexander Ivchenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Bootstrap broken on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 41515 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41515=edit Broken assembly

[Bug bootstrap/81033] New: [8 Regression] Bootstrap broken on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Bug ID: 81033 Summary: [8 Regression] Bootstrap broken on darwin Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #5 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com --- Hi Doug I build both GCC and GLIBC daily but for mips-img-linux-gnu and hard-float the only prob. I see is ADA fails building one multilib config. I do all langs I'll give try hard-float

[Bug tree-optimization/81025] [MIPS] soft-float glibc build fails at r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 Doug Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|REOPENED Last

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #7

[Bug target/79242] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242 Alexey Neyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stilor at att dot net --- Comment #4

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #29 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28) > As I've said before, the parallelization of ms-sysv.exp runs may be a > bonus, but is certainly separate from this PR and thus should be split

[Bug target/80966] ICE with -fstack-limit-register and large frames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk so far.