[Bug target/40836] ICE: "insn does not satisfy its constraints" (iwmmxt_movsi_insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40836 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/66097] Program fails to run with -O1 but runs with individual settings.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66097 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/65957] Loop with if-statement yields different results for -O3 vs -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65957 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/59499] Probably optimization error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59499 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/61639] GCC 4.7.4 can't longer compile clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61639 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug demangler/81684] Out of Memory in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81684 --- Comment #1 from Google-Autofuzz --- Created attachment 41910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41910=edit Demangler PoC

[Bug demangler/81684] New: Out of Memory in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81684 Bug ID: 81684 Summary: Out of Memory in demangler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug demangler/81683] Memory leak in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81683 --- Comment #1 from Google-Autofuzz --- Created attachment 41908 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41908=edit Demangler PoC

[Bug demangler/81683] New: Memory leak in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81683 Bug ID: 81683 Summary: Memory leak in demangler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug demangler/81682] New: Timeout in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81682 Bug ID: 81682 Summary: Timeout in demangler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug demangler/81682] Timeout in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81682 --- Comment #1 from Google-Autofuzz --- Created attachment 41906 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41906=edit Demangler PoC

[Bug demangler/81681] Memory leak in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81681 --- Comment #1 from Google-Autofuzz --- Created attachment 41904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41904=edit Demangler PoC

[Bug demangler/81681] New: Memory leak in demangler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81681 Bug ID: 81681 Summary: Memory leak in demangler Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug demangler/81680] Memory leak in demangle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81680 --- Comment #1 from Google-Autofuzz --- Created attachment 41902 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41902=edit Demangle PoC

[Bug demangler/81680] New: Memory leak in demangle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81680 Bug ID: 81680 Summary: Memory leak in demangle Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug tree-optimization/81679] use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug go/81617] mksigtab.sh fails to resolve NSIG with glibc 2.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81617 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Created attachment 41900 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41900=edit possible patch

[Bug go/81617] mksigtab.sh fails to resolve NSIG with glibc 2.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81617 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Would it be possible for you to check whether the patch at https://golang.org/cl/52611 fixes the problem? Actually I'll attach it here.

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 --- Comment #7 from chris.ol...@iti-global.com --- I'm not arguing that arrays declarations should be allowed to derive from incomplete types, nor all pointers-to-array of incomplete type be allowed; I'm specifically arguing that a struct should

[Bug tree-optimization/81679] use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, chris.ol...@iti-global.com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 > > --- Comment #4 from chris.ol...@iti-global.com --- > (In reply to

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 --- Comment #4 from chris.ol...@iti-global.com --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > Because the type doesn't exist, I don't know what you mean by a type that "doesn't exist". A declared but undefined struct is incomplete

[Bug tree-optimization/81679] use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > 1) When attribute unused is specified on a function argument of pointer type > in > a declaration of a function, GCC could use that

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- There is no such thing as an array type whose element is incomplete - you can't construct, or describe, such a type in C at all, and attempts to do so have undefined behavior in C90, are

[Bug tree-optimization/81679] New: use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679 Bug ID: 81679 Summary: use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/81678] New: Variadic template parameters containing pointer to member function fail to be parsed unless name of the parameter is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81678 Bug ID: 81678 Summary: Variadic template parameters containing pointer to member function fail to be parsed unless name of the parameter is specified Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 41899 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41899=edit Patch under test This is the patch I'm currently looking at. I am unhappy at having to use a tree to get maxval, but

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 --- Comment #2 from chris.ol...@iti-global.com --- This isn't an array of incomplete type, but a pointer-to-array of incomplete type; not just any incomplete type, but struct that is guaranteed to be complete when the outermost } is encountered.

[Bug c/81677] Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- In C90, arrays of incomplete types are forbidden because incomplete types are not (before C11) object types. See footnote 17 in subclause 6.1.2.5. In C99 this becomes a constraint in

[Bug target/53083] gcc bug in moving from the SSE registers back onto the heap.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/53312] crash in materialize_cgraph (invalid free)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53312 --- Comment #4 from philippe.waroquiers at skynet dot be --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > (In reply to philippe.waroquiers from comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > This looks like PR53214 - unable to verify without a

[Bug c/81677] New: Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81677 Bug ID: 81677 Summary: Can't declare pointer to array of incomplete type in struct Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81538] Optimization problem compiling op.c (Perl_custom_op_get_field) in perl 5.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81538 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization --- Comment #9

[Bug rtl-optimization/81538] Optimization problem compiling op.c (Perl_custom_op_get_field) in perl 5.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81538 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 41897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41897=edit miniperl debug session The flow and optimization of the Perl_custom_op_get_field function is quite complex. Two

[Bug target/81621] ICE in delete_insn, at cfgrtl.c:167 with s390x cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63386] Release version of CB wont compile Bullet (-o2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63386 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 81638, which changed state. Bug 81638 Summary: [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/81638] [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- Cool, thanks for confirming.

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger --- Confirmed. Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/80815] wrong code because of broken runtime alias check in vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80815 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- vect_perm added for the the test case. It should be bypassed now on sparc-sun-solaris2.12?

[Bug rtl-optimization/81538] Optimization problem compiling op.c (Perl_custom_op_get_field) in perl 5.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81538 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 41895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41895=edit Function Perl_custom_op_get_field

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug gcov-profile/81442] error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/81442] error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to cesar from comment #4) > I posted a patch that fixes this issue on July 13, 2017: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00750.html > > It is pending review. The patch has been

[Bug gcov-profile/81442] error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5) > ... the patches handle the issue in different ways: > - handle the case that there's an edge with uninitialized probability > - initialize probability on some

[Bug c++/81676] New: Wrong warning with unused-but-set-parameter within 'if constexpr'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81676 Bug ID: 81676 Summary: Wrong warning with unused-but-set-parameter within 'if constexpr' Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/66089] [6/7/8 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2015-05-12

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > I had in mind something like > wi::eq_p (wi::ext (w, TYPE_PRECISION (type), TYPE_SIGN (type)), w) > or so. Ah, good, thank you.

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- I had in mind something like wi::eq_p (wi::ext (w, TYPE_PRECISION (type), TYPE_SIGN (type)), w) or so.

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > The TREE_INT_CST_LOW part looks suspicious. Also, wide-int.h should provide > enough infrastructure so that you should be able to do everything on > wide-int,

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #14) > (In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #13) > > On July 20, 2017 10:47:54 AM PDT, ubizjak at gmail dot com > > wrote: > >

[Bug c++/81675] [6/7/8 Regression] attribute(noreturn) of destructor in :? not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/29366] atomics config for sh is weird

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/81566] [4.9/5/6/7/8 Regression] invalid attribute aligned accepted on functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81566 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|invalid attribute aligned |[4.9/5/6/7/8 Regression]

[Bug c/81656] incompatible _Alignas silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81656 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/59572] Not clear error message in smallest_mode_for_size in handled case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59572 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #69 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 61440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/61440] Bootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61440 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > What happens if you use -march=intel. With -mtune=intel, the lower half of the vector is moved directly whereas the upper one is still done through the stack:

[Bug c++/81675] New: attribute(noreturn) of destructor in :? not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675 Bug ID: 81675 Summary: attribute(noreturn) of destructor in :? not honored Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/53077] replace "Illegal preprocessor directive" message with "Ignoring preprocessor directive at %C. Use -cpp to enable the C preprocessor" (a patch by Tobias included)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, increases compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, increases compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Daniel Fruzynski from comment #2) > So there is another problem here: for some reason both mentioned gcc > versions accepts -mmovbe and -mno-movbe options. If movbe is not supported, > gcc should

[Bug c++/81674] New: gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81674 Bug ID: 81674 Summary: gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/59865] gnu multiversion calculates wrong target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59865 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What happens if you use -march=intel. Maybe the cost should have adjusted only for the case where moving between the register set is cheap (I forgot the internal tuning name for this case).

[Bug fortran/52387] I/O output of write after nonadvancing read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81673] New: Harmful SLP vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673 Bug ID: 81673 Summary: Harmful SLP vectorization Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug jit/81672] trunk/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c:2852: possible missing initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81672 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Probably harmless, but might benefit from some tidy up.

[Bug target/81644] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insn, BBRO pass duplicates BB that ends with flow control insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/81672] New: trunk/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c:2852: possible missing initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81672 Bug ID: 81672 Summary: trunk/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c:2852: possible missing initialiser Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/81644] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insn, BBRO pass duplicates BB that ends with flow control insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Aug 2 13:58:08 2017 New Revision: 250830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250830=gcc=rev Log: PR target/81644 * config/i386/i386.md (unspecv): Add

[Bug driver/81650] gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug c++/81636] Confusing warning message containing "#‘obj_type_ref’ not supported by expression#"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81636 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Paolo added FIX_TRUNC_EXPR and FLOAT_EXPR to dump_expr in r143790, but I believe we need more than just pp->expression (t);, we need to print it similarly to CONVERT_EXPR.

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 Daniel Fruzynski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- At the time I had not seen this on trunk but indeed it does fail there too.

[Bug c++/81671] [7/8 Regression] std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81671] [7/8 Regression] std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/81664] __attribute__((target("movbe"))) does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81664 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski --- So there is another problem here: for some reason both mentioned gcc versions accepts -mmovbe and -mno-movbe options. If movbe is not supported, gcc should complain that

[Bug rtl-optimization/81625] GCC v4.7 ... v8 is bloating code by > 25% compared to v3.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81625 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/81667] trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/81667] trunk/gcc/alloc-pool.h:239: possible missing initialiser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81667 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Aug 2 13:25:12 2017 New Revision: 250829 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250829=gcc=rev Log: PR other/81667 * alloc-pool.h (base_pool_allocator): Initialize

[Bug c++/81671] [7/8 Regression] std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to work|

[Bug c++/81671] New: std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671 Bug ID: 81671 Summary: std::nullptr_t incompatible to std::nullptr_t Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- It apparently started failing last week of January 2017. Only 64-bit fails, -m32 is fine. I don't know where that missing function name is coming from.

[Bug libstdc++/81670] New: include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp:253: suspicious assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81670 Bug ID: 81670 Summary: include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp :253: suspicious assignment ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/81650] gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/81668] LTO ODR warnings are not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, lto CC|

[Bug fortran/60355] [F08] constraint C519 for BIND attribute not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/81669] New: trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81669 Bug ID: 81669 Summary: trunk/gcc/fibonacci_heap.h:58: possible missing initialisation ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60355] [F08] constraint C519 for BIND attribute not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Apparently only for implicitly-typed variables. This works as expected: program main integer, bind(c) :: i end program main $ gfortran a.f90 a.f90:2:23: integer, bind(c) :: i

[Bug fortran/61450] ICE in gfc_global_used()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56412] [4.8] "libtool: cygpath: command not found" for mingw32 host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56412 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/81306] valgrind error for function warn_for_multistatement_macros in file c-warn.c line 2474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >