[Bug target/84743] default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:41:19AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Yep, gfortran is missing a simplification. When > > simplification of size(a) occurs, the int(1) is > > still an expression

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4) > > Replacing the line > > > > INTEGER :: A(int(1)) > > > > in comment #0 by > > > > INTEGER :: A(1) > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] New: bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 Bug ID: 84859 Summary: bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/84858] New: wrong exception handling of std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84858 Bug ID: 84858 Summary: wrong exception handling of std::function Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager

[Bug libstdc++/78420] [6/7/8 Regression] std::less<T*> is not a total order with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420 --- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #28) > I can commit a patch that fixes the original testcase, but I now think that > the resolution of https://wg21.link/lwg2450 requires compiler help of some >

[Bug c++/82336] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC requires but does not emit defaulted constructors in certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 14 01:03:13 2018 New Revision: 258512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258512=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82336 - link error with list-init default argument. *

[Bug fortran/61775] Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array constructor gives invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/61775] Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array constructor gives invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Mar 14 00:45:45 2018 New Revision: 258509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258509=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-13 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/83916] [7/8 Regression] Internal compiler error on valid template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83916 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/82336] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC requires but does not emit defaulted constructors in certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/80283] [6/7/8 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #24 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #23) > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #22) > > > > SCHED_PRESSURE_MODEL first tries to create a "model" schedule > > > that keeps register

[Bug libstdc++/78420] [6/7/8 Regression] std::less<T*> is not a total order with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely --- I can commit a patch that fixes the original testcase, but I now think that the resolution of https://wg21.link/lwg2450 requires compiler help of some kind, at least for cases like comment 27. It

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/84855] structered bindings require "decomposed" type to be copy'able

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84855 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84857] New: A valid call to a template function in a variadic template struct is rejected

: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: v.reshetnikov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following C++ code is rejected by GCC 8.0.1 20180313 (tested with https://godbolt.org/): /* SOURCE

[Bug fortran/56422] IR F08/0086: gfortran rejects valid implied-shape arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56422 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/80283] [6/7/8 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #23 from Wilco --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #22) > > SCHED_PRESSURE_MODEL first tries to create a "model" schedule > > that keeps register down as far as possible and then uses that > > to guide the "real"

[Bug bootstrap/84856] New: Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 Bug ID: 84856 Summary: Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/80283] [6/7/8 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #22 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #21) > Created attachment 43646 [details] > Patch to reduce spills for Armv7 > > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #20) > > (In

[Bug c/84853] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/47803] [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #8 from Dave Pagan --- Patch submitted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00621.html

[Bug libstdc++/78420] [6/7/8 Regression] std::less<T*> is not a total order with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely --- Here's a really horrible case: #include #include struct X { operator const X*() const { return this; } }; X x; X y; int main() { std::less<> lt; bool x_less_than_y = lt(x, y); bool

[Bug c++/84855] New: structered bindings require "decomposed" type to be copy'able

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84855 Bug ID: 84855 Summary: structered bindings require "decomposed" type to be copy'able Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/80283] [6/7/8 Regression] bad SIMD register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283 --- Comment #21 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 43646 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43646=edit Patch to reduce spills for Armv7 (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #20) > (In reply to

[Bug target/83712] [6/7 Regression] "Unable to find a register to spill" when compiling for thumb1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83712 --- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Mar 13 20:42:49 2018 New Revision: 258504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258504=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-13 Vladimir Makarov PR target/83712

[Bug c++/79937] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in replace_placeholders_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937 --- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill --- *** Bug 82410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/82410] [7/8 Regression] ICE in replace_placeholders_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82410 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84843] [8 Regression] C++ ICE on builtin redefinition since r258391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84843 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84843] [8 Regression] C++ ICE on builtin redefinition since r258391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84843 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 13 20:32:54 2018 New Revision: 258503 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258503=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84843 * decl.c (duplicate_decls): For redefinition of

[Bug c++/82565] [7 Regression] Concept and lambda return type deduction cause compilation to crash with "mmap: Cannot allocate memory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gccbugzilla at szaszm dot tk ---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 81997, which changed state. Bug 81997 Summary: [7/8 Regression] segfault while instantiating constrained function template https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81997 What|Removed

[Bug c++/81997] [7/8 Regression] segfault while instantiating constrained function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81997 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82565] [7 Regression] Concept and lambda return type deduction cause compilation to crash with "mmap: Cannot allocate memory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jesse at mind dot net --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 81918, which changed state. Bug 81918 Summary: [7/8 Regression] muddled Concept confuses compiler (segfault) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81918 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/81918] [7/8 Regression] muddled Concept confuses compiler (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81918 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82565] [7 Regression] Concept and lambda return type deduction cause compilation to crash with "mmap: Cannot allocate memory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/82565] [7/8 Regression] Concept and lambda return type deduction cause compilation to crash with "mmap: Cannot allocate memory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 13 20:22:31 2018 New Revision: 258502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258502=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82565 - ICE with concepts and generic lambda. * pt.c

[Bug c++/84798] [6/7 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears in a template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798 --- Comment #8 from Volker Reichelt --- *** Bug 79525 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/79525] [c++1y] ICE with auto as function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79525 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/84737] [8 Regression] 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737 --- Comment #9 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #7) > Do I understand it correctly that you suspect that the new IPA-CP > clone that is created from r256888 on is harmful? In that case, you > want to test that by

[Bug c++/84798] [6/7 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears in a template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84541] ICE with auto in function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84541 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84349] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with auto in function cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84349 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/63529] Bad error and ICE with Cray Pointers in Modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/61775] Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array constructor gives invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84720] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in decl_anon_ns_mem_p, at cp/tree.c:3472

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84720 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 13 18:58:15 2018 New Revision: 258501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258501=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84720 - ICE with rvalue ref non-type argument. * pt.c

[Bug c++/84839] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) when `decltype` is used with parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84839 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 13 18:57:10 2018 New Revision: 258500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258500=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84839 - ICE with decltype of parameter pack. * pt.c

[Bug c/84853] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target

[Bug c/84853] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84849] Ambiguous resolution of braze initializer list to a class with explicit constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84849 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Ambiguous resolution of |Ambiguous resolution of

[Bug c++/84854] [7/8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4774

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84854] [7/8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4774

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r239338.

[Bug c++/84849] Ambiguous resolution of braze initializer list to a class with explicit copy/move constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84849 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/84854] [7/8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4774

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84852] [8 Regression] ICE in calculate_line_spans, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84852 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from David

[Bug fortran/61775] Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array constructor gives invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/61775] Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array constructor gives invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c/84852] [8 Regression] ICE in calculate_line_spans, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84852 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/84854] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4774

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84854 Bug ID: 84854 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:4774 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/84853] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Bug ID: 84853 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84720] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in decl_anon_ns_mem_p, at cp/tree.c:3472

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84720 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/84852] New: [8 Regression] ICE in calculate_line_spans, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84852 Bug ID: 84852 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in calculate_line_spans, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1105 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11) > Nah, just the following - you removed LTO testing of prettyprinters > > Index: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/prettyprinters.exp >

[Bug ipa/84833] [8 Regression] target_clones regression since r251047

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84833 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > Just a note, as can be seen e.g. on > > static volatile int a; > > static int my_foo1 (void) { return 1; } > >

[Bug c/46921] Lost side effect when struct initializer expression uses comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 --- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Mar 13 18:10:09 2018 New Revision: 258497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258497=gcc=rev Log: PR c/46921 Lost side effect when struct initializer expression uses comma

[Bug c/46921] Lost side effect when struct initializer expression uses comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84839] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) when `decltype` is used with parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84839 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84850] -Wclass-memaccess on a memcpy in a copy assignment operator with no nontrivial bases or members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||84851 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/84845] [8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304: unrecognizable insn at -O2 and above at aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84845 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84851] New: missing -Wclass-memaccess for a memcpy in a copy ctor with a non-trivial member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84851 Bug ID: 84851 Summary: missing -Wclass-memaccess for a memcpy in a copy ctor with a non-trivial member Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On March 13, 2018 5:15:33 PM GMT+01:00, "nickc at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 > >--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton ---

[Bug c++/84850] -Wclass-memaccess on a memcpy in a copy assignment operator with no nontrivial bases or members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/84848] [8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_3.f08 -fcoarray=single -O2 -latomic execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-03-13 10:57 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin17. A target issue? I'm not sure how this test is supposed to work: Breakpoint 3, 0x00010498 in main

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84845] [8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304: unrecognizable insn at -O2 and above at aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84845 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- First of all, I'd say it is very weird not to include the actual operation name in the instruction name, that is the most important part. So something like: --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md.jj

[Bug target/84845] [8 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304: unrecognizable insn at -O2 and above at aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84845 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/84805] [8 Regression] ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:2096 since r258133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84805 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > I thank you for the fast fix. I can confirm that libreoffice now builds fine. You're welcome. > Are you considering adding the reduced test-case to our test-suite? See the submission.

[Bug libstdc++/70664] failbit is not set on stream reading negative value into unsigned type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70664 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/84743] default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt rather than help

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743 --- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Tue Mar 13 16:28:09 2018 New Revision: 258495 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258495=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-13 Aaron Sawdey PR

[Bug c++/84850] New: new GCC version prints warning on memcpy call (no nontrivial bases or members)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850 Bug ID: 84850 Summary: new GCC version prints warning on memcpy call (no nontrivial bases or members) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 --- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > It should be fixed in linker. OK - so how does the linker distinguish between a file that only contains debug information, none of which is needed, and a

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > Created attachment 43643 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Guys. > > Here is a possible patch, although it is a bit hackish. > Richard might not like it because

[Bug c++/84849] New: Ambiguous resolution of braze initializer list to a class with explicit copy/move constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84849 Bug ID: 84849 Summary: Ambiguous resolution of braze initializer list to a class with explicit copy/move constructors Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/84780] [8 Regression] wrong code aarch64 with -O3 --param=tree-reassoc-width=32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84780 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- That is a separate issue, not caused by the previous patch. I have a patch for this, too.

[Bug fortran/84848] [8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_3.f08 -fcoarray=single -O2 -latomic execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-03-13 10:57 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin17. A target issue? I see it also occurs on 32-bit hppa-unknown-linux-gnu but not on 32-bit

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 43643 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43643=edit Proposed patch Hi Guys. Here is a possible patch, although it is a bit hackish. Richard might not like it

[Bug sanitizer/83392] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/ptr-overflow-sanitization-1.c scan-tree-dump-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83392 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Need GCC 8 to reproduce: Thanks. What version of ld was this with?

[Bug c++/84798] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears in a template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 13 15:55:07 2018 New Revision: 258493 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258493=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84798 - ICE with auto in abstract function declarator. *

[Bug lto/84847] [8 Regression] Incompatibility between early LTO debug and "-Wl,--gc-sections" leads to corrupt DWARF debuginfo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Need

[Bug sanitizer/83392] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/ptr-overflow-sanitization-1.c scan-tree-dump-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83392 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- When I try to fix this using: --- gcc/sanopt.c.jj 2018-03-02 00:15:54.670780980 +0100 +++ gcc/sanopt.c2018-03-13 16:35:38.333020680 +0100 @@ -486,12 +486,17 @@ maybe_optimize_ubsan_ptr_ifn

[Bug tree-optimization/84005] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/84725] enable attribute nonstring for all narrow character types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84725 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84725] enable attribute nonstring for all narrow character types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84725 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Mar 13 15:33:16 2018 New Revision: 258492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258492=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84725 - enable attribute nonstring for all narrow character

[Bug sanitizer/83392] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/ptr-overflow-sanitization-1.c scan-tree-dump-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83392 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- The difference is in: 486 HOST_WIDE_INT bitpos; 487 base = get_inner_reference (base, , , , , 488 , , ); 489 if (offset == NULL_TREE 490

  1   2   3   >