[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- OK, I think I just have gotten closer to what is wrong: $ gfortran -g -O1 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 do_concurrent_5.f90 $ ./a.out $ gfortran -g -O1 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fopenmp

[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5) > > > The test should probably go to gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/. > > > > No, the testcase should go into libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/, > > as it

[Bug c++/85356] [7/8 Regression] ICE with operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85356 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/85362] New: unnecessary checks with -fsanitize=object-size and non-int indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85362 Bug ID: 85362 Summary: unnecessary checks with -fsanitize=object-size and non-int indices Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/85361] New: Variable length array allowed in c89/90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85361 Bug ID: 85361 Summary: Variable length array allowed in c89/90 Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug web/82686] Debian sid powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu 4.13.0-1-powerpc64 bootstrap breaks in stage3 with unexpected requirement for bdw-gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82686 --- Comment #12 from Dennis Clarke --- Thanks .. I'll give that a try. The real objective here is to get a simple native bootstrap going which includes libquadmath. My concern is that there is no support for that unless the ppc64 system has the

[Bug web/82686] Debian sid powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu 4.13.0-1-powerpc64 bootstrap breaks in stage3 with unexpected requirement for bdw-gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82686 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose --- you might want --enable-objc-gc=auto or --disable-objc-gc. See install.texi for the docs.

[Bug tree-optimization/85360] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/deallocate_stat.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (ICE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85360 Bug ID: 85360 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/deallocate_stat.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (ICE) Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/85359] New: duplicate -Wstringop-overflow for a strcmp call with a nonstring pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85359 Bug ID: 85359 Summary: duplicate -Wstringop-overflow for a strcmp call with a nonstring pointer Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug target/85358] New: PowerPC: Using -mabi=ieeelongdouble -mcpu=power9 breaks __ibm128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85358 Bug ID: 85358 Summary: PowerPC: Using -mabi=ieeelongdouble -mcpu=power9 breaks __ibm128 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85325] ICE on class template partial specialization for c++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85325 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/68544] ICE trying to pass derived type constructor as a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68544 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/85356] [7/8 Regression] ICE with operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85356 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug fortran/85357] New: Regression: gfortran versions 7.2.0/8.0.1 reject F03 procedure overriding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85357 Bug ID: 85357 Summary: Regression: gfortran versions 7.2.0/8.0.1 reject F03 procedure overriding Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/85347] New testcase vec-ldl-1.c FAILs on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85347 --- Comment #1 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- FWIW, the test runs ok on bns -m32 as written. Executing on host: /home/kelvin/gcc/build/gcc-trunk4fixvecldl.b4patch/gcc/xgcc \ -B/home/kelvin/gcc/build/gcc-trunk4fixvecldl.b4patch/gcc/

[Bug c++/85353] deprecation warning issued on data member with initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85353 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/85356] [7/8 Regression] ICE with operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85356 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) ... > Another alternative would be to implicitly reset the #pragma pack on "entry" > to every C++ standard header (or even every header), and restore it on > "exit."

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug target/85345] Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85345] Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/85356] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE with operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85356 Bug ID: 85356 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with operator= Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/85354] [8 regression] ICE with gcc.dg/graphite/pr84872.c starting with r259313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85354 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/82065] gfortran rejects redundant use of intrinsic module constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82065 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf --- This looks pretty much like a namespace problem. Adding in the example in comment #4 common /x/ integer_kinds e.g. to subroutine sub1 makes the code illegal but compile. It then prints: 1

[Bug rtl-optimization/85354] [8 regression] ICE with gcc.dg/graphite/pr84872.c starting with r259313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85354 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/85354] [8 regression] ICE with gcc.dg/graphite/pr84872.c starting with r259313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85354 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/85355] new test case g++.dg/warn/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-7.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/85355] New: new test case g++.dg/warn/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-7.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85355 Bug ID: 85355 Summary: new test case g++.dg/warn/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-7.C fails Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > The test should probably go to gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/. > > No, the testcase should go into libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/, > as it is a runtime test which needs the runtime library.

[Bug fortran/85352] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85352 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/85354] New: [8 regression] ICE with gcc.dg/graphite/pr84872.c starting with r259313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85354 Bug ID: 85354 Summary: [8 regression] ICE with gcc.dg/graphite/pr84872.c starting with r259313 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/85190] [8 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr81196.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85190 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Wed Apr 11 16:50:16 2018 New Revision: 259326 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259326=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite PR testsuite/85190 *

[Bug fortran/50525] gfortran should not allow early reference to entry dummy argument (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50525 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Duplicate of pr34663?

[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/85353] New: deprecation warning issued on data member with initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85353 Bug ID: 85353 Summary: deprecation warning issued on data member with initializer Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85352] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85352 --- Comment #1 from mecej4 --- The bug goes away if some apparently unrelated changes are made. For example, if "ENTRY rfinit" is commented out, the bug is not seen.

[Bug tree-optimization/85315] missed range optimisation opportunity for derefences where index must be 0 or otherwise constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- I asked Peter about that yesterday. The access to *p in your example is still meant to be undefined even under the proposed provenance rules. Here's his response:

[Bug fortran/85352] New: Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85352 Bug ID: 85352 Summary: Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status:

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Target Milestone|7.4

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On April 11, 2018 4:21:06 PM GMT+02:00, "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 > >--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug c++/70808] Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant for nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 11 15:55:15 2018 New Revision: 259325 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259325=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70808 * g++.dg/warn/Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant-7.C:

[Bug target/85321] Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- What warning do you expect? The problem is not specific to ostringstream, so we can't just add a warning when you try to use packing with that particular type. It happens for any code which you link to

[Bug target/85321] Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321 --- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Wed Apr 11 15:25:42 2018 New Revision: 259324 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259324=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-11 Aaron Sawdey PR

[Bug gcov-profile/85351] New: [GCOV] Wrong coverage with an executed exit() in if statement within a called function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351 Bug ID: 85351 Summary: [GCOV] Wrong coverage with an executed exit() in if statement within a called function Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83009] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to avieira from comment #5) > I have been looking at this and the problem does indeed lie with the > register not being a hard reg because aarch64_mem_pair_lanes_operand invokes >

[Bug target/83009] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 --- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have been looking at this and the problem does indeed lie with the register not being a hard reg because aarch64_mem_pair_lanes_operand invokes aarch64_legitimate_address_p with 1 for the

[Bug rtl-optimization/84566] error: qsort comparator not anti-commutative: -1, -1 on aarch64 in sched1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82407] [meta-bug] qsort_chk fallout tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407 Bug 82407 depends on bug 84566, which changed state. Bug 84566 Summary: error: qsort comparator not anti-commutative: -1, -1 on aarch64 in sched1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/85099] [meta-bug] selective scheduling issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85099 Bug 85099 depends on bug 84566, which changed state. Bug 84566 Summary: error: qsort comparator not anti-commutative: -1, -1 on aarch64 in sched1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566 What|Removed

[Bug target/84301] [6/7 Regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/84566] error: qsort comparator not anti-commutative: -1, -1 on aarch64 in sched1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84566 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov --- Author: amonakov Date: Wed Apr 11 14:36:04 2018 New Revision: 259322 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259322=gcc=rev Log: sched-deps: respect deps->readonly in macro-fusion (PR 84566) PR

[Bug gcov-profile/85350] New: [GCOV] wrong coverage when using constant variable in struct declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85350 Bug ID: 85350 Summary: [GCOV] wrong coverage when using constant variable in struct declaration Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/83009] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/83009] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug target/84301] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov --- Author: amonakov Date: Wed Apr 11 14:32:32 2018 New Revision: 259321 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259321=gcc=rev Log: sched-rgn: run add_branch_dependencies for sel-sched (PR 84301) PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/85342] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (regcprop.c:995) with -O2 -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85342 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43911 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43911=edit gcc8-pr85342.patch Untested fix. After failed apply_change_group, recog_data.insn is NULL and rest of recog_data is

[Bug target/85342] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (regcprop.c:995) with -O2 -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/85238] [8 Regression] lto-wrapper: fatal error: simple_object_copy_lto_debug_sections not implemented: Invalid argument on Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou --- > Looks good to me, aka OK if it passes whatever testing you think is > sufficient. Thanks. There is apparently another, preexisting issue visible in Ada: $ gcc -o t t.c -flto -g lto-wrapper.exe: fatal

[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test should probably go to gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/.

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug gcov-profile/85349] [GCOV] struct varaible definition in while(1) will cause incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 crillion at tiscali dot it changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libgcc/85334] Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85342] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (regcprop.c:995) with -O2 -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85342 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/85349] New: [GCOV] struct varaible definition in while(1) will cause incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85349 Bug ID: 85349 Summary: [GCOV] struct varaible definition in while(1) will cause incorrect coverage Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 Zack Weinberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zackw at panix dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug tree-optimization/85331] [8 Regression] during GIMPLE pass, internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (-O1 and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85331 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug 84613 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84016] [8 Regression] Spec2000 regression around Jan 14 and Jan 19 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84016 Bug 84016 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 84149, which changed state. Bug 84149 Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/85331] [8 Regression] during GIMPLE pass, internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (-O1 and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85331 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 11 13:35:13 2018 New Revision: 259320 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259320=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85331 * vec-perm-indices.h

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85348] ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85348] New: ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85348 Bug ID: 85348 Summary: ostringstream with #pragma pack(1) causes stack smashing error Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Apr 11 13:30:53 2018 New Revision: 259319 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259319=gcc=rev Log: Improve IPA-CP handling of self-recursive calls 2018-04-11 Martin Jambor

[Bug ipa/85329] [8 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85329 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 43910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43910=edit preprocessed source source package is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/i2pd upstream is http://i2pd.website/

[Bug target/85347] New: New testcase vec-ldl-1.c FAILs on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85347 Bug ID: 85347 Summary: New testcase vec-ldl-1.c FAILs on powerpc64-linux Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/85032] [8 regression] Wrong non-constant condition for static assertion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85032] [8 regression] Wrong non-constant condition for static assertion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Apr 11 13:10:16 2018 New Revision: 259318 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259318=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85032 * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1):

[Bug testsuite/85346] gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/85339] [8 Regression] With early LTO debug the early DWARF misses line-info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/85339] [8 Regression] With early LTO debug the early DWARF misses line-info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85339 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 11 13:05:35 2018 New Revision: 259317 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259317=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-11 Richard Biener PR lto/85339 *

[Bug fortran/85346] New: gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85346 Bug ID: 85346 Summary: gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_5.f90 FAILs with --disable-libgomp Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/85339] [8 Regression] With early LTO debug the early DWARF misses line-info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85339 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85345] New: Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345 Bug ID: 85345 Summary: Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libstdc++/85343] Overload __throw_ios_failure to allow passing errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85343 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug libstdc++/85343] Overload __throw_ios_failure to allow passing errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85343 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69560] x86_64: alignof(uint64_t) produces incorrect results with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560 --- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #18) > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #16) > > (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #15) > > > Because the ABI says so. > > > > Which ABI? In

[Bug target/85342] [8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (regcprop.c:995) with -O2 -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug middle-end/85344] Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85344 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from

[Bug middle-end/85344] Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85344 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- More worrying is that this code compiles without error when it should error out: void foo (void) { __asm( "%0" :: "J" ((unsigned char) 0x80)); }

[Bug middle-end/85344] Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85344 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- I have a patch, starting testing.

[Bug middle-end/85344] Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85344 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85344] New: Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85344 Bug ID: 85344 Summary: Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libstdc++/85343] New: Overload __throw_ios_failure to allow passing errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85343 Bug ID: 85343 Summary: Overload __throw_ios_failure to allow passing errno Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/85323] SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- If you mean adding if (__builtin_constant_p (__B) && __B == 0) return __A; and similar to all the various intrinsics, then that is not the right thing to do, it will make the headers much larger and even the

  1   2   >