[Bug lto/85405] [6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0.1 Known to fail|8.0.1

[Bug ipa/85329] [8 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85329 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/85405] [6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 17 05:41:40 2018 New Revision: 259429 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259429=gcc=rev Log: Support bitfields in Wodr machinery (PR lto/85405). 2018-04-17 Jan Hubicka

[Bug ipa/85329] [8 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:460

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85329 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 17 05:40:39 2018 New Revision: 259428 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259428=gcc=rev Log: Make redirection only for target_clones: V3 (PR ipa/85329). 2018-04-17 Martin

[Bug c/85427] New: internal compiler error: in constant_lower_bound, at poly-int.h:1527

/suhua/compilers/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180416 (experimental) [trunk revision 259396] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk abc.c during RTL pass: expand abc.c: In function ‘fn1’: abc.c:3:13: internal compiler error

[Bug bootstrap/85413] "./configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto " != "BOOT_CFLAGS +=-flto "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85413 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The difference between -flto and -flto=jobserver is minor (just speed of linking). I don't think this minor difference would cause the need to update the documentation.

[Bug bootstrap/84856] Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 --- Comment #9 from Kito Cheng --- Hi Jim: Yeah, you are right, so I guess just some missing in back-end now, thanks your quick response :)

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] [7/8 Regression] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 43955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43955=edit gcc/auto-host.h

[Bug rtl-optimization/85426] New: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85426 Bug ID: 85426 Summary: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1271 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80290] [6/7/8 Regression] g++ uses unreasonable amount of memory compiling nested string maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug c++/85039] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in nested_anon_class_index, at cp/mangle.c:1626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85039 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|aoliva at gcc

[Bug target/85400] R_SPARC_TLS_*: invalid relocations generated for optimized builds on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/85400] R_SPARC_TLS_*: invalid relocations generated for optimized builds on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug ipa/85421] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in ipa_propagate_frequency, at ipa-profile.c:405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85421 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/85039] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in nested_anon_class_index, at cp/mangle.c:1626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85039 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Mon Apr 16 21:35:34 2018 New Revision: 259423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259423=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/85039] no type definitions in builtin offsetof Types defined within a

[Bug target/85417] -fcf-protection should provide CET protection on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85417 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 43954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43954=edit A patch I am testing this patch.

[Bug bootstrap/84856] Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 --- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson --- I copied the design of the patch from the i386 backend, so in theory it should work. The layout of the stack is completely at the control of the target backend, so uses of STACK_BOUNDARY outside the backend

[Bug target/85400] R_SPARC_TLS_*: invalid relocations generated for optimized builds on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400 --- Comment #2 from Brian Vandenberg --- Sorry, I was hand-typing from an air-gapped network. I left the type name out; line 5 should read: > thread_local int mything = 3; -brian On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:52 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/85425] gcc 6.2.1 fails to catch error in function calling arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85425 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/85425] gcc 6.2.1 fails to catch error in function calling arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85425 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Heinzel --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) Many thanks for your quick response. I normally don't use -Wconversion because it floods me with uninteresting errors about size_t, floor(), and code from

[Bug c++/59960] accepts ill-formed 'auto a1 = t1, a2 = t2;' where t1 and t2 have different template types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59960 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de --- Comment

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/85418] -Wformat-truncation on inlinned function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85418 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/85425] gcc 6.2.1 fails to catch error in function calling arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85425 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The example can be reduced to: void ghhrobust_search (double ay, int type) { } void f(int i, double d) { ghhrobust_search(i, d); } This must not produce an error, because it is 100% valid according to

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Sasha Unknown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sasha2048 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/85419] Incorrect determination of null pointer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85419 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/84574] Function return thunks shouldn't be aliased to indirect branch thunks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84574 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 19:11:13 2018 New Revision: 259422 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259422=gcc=rev Log: i386: Don't generate alias for function return thunk Function return thunks

[Bug target/84039] x86 retpolines and CFI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84039 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 19:08:14 2018 New Revision: 259421 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259421=gcc=rev Log: i386: Add TARGET_INDIRECT_BRANCH_REGISTER For --- struct C { virtual

[Bug target/84530] -mfunction-return=thunk does not work for simple_return_pop_internal insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84530 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 19:06:32 2018 New Revision: 259420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259420=gcc=rev Log: i386: Update -mfunction-return= for return with pop When -mfunction-return=

[Bug c/85425] New: gcc 6.2.1 fails to catch error in function calling arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85425 Bug ID: 85425 Summary: gcc 6.2.1 fails to catch error in function calling arguments Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85424] The __builtin_packlongdouble function might have issues with the output overlapping the inputs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85424 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85424] New: The __builtin_packlongdouble function might have issues with the output overlapping the inputs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85424 Bug ID: 85424 Summary: The __builtin_packlongdouble function might have issues with the output overlapping the inputs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/83839] [8 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/config/i386/i386.c on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83839 --- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 18:55:04 2018 New Revision: 259414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259414=gcc=rev Log: x86: Add -mfunction-return= Add -mfunction-return= option to convert

[Bug web/82686] Debian sid powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu 4.13.0-1-powerpc64 bootstrap breaks in stage3 with unexpected requirement for bdw-gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82686 --- Comment #14 from Dennis Clarke --- Since this bug was a "bootstrap" issue I think I should close it as simply an issue related to the garbage collector libs needed.

[Bug target/83905] ix86_expand_epilogue modifies the copy of cfun->machine->frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83905 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 18:44:43 2018 New Revision: 259411 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259411=gcc=rev Log: i386: Use const reference of struct ix86_frame to avoid copy We can use

[Bug target/82499] x86: small stack initial adjustments could use push

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82499 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 18:42:57 2018 New Revision: 259408 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259408=gcc=rev Log: i386: Move struct ix86_frame to machine_function Make ix86_frame available

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- > We looked into this with Martin todday. There are two bugs: one is the fact > that lto.c forgets to register the type in case it was within strongly > connected component after its outer type. The order

[Bug target/85080] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-pr37194.c fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85080] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-pr37194.c fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Apr 16 18:18:42 2018 New Revision: 259407 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259407=gcc=rev Log: [gcc/testsuite] 2018-04-16 Bill Schmidt PR

[Bug middle-end/84955] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect OpenACC tile expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Apr 16 18:01:09 2018 New Revision: 259406 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259406=gcc=rev Log: [openacc] Fix ICE when compiling tile loop containing infinite loop 2018-04-16

[Bug tree-optimization/85420] missing -Wrestrict with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Whether that's a good or bad decision is a matter of opinion. Most coding guidelines advise against using strcpy even between distinct objects. I happen to think that's unnecessarily restrictive when the

[Bug rtl-optimization/85423] [8 Regression] ICE in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85423 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85421] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in ipa_propagate_frequency, at ipa-profile.c:405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85421 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/85420] missing -Wrestrict with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > The warning for attachment 43950 [details] is intended and the bug is > actually in failing to issue it without -fsanitize=undefined. Unlike for > raw memory

[Bug tree-optimization/85420] missing -Wrestrict with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/85423] New: [8 Regression] ICE in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85423 Bug ID: 85423 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6403 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/85421] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in ipa_propagate_frequency, at ipa-profile.c:405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85421 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/82686] Debian sid powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu 4.13.0-1-powerpc64 bootstrap breaks in stage3 with unexpected requirement for bdw-gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82686 --- Comment #13 from Dennis Clarke --- Finally managed to get a decent looking three stage bootstrap to complete without bizarre errors. Thanks to Matthias Klose for the suggestion to get away from that gc issue entirely. Testsuite is running

[Bug target/85417] -fcf-protection should provide CET protection on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85417 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|Extra test failures

[Bug middle-end/85420] More -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #3) > Hmm, this maybe creduce'd too much, the original source reads more like > >strcpy(b, b + a + 10); > > which would be only UB for sure if strlen(b + a + 10) >=

[Bug middle-end/85420] More -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 --- Comment #3 from Franz Sirl --- Hmm, this maybe creduce'd too much, the original source reads more like strcpy(b, b + a + 10); which would be only UB for sure if strlen(b + a + 10) >= 9, or?

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/84955] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect OpenACC tile expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to cesar from comment #6) > It should be noted that GCC also chokes with any empty OpenACC loop in > general. Filed as PR85422 - [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

[Bug lto/85422] [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries

[Bug lto/85422] New: [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85422 Bug ID: 85422 Summary: [openacc] ICE at cfgloop.c:468: segfault in flow_loops_find Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] [7/8 Regression] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/85421] New: [8 regression] internal compiler error: in ipa_propagate_frequency, at ipa-profile.c:405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85421 Bug ID: 85421 Summary: [8 regression] internal compiler error: in ipa_propagate_frequency, at ipa-profile.c:405 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/85420] More -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/84463] [6/7/8 Regression] Supposedly-incompliant "error: '* key0' is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/85420] More -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 --- Comment #1 from Franz Sirl --- Created attachment 43951 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43951=edit C++ testcase

[Bug middle-end/85420] New: More -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85420 Bug ID: 85420 Summary: More -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug c/85419] New: Incorrect determination of null pointer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85419 Bug ID: 85419 Summary: Incorrect determination of null pointer constant Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/84463] [6/7/8 Regression] Supposedly-incompliant "error: '* key0' is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/85418] New: -Wformat-truncation on inlinned function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85418 Bug ID: 85418 Summary: -Wformat-truncation on inlinned function Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 --- Comment #14 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Mon Apr 16 14:50:06 2018 New Revision: 259403 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259403=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-16 Aaron Sawdey PR

[Bug target/85417] Extra test failures with -fcf-protection -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85417 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 43947 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43947=edit Proposed fix We looked into this with Maritn todday. There are two bugs: one is the fact that lto.c forgets to

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov --- Or as Jakub (thanks!) noted on IRC, gcc/auto-host.h from the build tree may be also helpful and simpler for us to work with.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov --- The testcase is not easily reproducible because the rs6000 backend has some implicit dependencies on capabilities of configure-time binutils, and they are not visible as 'gcc -v' flags. So, to reproduce

[Bug middle-end/85414] [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:13810 with -Og -fgcse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85414 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84463] [6/7/8 Regression] Supposedly-incompliant "error: '* key0' is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85416] Massive performance regression when switching on "-march=native"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85416 --- Comment #1 from Martin Reinecke --- Just re-tested on an Intel Core i5-4570; on this CPU, there is no performance degradation.

[Bug demangler/85304] Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85304 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/85417] New: Extra test failures with -fcf-protection -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85417 Bug ID: 85417 Summary: Extra test failures with -fcf-protection -mcet Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/85414] [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:13810 with -Og -fgcse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85414 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- The problem is likely with the caching of ix86_compute_frame_layout results, at least if I call this function at the beginning of ix86_expand_prologue, it doesn't ICE anymore. What changes in particular is

[Bug middle-end/85403] internal compiler error: ... config/i386/i386.c:32347

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85403 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/85405] [6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2018-04-15

[Bug tree-optimization/85416] New: Massive performance regression when switching on "-march=native"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85416 Bug ID: 85416 Summary: Massive performance regression when switching on "-march=native" Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/85403] internal compiler error: ... config/i386/i386.c:32347

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85403 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 16 11:31:22 2018 New Revision: 259400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259400=gcc=rev Log: i386: Check error_mark_node in multiversioning Since CET is applied to the

[Bug c++/85415] New: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85415 Bug ID: 85415 Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2984 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/83983] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr83121 (test for LTO warnings, pr83121_0.C line 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/84331] Execution failures on Skylake server with -march=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84331 --- Comment #1 from Julia Koval --- Author: jkoval Date: Mon Apr 16 11:23:55 2018 New Revision: 259399 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259399=gcc=rev Log: Fixed g++.dg/ext/mv16.C with -march=native. gcc/ PR target/84331 *

[Bug target/84945] [8 Regression] UBSAN: gcc/config/i386/i386.c:33312:22: runtime error: shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84945 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Apr 16 11:22:40 2018 New Revision: 259398 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259398=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84945 * config/i386/cpuinfo.c (set_feature): Wrap into

[Bug target/85414] [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:13810 with -Og -fgcse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85414 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85414] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:13810 with -Og -fgcse

libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-259397-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180416 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug libgomp/85129] [openacc] Document GOMP_OPENACC_DIM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85129 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > I. trunk > > The GOMP_OPENACC_DIM environment variable is not documented (it should have > an entry in libgomp.texi at 'OpenACC Environment Variables'). Atm, in

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] [8 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini --- Nope. Something deeper. The new testcase would be accepted but the declaration of the int variable 'e' would not be usable, would be ignored.

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini --- In fact, if I slightly tweak the testcase to avoid the error by defining 'e' we would ICE again, because binding->type is found null without a preceding diagnostic. Thus I wonder if my patchlet in Comment 7

[Bug libgomp/85411] [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85411 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries

[Bug rtl-optimization/85408] ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85408 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/83009] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 --- Comment #7 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Bootstrap and regression testing looks good. Ill put the patch up on the ML when we enter stage 1 again.

[Bug bootstrap/85413] New: "./configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto " != "BOOT_CFLAGS +=-flto "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85413 Bug ID: 85413 Summary: "./configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto " != "BOOT_CFLAGS +=-flto " Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/85412] New: [8 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 Bug ID: 85412 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in put_TImodes, at sel-sched.c:7191 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/85129] [openacc] Document GOMP_OPENACC_DIM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85129 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #3) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2) > > GOMP_OPENACC_DIM seems to be the odd one here, and we should document > > the non-standard behaviour that it

[Bug libgomp/85411] New: [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85411 Bug ID: 85411 Summary: [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial

[Bug c++/85112] [8 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85112 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >