https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916
--- Comment #3 from Roger Mc Murtrie ---
This problem doesn't occur for compile only.
It occurs when I Build All from GPS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-08-11 8:04 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> This should do it:
I'll give it a test on my next build.
Thanks,
Dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should do it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/memory_resource.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/memory_resource.cc
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
namespace std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86920
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-08-11 4:08 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> N.B. this doesn't need compare and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-08-11 5:51 PM, bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
>
> --- Comment #13 from The Written Word com> ---
> (In reply to The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #14 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #13)
> (In reply to The Written Word from comment #10)
> > (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> > > It would help to see the uses of long_double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #13 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #10)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> > It would help to see the uses of long_double in stdlib.h.
>
> /usr/include/stdlib.h has:
>
> #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #12 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #11)
> Created attachment 44528 [details]
> stdlib.h long_double patch
My first attempt but it didn't work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #11 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 44528
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44528=edit
stdlib.h long_double patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
--- Comment #10 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #9)
> It would help to see the uses of long_double in stdlib.h.
/usr/include/stdlib.h has:
# ifndef _LONG_DOUBLE
#define _LONG_DOUBLE
# if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86920
Bug ID: 86920
Summary: A matching template specialization is not selected
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86919
Bug ID: 86919
Summary: strlen of a multidimensional array element with
non-constant offset not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86599
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. this doesn't need compare and exchange, just exchange.
I'll fix this early next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-08-11 3:31 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
>
> --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Does hppa64 really not have native
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86918
Bug ID: 86918
Summary: internal compiler error: unexpected expression 'v' of
kind template_parm_index
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression]|[6/7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86738
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] gcc 8.2: |[8 Regression] gcc 8.2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86627
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression] Signed |[6/7 Regression] Signed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80334
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 44527
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44527=edit
candidate patch to fix the error noted in comment 11
This patch fixes the unaligned accesses in the testcase in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86846
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Does hppa64 really not have native atomic ops for sizeof(void*) ?
I guess we need to use a mutex here, as I don't want libstdc++ to depend on
libatomic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80334
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78917
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Another test case:
$ cat f.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall -Wextra f.c
int f (int i)
{
const char * p = __builtin_strchr (i ? "123" : "456", '2');
return __builtin_strlen (p);
}
The strlen argument is a phi with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Bogus "is |[8 Regression] Bogus "is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86915
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86915
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Elliot Saba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||staticfloat at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with Merge C++ delayed folding branch., r230365.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Bug ID: 86917
Summary: ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2798
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916
--- Comment #2 from Roger Mc Murtrie ---
Correction
"As I have used gcc 6.1.0 with getting this error"
should have been:
"As I have used gcc 6.1.0 WITHOUT getting this error"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916
--- Comment #1 from Roger Mc Murtrie ---
I am also getting this problem with gcc 6.1.0
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 6.1.0 (x86_64-apple-darwin15) GCC error: |
| in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86914
--- Comment #1 from Even Rouault ---
Interstingly with gcc 8.2, char c[0] doesn't generate the appropriate code. The
only way of making it work is to use char c[] syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86835
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Aug 11 11:29:12 2018
New Revision: 263487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263487=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86835
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86728
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86728
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 11 11:02:22 2018
New Revision: 263486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263486=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86728 - C variadic generic lambda.
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86728
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 11 11:01:49 2018
New Revision: 263485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263485=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86728 - C variadic generic lambda.
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86884
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uecker at eecs dot berkeley.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86728
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 11 10:47:03 2018
New Revision: 263484
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263484=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86728 - C variadic generic lambda.
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86858
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86910
--- Comment #4 from Steffen Schuemann ---
I just realised, if I'm all wrong, and not handling this as an error is the way
to go, as described in LWG-defect-#2935, create_directory() would violate the
new behaviour described in 2935, as it passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86916
Bug ID: 86916
Summary: 8.1.0 (x86_64-apple-darwin15) Constraint_Error
erroneous memory access
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
49 matches
Mail list logo
