https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #7 from Krzysztof Nowicki ---
Thanks for the very quick response. I've applied the patch on top of GCC 9.1
and it indeed fixes the problem we've seen on MIPS64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #16 from Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95019
--- Comment #1 from bin cheng ---
Please provide the exact configuration/compilation command lines in bug report
next time, which could save others' time to reproduce. Considering I didn't
touch mips for years.
As for this specific issue, note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18
commit r11-345-gf6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18
Author: Bin Cheng
Date: Wed May 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #27 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #26)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > > if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
Bug ID: 95097
Summary: Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #26 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > if the loop has multi-exits or upbound is not a fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #25 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #18)
> > > Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
> > > if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94118
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fec3f62b9bfc03e5088a09036791c2ac84fe0c8
commit r11-344-g0fec3f62b9bfc03e5088a09036791c2ac84fe0c8
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri May 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95078
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> TER should go away, not be extended. So you are suggesting that we replace
>
> leaq44(%rdi,%rdx,4), %rdx --- redundant could be fwprop
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95023
--- Comment #2 from Ye Luo ---
I got the following error when building the new lib. Tried gcc 8 and 10 with
master and newlib-3.3.0. No difference
/home/yeluo/opt/build-amdgcn-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/yeluo/opt/build-amdgcn-gcc/./gcc/ -nostdinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
--- Comment #3 from Inbal Levi ---
Actually, you are right,
I'm currently working on a paper to change it, should have waited for
afterward.
The reason to change it is to align (...) with C behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95093
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Created https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545638.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096
Bug ID: 95096
Summary: Feature request: add -fsplit-dwarf
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But this doesn't seem like a very useful behaviour for the extension.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Rafael Avila de Espindola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael at espindo dot la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095
Bug ID: 95095
Summary: Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc-bugs at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95094
Bug ID: 95094
Summary: alignof(reference_to_type) doesn't return
alignof(referenced_type) as it ought to, by the
standard
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a0225e47868fbfceaecaa5e2de96c1c5a2251ea
commit r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfceaecaa5e2de96c1c5a2251ea
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90b160f8ec515f54ddc36519a6aaa60abdabdec1
commit r11-336-g90b160f8ec515f54ddc36519a6aaa60abdabdec1
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95087
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94906
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94906
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45a6686e76bfcd48f7c72a23d0e15186f76b4bfc
commit r9-8588-g45a6686e76bfcd48f7c72a23d0e15186f76b4bfc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95092
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95093
Bug ID: 95093
Summary: Implement DR 1966, Colon following enumeration
elaborated-type-specifier
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac627eb4162d31aa4d009c3c9a8da7dfd6cc34e0
commit r11-335-gac627eb4162d31aa4d009c3c9a8da7dfd6cc34e0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:43:54PM +, seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
>
> --- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer ---
> I don't know fortran and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer ---
I don't know fortran and this appears to be part of a multi-thousand line
extremely complex function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah good point.
struct A {
void operator delete(void*) = delete;
void operator delete[](void*) = delete;
};
A* f();
A* f2();
using type1 = decltype(delete f());
using type2 = decltype(delete[] f2());
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Probably the same issue:
>
> struct A {
> void operator delete(void*) = delete;
> void operator delete[](void*) = delete;
> };
>
> using type1 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94998
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed on master branch so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94998
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d17cdc17c90ce77cb90c569322c1f241d3530cec
commit r11-333-gd17cdc17c90ce77cb90c569322c1f241d3530cec
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue May 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79706
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #11)
> /home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gfortran -c -o
> module_ra_cam.fppized.o -I. -I./netcdf/include -I./inc -m64 -O0 -g3
> -mcpu=power8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a6790fb4e5090624fbd71e2b895e6bdd5319fd7
commit r11-332-g8a6790fb4e5090624fbd71e2b895e6bdd5319fd7
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #11 from Bill Seurer ---
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gfortran -c -o
module_ra_cam.fppized.o -I. -I./netcdf/include -I./inc -m64 -O0 -g3
-mcpu=power8 -Wno-deprecated-declarations -fconvert=big-endian -std=legacy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95092
Bug ID: 95092
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/asan/pr95051.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95091
Bug ID: 95091
Summary: ICE in gfc_hash_value, at fortran/class.c:538
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
Bug ID: 95090
Summary: ICE: identifier overflow: 129
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95089
Bug ID: 95089
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2843
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 78752, which changed state.
Bug 78752 Summary: [concepts] ICE with constrained variadic member function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:955b1f929906cabc5b17c40cbc7d767eebd64cc7
commit r11-331-g955b1f929906cabc5b17c40cbc7d767eebd64cc7
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95088
Bug ID: 95088
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_class_symbol, at fortran/class.c:653
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa31a3cdbf1571286671d8d3a83e31676862583e
commit r11-330-gfa31a3cdbf1571286671d8d3a83e31676862583e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86142
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44665
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a2dea6b63ae600eb1d084c06d8a3ba42c66dd6b
commit r11-323-g2a2dea6b63ae600eb1d084c06d8a3ba42c66dd6b
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6416f67273aaeafd6ad89c2c82076dabb50f8dbe
commit r11-322-g6416f67273aaeafd6ad89c2c82076dabb50f8dbe
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95087
Bug ID: 95087
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:14382
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nico at josuttis dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95086
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95086
Bug ID: 95086
Summary: brace initialization in captures doesn't work with
function calls
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Bug ID: 95085
Summary: diagnostic on designated-initializer from
braced-init-list could be better
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 12 May 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
>
> --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
> The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95084
Bug ID: 95084
Summary: code sinking prevents if-conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95083
Bug ID: 95083
Summary: x86 fp_movcc expansion depends on real_cst sharing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
STV generates:
8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea0x0(%esi),%esi
a1 00 00 00 00 mov0x0,%eax R_386_32target_p
83 ec 08sub$0x8,%esp
f3 0f 7e 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Bug ID: 95082
Summary: LE implementations of vec_cnttz_lsbb and
vec_cntlz_lsbb are wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
This ia32 psABI return value discussion also applies here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/ia32-abi/return$20value%7Csort:date/ia32-abi/9H4BBrIdkmk/sjWw06ZPnS4J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> GCC doesn't tail-call because the return types are not compatible. With a
> call
> it cannot optimize the stack adjustment because of the ABI.
>
> Note I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
The problem is since df_lr_bb_local_compute has
/* If the def is to only part of the reg, it does
not kill the other defs that reach here. */
if (!(DF_REF_FLAGS (def) & (DF_REF_PARTIAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 94988, which changed state.
Bug 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c
scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:119a7db1e05c9741803b3ff93266b00fd535732a
commit r11-320-g119a7db1e05c9741803b3ff93266b00fd535732a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(It currently enables p10 insns, but it leaves p9 insns disabled (and any
older insns your compiler doesn't default to as well)).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #2 from rhalbersma ---
OK, Alisdair Meredith points out on Twitter that in [class.compare.default]/6
there is a special sentence on array class data members
In that list, any subobject of array type is recursively expanded to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Ah. I couldn't reproduce this, but I used -mcpu=future.
Please don't use -mfuture, it does not work, it cannot work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Failure to optimize out |Failure to tail-call on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 94988, which changed state.
Bug 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c
scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
--- Comment #1 from rhalbersma ---
I just became aware of [depr.array.comp] in N4861
"Equality and relational comparisons (7.6.10, 7.6.9) between two operands of
array type are deprecated."
This is very surprising to say the least and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Paco Arjonilla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48518|0 |1
is obsolete|
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
