[Bug rtl-optimization/110093] New: [12/13/14 Regression][avr] Move frenzy leading to code bloat

,r9 adc r24,r10 adc r25,r11 rjmp .L1 ; 118 [c=4 l=1] jump Then finally, with v14 20230602, crazyness increases even more to even requires a stack frame and a frame pointer. Register allocator starts to move stuff to a stack slot and back again. Code size increa

[Bug debug/110073] [14 regression] btfout.cc format errors break bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2) > there seems to be a second fail on x86_64 darwin on line 970. I tried the alternate patch on a number of x86_64, i686 and power Darwin systems and bootstrap is

[Bug c++/110092] Missing warning that internal header is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110092 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems more like a bug in the IDE than in GCC. If you don't include the header at all then GCC tells you the right header: sp.cc: In function ‘int main()’: sp.cc:2:8: error: ‘shared_ptr’ is not a

[Bug c++/110092] New: Missing warning that internal header is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110092 Bug ID: 110092 Summary: Missing warning that internal header is used Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > > I suppose you want to apply this generally, not only to offloaded > > functions and when offloading is

[Bug middle-end/110091] New: bogus -Wdangling-pointer on non-pointer values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110091 Bug ID: 110091 Summary: bogus -Wdangling-pointer on non-pointer values Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/110089] sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110089 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- The important pattern in i386.md is *sub2, which allows CCGOCmode compare. This means that garbage in Overlow and Carry flags are allowed. In ix86_cc_modes_compatible, CCmode is returned for combination of

[Bug analyzer/110090] New: -fanalyze sometimes assumes contradictory conditions to be valid at the same time during path exploration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110090 Bug ID: 110090 Summary: -fanalyze sometimes assumes contradictory conditions to be valid at the same time during path exploration Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status:

[Bug target/109971] [14 regression] Several powerpc64 vector test cases fail after r14-1242-gf574e2dfae7905

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109971 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bffc52838e393a775e13dc48162669b0f43ebe09 commit r14-1493-gbffc52838e393a775e13dc48162669b0f43ebe09 Author: Ju-Zhe Zhong Date: Thu Jun

[Bug middle-end/110089] sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110089 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/110079] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with -freorder-blocks-and-partition and inline-asm goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110079 --- Comment #2 from yancheng.li at foxmail dot com --- I want to try to solve this problem, but I am not very familiar with RTL optimization. Could someone give me some guidance? For example, is this an omission in the

[Bug middle-end/110089] sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110089 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/101188] [postreload] Uses content of a clobbered register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101188 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Ulrich Weigand from comment #12) > I think your root cause analysis is correct. In this part of code: > > if (success) > delete_insn (insn); >

[Bug middle-end/110089] sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110089 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-* |x86_64-*-*, powerpc*

[Bug target/110083] [14 Regression] ICEs for testcase on fp-int-convert*timode after r14-1466-g3635e8c67e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110083 --- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle --- Created attachment 55241 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55241=edit proposed patch This patch fixes the problem. Bootstrap and regression tests underway.

[Bug middle-end/110089] sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110089 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* --- Comment #1 from

[Bug middle-end/110089] New: sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110089 Bug ID: 110089 Summary: sub-optimal code for attempting to produce JNA (jump on CF or ZF) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f8e64989c2418bb8a4050fc1f50039a7b9a0225 commit r12-9674-g6f8e64989c2418bb8a4050fc1f50039a7b9a0225 Author:

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cbaf2f96ec884d60e02d5d2a8a2f44ae0d390fd commit r13-7408-g7cbaf2f96ec884d60e02d5d2a8a2f44ae0d390fd Author:

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #55 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #54) > At least for -Os we probably want to consider moving everything but > small and maybe middle to out of line library functions? Not sure about that, we

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > I suppose you want to apply this generally, not only to offloaded > functions and when offloading is enabled? It could be done just for the functions that

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 --- Comment #54 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bf89a919fdab9e18b7ad3efaa1a79f1d7520ddf commit r14-1492-g7bf89a919fdab9e18b7ad3efaa1a79f1d7520ddf Author: Georg-Johann Lay

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 > > Thomas Schwinge changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55169|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/101188] [postreload] Uses content of a clobbered register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101188 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/110088] [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Keywords|

[Bug target/110088] New: [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110088 Bug ID: 110088 Summary: [avr] Improve operation with const on l-reg after move from d-reg Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug tree-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/109951] [14 Regression] libgomp, testsuite: non-native multilib c++ tests fail on Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109951 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > I am also somewhat puzzled by what conditions I need to take advantage of > the parallel running? > Darwin has /usr/bin/getconf and AFAICT the number of cpus is

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from ) > I am also somewhat puzzled by what conditions I need to take advantage of > the parallel running? > Darwin has

[Bug testsuite/109951] [14 Regression] libgomp, testsuite: non-native multilib c++ tests fail on Darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109951 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Thomas

Do you have 5 minutes

Dear Developers, We kindly request your participation in a short survey that will take just a few minutes of your time. Your feedback is crucial in helping us improve our products/services and enhance your overall experience. By sharing your thoughts, you'll play a significant role in shaping

[Bug target/110086] ICE when optimization level is changed using optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110086 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- That's usually a hint of a bug in the target specific option processing code.

[Bug tree-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization Ever

[Bug rtl-optimization/110087] Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- BTW: If the result of foo is random, then cmove gets badly predicted. Considering the problems with cmove on x86 (even without bad prediction), the above optimization can be quite important. Clang does it.

[Bug rtl-optimization/110087] New: Missing if conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087 Bug ID: 110087 Summary: Missing if conversion Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 109948, which changed state. Bug 109948 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable() https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #16) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15) > > Created attachment 55225 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > The attached patch substantially tidies up

[Bug target/110083] [14 Regression] ICEs for testcase on fp-int-convert*timode after r14-1466-g3635e8c67e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110083 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

[Bug fortran/106048] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 106048, which changed state. Bug 106048 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 What

[Bug fortran/106048] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 104430, which changed state. Bug 104430 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430

[Bug fortran/104430] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 --- Comment #20 from Arsen Arsenović --- I agree, it's probably better to just update all references to be clear that -m32 generates IA32 code, rather than i?86 code. IMO, for multilib, it's reasonable to target the same CPU as -m64 in terms

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 --- Comment #19 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #17) > I'm still confused. > > Conversely this means that the x86_64 'm32' multilib isn't actually "code > that runs on any i386 system", right?

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102532, which changed state. Bug 102532 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/102532] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/102190] Syntax error reported in associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102190, which changed state. Bug 102190 Summary: Syntax error reported in associate construct https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/102112] Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102112, which changed state. Bug 102112 Summary: Cannot associate with component of associate target https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- i386 is an overloaded term, sometimes it means just i386 CPUs and not i486 and later, at other times it means the all CPUs capable of running i386 32-bit code, sometimes it means ia32. I don't think it

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Brad, This is fixed on trunk (14-branch). I am going to close the PR for housekeeping purposes but will be sure to include the patch in a cumulative backport. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102109, which changed state. Bug 102109 Summary: Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 What|Removed

[Bug debug/110073] [14 regression] btfout.cc format errors break bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110073 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-06-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/109954] x86-64's -m32 does not conform to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109954 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/110086] New: ICE when optimization level is changed using optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110086 Bug ID: 110086 Summary: ICE when optimization level is changed using optimize attribute Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 99326, which changed state. Bug 99326 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/99326] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 95068, which changed state. Bug 95068 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/95068] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 93338, which changed state. Bug 93338 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/93338] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/87460] [F03] accepts-invalid bug with ASSOCIATE and array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87460 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87460, which changed state. Bug 87460 Summary: [F03] accepts-invalid bug with ASSOCIATE and array argument https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87460 What|Removed |Added

[Bug gcov-profile/110082] Coverage analysis vs. offloading compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br

[Bug fortran/87430] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87430, which changed state. Bug 87430 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/58517] ifcvt (after combine) puts ccreg clobbering insn between ccset insn and ccreg use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55237|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/85510] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression][Coarray] Linking error when accessing a coindexed variable inside an associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85510 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620324.html

[Bug tree-optimization/110080] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination at -Os when using __builtin_unreachable since r13-6945-g429a7a88438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110080 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.2 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 83154, which changed state. Bug 83154 Summary: ICE: associate and coarrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 83154, which changed state. Bug 83154 Summary: ICE: associate and coarrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/83154] ICE: associate and coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gcov-profile/110074] -fprofile-arcs profiles arcs generated by -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110074 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The profiling code cannot tell that apart, and yes, with sanitize recover we should. In principle we could detect all sanitizer calls to be in cold paths during profile estimation and have a profile

[Bug testsuite/66005] libgomp make check time is excessive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 commit r14-1490-g04abe1944d30eb18a2060cfcd9695d085f7b4752 Author: Thomas Schwinge

[Bug bootstrap/82856] --enable-maintainter-mode broken by incompatiblity of gcc's required automake and modern Perl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9edb6725717d668d144b2075f0dabf03ac4ec3d8 commit r14-1488-g9edb6725717d668d144b2075f0dabf03ac4ec3d8 Author: Thomas Schwinge

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 --- Comment #27 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca4a4cc0060cb8ae1a326d6dbfcd9459452e1574 commit r11-10841-gca4a4cc0060cb8ae1a326d6dbfcd9459452e1574 Author: Jakub

[Bug middle-end/109505] (t | 15) & svcntb() causes an OOM/ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109505 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa476528ceeac96865a48c49f3f1a15d566d209 commit r11-10840-gbfa476528ceeac96865a48c49f3f1a15d566d209 Author: Richard

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102532] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102190] Syntax error reported in associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/99326] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/102112] Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4b7a2355ed5099e35332388206c484744d Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug c++/110064] spurious missing initializer for member for anonymous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/110062] missed vectorization in graphicsmagick

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110062 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/109972] RISC-V: Could use umodsi3/udivsi3/divsi3 libcalls for 32-bit division/remainder on RV64 without M extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109972 --- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng --- We care but it's lower priority compare to other configuration, so create bug to tracking here should be best solution for now :P

<    1   2   3   >