[Bug target/110170] Sub-optimal conditional jumps in conditional-swap with floating point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e36498710f9ca84fefa578863cf505f484601b1 commit r12-9944-g1e36498710f9ca84fefa578863cf505f484601b1 Author: liuhongt Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/112096] `(a || b) ? a : b` should be simplified to a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112096 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note we already handle the bool case on the trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/112096] New: `(a || b) ? a : b` should be simplified to a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112096 Bug ID: 112096 Summary: `(a || b) ? a : b` should be simplified to a Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112095 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-26

[Bug tree-optimization/112095] New: `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112095 Bug ID: 112095 Summary: `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/112094] New: `popcnt(a) == n | a != 0` should be simplified to `a!=0 | n == 0`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112094 Bug ID: 112094 Summary: `popcnt(a) == n | a != 0` should be simplified to `a!=0 | n == 0` Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/102486] __builtin_popcount(y&-y) is not optimized to y!=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102486 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Rather: ``` int f2(unsigned y) { return (y&-y) != 0; } ```

[Bug target/112092] RISC-V: Wrong RVV code produced for vsetvl-11.c and vsetvlmax-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112092 --- Comment #3 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Maybe I'm missing something, but the RVV spec has this for VSETVLI: "The application specifies the total number of elements to be processed (the application vector length or AVL) as a candidate value

[Bug tree-optimization/96433] Failed to optimize (A / N) * N <= A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96433 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note what LLVM detects/matches is exactly: (for unsigned types) (A % B) <= A -> true (A % B) > A -> true

[Bug tree-optimization/112093] (X & Y) < X (unsigned) and (X & Y) != X should produce the same code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112093 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/112093] (X & Y) < X (unsigned) and (X & Y) != X should produce the same code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112093 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/112093] New: (X & Y) < X (unsigned) and (X & Y) != X should produce the same code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112093 Bug ID: 112093 Summary: (X & Y) < X (unsigned) and (X & Y) != X should produce the same code Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/112092] RISC-V: Wrong RVV code produced for vsetvl-11.c and vsetvlmax-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112092 --- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong --- To demonstrate the idea, here is a simple example to make you easier understand the idea: https://godbolt.org/z/Gxzjv48Ec #include "riscv_vector.h" void foo(int32_t *in1, int32_t *in2, int32_t *in3, int32_t

[Bug target/112092] RISC-V: Wrong RVV code produced for vsetvl-11.c and vsetvlmax-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112092 JuzheZhong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101590] (len & - N) <= len is not optimized to 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101590 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Just an FYI the corrected and full version (which I will be submitting later today or tomorrow morning) is: /* U & N <= U -> true U & N > U -> false U needs to be non-negative. U | N < U

[Bug target/112092] New: RISC-V: Wrong RVV code produced for vsetvl-11.c and vsetvlmax-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112092 Bug ID: 112092 Summary: RISC-V: Wrong RVV code produced for vsetvl-11.c and vsetvlmax-8.c Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug c++/101631] gcc allows for the changing of an union active member to be changed via a reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101631 --- Comment #6 from Nathaniel Shead --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > Fixed for 14 then by the drive-by bit or is there something left? It should be fixed now. The example in comment #2 is g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-union2.C.

[Bug modula2/112091] rs6000: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)', while building libgm2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112091 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug modula2/111956] Many powerpc platforms do _not_ have support for IEEE754 long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk --- Comment

[Bug modula2/112091] New: rs6000: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)', while building libgm2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112091 Bug ID: 112091 Summary: rs6000: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)', while building libgm2 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/111326] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-376-g47a76439911

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/105990] Dead code elimination failed at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105990 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > `(2 >> _2) == 2` could be optimized to just `_2 == 0`. > And then `_4` becomes `1` and then the conditional is optimized away and > such. Filed that as PR

[Bug tree-optimization/112090] ``(1 >> X) != 0` pattern should be extended to support other constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112090 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/112090] New: ``(1 >> X) != 0` pattern should be extended to support other constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112090 Bug ID: 112090 Summary: ``(1 >> X) != 0` pattern should be extended to support other constants Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/104773] compare with 1 not merged with subtract 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104773 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 56314 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56314=edit testcase

[Bug testsuite/111969] RISC-V rv32gcv: 12 grouped flaky failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111969 --- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill --- More info: QEMU v8.1.0 glibc 2.37 Only seen on rv32gcv Fails locally/CI: r14-4098-gbdb7d85dde5 Pass locally/CI: r14-4098-gbdb7d85dde5 Fails on CI, passes locally (?): r14-4876-g7b2984ad76c

[Bug libstdc++/112089] std::shared_lock::unlock should throw operation_not_permitted instead resource_deadlock_would_occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112089 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/112089] New: std::shared_lock::unlock should throw operation_not_permitted instead resource_deadlock_would_occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112089 Bug ID: 112089 Summary: std::shared_lock::unlock should throw operation_not_permitted instead resource_deadlock_would_occur Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug testsuite/111462] [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am still seeing the same failure on power. tried with g:668c4c3783970e7adf0591396b6d0d5286cc0541, r14-4930-g668c4c3783970e make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'

[Bug c++/100291] [11/12/13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: trying to capture ‘this’ in instantiation of generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100291 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka --- Maybe not exactly a dup, since this is an ICE-on-invalid testcase and strictly speaking a regression. But it doesn't seem like a regression worth fixing in release branches. And the underlying cause is

[Bug c++/106086] ICE: trying to capture 'this' in instantiation of generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106086 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |

[Bug c++/100291] [11/12/13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: trying to capture ‘this’ in instantiation of generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100291 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |

[Bug c++/111602] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "Error: symbol is already defined" for variable template dependent on default argument lambda of class dependent on local type used in sfinae and non-sfinae c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111602 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/112088] New: [14 Regression] GCN target testing broken by "amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112088 Bug ID: 112088 Summary: [14 Regression] GCN target testing broken by "amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL" Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/95448] Missing optimization: pointer untag, re-tag should be no-op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95448 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- ranger (EVRP) produces: _1 = a_2(D) & 7; if (_1 != 1) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] _1 : [irange] int [0, 7] MASK 0x7 VALUE 0x0 2->3 (T) _1 : [irange] int [0, 0][2, 7] MASK 0x7

[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Steve Lionel of Intel confirmed that the code is valid, and that if X is polymorphic, so is (X):

[Bug testsuite/111969] RISC-V rv32gcv: 12 grouped flaky failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111969 --- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill --- Thinking about it more this doesn't really make sense since AFAIK QEMU is compiled with the host compiler and shouldn't be affected by the GCC version that compiles large_2.exe.

[Bug testsuite/111969] RISC-V rv32gcv: 12 grouped flaky failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111969 --- Comment #3 from Patrick O'Neill --- These may be real failures that manifest in QEMU depending on the GCC used to compile it. I built qemu with r14-4098-gbdb7d85dde5 which caused the failures. >

[Bug middle-end/111976] Large constant zero-valued objects should go in .bss rather than .rodata

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111976 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note some file systems do have the concept of zero pages too.

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 --- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #14) > Created attachment 56313 [details] > inline minloc with mask > > This patch adds support for {min,max}loc with mask. Awesome, thank you! > It is not 100%

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56094|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug objc++/111920] [14 Regression] encode-{8,9,10}.mm internal compiler error: in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21533

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111920 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > N.B. this same ICE was affecting C++ too, several libstdc++ tests failed > with -std=c++20, e.g. > > GLIBCXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=20 make check >

[Bug target/111645] Intrinsics vec_sldb /vec_srdb fail with __vector unsigned __int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111645 --- Comment #6 from Steven Munroe --- (In reply to Carl Love from comment #5) > There are a couple of issues with the test case in the attachment. For > example one of the tests is: > > > static inline vui64_t > vec_vsldbi_64 (vui64_t vra,

[Bug tree-optimization/111972] [14 regression] missed vectorzation for bool a = j != 1; j = (long int)a;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111972 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug target/111235] [Armv7-a]: Control-dependency between atomic accesses removed by -O1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111235 --- Comment #5 from Luke Geeson --- Thank you for fixing this, Wilco! I will now test this bug using the code emitted by Godbolt. Consider again the same source program. When run through gcc with the same flags we get the ARM assembly test:

[Bug libstdc++/111936] std::stacktrace cannot be used in a shared library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111936 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/111936] std::stacktrace cannot be used in a shared library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111936 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7804e65ed78b5529635934ca06fbf68521aad32d commit r12-9942-g7804e65ed78b5529635934ca06fbf68521aad32d Author: Jonathan

[Bug target/111698] Narrow memory access of compare to byte width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111698 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-* |x86-*-* Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/111698] Narrow memory access of compare to byte width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111698 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:678e6c328c77db383431751bcfcf867b02369bd6 commit r14-4928-g678e6c328c77db383431751bcfcf867b02369bd6 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Wed

[Bug libstdc++/111936] std::stacktrace cannot be used in a shared library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111936 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13ad7b1603f31b65e181780a29ada3f9a331bf8f commit r13-7982-g13ad7b1603f31b65e181780a29ada3f9a331bf8f Author: Jonathan

[Bug middle-end/112087] New: gimple front end: Simple testcase with array fails to round trip

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112087 Bug ID: 112087 Summary: gimple front end: Simple testcase with array fails to round trip Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/112085] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112085 Bug ID: 112085 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112080] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112080 Bug ID: 112080 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug boehm-gc/112084] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112084 Bug ID: 112084 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: boehm-gc Assignee:

[Bug c++/112078] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112078 Bug ID: 112078 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112082] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112082 Bug ID: 112082 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112076] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112076 Bug ID: 112076 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112086] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112086 Bug ID: 112086 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112081] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112081 Bug ID: 112081 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112083] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112083 Bug ID: 112083 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112072] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112072 Bug ID: 112072 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112079] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112079 Bug ID: 112079 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112074] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112074 Bug ID: 112074 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112077] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112077 Bug ID: 112077 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112069] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112069 Bug ID: 112069 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112071] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112071 Bug ID: 112071 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112075] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112075 Bug ID: 112075 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112073] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112073 Bug ID: 112073 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112070] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112070 Bug ID: 112070 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112068] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112068 Bug ID: 112068 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112067] New: eeeee1989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112067 Bug ID: 112067 Summary: e1989 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug ipa/96503] attribute alloc_size effect lost after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503 --- Comment #8 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #7) > For __builtin_with_access we probably only want to allow > reducing the object size, while the 'extend_size' workaround  > used by systemd (cf comment #4)

[Bug d/112064] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112064 Bug ID: 112064 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112061] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112061 Bug ID: 112061 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112060] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112060 Bug ID: 112060 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112065] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112065 Bug ID: 112065 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112059] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112059 Bug ID: 112059 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c/112055] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112055 Bug ID: 112055 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/112066] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112066 Bug ID: 112066 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112057] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112057 Bug ID: 112057 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c/112054] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112054 Bug ID: 112054 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112062] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112062 Bug ID: 112062 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112056] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112056 Bug ID: 112056 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/112063] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112063 Bug ID: 112063 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee:

[Bug c++/112053] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112053 Bug ID: 112053 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112050] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112050 Bug ID: 112050 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112058] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112058 Bug ID: 112058 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/112052] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112052 Bug ID: 112052 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112051] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112051 Bug ID: 112051 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug d/112049] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112049 Bug ID: 112049 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112048] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112048 Bug ID: 112048 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug d/112047] New: bbbbbbb12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112047 Bug ID: 112047 Summary: bbb12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112046] New: aaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112046 Bug ID: 112046 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/112043] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112043 Bug ID: 112043 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee:

[Bug d/112041] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112041 Bug ID: 112041 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug d/112045] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112045 Bug ID: 112045 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112039] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112039 Bug ID: 112039 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug d/112044] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112044 Bug ID: 112044 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at

[Bug c++/112038] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112038 Bug ID: 112038 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c/112040] New: aaaaaaaaa12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112040 Bug ID: 112040 Summary: a12 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

  1   2   3   >