https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shinwogud12 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112665
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112387
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112387
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9f0af150358d93b4c4c5f65d662748ae87bd3d0
commit r14-6533-ge9f0af150358d93b4c4c5f65d662748ae87bd3d0
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Thu Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110606
--- Comment #11 from Jeevitha ---
Regarding the test case provided by Matthias Klose:
Within the AllocMemory() routine, the compiler aimed to eliminate the entire if
block but faced difficulties in removing references to the variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e20779a7d8e14e77df6efaeadc6bf3a001336ef
commit r14-6532-g9e20779a7d8e14e77df6efaeadc6bf3a001336ef
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Summary|[13/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112968
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112904
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:585dc19ef051959d688e6ea89b41998600480ecb
commit r14-6530-g585dc19ef051959d688e6ea89b41998600480ecb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112968
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ff33c609a64319583223d6d39a89e971f993ecf
commit r14-6529-g7ff33c609a64319583223d6d39a89e971f993ecf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e0f67b84a615ba186ab234a9bc43df0df5a50b6
commit r14-6528-g5e0f67b84a615ba186ab234a9bc43df0df5a50b6
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Thu Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
--- Comment #5 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
Thank you for your response. Naturally, I anticipated that the issue might be
with the s390x architecture cross-compiler. However, unexpectedly, I was
unaware that qemu was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113016
Bug ID: 113016
Summary: -mtls-dialect=gnu2 conflicts with -mfdpic but ICEs
rather than gives an error
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113015
Bug ID: 113015
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 12 does
not dominate use in block 13 at -O with _BitInt()
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
Richard S has a late combine PASS which is going to be merged in GCC-14.
Since we generate this following RTL int split1:
(insn 48 24 49 5 (set (reg:SI 149)
(const_int 0 [0])) -1
(nil))
(insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The use of __alloc_size__ here is definitely not well defined but GCC should
NOT crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
Bug ID: 113014
Summary: RISC-V: Redundant zeroing instructions in reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
Bug ID: 113013
Summary: [12/13/14 regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note once we remove the -1, GCC does not ICE. I am 99% sure it is undefined to
go one before the begining of the array, only one past the end of the array is
well defined.
Note I am not shocked that xorg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note I am not 100% sure the above code is well defined due to subtracting
> one from the allocated array.
and yes this represents exactly what the code does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112871
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113001
--- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill ---
Bisected to r14-3041-g18c453f0e63
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113012
Bug ID: 113012
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building xorg-server with
-fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112997
--- Comment #7 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > Why are you building libstdc++ sources with clang? I doubt that is
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113011
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
C23 working draft can be found at
https://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3096.pdf .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113011
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>From C99 draft: 5.1.2.2.1 Program startup
The function called at program startup is named main.The implementation
declares no prototype for this function. It shall be defined with a return type
ofintand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113011
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang even errors out:
:6:1: error: 'main' must return 'int'
6 | enum E main(){}
| ^~
| int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113011
Bug ID: 113011
Summary: main declared with enumerated type is not accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
--- Comment #4 from Edwin Lu ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #3)
> (In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #2)
> > Re-bisected to r14-6197-g2e7abd09621
> >
> > Full steps to reproduce:
> > mkdir dump1
> > ./build-gcc-linux-stage2/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113007
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113007
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Pavel Novikov from comment #0)
> e.g. for `std::variant` the overload
> set would be
>
> void F(std::monostate) {}
> void F(bool) {}
> void F(int64_t) {}
> void F(double) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #2)
> Re-bisected to r14-6197-g2e7abd09621
>
> Full steps to reproduce:
> mkdir dump1
> ./build-gcc-linux-stage2/gcc/xgcc -B./build-gcc-linux-stage2/gcc/
> -march=rv64gcv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112997
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think we can just change the declaration in unwind-cxx.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #10)
> Hi,
>
> It's not forgotten. I've agreed on a fix with the maintainers that should
> solve a bunch of other (older) issues with copysign as well.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112997
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283
--- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski ---
For aarch64, the test from comment #11 is so much worse on the trunk than in
GCC 13.2.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112997
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Why are you building libstdc++ sources with clang? I doubt that is supported.
GCC does not support WebAssembly backend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gkm at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
--- Comment #1 from Edwin Lu ---
Found issue with bisection script. Currently re-bisecting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113010
Bug ID: 113010
Summary: [RISCV] sign-extension lost in comparison with
constant embedded in comma-op expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
Bug ID: 113009
Summary: [14] RISC-V: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c
flakey tests
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
tly evaluates to false).
Declaring v2 fails to compile entirely:
opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20231213/include/c++/14.0.0/type_traits:3284:7:
required from 'constexpr const bool
std::is_trivially_default_constructible_v >'
3284 | = __is_trivially_constructib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113007
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 56874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56874=edit
Full testcase
Please next time attach the full testcase (or place it inline) instead of just
linking to godbolt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113007
Bug ID: 113007
Summary: `std::variant` converting constructor and `operator=`
compile while the C++ Standard says they must not
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 93740, which changed state.
Bug 93740 Summary: Template base classes parametrized by pointer-to-member are
amibiguous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93740
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 93740, which changed state.
Bug 93740 Summary: Template base classes parametrized by pointer-to-member are
amibiguous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93740
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99186
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35ba3add7d0a9fc6ce955ba8ad82b0413e86ad7d
commit r14-6520-g35ba3add7d0a9fc6ce955ba8ad82b0413e86ad7d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104867
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35ba3add7d0a9fc6ce955ba8ad82b0413e86ad7d
commit r14-6520-g35ba3add7d0a9fc6ce955ba8ad82b0413e86ad7d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93740
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c822ad86984e752734b9c371f9cfef9330334ec4
commit r14-6519-gc822ad86984e752734b9c371f9cfef9330334ec4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113006
Bug ID: 113006
Summary: OpenMP 5 - lvalue parsing support for map/to/from
clause
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113005
Bug ID: 113005
Summary: 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90',
'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_3.f90' execution test timeouts
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113004
Bug ID: 113004
Summary: OpenMP 5 - structs are not mapped element-wise by
default
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112956
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112956
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:819bc4f6700847068883eb862dfaed11f30db80b
commit r14-6513-g819bc4f6700847068883eb862dfaed11f30db80b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96997
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063564ecbfc618cd019f86216a0224e144effae1
commit r14-6511-g063564ecbfc618cd019f86216a0224e144effae1
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113003
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
> Slightly more reduced:
> ```
> _BitInt (2049) b2049;
> unsigned _BitInt (6384) b16384;
>
> void
> foo (signed char t)
> {
> b2049 = b16384 *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113003
Bug ID: 113003
Summary: ICE: in expand_mult, at expmed.cc:3603 at -O with
__builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt()
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
rithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231213 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113001
Bug ID: 113001
Summary: [14 Regression] RISCV Zicond ICE: in extract_insn, at
recog.cc:2812 with -O2 rv64gcv_zicond
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 05:36:55PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Do we need any other test cases?
>
I think that we need not added any testcases. The degree
trig function have been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Hi,
Nina fixed this in v8.0.0
(https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/54fce97cfcaf5463ee5f325bc1f1d4adc2772f38).
The fix was backported to v7.2.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112996
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
*** Bug 112996 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56868|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113000
Bug ID: 113000
Summary: Generate BTF always in early-finish regardless of
CO-RE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112921
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #15)
--- snip ---
>
> Jerry, are you starting with the patch submitted by Harald that
> fixes the doc issue. It seems 'gmake pdf', which is what I use
> to check doc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112921
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33a3f85ee4b5bc562a84c6896294278e0a5ab160
commit r14-6509-g33a3f85ee4b5bc562a84c6896294278e0a5ab160
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112534
--- Comment #9 from Arsen Arsenović ---
removing EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS from the gettext targets fixed the build on my
cfarm112.
overall, I'm not sure overriding what subconfigures discover and adjust CC and
CFLAGS with is a good idea. it seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112921
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56869
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56869=edit
Proposed fix containing missing shortreal modules
For completeness here are three SHORTREAL modules which match their
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110640
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111260
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108243
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:958940eb3511e341e57606f5a2f5399bc89533cb
commit r14-6506-g958940eb3511e341e57606f5a2f5399bc89533cb
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71093
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90bc2d09b5bfcc913f79543c3b65202e7246e162
commit r14-6508-g90bc2d09b5bfcc913f79543c3b65202e7246e162
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112988
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 56868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56868=edit
gcc14-pr112994-1.patch
Untested patch which adds the first above mentioned pattern.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Hi,
It's not forgotten. I've agreed on a fix with the maintainers that should solve
a bunch of other (older) issues with copysign as well.
Since it's a bug fix it's on my list after my stage3 changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> testing patch
A month later: any update on that?
I didn't see a patch posted, so perhaps there was more work to it.
Please leave a note if you're no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, don't we want next to the /* Simplify (t * 2) / 2) -> t. */ pattern (dunno
why it uses there in the comment 2 when it is actually generic (a * b) / a ->
b, doesn't rely on constants) also one (a * b) /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112318
S. Davis Herring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herring at lanl dot gov
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112822
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:373a85a82650d9938adb02a14686049cbcbe6892
commit r14-6498-g373a85a82650d9938adb02a14686049cbcbe6892
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112929
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d702387b1b765f85e19961a0b2a29df14df89bfd
commit r14-6497-gd702387b1b765f85e19961a0b2a29df14df89bfd
Author: Pan Li
Date: Wed Dec 13
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
