https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Indeed, the suggestion was not to disable the translations in general. A
similar issue shows up when running the testsuite. There is it solved by
"setenv LANG C" and "setenv LANG C.ASCII" – while various
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115203
Bug ID: 115203
Summary: [15 Regression] Build fail with non LANG=C in analyzer
self test: ICE in fail_formatted at selftest.cc:63 /
tree-diagnostic-path.cc:2158: test_control_flow_5:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115151
Bug ID: 115151
Summary: procedure(acos) [,pointer] :: p - is wrongly rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115150
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115150
Bug ID: 115150
Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] SHAPE of zero-sized array
yields a negative value
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44744
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> Another variant from lsdalton – or rather the
BTW: I have not verified that the cause is the same (temporary variable), but
it seems to be likely.
When
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44744
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113905
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Ups, testcase was lost. Re-written from scratch:
---
int var1() { return 1; }
int var2() { return 2; }
#pragma omp declare variant (var1) match(construct={target})
#pragma omp declare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104621
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
This got fixed for OpenMP 6 via OpenMP spec pull request #3383, adding:
* A declarative directive must be specified in the specification part after all
'USE', 'IMPORT' and 'IMPLICIT' statements.
* If a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114825
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
The difference between the failing program and a working program
(pointer-assignment in 'sub' comment out) is:
failing:
'type' in gfc_omp_clause_default_ctor is '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114754
Bug ID: 114754
Summary: [OpenMP] Missing 'uses_allocators' diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The code in comment#0 compiles at r14-9893-gded646c91d2c0f
> and gives the indicated results.
which is the commit:
Fortran: fix argument checking of intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113006
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #30 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #29)
> Might be for \r\n line endings?
New lines are handled slightly differently – and \f and \v don't seem to be
handled at all.
Comparing the result with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57896
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57896=edit
Testcase
It seems as if 'tabs' cause problems, e.g. for:
profile_single_file= .true.
where there are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #5)
> Tobias, it looks to me like you missed the connection ...
No, I didn't - I did link it (cf. top of comment 3) — but I just cannot read
:-/
Hence, for
(1) *teams*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
> For selector construct = {teams, parallel, for}
> score1 = 29 score2 = 29
> ---
>
> The constructs[i]'s score look fine.
>
> But I wonder why score == 29 and not 28.
Answer:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
The scoring is according to TR12:
> Each trait selector for which the corresponding trait appears
> in the construct trait set in the OpenMP context is given the
> value 2^(p−1) where p is the position of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114596
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Crossref to the OpenMP spec discussions [not publicly available]
related to the scoring:
* Jakub asked about this testcase in an omp-lang in the email 2019/016447.html
(w/o getting a reply.
* He then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111966
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114445
Bug ID: 114445
Summary: [OpenMP] indirect - potential race when creating
reverse-offload hash
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114419
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114335
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus ---
Regarding the LAPACK issue:
Actually, I am inclined to
* regard it as LAPACK bug
* that was also fixed upstream, see comment 6, to make g95 happy.
as ';' is not a value separator - while ' ;' is fine,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57693|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #34 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57693
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57693=edit
Extended testcase; comment shows results for gfortran(trunk),ifort,ifx,flang
See PR114304 for some related issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57680
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57680=edit
Testcase with decimal=COMMA, passes with ifort/ifx/flang - fails with gfortran
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
[For completeness: The LAPACK testsuite change Richard mentioned in comment 2
is
https://github.com/Reference-LAPACK/lapack/commit/64e8a7500d817869e5fcde35afd39af8bc7a8086
- That's for g95 and was applied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|[14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57668
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57668=edit
Testcase
Testresults of the attached testcase:
See also https://godbolt.org/z/q4rG61EvW
The attached testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114283
Bug ID: 114283
Summary: [OpenMP] Dummy procedures/proc pointers and
'defaultmap', 'default', 'firstprivate' etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114282
Bug ID: 114282
Summary: [OpenMP] Implicit mapping of function/procedure
pointers should use 'firstprivate'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110347
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113436
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
As mentioned in comment 0, PR110347's testcase (r14-9257-g4f82d5a95a244d)
contains '#if 0' code which has to be enabled once this bug is fixed.
Please remember to take care of:
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
For:
int *q;
#pragma omp target device(y5) map(q, q[:5])
GCC currently generates:
map(tofrom:q [len: 8]) map(tofrom:*q.4_1 [len: 20]) map(attach:q [bias: 0])
Expected:
'alloc:' instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114002
Bug ID: 114002
Summary: [OpenACC][OpenACC 3.3] Add 'acc_attach'/'acc_detach'
routine
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
> Anyway, renaming the binding label, like
>subroutine acc_attach_c(x) bind(C, name="acc_attach_renamed")
> makes the code compile.
Well, the code *does* compile as it is only a warning.
* * *
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997
Bug ID: 113997
Summary: Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global
procedure' with C binding
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113331
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113904
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
See comment 1 for remaining to-do items.
I also note that the Fortran resolution comes too early - during parsing - as
the following shows:
module m
implicit none
contains
subroutine test
!$omp declare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113904
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch for rejecting non-const arguments in Fortran (wrong-code bit) to bring it
in line with C/C++:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/645488.html
* * *
TODO as follow up:
* Permit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113906
Bug ID: 113906
Summary: [OpenMP][5.2] 'construct' context selectors lack many
constructs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113905
Bug ID: 113905
Summary: [OpenMP] Declare variant rejects variant-function
re-usage
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113904
Bug ID: 113904
Summary: [OpenMP][5.0][5.1] Dynamic context selector
'user={condition(expr)}' not handled
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Also not handled:
struct s { int *p; } s1;
...
#pragma omp target map(s1.p[:N])
p[0] = p[N-1] = 99;
Here, the pointer attachment is missing. See also PR113724 's attachment 57407
for a testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57407=edit
C testcase – passes with patch (except for '#if 0'ed PR113867 issues)
DejaGNU-ified testcase for this PR and ('#if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57398=edit
Patch - handling the libgomp issue
Possible patch - lightly tested. This fixes the issue in libgomp.
While always
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |burnus at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
The runtime issue is now PR113867.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57382
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57382=edit
Fortran testcase, kind of, as pointer + pointee mapping cannot be split
(working)
For completeness, a Fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113867
Bug ID: 113867
Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP] Wrong code with mapping
pointers in structs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57377
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57377=edit
Fixes the ICE – might paper over a real issue; doesn't fix the run-time issue →
TODO + 'data'-issue in PR comment 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113840
Bug ID: 113840
Summary: [OpenACC] !$acc loop seq – bogus rejection of
Fortran's EXIT/CYCLE + C/C++ break/continue
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Inside omp_build_struct_sibling_lists, the following assignment:
11654 grp->grp_start = new_next;
has on the LHS the [3] array with value:
(gdb) p *grp
$147 = {grp_start = 0x771f9688,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Inside: omp_build_struct_sibling_lists
new_next
= omp_accumulate_sibling_list (region_type, code,
struct_map_to_clause, *grpmap,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113731
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #9)
> (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #8)
> > the proposed patch doesn't fix the amdgcn-amdhsa bootstrap.
>
> So what is the error with the patch? The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Debugging shows:
In gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses
(line numbers are off by 1 as I have a #pragma GCC optimize("O0") on top of the
file):
13717 groups = omp_gather_mapping_groups (list_p);
...
13720
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113771
Bug ID: 113771
Summary: [14 Regression][GCN] ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect in
vect_transform_loop tree-vect-loop.cc:11969
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113721
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Bug ID: 113724
Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a
struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113721
Bug ID: 113721
Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP][nvptx] cuCtxSynchronize fail
when calling 'free' in the target regsion
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644181.html
It fixes this issue but two other kind of issues I still see for gfx1100.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110813
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
The GCN specific part has been applied to
GCC 14 mainline in commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a17299c17afeb92a56ef716d2d6380c8538493c4
Unhandled:
* Strided and optimized strided copy (incl. generic part of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113645
Bug ID: 113645
Summary: [amdgcn][gfx1030][gfx1100] ICE in RTL pass: vregs with
-O3: unrecognizable insn (vector reductions)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113513
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643648.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111966
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113513
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Looking at the called GOMP_OFFLOAD_* function, in the failing case, there is:
...
DEBUG GOMP_OFFLOAD_run
DEBUG GOMP_OFFLOAD_dev2host
DEBUG GOMP_OFFLOAD_free
DEBUG: nvptx_attach_host_thread_to_device - 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113513
Bug ID: 113513
Summary: [OpenMP] libgomp: cuCtxGetDevice error with
OMP_DISPLAY_ENV=true OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD="mandatory"
for libgomp.c/target-52.c
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113439
Bug ID: 113439
Summary: [OpenMP] Add more collapse testcases mixing
precisions, in particular (unsigned) int vs. _BigInt
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113436
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
BTW: The attach testcase misses 'firstprivate', which obviously needs to be
handled as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113436
Bug ID: 113436
Summary: [OpenMP] 'allocate' clause has no effect for
(first)private on 'target' directives
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108382
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Fixed-form Fortran likewise fails for:
!$acc enter
!$acc& data
!$omp flush
!$omp& RELEASE
end ! fails in this line: "Bad continuation line"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113288
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
The(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #3)
> Adding them are quite straightforward.
I guess so. Note: this PR is about the #define in gcc/config/i386, only.
> But I am not quite sure how the whole
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113288
Bug ID: 113288
Summary: [i386] Missing #define for -mavx10.1-256 and
-mavx10.1-512
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113216
Bug ID: 113216
Summary: [OpenMP] Improve omp_target_is_accessible
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113213
Bug ID: 113213
Summary: [OpenMP] Update omp_target_is_present /
omp_target_is_accessible handling for NULL
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113199
Bug ID: 113199
Summary: [14 Regression][GCN] ICE (segfault) when compiling
Newlib
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
and for that condition, we have:
3375 if (!integer_onep (*step_vector))
(gdb) p debug_tree(*step_vector)
constant 8>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
While higher at the call stack:
#3 0x0148714f in vect_transform_loop
(loop_vinfo=loop_vinfo@entry=0x350f2a0,
loop_vectorized_call=loop_vectorized_call@entry=0x0)
at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 56958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56958=edit
Reduced testcase (
$ amdgcn-amdhsa-gcc -g -O2 inp5.i -march=gfx900
during GIMPLE pass: vect
inp5.i: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
Bug ID: 113163
Summary: [14 Regression][GCN] ICE in
vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init, at tree-vect-loop.cc:9420
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113067
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 56901
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56901=edit
Simple testcase (C and Fortran) - as same-directory .diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113067
Bug ID: 113067
Summary: [OpenMP][5.1] Context selector - handle
'implementation={requires(...)}'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110639
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Posted a patch for (A)
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639947.html
but it seems as if I might have misunderstood some parts of the example at
OpenMP spec issue #1796 (TRAC864) /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110639
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
There are *two* independent issues:
(A) Predefined firstprivate does not find mappings done in the same
directive, e.g.
int a[100];
int *p = [0];
#pragma omp target teams distribute map(a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110639
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 56804
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56804=edit
gimplify.cc patch to ensure that GOVD_MAP_0LEN_ARRAY comes last (does not fix
the issue)
I tried the attached patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112779
Bug ID: 112779
Summary: [OpenMP] Support omp Metadirectives
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112763
Bug ID: 112763
Summary: [OpenMP] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses, at
gimplify.cc:13238 – with defaultmap(firstprivate) for
C++ member variables
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112667
Bug ID: 112667
Summary: [OpenMP] C++: Handle static local variable in target
regions
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110639
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
> If 'a' is already present on the device (e.g. 'omp target enter data
> map(a)'), it works.
This applies to both the comment 0 example where only a section of 'a' is
mapped start > 0 and for the comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110639
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Testing shows that the offsets are correctly handled but that there is an
ordering problem. Example:
int
main ()
{
int a[100] = {};
int *p = [0];
uintptr_t iptr;
#pragma omp target map(a, iptr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110347
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
An explicit 'firstprivate(x)' will be turned in the compiler from a FIELD_DECL
to:
int D.2935 [value-expr: ((struct t *) this)->x];
#pragma omp target firstprivate(D.2934) firstprivate(D.2935)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112634
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
@Kostadin: Sebastian posted a patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/637451.html
that should be fine as workaround, even if it is not completely correct, cf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112634
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Breakpoint 6, gen_assign_counter_update (gsi=0x7fffcab0,
call=0x77230b48, func=0x7736cb00, result=0x77200b98, name=0x258f5f2
"PROF_time_profile") at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112634
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
That's r14-5578-ga350a74d6113e3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112634
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
1 - 100 of 913 matches
Mail list logo
