[Bug driver/39356] assembler isn't called

2009-03-09 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #5 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-03-09 15:07 --- (In reply to comment #4) Sorry, pex_run co aren't the reason for this issue. By further debugging I found that for bigger functions using alloca with variable sizes wrong code is generated

[Bug driver/39356] assembler isn't called

2009-03-04 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-03-04 09:07 --- (In reply to comment #1) Huh. It's not even compiling. You're right. OTOH the sequence $ gcc -v -S hello.c $ gcc -v -c hello.s $ gcc -v -o hello hello.o builds correctly. Anyway the driver is broken

[Bug driver/39356] New: assembler isn't called

2009-03-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
-- Summary: assembler isn't called Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot

[Bug libstdc++/39107] Building an i686-pc-linux-gnu - i686-pc-mingw32 crosscompiler fails on libstdc++ configure

2009-02-05 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-02-05 16:34 --- (In reply to comment #5) It does get called when building that i686-pc-linux-gnu - i686-pc-mingw32 crosscompiler -- but maybe the fact that it does indicates a bug elsewhere in the build system

[Bug target/39002] [4.4 Regression] codegen bug, stack pointer is not restored

2009-01-29 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #17 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-29 10:47 --- (In reply to comment #16) Created an attachment (id=17208) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17208action=view) [edit] gcc44-pr39002.patch As MS_ABI sseregs save area isn't counted

[Bug target/39002] [4.4 Regression] codegen bug, stack pointer is not restored

2009-01-29 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #18 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-29 11:34 --- (In reply to comment #17) (In reply to comment #16) Created an attachment (id=17208) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17208action=view) [edit] gcc44-pr39002.patch As MS_ABI

[Bug c++/39002] New: codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
. -- Summary: codegen bug? Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 14:20 --- Created an attachment (id=17197) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17197action=view) assembler source This one works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 14:22 --- Created an attachment (id=17198) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17198action=view) assembler source which segfaults This one segfaults at ret statment at the end. -- http

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 14:27 --- What I can try is finding the revision which causes the fault. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 14:45 --- (In reply to comment #3) We need the preprocessed source of a *complete* (including main) program to be able to reproduce this. That's a little bit difficult here. It's a really large application

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 14:57 --- Anyway I will try to create a self contained small testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #8 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 16:52 --- Created an attachment (id=17200) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17200action=view) self contained testcase cross compiled to target x86_64-pc-mingw32 segfaults. commandline: x86_64-pc

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #9 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 17:01 --- Created an attachment (id=17201) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17201action=view) preproccesed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #10 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 17:01 --- Created an attachment (id=17202) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17202action=view) assembler source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #11 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 17:06 --- I vote for P1 because it's a secondary platform. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #12 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 18:04 --- fault came up between 2nd and 9th of January. With visual c++ 2005 there is no problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug c++/39002] codegen bug?

2009-01-28 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #13 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-28 19:06 --- The changes in revision 143118 to revesion 143120 are causing the fault. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002

[Bug target/38384] shared link/execute fails for cross gcc from linux to target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

2009-01-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #46 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-23 10:45 --- Created an attachment (id=17164) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17164action=view) Verbose output of static link step As you can see for all libraries except libdld archives are used

[Bug target/38384] shared link/execute fails for cross gcc from linux to target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

2009-01-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #47 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-23 10:50 --- Created an attachment (id=17165) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17165action=view) chatr output for the resulting object As you can see there is one dependency to libdl.1 what is ok

[Bug target/38384] link/execute fails for cross gcc from linux to target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

2009-01-22 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #41 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-22 18:15 --- (In reply to comment #40) Subject: Re: link/execute fails for cross gcc from linux to target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 configuring with --disable-symvers GNU symbol versioning is not supported

[Bug libstdc++/38919] math_stubs_long_double.cc: error: redefinition of 'long double ...' vs. /usr/x86_64-mingw32/include/math.h

2009-01-20 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-20 11:41 --- I don't think that this has anything to do with the crossconfig.m4 At least until revision 143362 trunk used to build cross compiler from x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to both mingw targets x86_64-pc-mingw32

[Bug libstdc++/38919] math_stubs_long_double.cc: error: redefinition of 'long double ...' vs. /usr/x86_64-mingw32/include/math.h

2009-01-20 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #5 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-20 11:50 --- Benjamin, I suspect that your changes on the 15th are causing the trouble. FYI, for libgfortran all the math test are performed at least for the x86_64-pc-mingw32 target even in a cross build. -- http

[Bug libstdc++/38919] math_stubs_long_double.cc: error: redefinition of 'long double ...' vs. /usr/x86_64-mingw32/include/math.h

2009-01-20 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-20 13:00 --- Benjamin, you have only #include cmath in both math_stubs_float.cc and math_stubs_long_double.cc. Then you use something like #ifndef _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FABSL I don't see any definition in scope. -- http

[Bug libstdc++/38919] math_stubs_long_double.cc: error: redefinition of 'long double ...' vs. /usr/x86_64-mingw32/include/math.h

2009-01-20 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-20 14:58 --- (In reply to comment #4) I don't think that this has anything to do with the crossconfig.m4 At least until revision 143362 trunk used to build cross compiler from x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to both mingw

[Bug libstdc++/38919] math_stubs_long_double.cc: error: redefinition of 'long double ...' vs. /usr/x86_64-mingw32/include/math.h

2009-01-20 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #8 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-20 15:12 --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #4) I don't think that this has anything to do with the crossconfig.m4 At least until revision 143362 trunk used to build cross compiler from x86_64

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-19 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #33 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-19 10:51 --- (In reply to comment #32) Dave, thank you for the explanation. Next week I will try to build some functional C++ application. Then we will see if there are remaining issues. Rainer

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-19 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #34 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-19 10:52 --- Created an attachment (id=17140) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17140action=view) C compile log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-19 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #35 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-19 10:53 --- Created an attachment (id=17141) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17141action=view) C compile static log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-19 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #37 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-19 10:54 --- Created an attachment (id=17143) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17143action=view) C++ compile static log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-19 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #36 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-19 10:53 --- Created an attachment (id=17142) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17142action=view) C++ compile log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-16 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #23 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-16 15:01 --- Created an attachment (id=17118) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17118action=view) fix file magic regex for hppa*64* This patch fixes the file magic regex for hppa*64*. All dependent

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-16 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #26 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-16 16:07 --- (In reply to comment #24) (In reply to comment #23) This patch fixes the file magic regex for hppa*64*. All dependent files have to be regenerated. This modified regex allows to detect PA-RISC

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-16 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #28 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-16 16:17 --- Created an attachment (id=17119) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17119action=view) fix file magic regex for hppa*64* updated patch -- r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com changed

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-16 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #29 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-16 16:45 --- Created an attachment (id=17120) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17120action=view) fix file magic regex for HP-UX hosts updated patch for all HP-UX hosts. -- r dot emrich at de dot

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-16 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #30 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-16 16:51 --- (In reply to comment #21) I dont't know if the warnings at the end of this message are a result of this issue or different one. The linker complains about fde encoding in .libs/bitmap_allocator.o

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-16 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #32 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-16 18:33 --- (In reply to comment #31) Probably, the warning needs to be suppressed. The warning is correct in that the encoding currently used contains dynamic relocations preventing the creation

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-15 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #22 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-15 13:07 --- (In reply to comment #21) libtool uses the following regex: (s[0-9][0-9][0-9]|ELF-[0-9][0-9]) shared object file - PA-RISC [0-9].[0-9] This matches for the native file command output: libm.2

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-14 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #20 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-14 13:58 --- (In reply to comment #18) Ranier, this should be working now. Can you try to cross-compile as before, but with updated gcc sources? Now it builds, but there are some issues. Will come back

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-14 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #21 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-14 18:47 --- The link step for libstdc++.la gives warnings for failed file format test using a file magic. This is wrong! The problem results from different output of native file command and the linux file command

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2009-01-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #10 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2009-01-06 10:20 --- (In reply to comment #8) What I would suggest doing is looking at the generated c++config.h file from a native build on hpux11.00, and seeing if HAVE_FINITE to HAVE_ISNANF are defined. If so, move them

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2008-12-29 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-12-29 12:14 --- Created an attachment (id=16999) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16999action=view) libstdc++/config.log The tests for the mathematical functions are skipped all together. Does anybody

[Bug bootstrap/35580] ICE in bootstrap while building libgcj

2008-12-29 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-12-29 15:43 --- Can't check anymore, no hardware! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35580

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2008-12-29 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-12-29 17:11 --- Build and Host is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I compared to a cross-build for ia64-unknown-linux-gnu target. In that case the tests are working. So, I'm a litlle bit confused. I may upload the config.log

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2008-12-08 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-12-08 17:08 --- (In reply to comment #1) Created an attachment (id=16815) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16815action=view) [edit] preproccesed source the following looks weired for me: # 31 /opt

[Bug bootstrap/38383] New: fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

2008-12-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38383

[Bug bootstrap/38383] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

2008-12-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-12-03 16:09 --- Created an attachment (id=16814) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16814action=view) possible patch That works for me. But someone has to verify that it doesn't cause regressions on native

[Bug libstdc++/38384] New: fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2008-12-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384

[Bug libstdc++/38384] fails to build cross gcc for target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 in libstdc++/libmath

2008-12-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-12-03 16:30 --- Created an attachment (id=16815) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16815action=view) preproccesed source the following looks weired for me: # 31 /opt/gnu/src/gcc/gcc-4.4.0-test/libstdc

[Bug tree-optimization/36830] [4.4 Regression] STORAGE_ERROR raised compiling s-os_lib.adb

2008-07-22 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-07-22 07:53 --- (In reply to comment #5) For me it is working today I don't Know if it's related but today (rev. 138048) I get the following on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: /SCRATCH/tmp.haKcfD9964/Linux/x86_64-unknown

[Bug bootstrap/35580] New: ICE in bootstrap while building libgcj

2008-03-14 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp

[Bug libgcj/32005] libjava fails to install

2008-03-14 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2008-03-14 11:43 --- seems to be the same as Bug 30071 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32005

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-12-13 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #18 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-12-13 11:58 --- Here the complete linker step. I added the -v -t +vallcompatwarnings command line switches. /usr/ccs/bin/ld -v -L/lib/pa1.1 -L/usr/lib/pa1.1 -z -u main -u __gcc_plt_call -o build/genconstants /usr/ccs/lib

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-12-13 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #19 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-12-13 12:06 --- /usr/ccs/bin/nm build/rtl.o Symbols from build/rtl.o: NameValue Scope TypeSubspace $$dyncall | |undef |milli | $CODE$ | 0|static|data

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-12-13 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #22 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-12-13 14:09 --- Created an attachment (id=14743) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14743action=view) assembler code rtl.s -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-12-13 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #21 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-12-13 14:08 --- Created an attachment (id=14742) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14742action=view) assembler code ggc-none.s -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-12-13 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #24 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-12-13 17:01 --- Created an attachment (id=14744) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14744action=view) preprocessed source gcc -c -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-12-11 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #17 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-12-11 12:26 --- I'm completly lost. On the same machine: Actual 4.2 branch works fine. Bootstrapping without java and using the resulting gcc as bootstrap compiler for both configurations hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 and hppa64

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-09 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #13 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-09 10:33 --- Your right, seems to be platform-specific. hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 is ok. I will investigate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-09 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #14 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-09 14:40 --- nm ggc-none.o Symbols from ggc-none.o: NameValue Scope TypeSubspace $CODE$ | 0|static|data |$CODE$ $CODE$ | 0|static|data |$CODE

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-09 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #15 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-09 15:06 --- Created an attachment (id=14515) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14515action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #11 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-07 10:58 --- Created an attachment (id=14494) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14494action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #10 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-07 10:57 --- Patch solves the problem for rtl.c in gcc-4.3.0, but later: gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing

[Bug bootstrap/34003] New: gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp

[Bug bootstrap/34003] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-06 10:23 --- Created an attachment (id=14488) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14488action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-06 11:35 --- (In reply to comment #3) I think 4.2 is also broken. 4.2.2 is ok. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-06 12:02 --- Takes a few minutes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34003

[Bug bootstrap/34003] [4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.0 unable to bootstrap itself; Unsatisfied symbols: ggc_free

2007-11-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-11-06 14:22 --- Created an attachment (id=14489) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14489action=view) preprocessed source gcc-4.2.2 yields the same problem -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava

2007-04-17 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-04-17 07:54 --- Created an attachment (id=13377) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13377action=view) Patch Proposed patch. I added a new target (install-exec-am) to Makefile.am to enforce the right

[Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava

2007-02-19 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #3 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-02-19 16:16 --- Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake? (If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.) install-binPROGRAMS: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES I

[Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava

2007-01-30 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-01-30 08:55 --- Subject: Re: make install fails for libjava Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake? (If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.) Sorry, I

[Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava

2006-12-05 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 GCC

[Bug java/29587] jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 708630224 bytes

2006-10-31 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-10-31 11:06 --- (In reply to comment #0) jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 708630224 bytes similiar problem here. hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 gcc-4.2.0 revison 118176 /SCRATCH/gcc-build/HP-UX

[Bug c/28821] New: Unable to build Python

2006-08-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-23 11:04 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv: LIBICONV which is LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #9 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-23 14:45 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Haley schrieb: Rainer Emrich writes: The config.log in libjava has two entries

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #11 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-23 16:17 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly Andrew Haley schrieb: Rainer Emrich writes: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Haley schrieb: Rainer

[Bug target/22097] libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5

2006-02-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #15 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-07 09:55 --- Created an attachment (id=10794) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10794action=view) fixes bootstrap failure in ligfortran/instrisics/c99_functions.c for mips-sgi-irix6.5 It's similiar

[Bug target/22097] libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5

2006-02-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #16 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-07 10:00 --- (In reply to comment #15) Created an attachment (id=10794) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10794action=view) [edit] fixes bootstrap failure in ligfortran/instrisics/c99_functions.c

[Bug target/22097] libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5

2006-02-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #18 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-07 16:35 --- Created an attachment (id=10796) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10796action=view) fixes bootstrap failure in libgfortran/instrisics/c99_functions.c for mips-sgi-irix6.5 second version

[Bug target/22097] libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5

2006-02-06 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #14 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-06 17:58 --- Subject: Re: libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Okay, I will try! Is there a preprocessor macro defined, which identifies IRIX? As I see, there are two macros which are candidates IMHO

[Bug target/22097] libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5

2006-02-02 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #12 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-02 18:01 --- Subject: Re: libgfortran build failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb: --- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 13:08 --- This could

[Bug ada/24468] link failure for several acats tests

2006-01-12 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #8 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-01-12 10:22 --- Subject: Re: link failure for several acats tests -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 for gcc-4.2 20060109: termination of testsuite run at c52103x with the following error: gmake: *** [check

[Bug ada/24468] link failure for several acats tests

2006-01-11 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-01-11 16:23 --- Subject: Re: link failure for several acats tests -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 laurent at guerby dot net schrieb: --- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-06 22:19

[Bug ada/24468] link failure for several acats tests

2006-01-09 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #6 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-01-09 09:19 --- Subject: Re: link failure for several acats tests -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 laurent at guerby dot net schrieb: --- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-06 22:19

[Bug ada/24468] link failure for several acats tests

2005-11-30 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-30 09:37 --- Michael Weiser supplied two patches to binutils-2.16.1 which resolve the libpthread issue. see http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 I used the MIPS_OPTIONAL.patch and the binutils-2.16.1

[Bug ada/24468] link failure for several acats tests

2005-11-30 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-30 14:28 --- Subject: link failure for several acats tests Here's the link failure: splitting /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.2/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/a/a83a02b.ada

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #17 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-07 16:25 --- Sorry, for the delay. I had a machine fault on the weekend. So, I'm trying the snapshot from 5th of november now! Look's good so far, already in stage 2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-07 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #18 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-08 07:47 --- Bootstrap of gcc-4.1-20051105 succeeded for c,c++,objc,obj-c++. Testsuite still in progress. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug middle-end/24514] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-03 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #16 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-03 16:38 --- (In reply to comment #15) I'm trying the patch! Result will follow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug middle-end/24514] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #3 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-01 09:46 --- Created an attachment (id=10097) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10097action=view) assembler output I compiled c-parser.c with the exact same commandline as in the bootstrap, except

[Bug middle-end/24514] ICE on bootstrap

2005-11-01 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-11-01 11:02 --- Also fails on at least tree-data-ref.c and tree-cfg.c with xgcc: Internal error: Trace/BPT/RangeErr/DivZero/Ovflow trap (program cc1) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug middle-end/24514] ICE on bootstrap

2005-10-31 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-10-31 17:37 --- same for gcc-4.1-20051029 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug c/24514] New: ICE on bootstrap

2005-10-25 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5 GCC host triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5 GCC target triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24514

[Bug ada/24468] New: link failure for several acats tests

2005-10-21 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.0.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5 GCC host

[Bug ada/24468] link failure for several acats tests

2005-10-21 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #1 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2005-10-21 08:03 --- (In reply to comment #0) The relevant binutils PR 1150: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24468