[Bug middle-end/71473] [5/6/7 Regression] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

2016-12-19 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org --- __sec_reduce_{min,max}_ind in Intel cilk(tm) plus don't give good performance, so one may suspect they are using size_t.(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > While this started with

[Bug libstdc++/77814] build fails trying to build eh_arm

2016-10-03 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77814 --- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org --- Permits bootstrap to proceed, will post to testresults when successful. Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/77814] New: build fails trying to build eh_arm

2016-10-01 Thread tprince at computer dot org
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39729 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39729=edit log from trunk stage 1 bootstrap of libstdc++ Initial bootstrap tries (and fails) to bu

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

2016-09-18 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 --- Comment #8 from tprince at computer dot org --- I show my configure parameters in my test results posts. At some time in the past, each of them has been important. I don't know if the parameters quoted by cygwin release pertain to cross

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

2016-09-15 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 --- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org --- Same failure of f951 after checking alternate svn apps.

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

2016-09-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- I suspect the Windows 10 provided svn may be partly at fault (although it works for bootstrapping on the Microsoft provided gcc in linux subsystem). I grabbed trunk using cygwin svn and have

[Bug fortran/77593] New: configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

2016-09-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
ormal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39621 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39621=edit Log file as specified in "please

[Bug c/71473] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

2016-06-09 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 38669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38669=edit C include file

[Bug c/71473] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

2016-06-09 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 38668 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38668=edit cilkplus C source (before preprocessing)

[Bug c/71473] New: cilkplus sum reducer ICE

2016-06-09 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 38667 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38667=edit cilkplus C source gcc 5.3 does not ICE on this case but run-time result is wrong. gcc -fcilkplus -std=c99

[Bug libstdc++/69266] bootstrap failure undefined reference to `std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits >::

2016-01-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266 --- Comment #9 from tprince at computer dot org --- Trunk on 2016-01-29 is bootstrapping successfully, after dealing with the reluctance of the build to update config.cache in several directories (gcc, libcpp, libstdc++-v3, libgomp). Although I

[Bug libstdc++/69266] bootstrap failure undefined reference to `std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits >::

2016-01-15 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266 --- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org --- This works only when building libstdc++ with an older g++ version.

[Bug libstdc++/69266] bootstrap failure undefined reference to `std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits >::

2016-01-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- It is possible to bootstrap by configure --disable-libstdcxx. Then it is possible to configure and build (but not make check?) in libstdc++-v3. I'm not sure of the consequences of this.

[Bug c++/69266] New: bootstrap failure undefined reference to `std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits >::

2016-01-13 Thread tprince at computer dot org
FIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- libtool: link: /cygdrive/c/users/tim/tim/tim/src/gnu/gcc1/cyg64/./gcc/xgcc -sha red-libgcc -B/cygdrive/c/users/t

[Bug fortran/68365] New: gfortran test case showing performance loss with vectorization

2015-11-15 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36716 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36716=edit gzip tar file of Fortran and C source fi

[Bug target/68365] gfortran test case showing performance loss with vectorization

2015-11-15 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68365 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36722 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36722=edit fortran source gfortran -c lcdmod.f90 should take care of the missing .mod

[Bug c/67967] New: ICE in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit

2015-10-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36510 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36510=edit C source 1st of many build failures on trunk: $ /cygdrive/c/users/tim/tim/tim/src/gnu/gcc1/cyg64/gcc/x

[Bug c/67967] ICE in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit

2015-10-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67967 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36511=edit include file

[Bug c/67967] ICE in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit

2015-10-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67967 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36512 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36512=edit C source According to ChangeLog, ktietz is the one who modified this since it was last working (verif

[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

2015-09-05 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 --- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36295 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36295=edit pre-processed C source pre-processed, without function calls

[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

2015-09-05 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 --- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36294 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36294=edit shortened c code C source with external function calls removed

[Bug tree-optimization/66740] [6 Regression] omp simd reduction miscompiles at -O3 with AVX (recent regression)

2015-07-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740 --- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org --- It optimizes with implicit simd reduction and gives correct result with option -ffast-math in place of -fopenmp.

[Bug c/66740] omp simd reduction miscompiles at -O3 with AVX (recent regression)

2015-07-02 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc6.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-cygwin/6.0.0/lt o-wrapper.exe Target: x86_64-unknown-cygwin Configured

[Bug c/66740] omp simd reduction miscompiles at -O3 with AVX (recent regression)

2015-07-02 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740 --- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc6.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-cygwin/6.0.0/lt o-wrapper.exe Target: x86_64-unknown-cygwin Configured

[Bug c/66740] omp simd reduction miscompiles at -O3 with AVX (recent regression)

2015-07-02 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 35898 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35898action=edit C source

[Bug c/66740] New: omp simd reduction miscompiles at -O3 with AVX (recent regression)

2015-07-02 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 35897 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35897action=edit f2c include file This regression is new

[Bug c++/65835] bootstrap failure: multiple invalid conversions from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’ [-fpermissive] in winnt.c

2015-05-20 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65835 tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65835] New: bootstrap failure: multiple invalid conversions from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’ [-fpermissive] in winnt.c

2015-04-21 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Created attachment 35380 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35380action=edit winnt.c from trunk g++ -c

[Bug c++/65835] bootstrap failure: multiple invalid conversions from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’ [-fpermissive] in winnt.c

2015-04-21 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65835 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Building by casting const char* to char *

[Bug c/65653] cilkplus reducer ICE

2015-04-01 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65653 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 35205 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35205action=edit pre-processed C source

[Bug c/65653] cilkplus reducer ICE

2015-04-01 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65653 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- runs well with Intel C++ Windows/linux

[Bug c/65653] New: cilkplus reducer ICE

2015-04-01 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Created attachment 35204 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35204action=edit cilkplus C source gcc -c -fcilkplus s319.i gcc version 5.0.0 20150326 s319.c:82:41: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr

[Bug c/63336] New: cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

2014-09-22 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Created attachment 33534 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33534action=edit pre-processed C source with cilkplus array notation $ gcc -std=c99 -c -fcilkplus -v s422.i Using built

[Bug c/61612] New: trunk revision 211984 winnt.c ‘hash_table_c’ does not name a type

2014-06-25 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org stage1 build fails (host==target==x86_64-pc-cygwin) ../../gcc/config/i386/winnt.c: In function ‘const char* i386_find_on_wrapper_lis t(const char*)’: ../../gcc

[Bug c/61212] New: gcc build failure on dos file system due to warnings treated as errors

2014-05-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org gcc trunk and fortran-dev build failure ../../libcpp/files.c:393:56: error: suggest parentheses around ‘’ within ‘||’ [-Werror=parentheses

[Bug c/60117] New: simd reduction clause suppresses simd auto-vectorization when -fopenmp is set

2014-02-08 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Created attachment 32082 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32082action=edit source code reproducer gcc version 4.9.0 20140203 gcc

[Bug c/60117] simd reduction clause suppresses simd auto-vectorization when -fopenmp is set

2014-02-08 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60117 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 32083 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32083action=edit f2c style include file

[Bug c/60117] simd reduction clause suppresses simd auto-vectorization when -fopenmp is set

2014-02-08 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60117 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Jakub Jelinek requested this PR filing

[Bug c/58942] New: cilkplus internal compiler error: tree check __sec_reduce_max_ind

2013-10-31 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org Created attachment 31123 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31123action=edit pre-processed source gcc -O2 -ftree-vectorize -fopenmp -std=c99

[Bug c/58942] cilkplus internal compiler error: tree check __sec_reduce_max_ind

2013-10-31 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58942 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- gcc -O2 -ftree-vectorize -fopenmp -std=c99 -funroll-loops --param max-unroll-times=4 -c -fcilkplus -v s315.i Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

2013-09-12 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

2013-09-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 30798 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30798action=edit pre-processed source

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

2013-09-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 30799 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30799action=edit C source

[Bug libgomp/58392] New: internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

2013-09-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tprince at computer dot org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Created attachment 30797 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id

[Bug libgomp/58392] internal compiler error: in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c (omp simd inside omp parallel)

2013-09-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392 --- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 30801 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30801action=edit include file needed for compilation from C source

[Bug c++/51669] New: ICE verify-gimple with openmp

2011-12-23 Thread tprince at computer dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669 Bug #: 51669 Summary: ICE verify-gimple with openmp Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/36211] New: __iconv_adaptor chooses char** where const char** is required

2008-05-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc

[Bug libstdc++/36211] __iconv_adaptor chooses char** where const char** is required

2008-05-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-05-11 15:57 --- 2 unicode.cc tests fail. Several other tests with -liconv pass. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36211

[Bug libstdc++/36211] __iconv_adaptor chooses char** where const char** is required

2008-05-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-05-11 17:26 --- I see that the failing case is looking for a libiconv in the library to match the char ** prototype, and failing to find one, while the one in the actual library is set up for the const char ** version. The comment

[Bug libstdc++/36211] __iconv_adaptor chooses char** where const char** is required

2008-05-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-05-11 18:04 --- Only the gcc-testresults reports where others report the same thing are clearly relevant: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-03/msg01444.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01528.html

[Bug libstdc++/36211] __iconv_adaptor chooses char** where const char** is required

2008-05-11 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #8 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-05-12 01:58 --- Yes, -liconv precedes the source file, where it must follow: Executing on host: /cygdrive/c/gnu/gcc-4.4-20080509/xp/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc -B/cygdrive/c/gnu/gcc-4.4-20080509/xp/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/cygdrive/c/gnu/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/31041] [4.3 Regression] verify_stmts failed: invalid operand to binary operator with -O2 -ftree-vectorize

2008-03-03 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #8 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-03-03 16:20 --- pr31341 has a patch attached to allow the test case to run on targets where there is checking for conflicts with stdint.h -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31041

[Bug testsuite/20360] 20021014-1.c fails on account of unsupported build option

2008-03-03 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-03-03 16:26 --- gcc-3.4.4 testsuite still shows the failure; none of the proposed fixes were applied. -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/31341] testsuite pr31041.c fails conflicting with stdint.h

2008-02-28 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-02-28 17:05 --- With Victor's patch on SVN: trunk revision 132553 version 4.4.0 20080222: PASS: gcc.dg/vect/pr31041.c (test for excess errors) -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/31341] testsuite pr31041.c fails conflicting with stdint.h

2008-02-28 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2008-02-28 21:07 --- (In reply to comment #3) I have no installed cygwin, could you check if this patch fixes the failure? Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr31041.c

[Bug testsuite/32932] New: ssp-2.c fails when previous gcc-4.3 installation is visible

2007-07-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32932

[Bug debug/28834] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -g crashes sometimes when using may_alias and structs (ICE in splice_child_die)

2007-07-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #27 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-29 18:00 --- same failure for gcc-4.3 mainline on i686-pc-cygwin -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/32932] ssp-2.c fails when previous gcc-4.3 installation is visible

2007-07-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-29 20:15 --- This test is reported failing also by anonymous testers of powerpc-apple-darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32932

[Bug middle-end/23845] missed strength reduction costs performance

2007-07-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-29 20:57 --- No longer relevant, due to changes in gfortran. -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/31340] testsuite setjmp-3 and setjmp-4 fail attempting to redefine raise

2007-07-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-29 20:54 --- The suggested function name change is in mainline, and this resolves the bug. -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers

2007-07-29 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #8 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-29 21:02 --- The patch discussed here was incorporated in mainline, and the failure was last reported 20070420. -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2007-07-15 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-15 18:43 --- The arrays in this example all have compatible alignment. This is one of the advantages many compilers see in the use of the old-fashioned block COMMON. In the usual case lft==1 all arrays in COMMON are aligned

[Bug fortran/32373] New: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (equivalence)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: can't determine dependence (equivalence) Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot

[Bug fortran/32373] not vectorized: can't determine dependence (equivalence)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 14:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13718) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13718action=view) source code which reproduces problem with equivalence This source code is derived from the public version posted

[Bug fortran/32375] New: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32375

[Bug fortran/32375] not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 15:04 --- Created an attachment (id=13720) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13720action=view) source code test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32375

[Bug fortran/32376] New: can't determine dependence (array with variable initial index)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32376

[Bug fortran/32376] can't determine dependence (array with variable initial index)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 15:15 --- Created an attachment (id=13721) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13721action=view) source code test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32376

[Bug fortran/32377] New: can't determine dependence (source/destination overlap)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32377

[Bug fortran/32377] can't determine dependence (source/destination overlap)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 15:26 --- Created an attachment (id=13722) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13722action=view) source code test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32377

[Bug fortran/32378] New: can't determine dependence (distinct sections of an array)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown

[Bug fortran/32378] can't determine dependence (distinct sections of an array)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=13723) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13723action=view) source code test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32378

[Bug fortran/32379] New: can't determine dependence (loop reversal required)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32379

[Bug fortran/32379] can't determine dependence (loop reversal required)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 15:45 --- Created an attachment (id=13724) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13724action=view) source code test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32379

[Bug fortran/32380] New: reports unaligned store and can't determine dependence

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
determine dependence Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet

[Bug fortran/32380] reports unaligned store and can't determine dependence

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-17 16:29 --- Created an attachment (id=13725) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13725action=view) source code test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380

[Bug fortran/32377] can't determine dependence (source/destination overlap)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-18 01:36 --- Performance change due to complete vectorization is not significant on Core 2 Duo. My apologies for submitting at normal priority. -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/32378] can't determine dependence (distinct sections of an array)

2007-06-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-06-18 01:39 --- Performance change for full vectorization is not significant on Core 2 Duo; suggest reduced ;priority, apologies for submitting at normal severity -- tprince at computer dot org changed: What

[Bug testsuite/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers

2007-04-27 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-27 17:02 --- According to my test of Dorit's updated patch, the following are now PASS: vect-iv-9.c vect-iv-4.c pr30771.c The patch changed FAIL to XFAIL for the following vect-reduc-dot-u16b.c vect-widen-mult-u16.c vect-reduc-dot

[Bug testsuite/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers

2007-04-27 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-27 23:56 --- I retyped the xfail instruction after applying the patch, and now gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c shows XFAIL as intended, with the patch Dorit posted yesterday. My patch must have been corrupted

[Bug testsuite/31341] testsuite pr31041.c fails conflicting with stdint.h

2007-04-27 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-28 06:42 --- Whatever the reason, cygwin has more headers active than just those specified in the file. I would have thought that stdint.h typedefs should be acquired from stdint.h rather than being specified slightly differently

[Bug fortran/31561] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90

2007-04-19 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #8 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-19 14:35 --- 4.2 branch appears to have the identical problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31561

[Bug testsuite/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers

2007-04-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-18 02:21 --- The patch which Dorit proposed does change the FAIL in the testsuite case vect-reduc-dot-u16a.c to XFAIL, according to my test. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31589

[Bug c/31589] New: gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers

2007-04-16 Thread tprince at computer dot org
to missing target specifiers Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build

[Bug c/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers

2007-04-16 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-16 14:18 --- Created an attachment (id=13371) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13371action=view) adds target qualifiers to files in gcc.dg/vect/ patch supplied to me by Dorit Nuzman. It changes ia64 reports from

[Bug fortran/31561] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90

2007-04-14 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-14 17:59 --- I tested successfully the patch proposed by dorit, which changes the report of these 2 cases to XFAIL for vect_no_align target: Index: vect-4.f90

[Bug c/31340] New: testsuite setjmp-3 and setjmp-4 fail attempting to redefine raise

2007-03-24 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/31341] New: testsuite pr31041.c fails conflicting with stdint.h

2007-03-24 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/31342] New: testsuite i386/pic-1.c FAILed for warning -fPIC ignored

2007-03-24 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31342

[Bug bootstrap/31039] Latest CVS-stage 2-Cannot create executables

2007-03-23 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-03-24 01:22 --- Note that the newly built bootstrap compiler fails the configure tests which have a trailing -V on the command line. Nearly all the various configure scripts provoke this failure. The one cited here happens

[Bug bootstrap/31039] Latest CVS-stage 2-Cannot create executables

2007-03-23 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #3 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-03-24 03:06 --- The failure can be worked around by commenting out the section of stdio.h in the cygwin distribution which sets __SCLE (conversion of \r\n to \n, according to comments). The code thus commented out apparently

[Bug middle-end/23845] missed strength reduction costs performance

2005-09-13 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-09-13 23:15 --- Created an attachment (id=9726) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9726action=view) include files from libgfortran, required in build -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23845

[Bug c/23845] New: missed strength reduction costs performance

2005-09-12 Thread tprince at computer dot org
]; -- Summary: missed strength reduction costs performance Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince

[Bug middle-end/23845] missed strength reduction costs performance

2005-09-12 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-09-13 00:13 --- Created an attachment (id=9714) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9714action=view) alternate version of libgfortran/generated/matmul_r8.c The C file in the attachment performs well on ia32

[Bug c/23808] New: ICE in convert-move, building libgfortran with tree-vectorize

2005-09-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
, building libgfortran with tree- vectorize Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince

[Bug c/21311] New: ice on valid code tree-vectorize (max of float array)

2005-04-30 Thread tprince at computer dot org
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug c/21311] ice on valid code tree-vectorize (max of float array)

2005-04-30 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-05-01 00:34 --- Created an attachment (id=8779) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8779action=view) pre-processed C code exhibiting ice in -ftree-vectorize This is the netlib Levine-Callahan-Dongarra vector

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] New: ICE: tree check, in recent builds, multiple functions in file

2005-04-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tprince at computer dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] ICE: tree check, in recent builds

2005-04-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-04-10 13:30 --- Created an attachment (id=8575) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8575action=view) A Livermore Fortran Kernel driver, reproduces ICE as described -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] ICE: tree check, in recent builds

2005-04-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-04-10 13:34 --- Created an attachment (id=8576) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8576action=view) A Livermore Fortran Kernel driver, reproduces ICE as described The functions can be compiled one by one

  1   2   >